Search

Increasingly, targeted therapies are being developed to treat malignancies. To define targets, determine mechanisms of response and resistance, and develop biomarkers for the successful investigation of novel therapeutics, high-quality tumor biospecimens are critical. We have developed standard operating procedures (SOPs) to acquire and process serial blood and tumor biopsies from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma enrolled in multicenter clinical trials. These SOPs allow for collection and processing of materials suitable for multiple downstream applications, including immunohistochemistry, cDNA microarrays, exome sequencing, and metabolomics. By standardizing these methods, we control preanalytic variables that ensure high reproducibility of results and facilitate the integration of datasets from such trials. This will facilitate translational research, better treatment selection, and more rapid and efficient development of new drugs. See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, “Biomarkers, Biospecimens, and New Technologies in Molecular Epidemiology.” Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(12); 2688–93. ©2014 AACR.

Great advances in analytical technology coupled with accelerated new drug development and growing understanding of biological challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity, have required a change in the focus for biobanking. Most current banks contain samples of primary tumors, but linking molecular signatures to therapeutic questions requires serial biopsies in the setting of metastatic disease, next-generation of biobanking. Furthermore, an integration of multidimensional analysis of various molecular components, that is, RNA, DNA, methylome, microRNAome and post-translational modifications of the proteome, is necessary for a comprehensive view of a tumor's biology. While data using such biopsies are now regularly presented, the preanalytical variables in tissue procurement and processing in multicenter studies are seldom detailed and therefore are difficult to duplicate or standardize across sites and across studies. In the context of a biopsy-driven clinical trial, we generated a detailed protocol that includes morphological evaluation and isolation of high-quality nucleic acids from small needle core biopsies obtained from liver metastases. The protocol supports stable shipping of samples to a central laboratory, where biopsies are subsequently embedded in support media. Designated pathologists must evaluate all biopsies for tumor content and macrodissection can be performed if necessary to meet our criteria of >60% neoplastic cells and

Purpose Assess glomerular yield and safety profile of two different types of needles for percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy. Materials and Methods Over 24 months, 121 ultrasonographic ultrasound-guided renal biopsies were performed on native kidneys of 121 adults: 66 with 16-gauge, 29-mm end-cut (BioPince) needles and 55 with 14-gauge, 1.9-mm side-notch (Tru-Cut) needles. Results The mean number of complete glomeruli harvested per biopsy was 21.0 and 19.3, respectively, and the mean number of core samples required to obtain a satisfactory biopsy was 1.8 and 2.6, respectively. The ratio of glomeruli harvested to core samples needed with the end-cut needle was 58% greater than that with the side-notch needles (11.7 vs 7.4, respectively; difference of 4.3; 95% confidence interval: 2.0, 6.8). Procedures performed with end-cut needles were associated with fewer major complications (1.5% vs 7.3% with side-notch needles). Conclusions Compared to the 14-g Tru-cut needle, the 16-g end-cut needle provided better glomerular yield per core sample, required fewer cores for satisfactory tissue specimen, and resulted in fewer major complications.

