Search

Background Task shifting is an approach to help address the shortage of healthcare workers through reallocating human resources but its impact on primary care is unclear. Objectives To provide an overview of reviews describing task shifts from physicians to allied healthcare workers in primary care and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods Six electronic databases were searched up to 15 December 2020, to identify reviews describing task shifting in primary care. Two reviewers independently screened the references for relevant studies, extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR-2. Results Twenty-one reviews that described task shifting in primary care were included. Task shifted include provision of care for people with chronic conditions, medication prescribing, and health education. We found that task shifting could potentially improve several health outcomes such as blood pressure, HbA1c, and mental health while achieving cost savings. Key elements for successful implementation of task shifting include collaboration among all parties, a system for coordinated care, provider empowerment, patient preference, shared decision making, training and competency, supportive organisation system, clear process outcome, and financing. Conclusion Evidence suggests that allied healthcare workers such as pharmacists and nurses can potentially undertake substantially expanded roles to support physicians in primary care in response to the changing health service demand. Tasks include providing care to patients, independent prescribing, counselling and education, with comparable quality of care.

Objective This study aimed to elucidate the experiences of public health nurses (PHNs) in Japan during the first wave of COVID-19. Design and sample Twelve PHNs in charge of responding to COVID-19 in X-city within Tokyo metropolis in Japan participated in this case study. Measurements Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires and semi-structured interviews on PHNs' experiences from January 2020 to May 2020. Results Initially, only infectious disease control division (IDCD) PHNs experienced confusion due to the rapidly increased workload. Managerial PHNs attempted to explain the need for a dispatch system for the IDCD, using available statistical data from other managerial members, within one's maximum understanding of this unprecedented situation. Without having a clear and forward-looking understanding regarding the purpose and reasons for dispatching, some dispatched PHNs had concerns and frustrations; they did not view the COVID-19 pandemic as a disaster. In the never-ending, exhausting work, PHNs managed to modify the provision of conventional services to residents. Conclusions Despite experiencing confusion, PHNs worked to continuously provide community services, re-considering the meaning of public health nursing. Prioritizing the work and shifting tasks to other professionals at an early stage of the pandemic may prevent organizational dysfunction.

Background Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor are high-volume procedures and represent a considerable workload on ophthalmology departments. Several departments have tried to meet this increase by shifting the task to nurses. To maintain high-quality patient care, we developed a training program for nurses that certifies them to administer injections. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate whether the nurses were confident and in control after participating in the training program and whether they were satisfied with the training and the new task. Methods Between 2014 and 2018, 12 registered nurses were trained in a tertiary hospital in central Norway. All the nurses were interviewed, either individually (n = 7) or in a group (n = 5). We analysed the interviews using Graneheim and Lundman’s qualitative content analysis. Results Eight subthemes were clustered within four main themes: 1) procedure and challenges, 2) motivation, 3) cooperation and confidence, and 4) evaluation. The nurses felt confident and in control when administering injections but experienced moments of insecurity. The new task gave the nurses a sense of achievement, and they highlighted improvement of patients’ lives as positive. A greater level of responsibility gave the nurses pride in their profession. They had suggestions that could improve training efficiency but were overall satisfied with the training program. Conclusions Our study showed that the nurses were satisfied with the training and that learning a new task led to higher self-esteem and increased respect from patients and colleagues. Suggestions to improve the training were identified; these should be considered before implementation by other departments.

Purpose: To determine safety, feasibility and patient satisfaction of an epilepsy nurse-based treatment course with frequent contacts and changes of anti-epileptic treatment provided by supervised anti-epileptic drug (AED) prescribing epilepsy nurses. Methods: Regular prescheduled clinical contacts with a neurologist to adjust AED treatment were largely substituted by on-demand contacts with epilepsy nurses with the delegated right to adapt AED within predefined limits. To secure safety, electronic medical files of patients with 6 or more contacts with epilepsy nurses were retrospectively analysed for clinical characteristics, safety measures and seizure frequency before/after the intensive treatment course and patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about treatment satisfaction. Results: Between January 1 st 2016 and 31 st December 2018, 2721 patients were treated by epilepsy nurses (2561 ambulatory controls, 8690 phone contacts). 617 patients received an intensive treatment course (six or more contacts in the observation period, range: 6–65) with an average length of 24.3 months. The average number of AED tried was 3.4. In patients with ongoing seizures (n = 310), 165 (53.2 %) reported an improvement of seizure frequency by 50 % or more. Seizure frequency fell from 4.4 to 2.4 days with seizures/months (p < 0.001). The epilepsy-related hospitalization rate was 0.86/patient; 27 episodes with status epilepticus occurred in 21 patients, three hospitalizations were due to severe side effects. There were no fatal complications. No hospitalization was related to the intensive treatment course by prescribing epilepsy nurses. The overall patients’ satisfaction was high. Conclusion: Intensive epilepsy treatment facilitated by epilepsy nurses was safe and associated with high patient accept and improvement of seizure frequency.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a growing worldwide public health concern. Previously, Japan experienced poorer outcomes among OHCA patients than in other high-income countries. In the early 1990s, through policy changes, the Japanese government introduced a task-shift model in pre-hospital care. Some medical practices previously provided by physicians exclusively were delegated to non-physicians, including laypeople. Additionally, we initiated a nationwide data collection system for evaluation. We started a nationwide registry of OHCA patients, a paramedic system to provide advanced life-support care, and basic life-support training for laypeople. In the 2000s, the procedures paramedics could provide were expanded, laypeople were allowed to use automated external defibrillators, and the Utstein style was introduced to the national registry. Consequently, pre-hospital advanced care and bystander first-aid increased, registry-based research contributed to evidence-based practices, and-most importantly-outcomes of OHCA patients considerably improved. These Japanese experiences demonstrate that streamlining pre-hospital care, including bystander interventions and standardized data collection, can improve OHCA patient outcomes. Despite this progress, however, there still exist many issues to be addressed in response to the changing and increasing care demands within Japan's aging population.