1. Long-term quality of life of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide vs chemotherapy
- Author
-
Francesco Autore, Eros Di Bona, Stefano D'Ardia, Paola Carluccio, Fabio Efficace, Walter Fiedler, Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla, Richard F. Schlenk, Monica Fumagalli, Karin Mayer, Valentina Mancini, G. Beltrami, Paola Fazi, Erika Borlenghi, Massimo Bernardi, Uwe Platzbecker, Massimo Breccia, Marco Vignetti, Prassede Salutari, Olimpia Finizio, Francesco Cottone, Luciano Levato, Ombretta Annibali, Lorella Melillo, and Maria Teresa Voso
- Subjects
Acute promyelocytic leukemia ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Clinical Trials and Observations ,medicine.medical_treatment ,law.invention ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Arsenic Trioxide ,Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute ,Quality of life ,Randomized controlled trial ,immune system diseases ,law ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,medicine ,Humans ,Clinical significance ,Arsenic trioxide ,neoplasms ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,organic chemicals ,Cancer ,Hematology ,Settore MED/15 ,medicine.disease ,biological factors ,humanities ,Confidence interval ,Treatment Outcome ,chemistry ,Quality of Life ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Key Points Patients with APL treated with ATRA-ATO reported better long-term quality of life outcomes than patients treated with chemotherapy.Late comorbidity and health problem prevalence was similar between patients with APL previously treated with ATRA-ATO or chemotherapy., Visual Abstract, The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term health-related quality of life of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treated with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) vs ATRA plus standard chemotherapy. Patients previously enrolled in the randomized controlled trial APL0406 were considered eligible for this follow-up study. The following patient-reported outcome measures were used: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (QLQ-CIPN20), and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The prevalence of late comorbidities and health problems was also assessed. The clinical significance of differences was evaluated based on predefined thresholds. A total of 161 of 232 potentially eligible patients were analyzed, of whom 83 were treated with ATRA-ATO and 78 were treated with ATRA chemotherapy. The median time since diagnosis of the study sample was 8 years. The 2 largest clinically meaningful differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 were observed for role functioning (Δ = 8.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 16.3) and dyspnea (Δ = −8.5; 95% CI, −16.4 to −0.7), favoring patients treated with ATRA-ATO. With regard to the SF-36 results, a clinically relevant better physical component score (Δ = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.8) was observed in patients treated with ATRA-ATO, but this was not the case for the mental component score. The 2 groups showed similar profiles in the scores of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 scales and in the prevalence of late comorbidities. Overall, our findings suggest that the greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATRA-ATO is also associated with better long-term patient-reported outcomes than ATRA chemotherapy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03096496.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF