Search

Percutaneous mitral valve repair has been increasingly performed worldwide after approval. We sought to investigate predictors of clinical outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing percutaneous valve repair. The MITRA-UMG study, a single-centre registry, retrospectively collected consecutive patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe or severe MR undergoing MitraClip therapy. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure. Between March 2012 and July 2018, a total of 150 consecutive patients admitted to our institution were included. Procedural success was obtained in 95.3% of patients. The composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF was met in 55 patients (37.9%) with cumulative incidences of 7.6%, 26.2%, at 30 days and 1-year, respectively. In the Cox multivariate model, NYHA functional class and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi), independently increased the risk of the primary endpoint at long-term follow-up. At Kaplan–Meier analysis, a LVEDVi > 92 ml/m2 was associated with an increased incidence of the primary endpoint. In this study, patients presenting with dilated ventricles (LVEDVi > 92 ml/m2) and advanced heart failure symptoms (NYHA IV) at baseline carried the worst prognosis after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Background Assessment of intracardiac flows and turbulence has acquired rising significance in the past few years, due to the development and introduction of technologies for non-invasive cardiovascular imaging. Recent studies have shown that alterations in intracardiac fluid dynamics can be helpful to identify abnormalities in cardiac function. Purpose This study investigates the additional information provided by the quantitative assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics for the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis (AS), by using an advanced echocardiography vortex-based approach. Methods Sixty-one patients with severe AS (33 females) and 38 healthy sex- and BSA-matched controls (CTRL) (15 females) were prospectively included and underwent echocardiographic assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics. Echocardiographic measurements were performed on apical three chamber views. The HyperDoppler software adapted to the echo-scanner without contrast injection was used to assess intracardiac vortex properties. The following parameters were obtained: vortex area (VA) (the ratio between the total vortex area and the left ventricular (LV) area); vortex length (VL) (the longitudinal length of the vortex relative to the total LV length; vortex depth (VD) (the distance of the vortex center from the LV base relative to the total LV long axis). Inter-rater variability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two independent operators. Results Patients with severe AS (mean gradient: 47,5±13,9 mmHg; aortic valve area: 0.7±0.2 cm2; ejection fraction: 53±7%) had increased LV wall thickness (p0.001, respectively) were significantly higher in AS patients compared with CTRL. Among those who underwent TAVR, we observed a significant difference in the delta values of VA and VL pre-postTAVR in patients with and without significant paravalvular leak (p Conclusions The newly defined VA, VL and VD, quantitative indices of vortical flow, were significantly increased in the LV cavity of patients with severe AS compared to normal subjects. These indices, whose measurement was feasible and reliable, might provide complementary information to standard echocardiography, useful for the further diagnostic and prognostic characterization of the heterogeneous population of patients with severe AS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background Evaluation of left atrial (LA) function is an emerging biomarker of cardiovascular disease (CVD). LA strain by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (LA strain, LAS) is feasible and reliable, and has been recently associated with adverse long-term outcomes in CVD, including aortic stenosis (AS). Purpose To evaluate the changes in left atrial strain (LAS) after correction of severe AS with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and assess its prognostic impact. Methods One hundred consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS who underwent TAVR at the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro have been enrolled. Echocardiographic examination before and after TAVR was performed using Vivid E95 system and analysed using the EchoPAC 112.99 workstation (GE Healthcare). Patients underwent clinical follow up visits regularly. The primary study outcome was the difference in ΔLAS (postTAVR-preTAVR) between patients that met the main clinical endpoint (a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization) and those not meeting the endpoint. Statistical analyses were performed using JASP (version 0.14.1) and KMWin (version 1.52). Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation and were compared through the unpaired Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test in case of a non-normal distribution. Differences between categorical variables were tested with the chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent correlates of ΔLAS and to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% CI. Kaplan-Meier was used to assess adverse event. Results During a median follow-up of 31 months, 35 patients (35%) met the composite clinical endpoint. The difference between LAS post-TAVR and LAS pre-TAVR (ΔLAS) was significantly larger in patients who met the combined endpoint (HR=0.76 [0.67–0.86]; p Conclusions A lower reduction in ΔLAS after TAVR was an independent predictor of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious disease that appeared in China in December 2019 and spread rapidly around the world. Several patients with severe COVID-19 infection can develop a coagulopathy according to the ISTH criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) with fulminant activation of coagulation, resulting in widespread microvascular thrombosis and consumption of coagulation factors. We conducted a meta-analysis in order to explore differences in coagulopathy indices in patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19. An electronic search was performed within PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus electronic databases between December 2019 (first confirmed Covid-19 case) up to April 6th, 2020. The primary endpoint was the difference of D-dimer values between Non-Severe vs Severe disease and Survivors vs Non-Survivors. Furthermore, results on additional coagulation parameters (platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time) were also analyzed. The primary analysis showed that mean d-dimer was significantly lower in COVID-19 patients with non-severe disease than in those with severe (SMD − 2.15 [− 2.73 to − 1.56], I2 98%, P 2 98%, P 2 96%, P 2 97%, P 2 98%, P 2 98%, P

