Search

Background The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as the primary treatment modality in clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) is emerging. The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term results of PCa patients treated with SBRT. Methods This non-selected, real-life patient cohort included 213 patients with localized PCa treated with a robotic SBRT device during 2012–2015. Results The median follow-up was 64 months (range, 10–85 months), and all risk-groups were represented as 47 (22.1%), 56 (26.3%) and 110 (51.6%) patients were classified into D’Amico risk stratification of low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered to 64.3% of the patients. At cut-off, the biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was 100, 87.5 and 80.0% for patients at low, intermediate and high-risk (p = 0.004), and 92.5, 84.2 and 66.7% for patients with Gleason score ≤ 6, 7 and ≥ 8, respectively (p = 0.001). The actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 97.9, 96.4 and 88.6% in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively, and at the cut-off, the disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of the whole cohort was high (99.1%), as only two high-risk patients died due to PCa. Conclusion Our present results of SBRT delivered with CyberKnife produced excellent long-term bRFS, OS and DSS outcomes among patients with localized PCa. We conclude that SBRT provides an efficient and convenient treatment option for patients with localized PCa, irrespective of the risk-group.

Background As aging is the most significant risk factor for cancer development, long-term prostate cancer (PCa) survivors have an evident risk of developing subsequent primary cancers (SPCs). Radiotherapy itself is an additional risk factor for cancer development and the SPCs appearing beyond 5 years after radiotherapy in the original treatment field can be considered as radiation-induced subsequent primary cancers (RISPCs). Methods During the years 1999-2008, 241 patients with localized PCa who underwent low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with I125 and were followed-up in Kuopio University Hospital, were included in this study. In this study the incidences and types of SPCs and RISPCs with a very long follow-up time after LDR-BT were evaluated. Results During the median follow-up time of 11.4 years, a total of 34 (14.1%) patients developed a metachronous SPC. The most abundant SPCs were lung and colorectal cancers, each diagnosed in six patients (16.7% out of all SPCs). The crude incidence rate of RISPC was 1.7% (n = 4). Half of the SPC cases (50%) were diagnosed during the latter half of the follow-up time as the risk to develop an SPC continued throughout the whole follow-up time with the actuarial 10-year SPC rate of 7.0%. The crude death rates due to metachronous out-of-field SPCs and RISPCs were 50 and 50%, respectively. Conclusion The crude rate of SPC was in line with previously published data and the incidence of RISPC was very low. These results support the role of LDR-BT as a safe treatment option for patients with localized PCa.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of late severe (≥Grade 3) urinary toxicity and the long-term efficacy after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods and Materials During the years 1999–2008, 241 patients with PCa who underwent LDR-BT with I 125 and were followed up in Kuopio University Hospital were included to this analysis. The incidence of late severe (Grade 3) urinary toxicity and the long-term efficacy results were analyzed. Results All D'Amico risk groups were represented, as 58.9%, 35.3%, and 5.8% of the patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. With a median followup of 11.4 years after implantation, the incidence of severe urinary toxicity increased throughout the followup period. The risk of Grade 3 urinary toxicity was highest among patients with higher Gleason scores ( p = 0.016) and higher initial urine residual volumes ( p = 0.017) and the cumulative incidence of severe urinary toxicity was 10.0%. The crude rate for transurethral prostatic resection was 5.8%. The relapse-free survival, the cause-specific survival, and the overall survival were 79.3%, 95.0%, and 66.4%, respectively. Conclusions The treatment was well tolerated as 90% of patients avoided any Grade 3 urinary toxicity. LDR-BT for localized PCa achieved high and durable efficacy. These results support the role of LDR-BT monotherapy as one of the valid primary treatment options for low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk patients.

Background/Aim: Our phase III trial showed that biweekly docetaxel (D) is better tolerated than triweekly D in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The safety of biweekly cabazitaxel (CBZ) post-docetaxel was studied in mCRPC. Patients and Methods: Altogether, 60 patients received CBZ 16 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and day 14 of a 4-week cycle. The mean serum PSA levels were 305 ng/ml, and the mean age 67 years. The primary endpoint was safety according to CTCAEv4.0. Results: A total of 255 4-week cycles of CBZ were administered. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (16.7%), pain (13.3%), fatigue (10.0%), anemia (5.0%) and non-neutropenic infection (10.0%). PSA responses occurred in 10 patients (16.7%). Clinical benefit rate was 38.3% and median survival 10 months. Conclusion: Biweekly CBZ is a well-tolerated treatment resulting in meaningful benefits for heavily pretreated mCRPC patients.

