Search

Introduction Thrombocytopenia can increase the bleeding risk in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. Prophylactic platelet transfusion (PT) is often performed to increase platelet counts in patients with CLD undergoing invasive procedures to prevent bleeding. Lusutrombopag, a small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is expected to be an alternative therapy to prophylactic PT. This study aimed to compare the effects between lusutrombopag and PT. Methods Data were obtained from a Japanese administrative database (April 2008–May 2019). Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent planned invasive procedures after the first CLD diagnosis and were observed for ≥ 30 days prior to invasive procedures were considered eligible. Patients who underwent planned invasive procedures with lusutrombopag prescription at 5–30 days before the procedure were categorized as the lusutrombopag group, whereas those who received PT at 1 day before and/or on the same day as the procedure, without lusutrombopag prescription, were classified as the PT group. Outcomes, including bleeding frequency during hospitalization and average medical costs (costs for prophylactic treatment and total costs between the day of the invasive procedure and 30 days after the invasive procedure), were compared between the groups after matching. Results Among 738,878 patients with CLD, 379 cases for each group were identified after matching. The incidence of bleeding events was lower in the lusutrombopag group than in the PT group (3.7% vs. 8.2%, p

Background and Aim Thrombocytopenia is a frequent hematological condition in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients increasing the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing invasive procedures. Without an alternative, clinical guidelines recommended the use of platelet transfusion (PT) prior to procedure to prevent this bleeding risk. Lusutrombopag (LUSU), an orally active, small‐molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, was developed as an alternative to PT. The objective of this study was to evaluate a cost‐effectiveness of LUSU as a potential alternative to PT in Japan. Methods A cost‐effectiveness analysis of LUSU relative to PT was conducted by a simulation model consisting of a decision tree combined to Markov model. Quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) were used as an indicator of efficacy, and the analysis was conducted from the Japanese public healthcare payer's perspective. The time horizon of the analysis was 50 years (a lifetime) and the discount rate was set at 2%. Results LUSU gained 6.1803 QALYs with an expected lifetime costs of 2 380 219 JPY compared to PT with 6.1712 QALYs gained and expected lifetime costs of 2 382 908 JPY. Thus, LUSU was deemed dominant compared with PT. Based on probabilistic analyses, the chance of LUSU being dominant and the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio being below 5 million JPY/QALY was estimated at 51.8% and 78.3%, respectively, demonstrating the robustness of the results. Conclusions LUSU was evaluated as an efficacious and cost‐saving treatment option for Japanese CLD patients with thrombocytopenia who required a planned invasive procedure compared with PT and economically should be considered as an alternative treatment., Thrombocytopenia is a frequent hematological condition in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients increasing the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing invasive procedures, and the use of platelet transfusion (PT) was recommended prior to procedure to prevent this bleeding risk. This study evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of lusutrombopag (LUSU) as a potential alternative to PT in Japan by using a simulation model consisting of a decision tree combined to Markov model. Compared with PT, LUSU was found to be an efficacious and cost‐saving treatment option for Japanese CLD patients with thrombocytopenia who required a planned invasive procedure.

Objective Lusutrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist that improves thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo invasive procedures. However, information on the efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag treatment and factors associated with the treatment is scarce. We analyzed the efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag treatment and the factors associated with a response to lusutrombopag. Methods Thirty-nine patients with chronic liver disease who received lusutrombopag treatment before undergoing invasive procedures were enrolled in this retrospective study. Of the 39 patients, 10 received lusutrombopag treatment multiple times for a total of 53 regimens of lusutrombopag treatment. Changes in platelet counts, the effects of repeated lusutrombopag treatment, and factors associated with response to lusutrombopag were analyzed. Results The median platelet count increased significantly from 4.5×104/μL before lusutrombopag treatment to 7.2×104/μL before the invasive procedure (p

Background/Aims: Lusutrombopag, a small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is used to treat thrombocytopenia based on the results of a phase 3 trial, including data for single-use administration in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated lusutrombopag use. Methods: Lusutrombopag was administered repeatedly in patients undergoing multi-cycle invasive procedures at intervals >1 month. Results: Data from 8 patients (median platelet count at baseline, 44.0 [range, 35–49] × 109/L) and 25 cycles of invasive procedures, including 2 cycles in 3 patients, 3 cycles in 4 patients, and 7 cycles in 1 patient, were retrospectively evaluated. The procedures included 18 transarterial chemoembolizations, 5 radiofrequency ablations, and 2 liver needle biopsies. Platelet counts increased significantly compared with baseline, and median changes in platelet counts were 46.0 × 109/L (p = 0.012) in cycle 1, 44.0 × 109/L (p = 0.012) in cycle 2, and 42.0 × 109/L (p = 0.008) in cycles 3–7. No severe adverse events, including portal vein thrombus or bleeding, were observed. Conclusions: Repeated use of lusutrombopag might be safe and effective against thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD undergoing multi-cycle invasive procedures, although long-term data from more patients are required.