AimsTo investigate the changes in left atrial strain (LAS) after correction of severe aortic stenosis (AS) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and assess its prognostic impact.Methods and resultsOne hundred consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS who underwent TAVR at the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro underwent echocardiographic examination including assessment of LAS before and after TAVR. Independent investigators collected outcome data and information. The primary study outcome was the difference in ΔLAS (postTAVR–preTAVR) between patients those met the main clinical endpoint (a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalisation) and those not meeting the endpoint.During a median follow-up of 31 months, 35 patients (35%) met the combined clinical endpoint. The difference between LAS post-TAVR and LAS pre-TAVR (ΔLAS) was significantly larger in patients who met the combined endpoint (HR=0.76 (0.67–0.86); pConclusionsA lower reduction in ΔLAS after TAVR was an independent predictor of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for heart failure.

Background: Non-invasive prediction of critical coronary artery stenosis (CAST) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is challenging. Strain parameters can often capture an impairment of regional longitudinal function; however, they are load dependent. A novel non-invasive method to estimate Myocardial Work (MW) has been recently proposed, showing a strong correlation with invasive work measurements. Our aim was to investigate the ability of non-invasive MW to predict the ischaemic risk area underlying a CAST.Methods and Results: The study population comprises 80 individuals: 50 patients with CAST and 30 controls (CTRL). Echocardiography recordings were obtained before coronary angiography to measure global longitudinal strain (GLS), Myocardial Work Index (MWI), Myocardial Constructive Work (MCW), Myocardial Wasted work (MWW), Myocardial Work Efficiency (MWE). Global MWI (p = 0.048), MWE (p < 0.001), and MCW (p = 0.048) at baseline were significantly reduced in patients with CAST compared to controls (p < 0.05). Regional MWE within the myocardial segments underlying the CAST, but not LS, was significantly reduced compared to non-target segments (p < 0.001). At ROC analysis, the diagnostic performance to predict CAST for regional MWE (AUC = 0.920, p < 0.001) was higher compared to both regional post-systolic shortening index (PSI) (AUC = 0.600, p = 0.129) and regional LS (AUC = 0.546, p = 0.469).Conclusions: Non-invasive estimation of MW work indices is able to predict a CAST before invasive angiography.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious disease that appeared in China in December 2019. Several patients with severe COVID-19 infection can develop a coagulopathy according to the ISTH-criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). We conducted a meta-analysis of all available studies on COVID-19 to explore the impact of coagulopathy on severe illness and mortality. An electronic search was performed within PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus electronic databases. The primary endpoint was the difference of D-dimer values between Non-Severe vs Severe disease and Survivors vs Non-Survivors. The primary analysis showed that mean d-dimer is significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with severe disease than in those without (SMD -2.15 [-2.73 to -1.56], I2 98%, P 2 96%, P 2 98%, P

Funding Acknowledgements ESC Training Grant 2019 Background Non-invasive prediction of critical coronary artery stenosis (CCS) is challenging. CCS may cause persistent impaired longitudinal function at rest, which could be detected by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). However, strain parameters are load dependent, hence they might not reflect systolic function accurately. A novel non-invasive method to calculate MW recently showed a strong correlation with invasive work measurements. Objectives To investigate the ability of non-invasive Myocardial Work (MW) indices: 1) to identify the ischaemic risk area during acute coronary occlusion (ACO); 2) to predict the ischaemic risk area underlying a CCS before coronary angiography. Methods The study population comprises 80 individuals: fifty consecutive patients (pts) referred for coronary angiography in a single tertiary coronary care centre and thirty controls (CTRL). Echocardiography recordings (GE-Healthcare) with systolic and diastolic non-invasive pressures, were obtained immediately before coronary angiography, during ACO, and immediately after revascularization to measure longitudinal strain along with myocardial work indices: Myocardial Work Index (MWI), Myocardial Constructive Work (MCW), Myocardial Wasted work (MWW), Myocardial work efficiency (MWE). Results Compared to baseline, we found a significant reduction of global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p = 0.005), MWI, MCW and MWE (p Interestingly, baseline global MWI, MCW and MWE were significantly reduced in pts with CCS at angiography compared to controls (p Conclusions Our results demonstrate that non-invasive estimation of regional and global MW parameters are able to identify myocardial ischemia upon ACO. Moreover, myocardial work indices measured at rest were able to predict the presence of CCS before invasive angiography, whereas MWE was more sensitive than myocardial strain to document regional impairment of myocardial function. Abstract 157 Figure.

