1. Comparison of Speech Perception Abilities of Children using Bimodal Hearing with Children using Cochlear Implant Alone
- Author
-
Sharda Sarda, Gauri Belsare, Prakash Bhardwaj, and Sai Belsare
- Subjects
Hearing aid ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Speech perception ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,General Medicine ,Chronological age ,Monaural ,Audiology ,01 natural sciences ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Audiometry test ,Cochlear implant ,0103 physical sciences ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,sense organs ,Implant ,Audiometry ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,business ,010301 acoustics - Abstract
Introduction There are very few studies comparing speech perception abilities of children using bimodal hearing over monaural cochlear implant and factors related to benefit of bimodal hearing. The aim of this study is to compare speech perception abilities of children using bimodal fitting versus children using cochlear implant alone and explore factors related to benefit of bimodal hearing. Materials and Methods In the present study, 20 cochlear implantees with the hearing age range of 3 to 8 years were included. Speech perception performance was assessed by means of Parent’s Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children scale and early speech perception (ESP) test: Pattern Perception Words, Monosyllabic Words, Bisyllabic, and Trisyllabic Words Identification test. ESP test was carried out in two conditions cochlear implant with hearing aid in opposite ear (CIHA), bimodal, and cochlear implant (CI) alone. Aided audiometry was also carried out in above mentioned two conditions. Results and Discussion On aided audiometry test, aided thresholds were improved by 5 to 6 dB in CIHA condition as compared to CI alone condition in 14 out of 20 children. Whereas on speech perception test, there was a significant improvement of 15 to 20% on domains of ESP test in these children. Factors such as implant age, chronological age, and number of hours of hearing aid usage were not significantly associated with benefit. Nevertheless aided threshold at 4,000 Hz was found to be significantly associated with bimodal benefit. Conclusion Bimodal hearing is beneficial in most of the children than monaural hearing through cochlear implant.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF