Search

Background Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience relapses and sustained disability progression. Since 2004, the number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS has grown substantially. As a result, patients, healthcare providers, and insurers are increasingly interested in comparative efficacy and safety evaluations to distinguish between treatment options, but head-to-head studies between DMTs are limited. Objective The aim of the current study was to compare efficacy and safety outcomes with the DMTs ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to adjust for cross-trial differences in study design and population. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozanimod compared with DMF. Individual patient-level data (IPD) for ozanimod were obtained from the SUNBEAM and RADIANCE Part B trials, and aggregate-level patient data (APD) for DMF were obtained from CONFIRM and DEFINE. A MAIC is used to weight IPD to APD based on important baseline patient characteristics considered to be effect modifiers or prognostic factors in order to balance the covariate distribution to establish more homogenous trial populations. Once trial populations are determined to be sufficiently homogenous, outcomes of interest are estimated and used to generate treatment effects between the weighted IPD and APD. We used MAIC methodology to compare efficacy and safety outcomes of interest between ozanimod 1.0 mg once daily (OD) and DMF 240 mg twice daily (BID), including confirmed disability progression (CDP) at 3 and 6 months, annualized relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapsed, overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations due to AEs. Results After matching patient data, baseline patient characteristics were balanced between patients receiving ozanimod and those receiving DMF. Compared with DMF, ozanimod demonstrated significantly improved CDP at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.86), ARR (rate ratio [RR] 0.80; 95% CI 0.67–0.97), proportion of patients relapsed (odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% CI 0.52–0.83), overall AEs (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.08–0.16), SAEs (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.19–0.39), and discontinuations (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.07–0.17). CDP at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two agents (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.62–1.26). Conclusions After adjustment of baseline patient characteristics, the MAIC demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of ozanimod 1.0 mg OD was superior to that of DMF 240 mg BID. Although a MAIC is less likely to produce biased estimates than a naïve or a standard indirect treatment comparison via a common comparator, limitations include potential confounding due to unobserved and thus unaccounted for baseline differences., Plain Language Summary Ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are disease-modifying therapies used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation is important to key patients, healthcare providers, and health insurers; however, head-to-head studies between MS therapies are limited. In this analysis, we used an indirect treatment comparison method, specifically a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), to compare results of clinical trials of ozanimod and DMF. In this MAIC, findings suggested that ozanimod was associated with greater reductions of relapses, a lowered risk of disability progression at 3 months, and improved safety outcomes compared with DMF. Although MAICs were conducted while adjusting for important treatment-effect modifiers and/or prognostic factors, the possibility of confounding as a result of unobserved baseline differences remains. Such an issue can be resolved only by conducting a head-to-head treatment comparison in a randomized clinical trial.

Introduction To compare all-cause and endometriosis-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs by service categories (outpatient, inpatient, emergency room [ER], pharmacy) among patients with newly diagnosed endometriosis using opioids compared to patients with endometriosis not using opioids. Methods A retrospective analysis of IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for women aged 18–49 with newly diagnosed endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code 617.xx; ICD-10 code N80.xx) over 24 months follow-up. Patients were stratified on the basis of opioid use within 12 months post first endometriosis diagnosis date. Patients with opioid use were 1:1 matched to patients without opioid use using propensity score matching. Results A total of 85,329 female patients with a new endometriosis diagnosis were identified and 48,470 patients (24,235 opioid and 24,235 non-opioid users) remained after inclusion–exclusion criteria and matching. Opioid patients had an estimated mean 30.33 outpatient visits, 29.59 pharmacy fills, 0.28 inpatient visits, 0.65 ER visits, and total length of stay (LOS) was 1.01 days. Non-opioid patients had an estimated mean 27.94 outpatient visits, 22.06 pharmacy fills, 0.23 inpatient visits, 0.42 ER visits, and total LOS was 0.82 days. On average, opioid patients had significantly greater all-cause HCRU compared to non-opioid patients (all p

Purpose: To study the effect of dexmedetomidine on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MI/RI)- induced imbalance on oxidant-prooxidant status and apoptotic changes in rats. Methods: Ninety (90) male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups – sham, model and post-treatment. In model rats, the anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery was ligated for 25 min, prior to their being subjected to reperfusion for 2 h. Rats in the post-treatment group were subjected to ligation at the anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery for 25 min, but they were intravenously injected with dexmedetomidine at a dose of 10 μg/kg prior to reperfusion. There was no ligation in the sham group. Malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were assayed. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) levels were also evaluated. Apoptosis was measured with TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Results: Compared with the sham group, MDA level in the model group was significantly rose, while SOD and GSH-Px activities were markedly decreased (p < 0.05). Moreover, there were higher LDH and CK-MB activities in model rats than in the sham rats, but they were significantly lower in the posttreatment group than in the model group (p < 0.05). Apoptosis was higher in model rats than in sham operation rats, but was markedly decreased in post-treatment rats than in model rats (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Post-treatment with dexmedetomidine exerts myocardial protective effect via significant reduction in oxidative stress-induced myocardial injury and apoptosis. Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, Antioxidant status, Programmed cell death