Generally, screen-detected cancers have more favourable tumour characteristics than clinically detected or symptomatic cancers. Less is known, whether the tumour characteristics of breast cancer have changed over time into more favourable in general and whether the changes have been similar in all ages.The aim of this study was to explore the change of breast cancer characteristics in parallel to the implementation of modern diagnostic methods in three age groups over four 5-year time periods between 1992 and 2011. The data from 942 primary breast cancers in one university hospital district in Finland were combined with data from the Finnish Cancer Registry and the Mass Screening Registry. The association of favourable tumour characteristics with time period, age group and diagnostic methods was explored.The most discernible secular change was the increase in oestrogen (ER)-positive cancers in every consecutive time period. The risk for ER positivity in the second, third and fourth period was 2- to 2.71-fold compared to the first period. An increase in small tumours and node-negative tumours was detected during the most recent years of data collection. The secular changes were observed in all age groups; however, overall ER positivity was most frequent among women beyond screening age and small tumours among screening-aged women. The increase in small and node-negative tumours could partly be explained by the implementation of new radiological methods.This study detected a secular change of tumour characteristics into more favourable irrespective of age group. If the trend continues, it seems that we are going to have a breast cancer population of mainly small ER-positive breast cancers in the future forcing to rethink the therapeutic approach.

The cost of cancer and outcomes of cancer care have been discussed a lot since cancer represents 3-6% of total healthcare costs and cost estimations have indicated growing costs. There are studies considering the cost of all cancers, but studies focusing on the cost of disease and outcomes in most common cancer sites are limited. The objective of this study was to analyze the development of the costs and outcomes in Finland between 2009 and 2014 per cancer site.The National cost, episode and outcomes data were obtained from the National register databases based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis codes. Cost data included both the direct and indirect costs. Two hospitals were used to validate the costs of care. The outcome measures included relative survival rate, mortality, sick leave days per patient and number of new disability pensions.The outcomes of cancer care in most common cancer sites have improved in Finland between 2009-2014. The real costs per new cancer patient decreased in seven out of ten most common cancer sites. The significance of different cost components differ significantly between the different cancer sites. The share of medication costs of the total cost of all cancers increased, but decreased for the five most common cancer sites.The changes in the cost components indicate that the length of stay has shortened in special care and treatment methods have developed towards outpatient care. This partially explains the decrease of costs. Also, at the same time outcomes improved, which indicates that decrease in costs did not come at the expense of treatment quality. As the survival rates increase, the relevance of mortality measures decreases and the relevance of other, patient-relevant outcome measures increases. In the future, the outcomes and costs of health care systems should be assessed routinely for the most common patient groups.

The cost of cancer and outcomes of cancer care has been much debated, since cancer represents 3-6% of total healthcare costs. The objective of this study was to analyse the development of the costs and outcomes in Finland between 2004 and 2014.The national cost, episodes and outcomes data were obtained from the national register databases. Two hospitals were used to validate the costs of care. The outcome measures included relative survival rate, mortality, sick leave days per patient and number of new disability pensions.The total cost of cancer in 2014 was 927 million €. The real costs increased by 1.7% per year over the period studied, while the cost per new cancer patient decreased. The relative survival rate was enhanced by 7%, and the number of sick leave days and new disability pensions per cancer patient was reduced. The share occupied by cancer treatment in total healthcare costs decreased slightly from 3.7% to 3.6%, indicating that cancer care has not become more expensive compared to the treatment of other diseases.This is the first survey to analyse the change in actual cancer costs and outcomes in the population-level within a 10-year period. Since cancer care outcomes in Finland have been among the best in Europe, the progress in terms of the costs and the conversions in the cost distributions across categories are significant and valuable sources for international comparisons.

Background/aim Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are important in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). The aim of the study was to evaluate the costs and effects of sunitinib in mRCC. Patients and methods A total of 81 mRCC patients who received first-line sunitinib therapy between 2010 and 2014 were recruited. Drug doses, laboratory and imaging studies, outpatient visits and inpatient stays were recorded. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured (15D- and EQ-5D - 3L questionnaires). Results The cost of sunitinib (mean 22,268 €/patient range 274 € to 105,121 €) covered 73% of the total costs during the treatment period. The total treatment cost was 30,530 €/patient (range=1,661-111,516 €). The median overall survival was 17.9 months. HRQoL decreased during treatment. Conclusion The main cost during sunitinib treatment of mRCC was the drug itself (73% of the total costs). Drug costs and HRQoL should be considered when choosing treatment for mRCC.