Therapeutic resistance remains a major obstacle in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and biomarkers to guide treatment are essential to improving survival and quality of life in mCRC patients. A biopsy-driven prospective study was designed to identify biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to a standard first-line therapy in patients with mCRC which could be useful in guiding treatment selection (QCROC-01; NCT00984048). We also hoped to recognize molecular changes over time, or resulting from the selection pressure of treatment, which could have implications for subsequent therapy. This study is ongoing and approved at thirteen sites with one-hundred patients enrolled so far. Patients with mCRC receiving FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) with bevacizumab consented to three needle core tumour biopsies at pre-treatment and at the time of resistance. The rate of both patient and physician acceptance of biopsies has steadily risen with time and experience. Serial bloods were also collected for proteomic analysis and circulating tumor DNA. Twenty-five biopsy samples were profiled using exome sequencing (tumor and germ line), RNAseq, low pass genome sequencing and miRNA analysis. Differential gene expression analysis revealed signatures associated with clinical response and resistance when comparing tumours obtained pre- and post-treatment. We detect changes in variant allele fraction including both depletion and enrichment of individual somatic mutations over the course of treatment, the latter of which may indicate subclonal and acquired “driver” mutations that confer therapeutic resistance. A small number of genes show recurrent evidence for changes in clonal enrichment at the time of relapse across multiple patients. These could also represent therapeutic targets for subsequent therapy for these patients, and as such, represent new treatment opportunities. Our findings provide insights into tumor evolution during first-line chemotherapy of mCRC that may hold clues to optimize current first-line therapeutic decision making and identifies potential target pathways for second-line stratification of patients. This study is part of the Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consortium which is a multi-site collaboration funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute and le fonds de recherche du québec - santé. Citation Format: Suzan McNamara, Ryan Morin, Mathilde Couëtoux du Tertre, Rosemary McCloskey, Rebecca Johnston, Daniel Fornika, Benoit Samson, Bernard Lespérance, Thierry Alcindor, Yoo-Joung Ko, Richard Dalfen, Eve St-Hilaire, Lucas Sideris, Felix Couture, Hans Prenen, Sabine Tejpar, Ronald Burkes, André Constantin, Errol Camlioglu, Adriana Aguilar, Adrian Gologan, Benoit Têtu, Celia M. Greenwood, Cyrla Hoffert, Samia Qureshi, Zuanel Diaz, Maud Marques, Micheal Witcher, Thérèse Gagnon-Kugler, Petr Kavan, Gerald Batist. Molecular profiling of sequential biopsies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer identifies genomic alterations that evolve during first-line therapy and could have therapeutic implications: A prospective study to identify molecular mechanisms of clinical resistance (QCROC-01: NCT00984048). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3888. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3888

Proceedings: AACR 103rd Annual Meeting 2012‐‐ Mar 31‐Apr 4, 2012; Chicago, IL Introduction: The biomarker discovery process requires patient tissue samples from which histology is verified and high-quality genomic material is isolated. Several methods have been developed to either preserve tissue morphology or extract sufficient quality and quantity of RNA and DNA for downstream discovery efforts. As clinical trials incorporate patient biopsies for biomarker discovery or validation, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure quality material and identify methods that allow for preservation of morphology and stabilization of molecular content concurrently. We assessed, in liver needle-core biopsies, different sampling, fixation, and genomic isolation methods to maintain morphology and obtain high-quality genomic material for a multi-center prospective study to identify biomarkers of clinical resistance to first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Four sampling methods (snap freezing, RNAlater, frozen RNAlater, formalin), two different fixation protocols for histological studies (10% formalin, RNAlater followed by OCT embedding and freezing) and two RNA isolation procedures (Triazol and AllprepDNA/RNA isolation) were evaluated. Results: Keeping in mind site feasibility, we report that the ideal condition to both preserve morphology and obtain high-quality genomic material of patient liver biopsy samples is to collect biopsies in RNAlater for shipping to a Central Pathology core, followed by washing with cold PBS (on dry ice) to permit proper RNA preservation during OCT embedding and cryostat sectioning for histological verification. Simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from the same biopsy core yields nucleic acids of optimal concentration and quality for downstream genomic applications. Conclusion: The collection of biospecimens using pre-determined protocol-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) is essential to control for pre-analytical variability inherent to multicenter trials. Furthermore, histological control of percent tumor cells in each biopsy is absolutely necessary to ensure optimal representation of tumor (>70%) in the specimen. The above conditions were used in the multicenter Q-CROC-01 study ([NCT00984048][1]), where three needle core biopsies are collected from liver metastases of patients with colorectal cancer. One biopsy is collected in formalin and is set aside for downstream immunohistochemistry experiments. Two biopsies are collected in RNAlater and verified for histology. If they pass quality control, both DNA and RNA are isolated concurrently and sent to discovery platforms (DNA: array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), methylation profiles, RNA: gene expression profiles, RT-PCR, microRNA profiles, alternative splicing profiles). Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3389. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3389 [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00984048&atom=%2Fcanres%2F72%2F8_Supplement%2F3389.atom