Search

Objective Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have an increased risk of developing post-transplant malignancies with lung cancer being one of the most common. In this retrospective study, we investigated incidence, use of systemic therapy and outcomes from lung cancer in OTR. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with lung cancer following a solid organ transplant at the University Health Network, Toronto, ON, CA, from January 1, 1980 to June 30, 2016 were included. Data for the study population, patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes were abstracted from solid OTR databases, our cancer registry and patient charts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier curves estimated median overall survival (OS) by histology, stage and systemic therapy. Results Amongst 7944 OTR (heart [N = 765], lung [n = 1668], liver [n = 2238], kidney [n = 3273]), 101 (1.3 %) developed lung cancer which were included in our analyses. Of these, 81 % were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 11 % small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 8% neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Median OS (months) was 25 in those that presented with Stage I/II NSCLC (44 %); 25 for Stage III NSCLC (7%); 3 for Stage IV NCLC (31 %); 10 for Limited stage SCLC (6%); 2 for Extensive stage (ES) SCLC (5%). NSCLC patients that received palliative chemotherapy had an OS of 8 months; ES-SCLC patients that received chemotherapy had an OS of 6 months. Of all patients who received platinum doublets (n = 16), 10 (62.5 %) required dose reductions at some point. Five patients experienced febrile neutropenia (31 %); two (12 %) had other toxicities leading to discontinuation. Conclusion Patients with stage I/II NSCLC and NET had poorer survival compared to historical norms in non-transplant patients. Patients who had stage III NSCLC or received palliative systemic therapy had survivals at or slightly below historic norms, although numbers were small. Chemotherapy can be administered in selected OTR patients though dose reductions and febrile neutropenia were common.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is said to adversely affect transplant outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pre-existing and new-onset DM on liver transplantation (LT) recipients.A single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of LT recipients (1990-2015) was undertaken.Of the 2209 patients, 13% (n = 298) had Pre-DM, 16% (n = 362) developed post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), 5% (n = 118) developed transient hyperglycemia (t-HG) post-LT, and 65% (n = 1431) never developed DM (no DM). Baseline clinical characteristics of patients with PTDM were similar to that of patients with Pre-DM. Incidence of PTDM peaked during the first year (87%) and plateaued thereafter. On multivariate analysis (Bonferroni-corrected), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the use of tacrolimus and sirolimus were independently associated with PTDM development. Both Pre-DM and PTDM patients had satisfactory and comparable glycemic control throughout the follow-up period. Those who developed t-HG seem to have a unique characteristic compared with others. Overall, 9%, 5%, and 8% of patients developed end-stage renal disease (ESRD), major cardiovascular event (mCVE), and de novo cancer, respectively. Both Pre-DM and PTDM did not adversely affect patient survival, retransplantation, or de novo cancer. The risks of ESRD and mCVE were significantly higher in patients with Pre-DM followed by PTDM and no DM.In this largest nonregistry study, patients with Pre-DM and PTDM share similar baseline clinical characteristics. Pre-DM increases the risk of ESRD and mCVE; however, patient survival was comparable to those with PTDM and without diabetes. Understanding the impact of PTDM would need prolonged follow-up.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment for single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤3 cm. Disease recurrence is common, and in some patients will occur outside transplant criteria. We aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for recurrence beyond Milan criteria in potentially transplantable patients treated with RFA as first-line therapy.We performed a retrospective cohort study of potentially transplantable patients with new diagnoses of unifocal HCC ≤3 cm that underwent RFA as first-line therapy between 2000-2015. We defined potentially transplantable patients as those aged70 years without any comorbidities that would preclude transplant surgery. Incidence of recurrence beyond Milan criteria was compared across 2 groups according to HCC diameter at the time of ablation: (HCC ≤2 cm vs. HCC2 cm). Competing risks Cox regression was used to identify predictors of recurrence beyond Milan criteria.We included 301 patients (167 HCC ≤2 cm and 134 HCC2 cm). Recurrence beyond Milan criteria occurred in 36 (21.6%) and 47 (35.1%) patients in the HCC ≤2 cm and the HCC2 cm groups, respectively (p = 0.01). The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates after RFA were 98.2%, 86.2% and 79.0% in the HCC ≤2 cm group vs. 93.3%, 77.6% and 70.9% in the HCC2 cm group (p = 0.01). Tumor size2 cm (hazard ratio 1.94; 95%CI 1.25-3.02) and alpha-fetoprotein levels at the time of ablation (100-1,000 ng/ml: hazard ratio 2.05; 95%CI 1.10-3.83) were found to be predictors of post-RFA recurrence outside Milan criteria.RFA for single HCC ≤3 cm provides excellent short- to medium-term survival. However, we identified patients at higher risk of recurrence beyond Milan criteria. For these patients, liver transplantation should be considered immediately after the first HCC recurrence following RFA.Radiofrequency ablation and liver transplantation are treatment options for early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After ablation some patients will experience recurrence or metastatic spread of the initial tumor or may develop new tumors within the liver. Despite close follow-up, these recurrences can progress rapidly and exceed transplant criteria, preventing the patient from receiving a transplant. We identified that patients with HCC2 cm and higher serum alpha-fetoprotein are at greater risk of recurrence beyond the transplant criteria. These data suggest that liver transplantation should be considered immediately after the first HCC recurrence for these patients.

Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an indication for liver transplantation, but recurrence after liver transplantation is associated with poor outcomes often requiring repeat transplantation. We investigated whether autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) could be used to stop progression of recurrent PSC and promote operational tolerance. Methods Twelve patients with recurrent PSC were fully evaluated and 5 were selected for aHSCT. Autologous hematopoietic stem cells were collected, purified by CD34 immunomagnetic selection and cryopreserved. Immunoablation using busulfan, cyclophosphamide and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin was followed by aHSCT. The primary endpoint of the study was the establishment of operational tolerance defined as lack of biochemical, histologic and clinical evidence of rejection while off immunosuppression at 2 years post-aHSCT. Results Two of the 5 patients achieved operational tolerance with no clinical or histological evidence of PSC progression or allo-rejection. A third patient developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome following aHSCT requiring repeat liver transplantation but has no evidence of PSC recurrence while on sirolimus monotherapy now more than 3 years after aHSCT. A fourth patient was weaned off immunosuppression but died 212 days after aHSCT from pericardial constriction. A fifth patient died from multiorgan failure. Immunosuppression-free allograft acceptance was associated with deletion of T cell clones, loss of autoantibodies and increases in regulatory T cells, transitional B cells, and programmed cell death protein-1 expressing CD8+ T cells in the 2 long-term survivors. Conclusions Although operational tolerance occurred following aHSCT, the high morbidity and mortality observed renders this specific protocol unsuitable for clinical adoption.

Introduction and aim. The prevalence and incidence of chronic liver disease is increasing resulting, in substantial direct and indirect medical costs. Overuse of investigations, treatments and procedures contribute to rising health care costs and can expose patients to unnecessary harm and delay in receiving care. The Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) campaign has encouraged professional societies to develop statements that are directly actionable by their members in an effort to promote higher-value health care that will lead to downstream effect on how other practitioners make decisions. Material and methods. The Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver (CASL) established its Choosing Wisely top five list of recommendations using the framework put forward by CWC. CASL convened a task force that developed a list of draft recommendations and shared this with CASL membership electronically with eventual ranking of the top five recommendations by consensus at Canadian Digestives Disease Week (CDDW) 2017. Following revisions, the CASL Executive Committee endorsed the final list, which was disseminated online by CWC (July 2017). Results. The top five recommendations physicians and patients should question include: 1) Don’t order serum ammonia to diagnose or manage hepatic encephalopathy (HE). 2) Don’t routinely transfuse fresh frozen plasma, vitamin K, or platelets to reverse abnormal tests of coagulation in patients with cirrhosis prior to abdominal paracentesis, endoscopic variceal band ligation, or any other minor invasive procedures. 3) Don’t order HFE genotyping based on serum ferritin values alone to diagnose hereditary hemochromatosis. 4) Don’t perform computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) routinely to monitor benign focal liver lesions. 5) Don’t repeat hepatitis C viral load testing in an individual who has established chronic infection, outside of anti-viral treatment. Conclusion. The Choosing Wisely recommendations will foster patient-physician discussions, reduce unnecessary treatment and testing, avert adverse effects from testing and treatment along with reducing medical expenditure in hepatology.

Introduction Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a recommended curative intent treatment option for patients with early stage hepa-tocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated if wait times for RFA were associated with residual tumor, tumor recurrence, need for liver transplantation, or death. Material and methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with HCC between January 2010 and December 2013 presenting to University Health Network (UHN) in Toronto, Canada. All patients receiving curative intent RFA for HCC were included. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine if wait times were associated with clinical outcomes. Results 219 patients were included in the study. 72.6% were male and the median age was 62.7 years (IQR 55.6-71). Median tumor size at diagnosis was 21.5 mm (IQR 17-26); median MELD was 8.7 (IQR 7.2-11.4) and 57.1% were Barcelona stage 0. The cause of liver disease was viral hepatitis in 73.5% (Hepatitis B and C). The median time from HCC diagnosis to RFA treatment was 96 days (IQR 75-139). In multivariate analysis, wait time was not associated with requiring liver transplant or tumor recurrence, however, each incremental 30-day wait time was associated with an increased risk of residual tumor (HR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.033) as well as death (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.11-1.36; p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion Incremental 30-day wait times are associated with a 9% increased risk of residual tumor and a 23% increased risk of death. We have identified system gaps where quality improvement measures can be implemented to reduce wait times and allocate resources for future RFA treatment, which may improve both quality and efficiency of HCC care.

Although initial therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) is usually successful, a significant subset of patients may have recurrent viremia. However, the epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence have not been fully defined, as well as the utility of prolonged antivirals after initial clearance.Solid organ transplant patients with first episode of CMV disease or asymptomatic viremia (≥1000 IU/mL) requiring treatment were identified by chart review. Clinical and virologic data were collected. The primary outcome was recurrence of CMV viremia or disease within 6 months of treatment discontinuation.The first episode of CMV viremia requiring antiviral therapy was assessed in 282 patients (147 CMV disease and 135 asymptomatic viremia). Cytomegalovirus occurred at 5.6 (0.63-27.7) months posttransplant. Recurrent CMV occurred in 30.5% patients at a median of 51 (0-160) days after discontinuation of therapy. Factors predictive of recurrence were treatment phase viral kinetics (P = 0.005), lung transplant (P = 0.002), CMV donor (D)+/recipient (R)- serostatus(P = 0.04) and recent acute rejection(P = 0.02). Prolonged antiviral therapy was given to 226 (80.1%) of 282 patients. Recurrence occurred in 73 (32.3%) of 226 patients that received prolonged antivirals versus 13 (23.2%) of 56 in those with no prolonged antivirals (P = 0.19).Recurrent CMV occurs in a significant percentage of patients after treatment of the first episode of CMV viremia/disease. CMV D+/R- serostatus, lung transplant, and treatment phase viral kinetics were significant predictors of recurrence. Continuation of prolonged antivirals beyond initial clearance was not associated with a reduced risk of recurrence.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the traditional criteria (advanced HCC) are typically offered palliation, which is associated with a 3-year survival rate lower than 30%. This study aimed to describe the outcomes for a subset of patients with advanced HCC who satisfied the Extended Toronto Criteria (ETC) and were listed for liver transplantation (LT).All patients listed in the Toronto liver transplantation program with HCC beyond both the Milan and University of California, San Francisco criteria were included in this study. Data were extracted from the prospectively collected electronic database. All radiologic images were reviewed by two independent radiologists. The primary end point was patient survival.Between January 1999 and August 2014, 96 patients with advanced HCC were listed for LT, and 62 (65%) of these patients received bridging therapy while on the waiting list. Bridging therapy led to a significant reduction in tumor progression (p = 0.02) and tumor burden (p 0.001). The majority of those listed underwent LT (n = 69, 72%). Both tumor progression on waiting list (hazard ratio [HR] 4.973; range1.599-15.464; p = 0.006) and peak alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at 400 ng/ml or higher (HR, 4.604; range 1.660-12.768; p = 0.003) were independently associated with waiting list dropout. Post-LT HCC recurrence occurred in 35% of the patients (n = 24). Among those with HCC recurrence, survival was significantly better for those who received curative treatment (p = 0.004). The overall actuarial survival rates from the listing were 76% at 1 year, 56% at 3 years, and 47% at 5 years, and the corresponding rates from LT were 93, 71, and 66%.Liver transplantation provides significantly better survival rates than palliation for patients with selected advanced HCC.

The intestinal microbiome (IM) is altered in patients with cirrhosis, and emerging literature suggests that this impacts on the development of complications. The PubMed database was searched from January 2000 to May 2015 for studies and review articles on the composition, pathophysiologic effects and therapeutic modulation of the IM in cirrhosis. The following combination of relevant text words and MeSH terms were used, namely intestinal microbiome, microbiota, or dysbiosis, and cirrhosis, encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, variceal bleeding, hepatopulmonary syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma. The search results were evaluated for pertinence to the subject of IM and cirrhosis, as well as for quality of study design. The IM in cirrhosis is characterized by a decreased proportion of Bacteroides and Lactobacilli, and an increased proportion of Enterobacteriaceae compared to healthy controls. Except for alcoholic cirrhosis, the composition of the IM in cirrhosis is not affected by the etiology of the liver disease. The percentage of Enterobacteriaceae increases with worsening liver disease severity and decompensation and is associated with bacteremia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatic encephalopathy. Lactulose, rifaximin and Lactobacillus-containing probiotics have been shown to partially reverse the cirrhosis associated enteric dysbiosis, in conjunction with improvement in encephalopathy. The IM is altered in cirrhosis, and this may contribute to the development of complications associated with end-stage liver disease. Therapies such as lactulose, rifaximin and probiotics may, at least partially, reverse the cirrhosis-associated changes in the IM. This, in turn, may prevent or alleviate the severity of complications.