Background: Luminal A breast cancer defined as hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative is known to be heterogeneous. Previous study showed that luminal A tumours with the expression of basal markers ((cytokeratin (CK) 5 or CK5/6) or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)) were associated with poorer prognosis compared with those that stained negative for basal markers. Prompted by this study, we assessed whether tumour characteristics and risk factors differed by basal marker status within luminal A tumours.\ud \ud Methods: We pooled 5040 luminal A cases defined by immunohistochemistry (4490 basal-negative ((CK5 (or CK5/6))− and EGFR−) and 550 basal-positive ((CK5 (or CK5/6+)) or EGFR+)) from eight studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Case–case comparison was performed using unconditional logistic regression.\ud \ud Results: Tumour characteristics and risk factors did not vary significantly by the expression of basal markers, although results suggested that basal-positive luminal tumours tended to be smaller and node negative, and were more common in women with a positive family history and lower body mass index.\ud \ud Conclusions: Most established breast cancer risk factors were similar in basal-positive and basal-negative luminal A tumours. The non-significant but suggestive differences in tumour features and family history warrant further investigations.

e14058 Background: ICIs have introduced novel irAEs, arising from various organ systems without strong timely dependency on initiation and discontinuation of the therapy. Early detection of the irAEs could result in improved safety profile of the treatment and better quality of life for patients. Symptom data collected by ePROs could be used as an input for ML based prediction models for early detection of irAEs. Methods: The utilized dataset consisted of two data sources. The first dataset consisted of 16 540 reported symptoms from 33 ICI-treated cancer patients, including 18 monitored symptoms collected using Kaiku Health digital platform. The second dataset included prospectively collected irAE data, including initiation and end dates, CTCAE class, and severity of 26 irAEs (the longest irAE lasted 799 days, and the shortest two days while median duration was 61 days). Two ML models were built using extreme gradient boosting, a well-known classification algorithm. Using the ePRO data, the first model was trained to detect the presence and the second model to detect the onset (0-21 days prior to diagnosis) of irAEs. The dataset was split into training (70 % of the data) and test sets (30 % of the data) by random allocation. The test set was left out from the model training and tuning, and was used only to evaluate the model performance. Results: The model trained to predict the presence of irAEs had an excellent performance with the test dataset. The prediction of the irAE onset was more difficult, but the model performance was still at a very good level. The performance metrics for the ML models are presented in Table. Conclusions: Current study suggests that ML based prediction models, using ePRO data as input for the models, can predict the presence and onset of irAEs with high accuracy. Thus, it indicates that digital symptom monitoring combined with ML could enable the detection of irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients. The results should be validated with a larger dataset from prospective clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03928938. [Table: see text]

