1. Comparison of the resonance sonorheometry based Quantra® system with rotational thromboelastometry ROTEM® sigma in cardiac surgery – a prospective observational study
- Author
-
Stefanie von Felten, Michael T. Ganter, Werner Baulig, Samira Akbas, Wolfgang Keul, Pascal Berdat, Marija Jovic, Oliver M. Theusinger, Philipp K. Schütt, Klaus Steigmiller, University of Zurich, and Baulig, Werner
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,10216 Institute of Anesthesiology ,610 Medicine & health ,Resonance Sonorheometry ,Anesthesiology ,Monitoring, Intraoperative ,Humans ,Medicine ,Ultrasonics ,RD78.3-87.3 ,Prospective Studies ,Cardiac Surgical Procedures ,Bland–Altman plot ,Blood Coagulation ,Aged ,Viscoelastic testing ,business.industry ,Research ,Elasticity ,Thrombelastography ,Cardiac surgery ,Thromboelastometry ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Median time ,Quantra ,Female ,2703 Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Rheology ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,ROTEM sigma, cardiac surgery ,Heparin neutralization - Abstract
Background Measures of the sonorheometry based Quantra® viscoelastic hemostatic analyzer (HemoSonics, LCC, Charlottesville, VA, USA) were compared with corresponding results of the ROTEM® sigma device (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). Methods In thirty-eight patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery between December 2018 and October 2019, blood samples were taken after induction of anesthesia (sample 1) and after heparin neutralization (sample 2) and measured on Quantra (QPlus® Cartridge) and ROTEM sigma (ROTEM® sigma complete + hep Cartridge). Clot times and clot stiffness values were recorded. Clot stiffness values of ROTEM amplitudes (A in mm) were converted to shear modulus (G) in hectoPascal (hPa): G (hPa) = (5 x A)/(100-A). Additionally, time-to-results was recorded. Spearman rank test correlation and Bland Altman analysis were performed. Results Clot stiffness parameters of the Quantra correlated strongly with corresponding measurements of the ROTEM with r = 0.93 and 0.94 for EXTEM A10 vs CS and r = 0.94 and 0.96 for FIBTEM A10 vs FCS for sample 1 and 2, respectively. Quantra clot time correlated strongly with ROTEM INTEM CT with r = 0.71 for sample 1 and r = 0.75 for sample 2. However, Bland Altman analysis showed no agreement in all compared assays of both methods. The median time to delivery of first and complete results was significantly shorter for Quantra (412 and 658 s) compared to ROTEM sigma (839 and 1290 s). Conclusions The Quantra showed a strong correlation with the ROTEM sigma for determining clot times and clot stiffness and the parameters assess similar aspects of clot development. However, these parameters are not directly interchangeable and implicate that separate cut-off values need to be established for users of the Quantra device. Word count: 278. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04210830) at December 20th 2019.
- Published
- 2021