Background During ischemia a close relationship exists between sub-endocardial blood flow and myocardial function. Strain parameters can capture an impairment of regional longitudinal function but are load dependent. Recently, a novel non-invasive method to calculate Myocardial Work (MW) showed a strong correlation with invasive work measurements. Our aim was to investigate the ability of non-invasive MW indices to identify the ischaemic risk area during transient acute coronary occlusion (TACO). Methods and results The study population comprises 50 individuals with critical coronary stenosis (CCS). Echocardiography recordings were obtained before coronary angiography, during TACO and after revascularization to measure global longitudinal strain (GLS), Myocardial Work Index (MWI), Myocardial Constructive Work (MCW), Myocardial Wasted work (MWW), Myocardial work efficiency (MWE). Compared to baseline, we found a significant reduction of GLS (p = 0.005), MWI, MCW and MWE (p Conclusions The non-invasive measurement of MW parameters is a sensitive and early marker of myocardial ischemia during TACO.

Mediterranean Diet (Med-Diet) is associated with reduced incidence of vascular events (VEs) in atrial fibrillation (AF), but the mechanism accounting for its beneficial effect is only partially known. We hypothesized that Med-Diet may reduce VEs by improving antioxidant status, as assessed by glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx3) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). We performed a prospective cohort study investigating the relationship between adherence to Med-Diet, serum baseline GPx3 and SOD activities, and the occurrence of VEs in 690 AF patients. GPx3 activity was directly associated with Med-Diet score (B = 0.192, p 0.001) and inversely with age (B = -0.124, p = 0.001), after adjustment for potential confounders; Med-Diet weakly affected SOD levels. During a mean follow-up of 46.1 ± 28.2 months, 89 VEs were recorded; patients with VEs had lower GPx3 levels compared with those without VEs (p = 0.002); and no differences regarding SOD activity were found. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that age (Hazard ratio [HR]:1.065, p 0.001), logGPx3 (above median, HR: 0.629, p 0.05), and Med-Diet score (HR: 0.547, p 0.05) predicted VEs. Med-Diet favorably modulates antioxidant activity of GPx3 in AF, resulting in reduced VEs rate. We hypothesize that the modulation of GPx3 levels by Med-Diet could represent an additional nutritional strategy to prevent VEs in AF patients. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 25, 751-755.

Up to 15% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients experience severe clinical presentation, resulting in acute respiratory distress (ARDS) and finally death. N-terminal natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with ARDS. However, whether or not this peptide can help discriminate high-risk COVID-19 patients remains unclear. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we summarized the available evidence on NT-proBNP in patients admitted for COVID-19. Pooled mean, mean differences (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were the summary metrics. Thirteen studies were finally selected for this analysis with a total of 2248 patients, of which 507 had a severe condition (n = 240) or died (n = 267). Pooled mean NT-proBNP levels on admission were 790.57 pg/mL (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 532.50 to 1048.64) in patients that experienced a severe clinical condition or died, and 160.56 pg/mL (95% CI: 118.15 to 202.96) in non-severe patients (SMD: 1.05; 95% (CI): 0.83 to 1.28; p < 0.001; I2 74%; and MD was 645.84 pg/mL (95% CI: 389.50–902.18). Results were consistent in studies categorizing patients as non-survivors versus survivors (SMD: 1.17; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.40; p < 0. 001; I2: 51%), and in those classifying populations in severe versus non-severe clinical condition (SMD: 0.94 95% CI 0.56 to 1.32; p < 0.001; I2: 81%; pinteraction = 0.30). In conclusion, our results suggest that assessing NT-proBNP may support physicians in discriminating high-risk COVID-19 patients.