Search

Background and objective Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to RhD-negative women is most often administered in gestational age (GA) 28-30 weeks with the next anti-D dose administered postpartum. The aim of this study was to analyse the proportion of RhD-negative women where RAADP is not detectable at term and in a pilot study to investigate whether RAADP administered in GA 28 and 38 results in detectable levels at term, post-term and post-delivery. Materials and methods In a retrospective analysis, 4280 RhD-negative women carrying an RHD positive fetus were included and the proportion with a negative antibody screen at delivery was determined. In the second part, 39 pregnancies were included prospectively, a second dose of RAADP was administered in GA 38 weeks, and anti-D was quantified before the second dose and then weekly for 5 weeks. Results In the retrospective analysis, 20·5% (856/4280) with RAADP administered in GA 28 were negative in routine antibody screening at delivery. In the small prospective study, 18% (7/39) had a negative antibody screen and 26% (10/39) had levels below 0·005 IU/ml, in the quantification assay, in GA 38. Anti-D prophylaxis administered in GA 38 showed detectable levels of anti-D up to 30 days post-delivery, with concentration at delivery 0·060 ± 0·034 IU/ml (mean ± SD). Conclusion Approximately 20% of the RhD-negative women show non-detectable levels of anti-D at term. A second dose of RAADP at GA 38 results in stable concentrations of anti-D at term, post-term and post-delivery, but with large interindividual variation.

Objective Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of neurodegeneration [neurofilament light chain (NFL), total Tau (T-Tau)], tau pathology [phosphorylated tau (p-Tau)], glial cell damage or activation [glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)], and brain amyloidosis [β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42)] are useful for diagnosis and prognosis in several neurodegenerative disorders. In this paper we investigate these markers and their relationship to key clinical milestones in patients with advanced Parkinson´s disease (PD) operated at our center with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for at least 15 years ago. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of available cerebrospinal fluid and clinical data in PD-patients, 15 years or more after they underwent STN-DBS surgery. All PD-patients implanted with STN-DBS at Sahlgrenska University Hospital before January 1, 2001, were regularly assessed until January 10, 2018, or until death, or until lost to follow-up. Results Twenty three PD patients were operated with STN-DBS. Sixteen of these (six females and ten males) underwent at least one lumbar puncture (LP) immediately prior to or after STN-DBS. Their age at the latest available LP was 64 (55–75) years [median (range)], PD duration 20 (11–33) years, and Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage 3 (2–4). Time between DBS operation and the last LP was 4.5 (0.3–10.8) years. Time from the last LP to the last follow up was 6 (0.1–18) years, and for the entire cohort 115 person-years. On January 10, 2018, four PD-patients (25%) were still alive. All preoperative CSF marker levels were normal. Between two days and six months after DBS, NFL and GFAP levels increased sharply but they normalized thereafter in most patients, and were normal up to almost 11 years after neurosurgery. Over time, all patients deteriorated slowly. At the last follow up, H&Y was 5 (3–5) and 12/16 were demented. There was no significant correlation between postoperative (> 6 months) CSF NFL, GFAP, T-Tau, p-Tau, β-amyloid levels and the presence of dementia, psychosis, inability to walk or need for nursing home at the time for LP, nor for presence of dementia at the last follow up or for death as of January 10, 2018. Conclusion CSF protein biomarkers remain normal despite long PD duration, severe disability, and chronic STN-DBS. They cannot be used for PD staging or prognostication but may indicate brain damage caused by other pathological factors.

Objective We present a pharmacokinetic study evaluating a single intramuscular dose of 250 μg anti-D immunoglobulin in the third trimester of pregnancy. The aim of the study was to determine the kinetic profile and duration of detectable levels of anti-D. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Antenatal outpatient clinic. Population Healthy Rhesus D (RhD)-negative pregnant women with an RHD-positive fetus. Methods Serial plasma anti-D quantitations following antenatal administration of anti-D immunoglobulin were performed using flow cytometry. Kinetic profiles for anti-D levels were generated from the concentration values at predetermined sampling time points. The half-lives were calculated by linear regression analysis. Main outcome measures. Time vs. concentration profile, half-life and anti-D concentration ≥1 ng/mL close to term. Results The maximal plasma concentration of anti-D was usually seen at 3-10 days postinjection, with a median value of 25 ng/mL. The half-life varied between individuals, with a median of 23 days. We found detectable levels of anti-D IgG within two weeks of parturition in 11 of 12 women. Conclusions The preparation of anti-D immunoglobulin used in the present study, if administrated in pregnancy week 28-30, is associated with detectable levels of anti-D in most women at the time of delivery. Although the half-time is 23 days, it is uncertain whether all mothers have adequate anti-D concentrations at term. Alternative strategies may be evaluated in the future, with repeated administration of antenatal prophylaxis at term rather than conventional postpartum administration of anti-D.

Objective To estimate the incidence of RhD immunisation after implementation of first trimester non-invasive fetal RHD screening to select only RhD negative women carrying RHD positive fetuses for routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP). Materials and Methods We present a population-based prospective observational cohort study with historic controls including all maternity care centres and delivery hospitals in the Stockholm region, Sweden. All RhD negative pregnant women were screened for fetal RHD genotype in the first trimester of pregnancy. Anti-D immunoglobulin (250–300 µg) was administered intramuscularly in gestational week 28–30 to participants with RHD positive fetuses. Main outcome measure was the incidence of RhD immunisation developing during or after pregnancy. Results During the study period 9380 RhD negative women gave birth in Stockholm. Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma was performed in 8374 pregnancies of which 5104 (61%) were RHD positive and 3270 (39%) RHD negative. In 4590 pregnancies with an RHD positive test the women received antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The incidence of RhD immunisation in the study cohort was 0.26 percent (24/9380) (95% CI 0.15–0.36%) compared to 0.46 percent (86/18546) (95% CI 0.37 to 0.56%) in the reference cohort. The risk ratio (RR) for sensitisation was 0.55 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.87) and the risk reduction was statistically significant (p = 0.009). The absolute risk difference was 0.20 percent, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 500. Conclusions Using first trimester non-invasive antenatal screening for fetal RHD to target routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis selectively to RhD negative women with RHD positive fetuses significantly reduces the incidence of new RhD immunisation. The risk reduction is comparable to that reported in studies evaluating the outcome of non selective RAADP to all RhD negative women. The cost-effectiveness of this targeted approach remains to be studied.

In a crossover study we compared the single dose effect of 200mg levodopa (plus decarboxylase inhibitor) in the form of Madopar with that of Madopar Dispersible on the motor performance of eight patients with Parkinson's disease, after 12h without their ordinary anti-parkinsonian medication and food intake. Objective recording of their performance was done with an opto-electronic camera and automatic computerised treatment of the movement data and with scoring according to the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. We conclude that Madopar Dispersible has a much faster and more constant onset of action than the standard preparation (25 vs 46min.). The effect duration and the effects on motor performance were otherwise the same.