301. Frequency of Renal Monitoring - Creatinine and Cystatin C (FORM-2C): an observational cohort study of patients with reduced eGFR in primary care
- Author
-
Richard Stevens, FD Richard Hobbs, Clare Bankhead, Christopher A. O’Callaghan, Jan Y Verbakel, Tim James, Brian Shine, Rafael Perera-Salazar, Susannah Fleming, Kathryn Mary Taylor, and Louise Jones
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,estimated glomerular filtration rate ,Urology ,Renal function ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Primary care ,urologic and male genital diseases ,Kidney ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,primary care ,0302 clinical medicine ,Chronic kidney disease ,cystatin C ,eGFR ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,glomerular filtration rate ,Creatinine ,biology ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Research ,creatinine ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,female genital diseases and pregnancy complications ,chronic kidney diseases ,primary health care ,Cystatin C ,chemistry ,biology.protein ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Family Practice ,business ,Kidney disease ,Cohort study ,Glomerular Filtration Rate - Abstract
BackgroundMonitoring is the mainstay of chronic kidney disease management in primary care; however, there is little evidence about the best way to do this.AimTo compare the effectiveness of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from serum creatinine and serum cystatin C to predict renal function decline among those with a recent eGFR of 30–89 ml/min/1.73 m2.Design and settingObservational cohort study in UK primary care.MethodSerum creatinine and serum cystatin C were both measured at seven study visits over 2 years in 750 patients aged ≥18 years with an eGFR of 30–89 ml/min/1.73 m2 within the previous year. The primary outcome was change in eGFR derived from serum creatinine or serum cystatin C between 6 and 24 months.ResultsAverage change in eGFR was 0.51 ml/min/1.73 m2/year when estimated by serum creatinine and −2.35 ml/min/1.73 m2/year when estimated by serum cystatin C. The c-statistic for predicting renal decline using serum creatininederived eGFR was 0.495 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.471 to 0.519). The equivalent c-statistic using serum cystatin C-derived eGFR was 0.497 (95% CI = 0.468 to 0.525). Similar results were obtained when restricting analyses to those aged ≥75 or 2. In those with eGFR 2, serum cystatin C-derived eGFR was more predictive than serum creatinine-derived eGFR for future decline in kidney function.ConclusionIn the primary analysis neither eGFR estimated from serum creatinine nor from serum cystatin C predicted future change in kidney function, partly due to small changes during 2 years. In some secondary analyses there was a suggestion that serum cystatin C was a more useful biomarker to estimate eGFR, especially in those with a baseline eGFR 2.
- Published
- 2020