1. Risk evaluation of denosumab and zoledronic acid for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases: a propensity score–matched analysis
- Author
-
Masaki Hirabatake, Tohru Hashida, Mayu Morimoto, Nobuyuki Muroi, Toshihiko Takenobu, Kohei Doi, Shinsuke Yamamoto, and Hiroaki Ikesue
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Bone Neoplasms ,Zoledronic Acid ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Risk factor ,Propensity Score ,Retrospective Studies ,Osteonecrosis of the jaw ,Bone Density Conservation Agents ,Diphosphonates ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Bone metastasis ,medicine.disease ,Denosumab ,Zoledronic acid ,Oncology ,Propensity score matching ,Original Article ,Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Purpose This study evaluated the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with cancer who received denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) for treating bone metastasis. Methods The medical records of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not undergo a dental examination at baseline were excluded. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the risk of developing MRONJ between the denosumab and ZA groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between patient characteristics and compare outcomes for both groups. Results Among the 799 patients enrolled, 58 (7.3%) developed MRONJ. The incidence of MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (9.6% [39/406] vs. 4.8% [19/393], p = 0.009). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that denosumab treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65–5.25; p p p = 0.016). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that denosumab poses a significant risk for developing MRONJ in patients treated for bone metastasis, and thus these patients require close monitoring.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF