Search

Background and purpose Cerebral vasodilatory capacity assessment for risk stratification in patients with extracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion may be useful. We describe a new method that assesses cerebral vasodilatory capacity as part of catheter-based cerebral angiography. Methods We prospectively assessed regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in the arterial distribution of interest using a controlled contrast injection in the common carotid or the subclavian arteries. rCBV maps were created using a predefined algorithm based on contrast distribution in the venous phase (voxel size: .466 mm3 ). rCBV maps were acquired again after selective administration of intra-arterial nicardipine (2.0 mg) distal to the stenosis. Two independent observers graded the change in rCBV in 10 predefined anatomical regions within the tributaries of the artery of interest (0 = reduction, 1 = no change, 2 = increase) and total rCBV change scores were summated. Results Twenty-five patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (n = 18; 0-90% in severity) or extracranial vertebral artery stenosis (n = 7; 0-100% in severity) were assessed. There was an increase in rCBV in a tributary of the artery of interest in 18 of 25 after intra-arterial nicardipine (mean score: 11.98; range 0-19.5). There was no change or decrease in rCBV in 7 of 25 patients. The mean rCBV change score was similar in patients with an assessment of internal carotid artery or vertebral artery distributions (12.2 ± 5.3; 11.4 ± 2.5; P = .68). Conclusion Selective vasodilatory response to intra-arterial nicardipine in the affected arterial distribution during catheter-based cerebral angiography may provide new data for risk stratification.

Objective To present guidance for clinicians caring for adult patients with acuteischemic stroke with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. Methods The summary was prepared after review of systematic literature reviews,reference to previously published stroke guidelines, personal files, and expert opinionby members from 18 countries. Results The document includes practice implications for evaluation of stroke patientswith caution for stroke team members to avoid COVID-19 exposure, during clinicalevaluation and conduction of imaging and laboratory procedures with specialconsiderations of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in strokepatients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Results Conclusions—The summary is expected to guide clinicians caring for adult patientswith acute ischemic stroke who are suspected of, or confirmed, with COVID-19infection.

Background and purpose On 11 March 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 infection a pandemic. The risk of ischemic stroke may be higher in patients with COVID-19 infection similar to those with other respiratory tract infections. We present a comprehensive set of practice implications in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. Methods The practice implications were prepared after review of data to reach the consensus among stroke experts from 18 countries. The writers used systematic literature reviews, reference to previously published stroke guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate practice implications. All members of the writing group had opportunities to comment in writing on the practice implications and approved the final version of this document. Results This document with consensus is divided into 18 sections. A total of 41 conclusions and practice implications have been developed. The document includes practice implications for evaluation of stroke patients with caution for stroke team members to avoid COVID-19 exposure, during clinical evaluation and performance of imaging and laboratory procedures with special considerations of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Conclusions These practice implications with consensus based on the currently available evidence aim to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke who are suspected of, or confirmed, with COVID-19 infection. Under certain circumstances, however, only limited evidence is available to support these practice implications, suggesting an urgent need for establishing procedures for the management of stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.

Background: Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rt-PA) prior to thrombectomy may reduce the risk of intraprocedural distal embolization in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: We analyzed the diffusion-weighted imaging acquired with 1.5- or 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans obtained within 24 hours of thrombectomy in consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. An independent physician identified distal embolization, defined as discrete foci of restricted diffusion independent of the primary area of infarction on MRI scan. Patients were stratified based on whether they had or did not receive IV rt-PA prior to thrombectomy. Results: Distal embolization was seen in 59 (ipsilateral in 56) of 63 patients (mean age ± SD; 64.6 ± 15.3 years) who underwent thrombectomy (mean number 8.6; range 0-32). There was no difference in mean number of ipsilateral hemispheric distal embolization between the 2 groups (7.9 ± 6.1 versus 7.5 ± 7.6, P = .82). After adjusting for age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, the time interval between symptom onset and thrombectomy, there was no association between receiving IV rt-PA prior to thrombectomy and number of ipsilateral distal emboli (P = .90). There was no relationship between the number of ipsilateral emboli and rates of favorable outcome after adjusting for other confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.0; 95% confidence interval .89 - 1.0; P = .40). Conclusions: Although distal embolization is very common after thrombectomy, IV rt-PA prior to procedure does not reduce the risk of intraprocedural distal embolization.

