1. Basiliximab With Delayed Tacrolimus Improves Short-Term Renal Outcomes Post-Liver Transplantation—a Real-World Experience
- Author
-
James Neuberger, Peter Nightingale, Neil Rajoriya, M. Thamara P. R. Perera, Alexander Boyd, Jaimin Patel, James Ferguson, and Andrew Brown
- Subjects
Adult ,Graft Rejection ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Basiliximab ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Liver transplantation ,Kidney ,urologic and male genital diseases ,Tacrolimus ,Postoperative Complications ,Adrenal Cortex Hormones ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Retrospective Studies ,Immunosuppression Therapy ,Transplantation ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Graft Survival ,Acute kidney injury ,Retrospective cohort study ,Immunosuppression ,Acute Kidney Injury ,Middle Aged ,Mycophenolic Acid ,medicine.disease ,Liver Transplantation ,Regimen ,Treatment Outcome ,Drug Therapy, Combination ,Female ,Surgery ,business ,Immunosuppressive Agents ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after liver transplantation (LT). Induction with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists is often used as a “renal-sparing” strategy. The aim of this study was to assess this approach in a real-world setting in an LT center. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of LTs between 2011 and 2018 was performed to assess the impact of a renal-sparing strategy using basiliximab in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids from day 0 post-LT along with delayed introduction of tacrolimus. This was compared with a group receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids from the outset. Results The renal-sparing regimen was associated with significantly lower incidence of all-stage AKI at day 7 post-LT (36% vs 55%, P = .006) and less decline in renal function at 3 months (39% vs 57%, P = .01). No further significant differences in renal outcomes were observed at other time points on follow-up to 1 year post-LT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute cellular rejection, inpatient length of stay or graft survival. The decision to adopt a renal-sparing regimen was predominantly made on a clinically reactive basis within the first 24 hours post-LT in 77%, and was preordained in 23%. Cost-effectiveness analysis did not find evidence of a significant cost saving when using a renal-sparing strategy. Conclusion This study provides real-world analysis of the use of a renal-sparing immunosuppression regimen in LT. Although improvements in incidence of AKI in the short term were demonstrated, this did not translate to cost savings or improved renal outcomes after 3 months.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF