1. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of CD19‐selected cells: Utility in detecting disease in post‐therapy samples of B‐cell neoplasms
- Author
-
Caitlin E. Walsh, Vundavalli V. Murty, Bachir Alobeid, Govind Bhagat, Andrew M. Parrott, and Alecia Christiano
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Cancer Research ,Pathology ,CD19‐selection ,Somatic evolution in cancer ,B‐cell ,cytogenetics ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Neoplasm ,Child ,In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ,Original Research ,Aged, 80 and over ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,leukemia ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Survival Rate ,Oncology ,Child, Preschool ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Adult ,measurable residual disease ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lymphoma, B-Cell ,minimal disease ,Adolescent ,Antigens, CD19 ,lymphoma ,Context (language use) ,Biology ,lcsh:RC254-282 ,Flow cytometry ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,FISH ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Interphase ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Chromosome Aberrations ,flow cytometry ,Cytogenetics ,Clinical Cancer Research ,medicine.disease ,Lymphoma ,post‐therapy ,karyotype ,030104 developmental biology ,Cytometry ,neoplasm ,Follow-Up Studies ,Fluorescence in situ hybridization - Abstract
Context The detection of low‐level persistent or relapsed B‐cell neoplasms, particularly post‐therapy, can be challenging, often requiring multiple testing modalities. Objective Here we investigate the utility of CD19‐based selection of neoplastic B‐cells (CD19S) as an enrichment strategy to improve the detection rate of cytogenetic abnormalities in post‐therapy samples of B‐cell neoplasms, especially those with low‐level disease. Design In a cohort largely comprised of post‐therapy B‐ALL and CLL samples, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on CD19‐selected cells (CD19S FISH) in 128 specimens from 88 patients, and on non‐selected cells (NS FISH) in a subset of cases. The FISH findings were compared with the concurrent flow cytometry (FC) results in all samples and molecular analysis in a subset. Results CD19S FISH was able to detect cytogenetic aberrations in 86.0% of post‐therapy samples with evidence of disease as determined by routine or MRD FC, compared to 59.1% of samples by NS FISH. CD19S FISH detected significantly higher percentages of positive cells compared to NS FISH (p, A systematic comparison of CD19‐selected (CD19S) FISH versus non‐selected FISH analysis establishes superiority (qualitative and quantitative) of the former modality in detecting post‐therapy persistence or relapse of B‐cell neoplasms. CD19S FISH can complement flow cytometric evaluation for the detection of low‐level involvement in B‐cell neoplasms and particularly in the detection of post‐therapy recurrent/emerging small subclones. Flow cytometry detection of
- Published
- 2021