Background: Thrombus composition may vary among acute ischemic stroke patients. Thrombus composition is a key factor in determining susceptibility to mechanical and pharmacological thrombus disruption and thus the degree of successful recanalization. Many studies have reported the correlation between thrombus components and parameters such as stroke etiology, treatment outcome but there is still a lack of information due to a small sample size. We determined the relationship of thrombus composition on the success of thrombectomy in this multicenter study. Methods: We analyzed the data on 111 acute stroke patients, treated with mechanical thrombectomy, taken from 3 different stroke centers. Retrieved clots underwent semiquantitative proportion analysis by pathologists blinded to patient characteristics and imaging findings. Thrombus type was classified as erythrocyte rich, fibrin-rich and mixed type. Primary outcome assessment was the effect of clot composition on recanalization attempts. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of attempt number. Successful recanalization is defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scale 2b and 3. The good functional outcome is defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 3 months. Results: Successful recanalization was achieved in 86 of 111 patients who underwent acute thrombectomy. Pathological characteristics did not differ significantly when compared to the number of attempts for recanalization (p = 0.469). Symptom recanalization time was shorter for patients recanalized with fewer attempts (p=0.0027). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) or Stroke Etiologic Subtype was not correlated significantly with thrombectomy attempts ( p=0.76 and 0.22, respectively) as well. There was a no significant trend for good functional outcome with fewer attempts (p=0.10). There was no predictor of the number of attempts in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In our study, histological thrombus composition had no impact on the number of attempts of thrombectomy done in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Background: Anemia will negatively affect cerebral collaterals and penumbra. Eventually, it may cause worse clinical outcomes and even increase mortality rates in stroke patients. Anemia has recently been suggested to be an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of the presence of anemia on clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving the prospectively and consecutively collected data of 90 adult patients between January 2015 and August 2016. Hemoglobin (Hb) cutoff levels were accepted as 12 g/dL for women and 13 g/dL for men. Patients having anemia were further divided into three subgroups as severe anemia (Hb Results: Forty of the subjects (44.4%) had anemia. Moderate anemia was detected in 14 out of 90 patients (15.5%) and severe anemia was found in only four of them (4.4%). Poor functional outcome (mRS 3-6) was similar in both anemic and non-anemic patients (37.5% vs. 38%, respectively, p = 0.08), but poor functional outcome was found to be statistically significant with severe anemic group (Hb p = 0.003). In multiple logistic regression analysis, moderate and severe anemia has been found to increase the mortality (p = 0.032). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a poor functional outcome only in moderate to severe anemic patients. Clinicians should keep in mind the negative effect of moderate to severe anemia in the clinical course of acute stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

Dolichoectasia is a term used to describe marked widening, tortuosity and elongation of an artery. Intracranial vertebral and basilar arteries are most commonly involved. Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia is usually asymptomatic. Both vertebrobasilar and bilateral carotid dolichoectasia has been reported very rarely in the literature. Cranial nerve compression and cerebral ischemia findings are frequently seen in symptomatic patients. We reported a 67-year-old female, without medical or family history for cerebrovascular disease, presented with vertebrobasilar and bilateral carotid dolichoectasia and subarachnoid hemorrhage, manifesting as reduced level of consciousness and weakness, and left abducens palsy.

ObjectiveTo determine the relative effectiveness of proximal and distal protection in prevention of cerebral ischemic events during carotid artery stent (CAS) placement using diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI).MethodsWe analyzed data from patients who had undergone DW-MRI before and within 24 hours of CAS for symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (with last ischemic events within 3 months). The study was performed prospectively; patients were not randomized, and were treated either with a proximal balloon occlusion system (Mo.Ma; Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) or filter-type distal protection device (Spider device; ev3, Plymouth, Minnesota, USA).ResultsOf the 45 patients (mean age±SD: 66.9±9.8 years; 73.3% were men) who underwent CAS, 19 had proximal protection and 26 distal protection. New ischemic lesions were detected in 26/45 patients on DW-MRI scans obtained within 24 hours after CAS. The proportion of patients with new lesions on DW-MRI at 24 hours was not different between the two groups (47.4% vs 65.4% for proximal and distal protection, respectively). The mean number of new ischemic lesions on post-CAS DW-MRI was non-significantly higher in patients who underwent CAS with distal protection (2.80±3.54 for proximal protection vs 4.96±5.11 for distal protection; p=0.12). The proportion of patients with new lesions >1 cm did not differ between the two groups (5.3% for proximal protection vs 11.5% for distal protection; p=0.62). There was no difference in the rates of ischemic stroke between patients who underwent CAS treatment using proximal and distal protection (5.3% vs 7.7%; p=1.000).ConclusionsWe found a relatively high rate of new ischemic lesions in patients undergoing CAS with cerebral protection. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with new lesions between patients treated using distal protection and those treated using proximal protection.