Aims: Thrombocytopenia is a common complication among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). To increase platelet counts, lusutrombopag, a small-molecule, second-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonist, was developed in September 2015. Lusutrombopag is mainly used in patients with platelet counts Methods: We evaluated 36 patients who received lusutrombopag for CLD. Changes in platelet counts were evaluated. A treatment response was defined as an increasing platelet count ≥20,000/µL from baseline after drug administration. The differences related to these changes between platelet counts ≥50,000 and Results: Of the patients, 25 had platelet counts ≥50,000/µL. The increase in platelet count and the date in which it reached a maximum did not significantly differ between the groups. The effectiveness of lusutrombopag did not significantly differ between the groups. In both groups, no adverse reaction was observed during lusutrombopag administration. Conclusion: In this study, we showed the effectiveness of lusutrombopag, which had no complications. This study is the first to report that the effectiveness of lusutrombopag was the same for patients with platelet counts ≥50,000/µL and

AIMS Thrombocytopenia is often associated with chronic liver disease. Lusutrombopag is a small molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist designed to temporarily increase the platelet count in patients with chronic liver disease for whom elective invasive procedures are planned. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of repeated use of lusutrombopag prior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma were examined. METHODS Eight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had a platelet count

Background & Aims Despite limitations, platelet transfusion has been used to minimise bleeding risk in patients with thrombocytopaenia. Lusutrombopag is an oral, thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for treatment of thrombocytopaenia associated with chronic liver disease in patients undergoing planned invasive procedures. This post-hoc analysis assessed the magnitude of platelet count change based on the integrated per-protocol population from 2 similar phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Methods Adults with chronic liver disease-induced thrombocytopaenia and platelet count, Graphical abstract, Highlights • Thrombocytopaenia is common in patients with chronic liver disease. • Lusutrombopag increased platelet count ≥1.5-fold in most patients with chronic liver disease-induced thrombocytopaenia. • Lusutrombopag doubled platelet count in half of patients treated. • Lusutrombopag-induced platelet count increases (without platelet transfusion) lasted for 3 weeks.

Background Chronic liver disease (CLD) is often complicated by severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count 50,000/µL at baseline: the proportions of patients who did not require platelet transfusion were 84–96%, which might be overestimated. Methods The efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag were retrospectively investigated in CLD patients with platelet count of Results Among 31 patients who received lusutrombopag, 23 patients (74.2%) patients showed a platelet count of ≥ 50,000/µL (Group A) and did not require platelet transfusion. The remaining 8 patients (25.8%) did not reached platelet ≥ 50,000/µL (Group B). The means of platelet increase were 38,000/µL and 12,000/µL in groups A and B, respectively. A low platelet count at baseline was a characteristic of patients in group B. Among 13 patients who repeatedly used lusutrombopag, lusutrombopag significantly increased the platelet count as the initial treatment. When all repeated uses of lusutrombopag were counted among these 13 patients, platelet transfusion was not required in 82.1% (23/28) of treatments. Although one patient showed portal thrombosis after lusutrombopag treatment, the thrombosis was disappeared by anticoagulant treatment for 35 days. The degree of platelet increase with lusutrombopag was larger than that in their previous platelet transfusion. Conclusions The proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion was 74.2%, which is smaller than that in former studies which included CLD patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL. However, lusutrombopag is effective and safe for CLD patients with a platelet count of

Background and Aims Thrombocytopenia complicates management of chronic liver disease (CLD), and may interfere with the performance of invasive procedures. Lusutrombopag (LUSU), an oral, small molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, has been studied for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD who are scheduled for invasive procedures. Aiming to further assess its efficacy and safety, a meta-analysis of LUSU randomised controlled trial (RCT) data is presented. Method A direct random-effects meta-analysis was conducted in Stata 14.2MP, using the method of DerSimonian and Laird, with data from three RCTs enrolling pre-procedure CLD patients with a platelet count (PC) Results LUSU is statistically significantly better than PBO in reducing the need for platelet transfusions (PT) prior to and after an invasive procedure (No PT during study: Odds ratio 11.24 (95% CI: 2.83, 44.64); p = 0.001). During the procedure window, patients who received LUSU and no PT had a statistically significant higher increase in PC than patients who received PBO and a PT (mean difference between LUSU and no PT versus PBO with PT at day 12: 34.18 × 109/L (95% CI: 30.31, 38.06; p Conclusion Lusutrombopag is well tolerated and can increase platelet count in thrombocytopenic CLD patients prior to an invasive procedure, reducing the need for platelet transfusions and lowering the risk of bleeding.

Background Thrombocytopenia represents an obstacle for invasive procedures in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients. We aimed to estimate the appropriate dose and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag for the treatment of thrombocytopenia before percutaneous liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for primary hepatic cancer in patients with CLD. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in Japan, 61 CLD patients with platelet count

The efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag administration for thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who undergo two or more planned invasive procedures is unknown. We herein report our findings regarding the effects of repeated lusutrombopag administration given to avoid platelet transfusion in a patient with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia. The platelet count showed a positive response to lusutrombopag treatment prior to the initial invasive procedure to treat a hepatoma, so platelet transfusion was not necessary. In conclusion, lusutrombopag may be a useful drug for patients with thrombocytopenia to avoid platelet transfusion in those undergoing two or more planned invasive procedures.

Lusutrombopag, a small molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, has been approved for the treatment of chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia due to hypersplenism in patients scheduled to undergo elective invasive procedures in Japan. We performed partial splenic embolization (PSE) after administration of lusutrombopag in two patients with thrombocytopenia due to cirrhosis. Case 1 involved a 50-year-old man who developed cirrhosis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and alcohol consumption. Case 2 involved a 30-year-old woman who developed cirrhosis due to HBV infection only. Lusutrombopag administration led to an increase in platelet count in both patients, and PSE was performed safely. However, in Case 2, the patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation. Further study with a larger population is required to investigate the indications for and risks of the use of lusutrombopag.

Thrombocytopenia is common in patients with advanced liver disease. These patients frequently require invasive diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in the setting of thrombocytopenia. A common platelet goal before such procedures is ≥50,000/μL, but target levels vary by provider and the procedure. Platelet transfusion has disadvantages, including safety and cost. No other short‐term options for ameliorating thrombocytopenia before procedures were available until the thrombopoietin receptor agonists were recently approved. Avatrombopag and lusutrombopag can be used in certain patients with thrombocytopenia due to advanced liver disease undergoing elective invasive procedures; these new agents are highly effective in carefully selected patients, and real world data of safety and efficacy are awaited., TPO receptor agonists are an exciting new development that can raise platelet counts in liver patients with thrombocytopenia before elective procedures. We review the strategies to address peri‐procedure thrombocytopenia including data on the most recent trials involving TPO receptor agonists.

Aim Lusutrombopag is approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease patients undergoing invasive procedures. This real-world surveillance assesses the safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in Japan. Methods This ongoing, multicenter, prospective, real-world surveillance is collecting data from case report forms between October 2016 and May 2021. Interim data up to September 2018 were used to evaluate safety (adverse events and adverse drug reactions [ADRs]) and effectiveness (proportion of patients avoiding preoperative platelet transfusion and change in platelet count from baseline). Results The safety analysis set included 331 patients. The mean baseline platelet count was 46.2 ± 13.7 × 109 /L. Of 377 invasive procedures, radiofrequency ablation (110 procedures, 29.2%) was the most frequent. The mean time from starting lusutrombopag treatment to invasive procedure was 12.3 days. Incidences of serious adverse events and ADRs were 8.76% and 3.32%, respectively. Six cases (1.81%) of portal vein thrombosis were considered serious adverse events; of these, four cases (1.21%) were classified as serious ADRs. Of 300 patients who underwent an invasive procedure (excluding those with platelet transfusion refractoriness), 282 (94.0%) avoided preoperative platelet transfusion. In patients with platelet measurements before and after lusutrombopag administration who did not undergo platelet transfusion, the mean maximum change in platelet count from baseline was 41.7 ± 31.4 × 109 /L (range, -6 to 276; n = 286). All patients receiving second (n = 20) and third (n = 1) treatments avoided preoperative platelet transfusion without developing any ADRs. Conclusions This real-world surveillance further supports the safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing invasive procedures.

