Search

Traditional ureteral access sheaths rely on tapered dilators and the Dotter principle of axial force to gain access into the ureter. We compared the performance of a novel balloon expandable ureteral access sheath using radial dilatation with that of a conventional ureteral access sheath.Ten farm pigs underwent randomized placement of the novel sheath in 1 ureter and a conventional ureteral access sheath in the contralateral ureter followed by videotaped ureteroscopy. Acute study end points included maximum and mean force of sheath insertion and removal, saline flow rate and subjective urothelial damage following sheath insertion/inflation. Additionally, blinded reviewers rated urothelial damage on digitally recorded video following sheath removal. Chronic data included gross and histological ureteral analysis at 30 days.The novel ureteral access sheath inserted with less maximum force (0.36 vs 1.48 pounds, p0.001) and less average force (0.11 vs 0.49 pounds, p = 0.001). The flow rate during 5 minutes was higher in the new sheath (90.0 vs 80.6 cc per minute, p0.05). Withdrawal forces were not statistically different between the sheaths. The novel sheath also had a lower subjective trauma scale rating (4.2 vs 6.1, p0.05). Eight blinded reviewers determined that the novel ureteral access sheath resulted in less total urothelial tear length (1.3 vs 2.7 cm, p = 0.03) and less visible ureteral damage in all animals except 1 (p = 0.04).The novel balloon expandable ureteral access sheath had easier insertion and a better flow rate, and caused less urothelial trauma in this porcine model. This ureteral access sheath offers a promising new option for ureteral access. A randomized clinical trial is in progress to assess the benefits of this new ureteral access sheath.

We compared laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty to identify factors associated with procedural efficacy.We conducted a retrospective multicenter trial incorporating 865 cases from 15 centers. We collected perioperative data including anatomical and procedural factors. Failure was defined subjectively as pain that was unchanged or worse per medical records after surgery. Radiographic failure was defined as unchanged or worsening drainage on renal scans or worsening hydronephrosis on computerized tomography. Bivariate analyses were performed on all outcomes and multivariate analysis was used to assess factors associated with decreased freedom from secondary procedures.Of the cases 759 (274 laparoscopic pyeloplasties with a mean followup of 15 months and 465 robotic pyeloplasties with a mean followup of 11 months, p0.001) had sufficient data. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, previous endopyelotomy and intraoperative crossing vessels were associated with decreased freedom from secondary procedures on bivariate analysis, with a 2-year freedom from secondary procedures of 87% for laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs 95% for robotic pyeloplasty, 81% vs 93% for patients with vs without previous endopyelotomy and 88% vs 95% for patients with vs without intraoperative crossing vessels, respectively. However, on multivariate analysis only previous endopyelotomy (HR 4.35) and intraoperative crossing vessels (HR 2.73) significantly impacted freedom from secondary procedures.Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty are highly effective in treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction. There was no difference in their abilities to render the patient free from secondary procedures on multivariate analysis. Previous endopyelotomy and intraoperative crossing vessels reduced freedom from secondary procedures.

Aim: Natural orifice approaches for nephrectomy have included access via the stomach, vagina, bladder, and rectum. The use of the ureter as a natural orifice for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy has not previously been reported. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of transureteral laparoscopic NOTES nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: Three female farm pigs (29.2–30.8 kg) were placed into the lithotomy position. A cystoscopically placed extra-stiff guide wire was used to place a prototype dilating sheath into the left ureter. After dilation of the ureter and urethra, the sheath was exchanged for a 12-mm bariatric laparoscopic trocar. A 10.5-inch-long, 10-mm offset operating laparoscope with an internal 5-mm working port was utilized for the nephrectomy. One 2-mm and one 2/3-mm port were placed transabdominally to facilitate in situ morcellation. The kidney was cut into slices using the bipolar device and extracted via the ureteral port using the ho...

Objectives: To address the significant shortage of kidneys available for transplant, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been employed to further decrease the morbidity of kidney donation. To circumvent the complexity of LESS, we have developed a bridging hand-assisted LESS (BLESS) technique that allows the surgeon to gain experience with single-incision surgical techniques in the setting of traditional hand-assisted laparoscopy. Methods: A retrospective study of three patients undergoing BLESS donor nephrectomy was performed. Similar to LESS, this bridging technique employs a single periumbilical incision, but enlargement of the incision by a few centimeters facilitates immediate transition to hand-assisted laparoscopy if needed. Statistics on preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables was collected for the patients undergoing this procedure. Results: BLESS patients had a mean age of 31. Average postoperative hospital stay was short at 1.34 days, with two of the three p...