Objectives:Evaluate all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and costs among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients with high-risk versus low-risk opioid use or patients with chronic versus non-chronic opioid use.Methods:A retrospective analysis of IBM MarketScan®Commercial Claims data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for females aged 18 to 49 with newly diagnosed endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition code: 617.xx; International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition code: N80.xx). Two sub-cohorts were identified: high-risk (⩾1 day with ⩾90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or ⩾1-day concomitant benzodiazepine use) or chronic opioid utilization (⩾90-day supply prescribed or ⩾10 opioid prescriptions). High-risk or chronic utilization was evaluated during the 12-month assessment period after the index date. Index date was the first opioid prescription within 12 months following endometriosis diagnosis. All outcomes were assessed over 12-month post-assessment period while adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.Results:Out of 61,019 patients identified, 18,239 had high-risk opioid use and 5001 chronic opioid use. Health care resource utilization drivers were outpatient visits and pharmacy fills, which were higher among high-risk versus low-risk patients (outpatient visits: 17.49 vs 15.51; pharmacy fills: 19.58 vs 16.88, p Conclusion:This analysis demonstrates significantly higher all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and total costs for high-risk opioid users compared to low-risk opioid users among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients over 1 year. Similar trends were observed for comparing chronic opioid users with non-chronic opioid users, except for endometriosis-related pharmacy fills and associated costs.

Background A growing number of immunomodulating disease-modifying therapies are available for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). In the absence of randomized head-to-head trials, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) can be used to adjust for cross-trial differences and evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of these agents. We used MAIC methodology to indirectly compare key outcomes with ozanimod (OZM) and teriflunomide (TERI) in the treatment of RMS. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted to identify clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of OZM vs TERI. Given the absence of head-to-head trials of OZM vs TERI, we used a matching-adjusted indirect comparison to adjust for potential treatment effect modifiers and prognostic factors while assessing confirmed disability progression (CDP), relapse, and safety outcomes. Individual patient data for OZM (SUNBEAM and RADIANCE Part B trials) and aggregate level data for TERI (ASCLEPIOS I/II, TOWER, OPTIMUM, and TEMSO trials) were used to evaluate the following outcomes: annualized relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapsed, CDP at 3 and 6 months, overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations due to AEs. Results After matching, baseline patient characteristics were balanced between OZM and TERI. Compared with TERI, OZM demonstrated significant improvements in ARR (rate ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62–0.84), proportion of patients relapsed (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44–0.70), overall AEs (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.29–0.43), SAEs (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37–0.77), and discontinuations due to AEs (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.09–0.21). OZM demonstrated statistically significant improvements in CDP at 3 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66–0.92) but nonsignificant differences at 6 months (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.60–1.01) compared with TERI. Conclusion In this indirect treatment comparison of patients with RMS, OZM appeared to have an improved benefit–risk profile over TERI.

e16252 Background: Treatment options remain limited for pts newly diagnosed with mPDAC. NCCN and ASCO guidelines both recommend treatment with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in the first line (1L) setting for pts with mPDAC and good performance status. Over 80% of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) studying treatments for mPDAC have failed to meet their primary endpoints. Recently published analyses have utilized real-world (RW) data to compare outcomes between pts enrolled in clinical trials and RW pts. This study sought to identify the eligible population of pts with mPDAC treated with FOLFIRINOX in the 1L setting who would meet RCT eligibility criteria for the phase 1/2 study (NCT02551991) evaluating NALIRIFOX for pts with previously untreated locally advanced or mPDAC, and to assess their survival outcomes. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized the Flatiron Health EHR database. Data were analyzed for adult pts diagnosed with mPDAC between January 2016 and February 2020 who initiated treatment with FOLFIRNOX in 1L within 90 days of their diagnosis for metastatic disease. Eligibility criteria from the phase 1/2 trial were applied to select a population of RW pts who may have been eligible to enter the RCT. Pts meeting the following criteria were included: good performance scores (ECOG 0-1), adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal function, were recovered from the effects of surgery, were untreated in the year prior to initiating 1L, and had no evidence of a different cancer in the last three years. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the median overall survival (mOS) from the start of 1L FOLFIRNOX treatment. Results: Of the 1,210 pts treated with 1L FOLFIRINOX, 652 pts (53.8%) met less stringent versions of the RCT eligibility criteria in which missing values were deemed to indicate normal function/performance; 244 pts (20.2%) met the more stringent criteria and had complete data. The most restrictive selection criteria were the requirements for adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal function and having received prior therapy. The median age at treatment initiation among the 244 pts was 64 years (IQR: 58 – 70). 153 pts were male (62.7%), 158 were White (64.8%), and ECOG scores of 0 and 1 were split among the cohort 50%/50%. The mOS observed for the 244 pts was 10.1 months (95% CI: 9.1 – 11.3). The reported mOS from the phase 1/2 trial of NALIRIFOX was 12.6 months (8.7 – 18.7). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that RW data may be used to select a comparator cohort for a clinical trial. Initial estimates suggest NALIRIFOX pts from the RCT experienced longer survival than those receiving 1L FOLFIRINOX in the RW setting. Further analysis is necessary to minimize the effects of confounding and the differences in data collection between the RW and the RCT settings.