Data regarding transplantation outcomes in ventilated intensive care unit (ICU)–dependent patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are conflicting. This single-center cohort study investigated the outcomes of patients with ESLD who were intubated with mechanical support before liver transplantation (LT). The ICU plus intubation group consisted of 42 patients with decompensated cirrhosis and mechanical ventilation before transplantation. LT was considered for intubated ICU patients if the fraction of inspired oxygen was ≤40% with a positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 10, low pressor requirements, and the absence of an active infection. Intubated ICU patients were compared to 80 patients requiring ICU admission before transplantation without intubation and to 126 matched non–ICU-bound patients. Patients requiring ICU care with intubation and ICU care alone had more severe postoperative complications than non–ICU-bound patients. Intubation before transplantation was associated with more postoperative pneumonias (15% in intubated ICU transplant candidates, 5% in ICU-bound but not intubated patients, and 3% in control group patients; P = 0.02). Parameters of reperfusion injury and renal function on postoperative day (POD) 2 and POD 7 were similar in all groups. Bilirubin levels were higher in the ICU plus intubation group at POD 2 and POD 7 after transplantation but were normalized in all groups within 3 months. The ICU plus intubation group versus the ICU-only group and the non-ICU group had decreased 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival (81% versus 84% versus 92%, 76% versus 78% versus 87%, and 71% versus 77% versus 84%, respectively; P = 0.19), but statistical significance was not reached. A Glasgow coma scale score of 7 before transplantation was associated with high postoperative mortality in ICU-bound patients requiring intubation (38% versus 23%; P = 0.01). In conclusion, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation should not be considered contraindications for LT. With careful patient selection, acceptable long-term outcomes can be achieved despite increased postoperative complications. Liver Transpl 21:761–767, 2015. © 2015 AASLD.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide.(1) Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the current recommended curative treatment option for non-surgical patients with early stage disease.(2) A recent report by Cancer Care Ontario shows the expected number of HCC cases requiring RFA will grow at a greater rate than RFA capacity estimates.(3) Currently, no recommended wait times exist for HCC. AIMS: In this study, we look at wait times for patients with HCC undergoing RFA and the development of adverse events. We also aimed to identify system gaps where quality improvement measures can be implemented. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at the University Health Network looking at all patients diagnosed with HCC and referred for RFA between January 2010 until December 2013. Data on demographics and co-morbidities were obtained along with biochemistry, hematology and virology values. The time from diagnosis of HCC to presentation at Tumor Board rounds and the time from Tumor Board rounds to treatment were documented. Outcomes defined a priori were all-cause death and all-cause liver transplantation. Statistical analysis was performed with a help of a statistician. The study was approved by the UHN Research Ethics Board. RESULTS: 225 patients were included in the study. 72.4% percent were male and the median age was 63 years (SD+/-10.4). Median tumor size at diagnosis was 22 mm (SD +/-8.3), mean MELD was 8.7 (Range=7.2–11.3) and 55.6% had Barcelona stage 0. The cause of liver disease was viral hepatitis in 73% (Hepatitis B and C). The median time from HCC diagnosis to RFA treatment was 97 days (IQR 75–139). In multivariable analysis wait times per 30 days was associated with an increased risk of death (HR=1.16; 95% CI 1.08–1.25; p=

Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS1) is acute renal failure in the setting of advanced cirrhosis, and it results from hemodynamic derangements, which should be fully reversible after liver transplantation. However, the rate of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) reversal and factors predicting renal outcomes after transplantation have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of HRS1 patients after liver transplantation and factors predicting HRS reversal. A chart review of all liver transplant patients with HRS1 (according to International Ascites Club criteria) at Toronto General Hospital from 2001 to 2010 was conducted. Patient demographic data, pretransplant and posttransplant laboratory data, and the presence of and time to posttransplant HRS reversal (serum creatinine

BACKGROUND: The literature regarding post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) is limited.OBJECTIVES: To study the incidence, predictors and outcomes of PTLD after liver transplantation in a single, large-volume centre.METHODS: The charts of all LTRs (n=1372) in the authors’ centre between January 2000 and June 2012 were retrospectively reviewed and those who developed PTLD were identified. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were prospectively collected. Responses to treatment, including complete response, no response, relapse and survival, were recorded.RESULTS: The incidence of PTLD in LTRs was 32 in 1372 (2.3%). Overall, median survival was 37 months (range 0.5 to 195 months), with one-, three- and five-year survival rates of 81%, 74% and 60%, respectively. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative patients had a better mean (± SD) survival (95±79 months) than EBV-positive patients (41±42 months) (P=0.02). For stage I/II PTLD, one-, three- and five-year actuarial survival was 87%, 87% and 75%, compared with 50%, 30% and 0% for stage III/IV PTLD, respectively (P=0.001). In patients with complete response, median survival was 58 months (range 10 to 195 months); and one-, three- and five-year actuarial survival was 100%, 94% and 76%, respectively, after diagnosis of PTLD. Changing immunosuppression (IS) from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus at the time of diagnosis may have improved survival (seven of seven survivors) compared with only decreasing or stopping IS (14 of 25 survivors) (P=0.07).CONCLUSIONS: This series from a single large-volume centre showed excellent short and long-term survival after PTLD in adult LTRs who were EBV negative, had early disease and showed complete response. Consistent with the known in vitro antiproliferative effect of sirolimus, switching IS from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus may improve survival.

BACKGROUND Reactivation of human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 and HHV-7 has been linked to various posttransplant adverse events through immunomodulatory effects. The potential utility of monitoring for HHV-6 and HHV-7 viremia remains unclear. METHODS In this clinical trial, 129 liver transplant recipients were randomized to be monitored in real-time for HHV-6 and HHV-7 viremia by polymerase chain reaction at regular intervals from 0 to 12 weeks after transplantation ("monitoring" group) or to undergo usual care ("no-monitoring" group). Therapeutic intervention for a positive polymerase chain reaction result included reduction in immunosuppression and preemptive antiviral therapy, at the discretion of the attending team. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse events indirectly attributable to viral reactivation (including opportunistic infection, graft rejection and severe hepatitis C virus recurrence). RESULTS In the "monitoring" group, HHV-6 and HHV-7 viremia occurred in 23 of 64 patients (35.9%) and 21 of 64 patients (32.8%) patients, respectively. We found no cases of symptomatic HHV-6 and HHV-7 disease. Some therapeutic interventions were performed in 59.1% of viremic episodes. There were no differences in cumulative incidence of the primary outcome between the "monitoring" and "no-monitoring" groups at 1 year (58.7% vs. 52.3%; odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.55) or at 5 years after transplantation (79.0% vs. 70.3%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-1.42). However, we found a trend toward a lower incidence of graft rejection at year 1 in the "monitoring" group (30.2% vs. 44.6%; P=0.091). CONCLUSION In this first trial, no benefit could be demonstrated from routine monitoring of HHV-6 and HHV-7 viremia in graft or patient outcome after liver transplantation.

Whether and when recovery beyond the need for transplant may occur in patients listed for decompensation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients delisted following recompensation. Seventy-seven patients who were listed between 2005 and 2015 for decompensation, but later delisted following recompensation were included. Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) was the underlying etiology in the majority (n = 47, 61%). Listing characteristics of these patients were compared with those of decompensated ALD patients who either underwent deceased donor liver transplantation or died on the waiting list. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score

Introduction. Hepatitis C (HCV) continues to be the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). Sustained virological response (SVR) rates to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy for recurrent HCV in Genotype 1 (G1) LT recipients have been disappointing (30-40%). Experience with triple therapy using protease inhibitors (PI) boceprevir (BOC), telaprevir (TVR) in these patients has been limited. Material and methods. This national multicenter retrospective study included 76 patients (64 male, mean age 57 ± 6 years), treated for G1 HCV recurrence with either BOC (n = 41) or TVR (n = 35), who were non-responders or relapsers (n = 54), treatment naive (n = 22) or had fibrosing cholestatic HCV (n = 3). 53 patients were on cyclosporine, 22 on tacrolimus and one patient on prednisone alone. Results. On treatment virologic response was observed in 84% (64/76), 83% in BOC and 85% in TVR group. A higher week 4 response after starting triple therapy (RVR) was noted in TVR group 25/35 (81%) as compared to BOC group 26/41 (63%); p value = 0.02. The end of treatment response was 78% and 75% in BOC and TVR group, respectively. SVR 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation was observed in 59.5% (22/37); 58.3% in the BOC group and 61.5% in TVR group. Treatment was discontinued early in 23 patients (serious adverse effects n = 19, treatment failure n = 4). Infections occurred in 5 patients with 2 deaths (all in BOC). Anemia was the most common side effect (n = 55, 72%) requiring erythropoietin and RBV dose reduction. In the BOC group, cyclosporine dose reduction was 2.2 ± 1.0 fold and 8.6 ± 2.4 fold with tacrolimus. In TVR group, dose reduction was 3.0 ± 1.4 with cyclosporine and 12 ± 5.7 fold with tacrolimus. Conclusions. PI-based triple therapy appears more effective in producing HCV-RNA clearance than dual therapy. Tolerability is a serious issue and drug-drug interactions are manageable with close monitoring.

Drug induced pancreatitis (DIP) is a serious adverse effect of many commonly used drugs. Pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin used for treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection and various protease inhibitors (PIs) such as indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir used for HIV infection have been reported to cause DIP; although the mechanism of pancreatitis is not well known. Recently, telaprevir and boceprevir are introduced for treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection along with peg-IFN and ribavirin. There are no reports of acute pancreatitis due to telaprevir and boceprevir in liver transplant setting. We managed two such cases; both were male with HCV genotype 1 infection, had living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer few years ago and stable on cyclosporine. Both developed AP a month after adding one of PI to their combination therapy. First patient had past history of partial response with peg-IFN and ribavirin and retreated with addition of telaprevir to combination therapy. Second patient received peg-IFN and ribavirin for 4 months and then boceprevir was added. Patients were managed conservatively, the culprit PI was stopped and they recovered. We used the Naranjo Probability Scale for Adverse Drug Events to estimate the probability that a drug was the cause of the acute pancreatitis. A score of 7 was calculated in both patients, indicating a probable adverse drug reaction. The algorithm devised by Trivedi et al to diagnose drug-induced pancreatitis was also used and confirmed that this was likely to be a drug reaction. There is adequate circumstantial evidence pointing to telaprevir and boceprevir as the cause of their acute pancreatitis. Further evidence is needed but in the meantime we would recommend routine monitoring of amylase levels for all patients on triple therapy and advise patients of potential symptoms for which they should seek medical advice.

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is impaired by universal disease recurrence and suboptimal response to antiviral therapy. Inhibition of angiotensin-II signalling by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB) decreases hepatic stellate cell activation in vitro and hepatic fibrogenesis in animal models. A single-center retrospective analysis suggested that angiotensin blockade (AB) inhibits fibrosis progression in recurrent HCV post-LT. This study assessed the effect of AB on fibrosis progression in an independent patient cohort.Chart review of all patients who underwent transplantation in our institution for HCV-related ESLD between January 2000 and February 2008 revealed 109 patients with ≥2 protocol liver biopsies and free of antiviral therapy post-LT up to the last biopsy analyzed; 27 of 109 patients were treated with ACE-I/ARB for ≥12 months, 82 were not. Fibrosis was staged using METAVIR.Live-donor LT was more frequent in controls than in the AB group (25% vs 11%; P .05). However, parameters known to affect outcome of recurrent HCV, including donor age, prevalence of diabetes, acute cellular rejection, and immunosuppression, were similar in both groups. Time between first and last biopsy (median, 23 months), stage of fibrosis, fibrosis progression rates (median 0.47 vs 0.45 unit/y; P = .46), and time to develop fibrosis stage ≥2 did not differ between groups. Results held true if deceased-donor LT were analyzed separately.Our study does not support the contention of a previous report that use of AB reduces fibrosis progression in recurrent HCV post-LT.

Background In parallel with the obesity epidemic, liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing dramatically in North America. Although survival outcomes are similar to other etiologies, liver transplantation in the NASH population has been associated with significantly increased resource utilization. We sought to compare outcomes between live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) at a high volume North American transplant center, with a particular focus on resource utilization. Methods The study population consists of primary liver transplants performed for NASH at Toronto General Hospital from 2000 to 2014. Recipient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, graft and patient survivals, and resource utilization were compared for LDLT versus DDLT. Results A total of 176 patients were included in the study (48 LDLT vs 128 DDLT). LDLT recipients had a lower model for end-stage liver disease score and were less frequently hospitalized prior to transplant. Estimated blood loss and early markers of graft injury were lower for LDLT. LDLT recipients had a significantly shorter hospitalization (intensive care unit, postoperative, and total hospitalization). Conclusions LDLT for NASH facilitates transplantation of patients at a less severe stage of disease, which appears to promote a faster postoperative recovery with less resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Recurrent hepatitis C following LT is universal, and significant fibrosis (SF, Metavir fibrosis stage ≥2) apparent on protocol biopsy typically prompts antiviral therapy.OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of protocol liver biopsies in this setting.METHODS: A total of 151 patients who underwent LT related to HCV infection between July 2004 and December 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Data regarding protocol liver biopsies at six, 12 and 24 months post-LT, conventional laboratory parameters and demographic information were obtained.RESULTS: The 151 patients included in the present study had significantly lower serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels than the four patients who progressed to receive antiviral treatment for SF before six months post-LT (PCONCLUSION: The protocol liver biopsy at six months could be eliminated, especially in patients who consistently exhibit low AST levels. Histological activity, the presence or absence of fibrosis, and AST values at the 12-month biopsy may lead to the decision to defer the protocol biopsy at 24 months or result in earlier introduction of antiviral therapy.

The increased prevalence of obesity worldwide threatens the pool of living liver donors. Although the negative effects of graft steatosis on liver donation and transplantation are well known, the impact of obesity in the absence of hepatic steatosis on outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown. Consequently, we compared the outcome of LDLT using donors with BMI30 versus donors with BMI ≥30. Between April 2000 and May 2014, 105 patients received a right-lobe liver graft from donors with BMI ≥30, whereas 364 recipients were transplanted with grafts from donors with BMI30. Liver steatosis10% was excluded in all donors with BMI30 by imaging and liver biopsies. None of the donors had any other comorbidity. Donors with BMI30 versus ≥30 had similar postoperative complication rates (Dindo-Clavien ≥3b: 2% vs. 3%; p = 0.71) and lengths of hospital stay (6 vs. 6 days; p = 0.13). Recipient graft function, assessed by posttransplant peak serum bilirubin and international normalized ratio was identical. Furthermore, no difference was observed in recipient complication rates (Dindo-Clavien ≥3b: 25% vs. 20%; p = 0.3) or lengths of hospital stay between groups. We concluded that donors with BMI ≥30, in the absence of graft steatosis, are not contraindicated for LDLT.

Cyclosporine A (CSA), but not tacrolimus (TAC), inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication in vitro. Clinical reports on the efficacy of interferon-α (IFNα)-based antiviral therapy (AVT) for recurrent HCV after liver transplantation (LT) with CSA and TAC are conflicting. Our aim was to assess whether AVT for recurrent HCV after LT is more effective with CSA or TAC. We performed an electronic database search (1995-2012) and a manual abstract search (2005-2012). The a priori defined eligibility criteria included the use of AVT for recurrent HCV with IFN (standard or pegylated) and ribavirin and the reporting of sustained virological response (SVR) rates with CSA and TAC (the primary outcome). Two authors identified and extracted data independently. Dichotomous data were expressed as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a random effects model. In all, 5058 references were retrieved, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 17 observational studies (13 full-text articles) met the eligibility criteria; the meta-analysis was based on the latter studies. The pooled SVR rates were 42% (395/945) with CSA and 35% (471/1364) with TAC (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00-1.39, P = 0.05). Although the pooled data contained significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 45%, P = 0.02), the SVR rates in the RCT were comparable (39% with CSA and 35% with TAC). Limiting the analysis to the 7 studies reporting on 40 or more patients in each group (with 1634 patients in all) favored CSA (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.09-1.38, P < 0.001), and heterogeneity disappeared (I(2) = 0%, P = 0.62). In conclusion, IFN-based AVT for recurrent HCV after LT seems marginally more effective with CSA versus TAC; the study heterogeneity, however, limits firm conclusions.

Summary Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection occurs universally and is regarded as a major cause of mortality after liver transplantation (LT) for HCV-related end-stage liver disease. We conducted this large, single-center, retrospective study to ascertain the long-term impact of virological response to treatment of recurrent hepatitis C on survival of LT recipients. From August 1987 to October 2011, 285 patients have received interferon-based antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C. Of these 285, 245 patients were enrolled in this study. One hundred and twenty-six patients (51.4%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Relapsers (undetectable HCV-RNA at end of treatment, becoming positive afterward) comprised 9.0% (22/245), and nonresponse (NR; never achieving undetectable HCV-RNA) 39.6% (97/245). The median follow-up after completion of antiviral treatment was 2081 days. Using Kaplan–Meier method, patients who achieved SVR were shown to have significantly better 5-year patient survival (95.2%) than the NR group (49.9%) (P

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), given in combination with nucleos(t)ide therapy, has reduced the rate of recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation (LT), although the most effective protocol is unknown. We have retrospectively evaluated the use of long-term nucleos(t)ide analog in combination with one yr of low-dose HBIG. One hundred and fifty-two adults with HBV-related liver disease underwent LT in our center from January 1999 to August 2009; of these, 132 patients who received one yr of HBIG combined with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (largely on lamivudine [LAM] alone, n = 97) afterward were included for the purposes of this study. Median follow-up post-transplantation was 1752 d. Patient survival was 93.9%, 86.9% and 84.1% at 1, 5, and 10 yr, respectively; none of the 17 deceased patients had recurrent HBV. HBV recurrence was observed in nine patients (all received LAM+HBIG), yielding recurrence rates of 2.3%, 5.1%, and 8.6% at 1, 3, and 5/10 yr, respectively. All recurrences were successfully managed, usually with additional antiviral treatment. In conclusion, this study, with its long-term follow-up, demonstrates that short course of low-dose HBIG (without anti-HBs monitoring) combined with the use of long-term nucleos(t)ide analog is effective and less cumbersome than many protocols in current use.

SUMMARY Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection which is often a silent disease has resulted in a global epidemic. The diagnosis of hepatitis C virus often requires confirmation with molecular techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction for detection of HCV RNA. Following laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis, molecular techniques are routinely used to monitor HCV RNA levels, particularly in those undergoing treatment. Unfortunately, molecular tests are relatively expensive and their cost may be prohibitive in the developing world. Several studies have investigated the applicability of the hepatitis C core Ag (HCVcAg), as a substitute for measuring HCV RNA levels. In this review, we provide an overview of the major findings of these studies focused on the utility of measuring HCVcAg antigen levels in the clinical setting. Overall, measuring HCVcAg levels is associated with several advantages and disadvantages. It may be useful in different clinical settings for monitoring HCV patients after obtaining an initial baseline HCV RNA result. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the graft is universal and interferon based antiviral therapy remains at present the treatment of choice in HCV liver transplant recipients. Apart from the antiviral effects, interferon and ribavirin have both potent immunomodulatory properties resulting in a broad range of immune-related disorders including acute cellular rejection and chronic ductopenic rejection as well as de novo autoimmune hepatitis. Further complicating the picture, HCV infection per se is associated with a variety of autoimmune phenomena. We discuss here the immune-mediated complications and their relationship to chronic HCV and interferon based antiviral therapy.

Progressive deterioration in liver function is a common cause of hepatic decompensation and indication for liver transplantation in patients with advanced liver disease. Previous studies in animal models of acute and chronic liver disease revealed that daily ciprofloxacin improves biochemical parameters of hepatic function. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether hepatic function improves in patients with advanced liver disease after 1 month of daily ciprofloxacin therapy. A secondary objective was to determine whether ciprofloxacin treatment for 1 or 3 months results in fewer hospitalizations for decompensated liver disease. Forty-four patients with advanced liver disease awaiting liver transplantation received oral ciprofloxacin (250 or 500 mg twice daily) or placebo for 1 (n = 22/group) or 3 (n = 10 ciprofloxacin, 14 placebo) months. Compared to placebo recipients, ciprofloxacin-treated patients had mild improvements in serum albumin levels (+1.5 versus −3.4%, p = 0.026) while bilirubin and international normalized ratios (INR) of prothrombin times remained unchanged. Overall, fewer hospitalizations occurred in ciprofloxacin-treated patients (1/22, 5% versus 7/22, 32%, respectively, p = 0.02) during the study period. Treatment was well tolerated and no resistant infections occurred in either cohort. The results of this study suggest that daily ciprofloxacin may result in fewer hospitalizations for patients with advanced liver diseases awaiting liver transplantation but not by enhancing hepatic function.

