1. Cross-sectional comparison of spiral versus block integrated curriculums in preparing medical students to diagnose and manage concussions
- Author
-
Sarah K Fraser, Jonathan D. Smirl, Alexander D Wright, and Paul van Donkelaar
- Subjects
Medical education ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,Students, Medical ,020205 medical informatics ,Second-impact syndrome ,Teaching Materials ,education ,Concussion ,lcsh:Medicine ,02 engineering and technology ,Integrated curriculum ,Education ,Education, Distance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Spiral curriculum ,Statistical significance ,Block (telecommunications) ,Integrated ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Curriculum ,Spiral ,Schools, Medical ,lcsh:LC8-6691 ,lcsh:Special aspects of education ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,Neurological exam ,General Medicine ,Curriculum design ,medicine.disease ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Physical therapy ,Dementia ,Clinical Competence ,business ,Research Article ,Computer-Assisted Instruction ,Education, Medical, Undergraduate ,Program Evaluation - Abstract
Background: An integrated curriculum is designed to be repetitive yet progressive and the concept has rapidly established itself within medical education. National organizations have recommended a shift to a spiral curriculum design, which uses both vertical and horizontal integration. This study examined differences between the recently implemented integrated spiral (class of 2019) and conventional block (classes of 2016–2018) MD curricula at the University of British Columbia (UBC) with respect to knowledge of concussion. Methods: Cross-sectional online survey (FluidSurveys: Fluidware, Ottawa, ON), distributed via email to UBC medical students during the 2015–2016 academic year. Questions focused on demographic data, knowledge of concussion definition, and management considerations. Differences in responses across the two groups were assessed using chi-square tests. Ordinal Likert-scale data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-Tests. Statistical significance was determined a priori at p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF