1. Fifteen-Year Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Elderly Patients
- Author
-
Giuseppe Lauria, Mohamed-Yassine Benzha, Soukaina Scadi, Elodie Phamisith, Jean-Pierre Villemot, Pan Dan, Maxime Hubert, Juan-Pablo Maureira, Yihua Liu, Benjamin Perin, and Nianguo Dong
- Subjects
Reoperation ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Valve-sparing aortic root replacement ,Marfan syndrome ,Aortic valve ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Aortic Valve Insufficiency ,Marfan Syndrome ,Aortic valve repair ,Bicuspid aortic valve ,Aortic valve replacement ,Humans ,Medicine ,Endocarditis ,Aorta ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,business.industry ,Perioperative ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Aortic Valve ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) techniques have several advantages such as preservation of physiological haemodynamics of the native aortic valve and avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications. However, VSRR procedures are generally performed in young patients and the long-term results in elderly patients (≥65 years) are scarce.Fifty-six (56) consecutive patients underwent VSRR surgery by a single surgeon at the current centre between January 2006 and December 2013; a modified "remodelling technique" was typically performed. The mean age was 58.86±12.5 years; Marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve were both present in six patients (10.7%); 38 patients (67.8%) presented with greater than moderate aortic regurgitation; and 17 patients (30.4%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III before surgery. They were divided into two groups according to their ages receiving VSRR surgery: Group E (elderly patients aged ≥65 years, n=24) and Group Y (young patients aged65 years, n=32). The primary outcomes were aortic valve-related reoperation, cardiovascular reoperation, all-cause mortality, and functional status.One (1) patient in Group E was converted to aortic valve replacement as a result of a failed aortic valve repair. No perioperative mortality was observed. The mean follow-up was 11.5±2.9 years. Aortic valve-related reoperation was noted in two patients of each group (one with endocarditis, one with severe aortic regurgitation). Cardiovascular reoperations were observed in three and six patients, and all-cause deaths in seven and two patients in Group E and Group Y, respectively. The 10-year freedom from aortic valve-related reoperation was estimated to be 91.7±5.6% and 92.7±5.0% (p=0.594), the 10-year freedom from cardiovascular reoperation was 86.4±7.3% and 81.1±7.7% (p=0.781), and the cumulative 10-year survival rates were 74.0±9.2% and 93.8±4.3% (p=0.018) in Group E and Group Y, respectively. During follow-up, 6.7% of patients were in NYHA class III and 6.4% of patients developed moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. Cox regression analysis failed to identify predictors for primary outcomes.Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can safely be performed in elderly patients with low early mortality and satisfactory long-term freedom from aortic valve-related and cardiovascular re-intervention.
- Published
- 2022