In 2002, the New York State Committee on Quality Improvement in Living Liver Donation prohibited live liver donation for potential recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores greater than 25. Despite the paucity of evidence to support this recommendation, many centers in North America remain reluctant to offer living donor (LD) to patients with moderate to high MELD scores.We analyzed 271 consecutive adult-to-adult right lobe LD liver transplants performed at our institution between 2002 and 2008 to study the relationship, between recipient MELD scores and the outcome of LD liver transplantation. The recipients were categorized according to their MELD score into a low (Low:25)and high (Hi:or=25) MELD group. We compared short-term donor morbidity, graft loss within 30 days, length of hospital stay, biochemical markers of hepatocyte injury and graft function, and 90 day posttransplant complications including infection, rejection, bleeding, and renal failure. Long-term posttransplant outcome was measured by graft and patient survival after 1-, 3-, and 5-years.Donor and recipient characteristics were similar between groups. Donor outcomes were similar in both groups. Peak recipient aspartat aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and length of hospital stay were similar between both groups. The proportional decrease in postoperative INR and creatinine within the first week was greater in the high versus low MELD score group. High MELD score recipients had more frequent postoperative pneumonia (Low: 2.2% vs. Hi: 14%, P = 0.003), while no differences were observed in rates of biliary complications, rejection, renal failure, or overall infections. Recipients with a MELD25 versusor=25 had a similar 1-year (Low: 92% vs. Hi: 83%), 3-year (Low: 86% vs. Hi: 80%), and 5-year (Low: 78% vs. Hi: 80%) graft survival after LD liver transplantation (P = 0.51).LD liver transplantation can provide excellent graft function and survival rates in high MELD score recipients. Thus, when deceased donor organs are scare, a high MELD score alone should not be an absolute contraindication to living liver donation.

Many centers require a minimal graft to body weight ratio (GBWR) ≥ 0.8 as an arbitrary threshold to proceed with right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RL-LDLT), and there is often hesitancy about transplanting lower volume living donor (LD) liver grafts into sicker patients. The data supporting this dogma, based on the early experience with RL-LDLT at Asian centers, are weak. To determine the effect of LD liver volume in the modern era, we investigated the impact of GBWR on the outcome of RL-LDLT with a GBWR as low as 0.6 at the University of Toronto. Between April 2000 and September 2008, 271 adult-to-adult RL-LDLT procedures and 614 deceased donor liver transplants were performed. Twenty-two living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) cases with a GBWR of 0.59 to 0.79 (group A) were compared with 249 LDLT cases with a GBWR ≥ 0.8 (group B) and with 66 full-graft deceased donor liver transplants (group C), who were matched 3:1 according to donor and recipient age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and presence of hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma with the low-GBWR group. Portal vein shunts were not used. Markers of reperfusion injury [aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)], graft function (international normalized ratio and bilirubin), complications graded by the Clavien score, and graft and patient survival were compared. As expected, LD recipients had a significantly shorter cold ischemia time (94 ± 43 minutes for A, 96 ± 57 minutes for B, and 453 ± 152 minutes for C, P = 0.0001). However, the peak AST, peak ALT, absolute decrease in the international normalized ratio, day 7 bilirubin level, postoperative creatinine clearance, complication rate graded by the Clavien score, and median hospital stay were similar in all groups. The rate of biliary complications was higher with LD grafts than deceased donor grafts (19% for A versus 10% for B and 0% for C, P = 0.2). Patient survival was similar in all groups at 1, 3, and 5 years (91% for A versus 89% for B and 93% for C at 1 year, 87% for A versus 81% for B and 89% for C at 3 years, and 83% for A versus 81% for B and 87% for C at 5 years, P = 0.63). A Cox proportional regression analysis revealed only hepatitis C virus as a risk factor for poorer graft survival and not GBWR as a continuous or categorical variable. In conclusion, we found no evidence of inferior outcomes with smaller size grafts versus larger size LD grafts or full-size deceased donor grafts. Further studies are warranted to examine the factors affecting the function of smaller grafts for living liver donation and thereby define the safe lower limits for transplantation. Liver Transpl 15:1776–1782, 2009. © 2009 AASLD.

We studied the role of donor and recipient age in transplantation/ischemia-reperfusion injury (TIRI) and short- and long-term graft and patient survival. Eight hundred twenty-two patients underwent deceased donor liver transplantation, with 197 donors being ≥60 years old. We evaluated markers of reperfusion injury, graft function, and clinical outcomes as well as short- and long-term graft and patient survival. Increased donor age was associated with more severe TIRI and decreased 3- and 5-year graft survival (73% versus 85% and 72% versus 81%, P < 0.001) and patient survival (77% versus 88% and 77% versus 82%, P < 0.003). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and recipient age were the only independent risk factors for graft and patient survival in patients receiving an older graft. In the HCV(+) cohort (297 patients), patients ≥ 50 years old who were transplanted with an older graft versus a younger graft had significantly decreased 3- and 5-year graft survival (68% versus 83% and 64% versus 83%, P < 0.009). In contrast, HCV(+) patients < 50 years old had similar 3- and 5-year graft survival if transplanted with either a young graft or an old graft (81% versus 82% and 81% versus 82%, P = 0.9). In conclusion, recipient age and HCV status affect the graft and patient survival of older livers. Combining older grafts with older recipients should be avoided, particularly in HCV(+) patients, whereas the effects of donor age can be minimized in younger recipients. Liver Transpl 15:1288–1295, 2009. © 2009 AASLD.

Hepatitis C recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT). Whether its progression differs after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is still debated. We retrospectively analyzed 201 consecutive LTs performed at our institution for hepatitis C–related end-stage liver disease between April 2000 and December 2005 (46 LDLTs and 155 DDLTs). Patients were followed with protocol biopsies for medians of 29 (LDLT) and 39 months (DDLT; P = 0.7). Although overall graft and patient survival did not differ, the mean fibrosis stage (Metavir) was significantly higher at 12 to 48 months post-LT (all P 45 years carried a relative risk of 8.17 (confidence interval = 2.6–25.5, P = 0.001) for reaching fibrosis stage 3 or 4 at 2 years post-LT. In conclusion, donor age, rather than the transplant approach, determines the progression of recurrent hepatitis C after LT. LDLT, allowing for the selection of younger donors, may particularly benefit hepatitis C patients. Liver Transpl 14:1778–1786, 2008. © 2008 AASLD.