AIM To report patient and procedure-related factors affecting the angiographic and clinical outcome in patients treated with the Silk device. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients with intracranial aneurysms in whom treatment was attempted with the Silk flow diverter by our neurovascular team between October 2010 and November 2013 were included consecutively. The data was analyzed by an independent stroke neurologist not involved in the treatment of the patients. RESULTS A total of 96 patients (64 female) with ages range from 3 to 78 were included in this study. We found that 54 of the patients were asymptomatic and 42 of them symptomatic, while 21 had a prior history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Mean aneurysm size was 10.2 mm (range 2 to 40 mm). 2 patients died due to consequences of SAH. 3 patients developed visual decline on the follow-up, 2 of these were procedure-related. Symptomatic thromboembolic events were noted in 7 cases. Patients with aneurysms smaller than 13 mm had significantly less complications and higher occlusion rates. The complication rate was significantly high in patients admitted with symptoms. Adjunctive coiling had no impact on outcome. CONCLUSION Safety and efficacy of flow diversion in this series was closely related to aneurysm size and presenting symptoms. A size cut-off for safety and efficacy has not been reported before and will be useful not only for future studies but also for patient counseling in daily practice. The futility of adjunctive coiling in this series calls for reappraisal of the current recommendations for this specific device.

AIM We evaluated the procedural outcomes of intracranial aneurysm treatment with the Silk device and its relation with operator experience. We also detailed some technical points we learned throughout our experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred and six consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated using Silk (BaltExtrusion, Montmorency, France) stent between October 2010 and November 2013 were included. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, sex, aneurysm size, location, technical success, and adverse events. RESULTS There were 106 patients (71 female) undergoing 116 procedures with a mean age of 49.8 (range: 3-78 years). Mean aneurysm size was 10.7±8.0 (range, 2-40 mm). Technical success of the procedures was 96.5%. Adverse event rate was 11.2%. Among adverse events, there were 4 adverse events without complications, 2 mild complications, 7 severe complications, 4 of which resulted with death. The adverse event rate was significantly higher during the first half of the operator's experience. The rate of adverse events seemed to stabilize after around 50 patients. Adverse events, regardless of the presence or absence of a clinical complication, were more frequent in aneurysms larger than 18.5 mm. CONCLUSION Safety of flow-diverter (FD) placement for intracranial aneurysms increases with operator experience. Training programs in endovascular management of cerebrovascular diseases and relevant fellowship curricula must be adapted to include sufficient flow diverter experience. The learning curve needs to be kept in mind when studies comparing different FD devices or those comparing other treatments to FDS are planned.

By comparing neurocognitive test results from patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and those from patients with simple snoring, we aimed to establish whether OSAS negatively influences cognition. Patients with mild-to-severe OSAS (n = 29) and nonhypoxic simple-snoring patients (n = 30) were admitted to the study. All participants in both groups were evaluated with polysomnography and neurocognitive tests, including the Stroop Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Trail-Making Test, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Significant differences were identified between the groups for test scores on the Rey 1, SDMT, and Stroop tests. We propose that accurate OSAS diagnosis and treatment might help to prevent cognitive decline.

Background and aim: Ischemic cerebrovascular events are the most common reason for patients to be bedridden and the third most common reason for death. Many studies in recent years have demonstrated that carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this study, we aimed to report early outcomes of patients who were treated with CAS in our clinic and discuss practicability, advantages and safety of CAS. Methods and Findings: Eighty patients who underwent CAS between December 2009 and May 2011 were eligible. The mean age was 65 years (range, 49 - 89 years). Of the study group, 73.75% were males and 26.25% were female. The percentage of asymptomatic patients was 11.7%, and the remaining patients were symptomatic. A distal embolic protection device (Angioguard®) was used in 22% of the patients whereas, in the other patients (78%), a proximal blockage system (Mo.MA®) was used. Self-expandable hybrid stents were implanted in all patients and post-dilatation was performed after implantation. None of the patients suffered from stroke, myocardial infarction or death due to CAS during their hospital stay. The mean follow-up period was 10 months (range 2 - 18 months) after discharge. None of the patients had died or had a stroke, a transient ischemic attack (TIA), or a myocardial infarction during the follow-up period. Re-stenosis was not observed in the follow-up carotid Doppler ultrasonography; flow rates were within normal limits. Conclusion: No major complication was observed during the early follow-up period in patients who underwent CAS in our clinic. Only 2 (2.5%) patients showed transient numbness and weakness and these did not lead to morbidity. In the management guide of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery diseases, CAS, in the light of recent studies, is recommended as an alternative to CEA in recommendations for revascularization. One of the important issues emphasized in this guide is the experience of centers. Very low complication rates after CAS suggested that, with suitable patient selection and an experienced team, similar results may be obtained.