Background The oral thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist lusutrombopag (Mulpleta®) was developed to improve thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease prior to elective invasive medical procedures. Mulpleta® was first approved for use in Japan in 2015 and in the USA in 2018. In the present report, we discuss a case in which pain management was performed during left renal artery embolization via continuous epidural anesthesia following oral administration of lusutrombopag. To our knowledge, this is the first report to discuss the use of lusutrombopag prior to epidural anesthesia. Case presentation The patient was a 78-year-old woman scheduled to undergo renal artery embolization to address a 3-cm aneurysm of the left renal artery. Fourteen days prior to the scheduled embolization procedure, the urologist was asked to insert an epidural catheter for perioperative and postoperative analgesia. Type C chronic cirrhosis was observed, and platelet count was 5.6 × 104/μL. Eleven days prior to embolization, oral lusutrombopag was initiated at a dosage of 3 mg/day (day 1). Oral lusutrombopag therapy was continued for 5 days, and platelet count on day 11 (i.e., the day prior to surgery) was 12.6 × 104/μL. An epidural catheter was inserted on day 12, following which embolization was performed. Platelet count on day 13 was 11.0 × 104/μL, and the catheter was removed on day 14. No symptoms of epidural hematoma or thrombosis were observed during the patient’s disease course. Conclusions As lusutrombopag is a relatively safe platelet-increasing agent, we believe that this drug can serve as a potential treatment option when performing elective epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic liver disease complicated by thrombocytopenia.

Lusutrombopag was administered to a patient with thrombocytopenia due to chronic liver disease before an invasive procedure. Lusutrombopag, the first drug of its kind, was developed to improve platelet count thereby, avoiding the need for platelet transfusion. Lusutrombopag is potentially effective for the management of haemostasis during invasive procedures, such as tooth extraction. Herein, we present a case of tooth extraction surgery in a patient treated with lusutrombopag. The patient was a 63-year-old woman suffering from thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis. Tooth extraction was indicated by the diagnosis of caries and apical periodontitis of the maxillary left second molar. Mild spontaneous bleeding in the surrounding gum tissue and a reduced platelet count (5.1 × 104 /μL) were observed. Haemostatic difficulties were predicted to accompany tooth extraction surgery. Consultation with a gastroenterology clinic led us to implement lusutrombopag prior to the procedure. The patient’s platelet count had risen to 10.9 × 104 /μL by the day of the surgery. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative bleeding was observed. No adverse events associated with lusutrombopag administration were observed. Lusutrombopag can increase platelet count, suggesting its utility in invasive procedures such as tooth extraction.

This review provides details about three small molecules that were recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of thrombocytopenia. The new treatments include lusutrombopag, avatrombopag, and fostamatinib. The first two drugs are orally active thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) agonists which are FDA-approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure. Fostamatinib is orally active prodrug that, after activation, becomes spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor. Fostamatinib is currently used to treat chronic and refractory immune thrombocytopenia in patients who have had insufficient response to previous treatment. Chemical structures, available dosage forms, recommended dosing, pharmacokinetics, results of toxicity studies in animals, most frequent adverse effects, significant outcomes of the corresponding clinical trials, and their use in specific patient populations are thoroughly described. Described also is a comparative summary of the different aspects of five currently available therapies targeting TPO-R or SYK for the treatment of thrombocytopenia.

A 56-year-old Japanese man with liver cirrhosis (LC) due to hepatitis C virus was admitted to our hospital for radiofrequency ablation of residual tumor following lusutrombopag administration. Laboratory tests revealed thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. The patient’s LC was managed, and he was classified as Child–Pugh A. After admission, lusutrombopag was administered for 7 days. The platelet count increased to over 50,000/mm3 after 7–14 days and returned to previous levels 50 days after administration. Leukocyte and erythrocyte counts also increased in response to the treatment and stayed elevated for over 120 days. Lusutrombopag acts selectively on human thrombopoietin (TPO) receptors and activates signaling pathways that promote the proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow progenitor cells into megakaryocytes, consequently increasing the blood platelet count. However, the patient treated with lusutrombopag in our case study showed increased blood leukocyte and erythrocyte counts as well. Given that TPO receptors are reportedly expressed in not only megakaryocyte progenitor cells but also hematopoietic progenitors, lusutrombopag may potentially improve pancytopenia caused by LC and can be used for the recovery of blood counts before other treatments.