North American Aboriginal populations are at increased risk for developing immune-mediated disorders, including autoimmune hepatitis. In the present study, the demographic, clinical, biochemical, serological, radiological and histological features of autoimmune hepatitis were compared in 33 First Nations (FN) and 150 predominantly Caucasian, non-FN patients referred to an urban tertiary care centre. FN patients were more often female (91% versus 71%; P=0.04), and more likely to have low serum albumin (69% versus 36%; P=0.0006) and elevated bilirubin (57% versus 35%; P=0.01) levels on presentation compared with non-FN patients. They also had lower hemoglobin, and complement levels, more cholestasis and higher serum immunoglobulin A levels than non-FN patients (P=0.05 respectively). Higher histological grades of inflammation and stages of fibrosis, and more clinical and radiological evidence of advanced liver disease were observed in FN patients, but the differences failed to reach statistical significance. The results of the present study suggest that in addition to being more common, autoimmune hepatitis may be more severe in FN populations, compared with predominantly Caucasian, non-FN populations.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare entity. At the present time, there is no standardized effective therapy. Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a treatment for this rare tumour.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of liver transplantation for HEHE at eight centres across Canada.METHODS: The charts of patients who were transplanted for HEHE at eight centres across Canada were reviewed.RESULTS: A total of 11 individuals (eight women and three men) received a LT for HEHE. All LTs were performed between 1991 and 2005. The mean (± SD) age at LT was 38.7±13 years. One patient had one large liver lesion (17 cm × 14 cm × 13 cm), one had three lesions, one had four lesions and eight had extensive (five or more) liver lesions. One patient had spleen involvement and two had involved lymph nodes at the time of transplantation. The mean duration of follow-up was 78±63 months (median 81 months). Four patients (36.4%) developed recurrence of HEHE with a mean time to recurrence of 25±25 months (median 15.6 months) following LT. The calculated survival rate following LT for HEHE was 82% at five years.CONCLUSIONS: The results of LT for HEHE are encouraging, with a recurrence rate of 36.4% and a five-year survival rate of 82%. Further studies are needed to help identify patients who would benefit most from LT for this rare tumour.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage autoimmune liver diseases. However, the underlying disease may recur in the graft in some 20% of cases. The aim of this study is to determine whether LT using living donor grafts from first-degree relatives results in higher rates of recurrence than grafts from more distant/unrelated donors. Two hundred sixty-three patients, who underwent a first LT in the Toronto liver transplant program between January 2000 and March 2015 for autoimmune liver diseases, and had at least 6 months of post-LT follow-up, were included in this study. Of these, 72 (27%) received a graft from a first-degree living-related donor, 56 (21%) from a distant/unrelated living donor, and 135 (51%) from a deceased donor for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 138, 52%), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 69, 26%), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 44, 17%), and overlap syndromes (n = 12, 5%). Recurrence occurred in 52 (20%) patients. Recurrence rates for each autoimmune liver disease were not significantly different after first-degree living-related, living-unrelated, or deceased-donor LT. Similarly, time to recurrence, recurrence-related graft failure, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, first-degree living-related donor LT for PSC, PBC, or AIH is not associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence.

Background & Aims: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is one of the most common causes of liver enzyme elevation in the West. Its prevalence is likely to increase further, paralleling the epidemic increase of the metabolic syndrome. Serotonin degradation by monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) was recently implicated as an important source of reactive oxygen species. We therefore tested the pathogenetic role of serotonin in a murine model of diet-induced steatohepatitis. Methods: Wild-type and serotonin-deficient mice, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (Tph1−/−) were fed a choline-methionine–deficient diet for 2 and 6 weeks. MAO-A was inhibited with clorgyline. Steatosis, hepatocyte injury, and hepatic inflammation were assessed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and biochemical analysis. Expression levels of MAO-A and serotonin transporter were analyzed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. Oxidative stress was detected by measuring lipid peroxidation. Mitochondrial damage was determined by electron microscopy and quantification of cytochrome c release. Results: After choline-methionine–deficient diet, Tph1−/− mice displayed an equal degree of steatosis, yet reduced hepatocellular injury and less severe inflammation. The difference in these NASH-defining features could be attributed to an increased uptake and catabolism of serotonin, yielding enhanced levels of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxides, which mediated hepatocellular injury by mitochondrial damage and inflammation. Inhibition of MAO-A reduced hepatocellular damage in wild-type mice. Correspondingly, MAO-A expression was up-regulated significantly in human NASH. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that serotonin plays a role in the pathogenesis of steatohepatitis, and therefore might represent a novel target for the prevention and treatment of NASH.

BACKGROUND: Numerous, mostly uncontrolled, observations suggest that artificial liver support with the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) improves pathophysiologic sequelae and outcome of acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure. MARS is felt to be safe, but extracorporeal circuits may activate coagulation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of and risk factors for activation of coagulation during MARS treatment. PATIENTS/METHODS: Retrospective analysis of coagulopathy/bleeding complications observed during 83 consecutive MARS sessions in 21 patients (11 men; median age 46 years; median three sessions per patient; median duration of session 8 h). RESULTS: Nine clinically relevant episodes of coagulopathy/bleeding were observed in eight patients, forced to premature cessation of MARS in seven and ended lethal in four. Four complications occurred during the first, five during later (third to seventh) MARS sessions and two bleeders tolerated further sessions without complications. Coagulation parameters worsened significantly also during MARS sessions not associated with bleeding (P< or =0.004). In univariate analysis, patient's age, vasopressor therapy, pretreatment INR, fibrin D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations, but not severity of underlying disease (MELD, Child-Pugh, SAPS II scores), were significantly associated with coagulopathy (P

Acute liver failure (ALF) is characterized by massive acute injury to a previously healthy liver associated with development of hepatic encephalopathy. The same clinical syndromeoccurring in patientswith pre-existing ‘‘clinically silent’’ chronic liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or Wilson’s disease is, somewhat imprecisely, often also referred to as ALF. Depending on the time elapsed between appearance of jaundice and development of encephalopathy, ALF is often subdivided in hyperacute (0–7 days), acute (8–28 days) and subacute (29–84 days) forms [1]. With an estimated annual incidence of 2000 cases in the US [2], ALF is a relatively rare condition, but carries a short-term (3 week) mortality in excess of 40% [3]. If the patient survived, however, the liver typically recovers fully, both structurally and functionally (except in the AIH and Wilson’s cases). Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the only therapy to date able to substantially alter the survival outcome in patients with ALF. In a recent prospective study, short-term survival of patients listed for OLT was 84% if transplantation was possible in a timely fashion (median within 3.5 days of listing), but only 35% if not [3]. Transplantable livers are a scarce resource and OLT, while potentially life saving, carries relevant long-termmorbidity and mortality. Appropriate selection of patients for OLT therefore requires tools allowing to accurately prognosticate spontaneous recovery (i.e.: without OLT) early-on during the course of ALF, when results of liver transplantation are best. Conceptually, prognosis in ALF depends on the net sum in time of processes leading to hepatocellular damage and those attempting repair [4]. In addition, development of complications, in particular increased intracranial pressure and multiorgan failure (often due to sepsis), affects outcome, cerebral herniation and sepsis remaining themost frequent causes of death inALF [5]. Thus, an ideal prognostic test should capture all these features with parameters readily available early during hospital admission and have a high predictive accuracy for death and survival without OLT. Unfortunately, even the best sets of prognostic criteria available today, the King’s College [6] and the Clichy criteria [7,8], fall short of this ideal.