Natural orifice approaches for nephrectomy have included access via the stomach, vagina, bladder, and rectum. The use of the ureter as a natural orifice for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy has not been previously reported. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of transureteral laparoscopic NOTES nephrectomy.Three female farm pigs (29.2-30.8 kg) were placed into the lithotomy position. A cystoscopically placed extra-stiff guidewire was used to place a prototype dilating sheath into the left ureter. After dilation of the ureter and urethra, the sheath was exchanged for a 12-mm bariatric laparoscopic trocar. A 10.5-inch long 10-mm offset operating laparoscope with an internal 5-mm working port was used for the nephrectomy. One 2-mm and one 2/3-mm port were placed transabdominally to facilitate in situ morcellation. The kidney was cut into slices using the bipolar device and extracted via the ureteral port using the housing of a 12-mm bariatric stapling device.All three transureteral nephrectomies were successfully completed. The total mean operative time was 220 minutes (range 113-346 min). Component portions of the procedure were: Ureteral access (mean 21 min), nephrectomy (mean 70 min), and kidney morcellation (mean 103 min). Mean estimated blood loss was 20 mL (range 5-50 mL). There were no intraoperative complications.This nonsurvival porcine feasibility study demonstrates the successful performance of transureteral nephrectomy. This approach shows promise as a way to decrease the invasiveness of NOTES nephrectomy by using the ureteral orifice as an access site.

Although radiation exposure from CT and plain film imaging has been characterized, the radiation received by patients during modern-era fluoroscopy has not been well described. The purposes of this study were to measure absolute organ and tissue-specific radiation doses during ureteroscopy and to determine the influence of body mass index (BMI) and sex on these doses.Eight cadavers underwent a simulated left ureteroscopy. Using a modern C-arm with automatic exposure control settings, thermoluminescent dosimeters were exposed for a fluoroscopy time of 145 seconds (mean time of clinical ureteroscopies from 2006 to 2008). Total tissue exposures were compared by BMI and between sexes using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test and the Mann-Whitney test with p0.05 considered significant.Among all cadavers, radiation doses were significantly lower in all contralateral organs excluding the gonad (p0.012). Doses were similar bilaterally in the gonad in cadavers with BMI30, and in all organs in cadavers with BMI30 (p0.05). There were significantly higher mean bilateral gonadal doses in female cadavers (3.4 mGy left and 1.9 mGy right) compared with male cadavers (0.36 mGy left and 0.39 mGy right). The highest cancer risk increase was seen at the posterior skin equivalent to 104 additional cancers per 100,000 patients.Contralateral doses were lower for all organs except the gonad when the BMI was30. In contrast, when the BMI was30, there was no difference in radiation dose delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral organs. Gonadal doses were significantly higher in female cadavers. Modern-era fluoroscopy remains a significant source of radiation exposure and steps should be taken to minimize exposure during ureteroscopy.

During laparoscopic surgery, scissors are used to cut a variety of tissue, including fibrotic or calcified tissue, sutures, and occasionally tissue containing staples. Disposable scissors may become dull and ineffective. The purpose of this study is to compare the durability and ergonomics of three different brands of laparoscopic scissors.Three different laparoscopic scissors (Applied Medical Direct Drive, Ethicon Endosurgery Endopath, U.S. Surgical Auto Suture Endo Shear) were used in this study. Six of each type were compared in a variety of objective and subjective tests. Subjective testing included two surgeons' ratings of the scissors' ability to cut fresh tissue and tissue with staples. Twenty blinded volunteers also rated the cutting ability and ergonomics of the scissors. Objective data included high-resolution digital photography and scanning electron microscopy of the scissor blades to quantify the number of imperfections after use.All three new scissors easily cut fresh tissue. The Direct Drive performed significantly better when cutting staples, when cutting tissues after cutting staples, and in the combined overall comparison. Volunteers rated the cutting ability and ergonomics of the Direct Drive more desirable than the other brands. Further, high-resolution digital photography and scanning electron microscopy demonstrated significantly less damage to the Direct Drive. Finally, a reusable handle on the Direct Drive scissor resulted in a 53% and 59% cost savings compared with the Endopath and Endo Shear, respectively.All three types of scissors cut fresh tissue easily. The Direct Drive was significantly more durable, had better ergonomics, and was less expensive compared with the other two brands.