In order to exploit the 430-cavity in the active sites of neuraminidases, 22 zanamivir analogs with C-1 and C-4 modification were synthesized, and their inhibitory activities against both group-1 (H5N1, H1N1) and group-2 neuraminidases (H3N2) were determined. Compound 9f exerts the most potency, with IC(50) value of 0.013, 0.001, and 0.09 μM against H3N2, H5N1, and H1N1, which is similar to that of zanamivir (H3N2 IC(50) = 0.0014 μM, H5N1 IC(50) = 0.012 μM, H1N1 IC(50) = 0.001 μM). Pharmacokinetic studies of compound 9f in rats showed a much longer plasma half-life (t(1/2)) than that of zanamivir following administration (po dose). Molecular modeling provided information about the binding model between the new inhibitors and neuraminidase, with the elongated groups at the C-1-position being projected toward the 430-loop region. This study may represent a novel starting point for the future development of improved antiflu agents.

To construct a reliable computational model for the classification of agonists and antagonists of 5-HT(1A) receptor.Support vector machine (SVM), a well-known machine learning method, was employed to build a prediction model, and genetic algorithm (GA) was used to select the most relevant descriptors and to optimize two important parameters, C and r of the SVM model. The overall dataset used in this study comprised 284 ligands of the 5-HT(1A) receptor with diverse structures reported in the literatures.A SVM model was successfully developed that could be used to predict the probability of a ligand being an agonist or antagonist of the 5-HT(1A) receptor. The predictive accuracy for training and test sets was 0.942 and 0.865, respectively. For compounds with probability estimate higher than 0.7, the predictive accuracy of the model for training and test sets was 0.954 and 0.927, respectively. To further validate our model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the Area-Under-the-ROC- Curve (AUC) value was calculated to be 0.883 for training set and 0.906 for test set.A reliable SVM model was successfully developed that could effectively distinguish agonists and antagonists among the ligands of the 5-HT(1A) receptor. To our knowledge, this is the first effort for the classification of 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists and antagonists based on a diverse dataset. This method may be used to classify the ligands of other members of the GPCR family.

Background Sepsis management guidelines endorse use of biomarkers to support clinical assessment and treatment decisions in septic patients. The impact of biomarkers on improving patient outcomes remains uncertain. Methods Retrospective observational study of adult sepsis discharges between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, from Premier Healthcare Database hospitals. Sepsis was defined by an All Patients Refined Diagnosis-Related Group code of 720 (septicemia and disseminated infections). Use of four biomarker strategies was evaluated based on hospital records: (i) >1 procalcitonin (PCT), (ii) 1 PCT, (iii) no PCT but ≥1 C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or lactate and (iv) no sepsis biomarkers. Associations between biomarker use and clinical and cost outcomes were examined. The primary outcome was impact of biomarker strategy on hospital costs per day. Results Among 933,591 adult sepsis discharges during the study period, 731,392 (78%) had biomarker tests ordered. In multivariable analyses, discharges with >1 PCT had higher hospital costs per day ($1,904; 95% confidence interval [CI] $1,896–$1,911) compared with discharges with no sepsis biomarkers ($1,606; 95% CI $1,658–$1,664). Discharges with >1 PCT also had greater illness severity and antimicrobial exposure compared with other biomarker-use groups. The adjusted odds of dying during hospital stay compared with being discharged were significantly lower for sepsis discharges with >1 PCT (0.64; 95% CI 0.61–0.67) and 1 PCT (0.88; 95% CI 0.85–0.91) compared with no sepsis biomarker use. The proportion of discharges with ≥1 PCT increased almost six-fold during the study; use of other biomarkers remained constant. Conclusions Between 2012 and 2015, PCT use among sepsis discharges increased six-fold while lactate and CRP use remained unchanged. PCT use was associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality but increased hospital costs per day. Serial biomarker monitoring may be associated with improved patient outcomes in the most critically ill septic patients.

The coincidence of 3 different rare coronary artery anomalies is extremely rare, and has not been reported so far. We report multiple imaging findings of a giant coronary artery aneurysm, which has a fistulous connection to the right ventricle associated with anomalous origin of the anterior descending coronary artery from the right coronary artery in a 67-year-old woman who suffered with a 20-year history of progressively chest distress on exertion and a history of untreated Kawasaki disease in her childhood. The patient received surgical treatment. The aneurysm was resected and openings at both ends being oversewn. And the fistula was also closed directly. She recovered and discharged uneventfully. The coincidence of 3 different rare coronary artery anomalies in adult patient with untreated Kawasaki disease is a rare and complicated condition, in which surgical treatment is recommended.