The present document presents the proceedings of the consensus development conference on the management of viral hepatitis held in January 2007 under the auspices of the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver and the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada. Several new agents have become available since the last such document was published in 2004, and new information has become available to help assess risk of adverse outcomes and who should be treated. In addition, the participants at the meeting identified a number of structural barriers that exist uniquely in Canada and that prevent physicians from properly managing their patients. The conference discussed the selection of patients for treatment and the drugs that can be used to treat these patients, as well as the treatment of hepatitis B in special populations. The present document should be read in conjunction with the companion document on the management of chronic hepatitis C.

Since the last consensus conference on the management of chronic viral hepatitis, a number of studies looking at modifications of the standard course of treatment have been published. These changes have been sufficiently substantive to warrant review to determine whether any changes in the recommended treatment algorithms are needed. A consensus development conference was held in January 2007, and the present document highlights the results of the presentations and discussion about these issues. It reviews the epidemiology of hepatitis C in Canada, treatment of acute hepatitis C and new algorithms in chronic hepatitis C, including retreatment of previous treatment failures. In addition, sections on management of hepatitis C in special populations have been updated. There is also a section on the use of hematopoietic growth factors to help manage patients on therapy. The document should be read in conjunction with the previous document to identify changes. Some recommendations made in the previous document remain and are not discussed here.

The selection of liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies mostly on tumor size and number. Instead of relying on these factors, we used poor tumor differentiation and cancer-related symptoms to exclude patients likely to have advanced HCC with aggressive biology. We initially reported similar 5-year survival for patients whose tumors exceeded (M+ group) and were within (M group) the Milan criteria. Herein, we validate our original data with a new prospective cohort and report the long-term follow-up (10-years) using an intention-to-treat analysis. The previously published study (cohort 1) included 362 listed (294 transplanted) patients from January 1996 to August 2008. The validation cohort (cohort 2) includes 243 listed (105 M+ group, 76 beyond University of California San Francisco criteria; 210 transplanted) patients from September 2008 to December 2012. Median follow-up from listing was 59.7 (26.8-103) months. For the validation cohort 2, the actuarial survival from transplant for the M+ group was similar to that of the M group at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years: 94%, 76%, and 69% versus 95%, 82%, and 78% (P = 0.3). For the combined cohorts 1 and 2, there were no significant differences in the 10-year actuarial survival from transplant between groups. On an intention-to-treat basis, the dropout rate was higher in the M+ group and the 5-year and 10-year survival rates from listing were decreased in the M+ group. An alpha-fetoprotein level >500 ng/mL predicted poorer outcomes for both the M and M+ groups. Conclusion Tumor differentiation and cancer-related symptoms of HCC can be used to select patients with advanced HCC who are appropriate candidates for liver transplantation; alpha-fetoprotein level limitations should be incorporated in the listing criteria for patients within or beyond the Milan criteria. (Hepatology 2016;64:2077-2088).

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment modality for end stage liver disease caused by many etiologies including autoimmune processes. That said, the need for transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but not for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), has decreased over the years due to the availability of effective medical treatment. Autoimmune liver diseases have superior transplant outcomes than those of other etiologies. While AIH and PBC can recur after LT, recurrence is of limited clinical significance in most, but not all cases. Recurrent PSC, however, often progresses over years to a stage requiring re-transplantation. The exact incidence and the predisposing factors of disease recurrence remain debated. Better understanding of the pathogenesis and the risk factors of recurrent autoimmune liver diseases is required to develop preventive measures. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of incidence, diagnosis, risk factors, clinical course, and treatment of recurrent autoimmune liver disease (AIH, PBC, PSC) following LT.

Liver transplantation (LT) is a successful and well-established therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). The reported 1-year survival after LT exceeds 80% for all patient populations.1 However, the number of patients on LT waiting lists exceeds by far the number of available grafts. In most regions, around 20% to 30% of patients will die on the LT waiting list. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel strategies to increase the donor pool, especially for critically ill patients that urgently require a LT. Live donor LT (LDLT) is an attractive option to overcome this problem.2,3 Live donor LT may provide a faster access to transplantation, shortening LT waiting times and thus, improving overall survival. However, LT outcome in critically ill patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management, intubation with mechanical ventilation, and often multiorgan failure is controversial.4,5 The increased risk of postoperative mortality of these critically ill patients and the ethical concerns of an urgent donor work-up makes it unclear if LDLT is an appropriate alternative for this patient population. Moreover, many centers are reluctant to even offer LDLT to patients who are hospitalized in the ICU and require mechanical ventilation support.6,7 It has been suggested that patients with decompensated liver disease and high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores should not be considered as candidates for LDLT.8,9 These reports indicate that the risk taken by the live donors exceeds the benefits achieved by the recipients. However, the lack of data in this field limits transplant physicians, our patients, and their potential live donors to make an informed decision about LDLT as an option for critically ill patients. To the best of our knowledge, evidence supporting the use of LDLT to treat decompensated liver disease in patients under mechanical ventilation support and ICU care at the time of transplant is scarce. Herein, we report a single-center experience of LDLT for the treatment of decompensated liver disease in adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation and ICU care at the time of transplant. The outcome of LDLT in critically ill patients was compared to the outcome of patients receiving deceased donor LT (DDLT) under the same circumstances. In this study, we were able to prove that LDLT offers a faster access to transplantation for critically ill patients.

Approximately 400 liver transplants are performed in Canada every year and close to 6000 per year in the United States. Forty per cent to 45% of all liver transplants are performed for patients with underlying hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. These patients have a different natural history, new complication risks and different treatment efficacy than nontransplant HCV patients. Every effort must be made to identify those patients at highest risk for progressive liver disease post-transplant. Recurrent HCV is an Achilles’ heel to transplant hepatology. The true natural history of this disease is only starting to unravel and many questions remain unanswered on the optimal management of these patients after liver transplantation. The present report summarizes the literature and ongoing research needs that are specific to HCV-related liver transplantation.

Background/Aims In chronic hepatitis C, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of amantadine (AMA) and interferon (INF) compared to INF monotherapy, have produced conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis of the individual patient's data from previous studies. Methods Nine hundred and seventy-two patients from six European centres were evaluated by means of individual patient meta-analysis, using mixed models with centres and the centre–treatment interaction fitted as random variables. Results At the end of therapy, virological responses were 38.5% (95% CI 34.1–42.8) after INF and AMA, and 29.5% (95% CI 25.5–33.6) after INF alone (P=0.003). Sustained response occurred in 111 (23.1%; 95% CI 19.3–20.2) and 85 patients (17.3%; 95% CI 14.0–20.7), respectively (P=0.03). Even accounting for the centre effect, therapy with AMA and INF was more effective than IFN alone (P=0.029). When genotypes and viraemia levels were combined, the response rate after combination therapy doubled that observed with IFN alone in all subgroups, except those with low viraemia and genotypes 2 or 3. Conclusions In chronic hepatitis C, therapy with AMA and INF is effective and may be an alternative to INF and ribavirin in patients who cannot tolerate ribavirin.