GWAS have identified a breast cancer susceptibility locus on 2q35. Here we report the fine mapping of this locus using data from 101,943 subjects from 50 case-control studies. We genotype 276 SNPs using the ‘iCOGS’ genotyping array and impute genotypes for a further 1,284 using 1000 Genomes Project data. All but two, strongly correlated SNPs (rs4442975 G/T and rs6721996 G/A) are excluded as candidate causal variants at odds against >100:1. The best functional candidate, rs4442975, is associated with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) disease with an odds ratio (OR) in Europeans of 0.85 (95% confidence interval=0.84−0.87; P=1.7 × 10−43) per t-allele. This SNP flanks a transcriptional enhancer that physically interacts with the promoter of IGFBP5 (encoding insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5) and displays allele-specific gene expression, FOXA1 binding and chromatin looping. Evidence suggests that the g-allele confers increased breast cancer susceptibility through relative downregulation of IGFBP5, a gene with known roles in breast cell biology., Previous studies identified an association between the 2q35 locus and breast cancer. Here, the authors show that a SNP at 2q35, rs4442975, is associated with oestrogen receptor positive disease and suggest that this effect is mediated through the downregulation of a known breast cancer gene, IGFBP5.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and large-scale replication studies have identified common variants in 79 loci associated with breast cancer, explaining ∼14% of the familial risk of the disease. To identify new susceptibility loci, we performed a meta-analysis of 11 GWAS, comprising 15,748 breast cancer cases and 18,084 controls together with 46,785 cases and 42,892 controls from 41 studies genotyped on a 211,155-marker custom array (iCOGS). Analyses were restricted to women of European ancestry. We generated genotypes for more than 11 million SNPs by imputation using the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel, and we identified 15 new loci associated with breast cancer at P < 5 × 10(-8). Combining association analysis with ChIP-seq chromatin binding data in mammary cell lines and ChIA-PET chromatin interaction data from ENCODE, we identified likely target genes in two regions: SETBP1 at 18q12.3 and RNF115 and PDZK1 at 1q21.1. One association appears to be driven by an amino acid substitution encoded in EXO1. ispartof: Nature Genetics vol:47 issue:4 pages:373-80 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Breast cancer risk factors and clinical outcomes vary by tumour marker expression. However, individual studies often lack the power required to assess these relationships, and large-scale analyses are limited by the need for high throughput, standardized scoring methods. To address these limitations, we assessed whether automated image analysis of immunohistochemically stained tissue microarrays can permit rapid, standardized scoring of tumour markers from multiple studies. Tissue microarray sections prepared in nine studies containing 20 263 cores from 8267 breast cancers stained for two nuclear (oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), two membranous (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor) and one cytoplasmic (cytokeratin 5/6) marker were scanned as digital images. Automated algorithms were used to score markers in tumour cells using the Ariol system. We compared automated scores against visual reads, and their associations with breast cancer survival. Approximately 65-70% of tissue microarray cores were satisfactory for scoring. Among satisfactory cores, agreement between dichotomous automated and visual scores was highest for oestrogen receptor (Kappa = 0.76), followed by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Kappa = 0.69) and progesterone receptor (Kappa = 0.67). Automated quantitative scores for these markers were associated with hazard ratios for breast cancer mortality in a dose-response manner. Considering visual scores of epidermal growth factor receptor or cytokeratin 5/6 as the reference, automated scoring achieved excellent negative predictive value (96-98%), but yielded many false positives (positive predictive value = 30-32%). For all markers, we observed substantial heterogeneity in automated scoring performance across tissue microarrays. Automated analysis is a potentially useful tool for large-scale, quantitative scoring of immunohistochemically stained tissue microarrays available in consortia. However, continued optimization, rigorous marker-specific quality control measures and standardization of tissue microarray designs, staining and scoring protocols is needed to enhance results.

The use of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as primary treatment modality in clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) is emerging, because the low α/β-ratio favors the use of high dose per fraction in PCa. There is a need for more data about SBRT, especially in high-risk PCa patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and the short-term efficacy of robotic SBRT in a clinical patient cohort with localized PCa including also high-risk patients (D'Amico risk stratification).A total of 240 consecutive patients with clinically localized PCa were treated primarily with SBRT to total doses of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using a robotic SBRT device (CyberKnifeNeither acute grade 3 or higher GU nor rectal toxicity was observed. Regardless of the fact that 29 (13.3%) patients experienced intermediate-term toxicity requiring diagnostic interventions, the rates of intermediate-term grade 3 GU, rectal and infectious toxicity were low, 1.8%, 0.9% and 1.4%, respectively. A biochemical relapse was observed in ten (4.6%) patients. With the median follow-up time of 23 months the biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate was 100%, 96.6% and 92.8% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively.The toxicity of robotic SBRT in a large clinical cohort of PCa patients was tolerable and the early PSA response was good in all risk groups. The hypofractionated SBRT offers a possibility to high dose per fraction and to provide the whole radiotherapy treatment within two to three weeks.

Background: Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) had extended responses to the androgen receptor antagonist ODM-201, in phase 1/2 studies. Objective: To evaluate the safety and antitumour activity of prolonged ODM-201 treatment in patients with CRPC. Design, setting, and participants: The ARADES trial was a multicentre phase 1 (dose escalation) and phase 2 (dose expansion) trial; 134 patients with CRPC were stratified by previous chemotherapy to receive ODM-201. This paper reports extended follow-up in CYP17 inhibitor (CYP17i)-naïve patients. Intervention: Patients (n = 77) received oral ODM-201 twice daily at daily doses of 200–1800 mg. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Safety, measured as the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and radiographic progression. Results and limitations: The safety profile of extended ODM-201 treatment (median treatment duration 8.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6–11.0) was consistent with that reported at the time of the original data cutoff in the main ARADES trial, with no unexpected safety concerns over time. The majority of AEs (61.1%) were mild (grade 1); the most common AE was fatigue/asthenia (35.1% of patients), with no clear relationship to ODM-201. Median time to PSA progression was 25.2 mo (95% CI 11.3–25.2) for chemotherapy-naïve men and not reached (NR; 95% CI 5.5–NR) for chemotherapy-pretreated patients; a trend for improved antitumour response was observed for chemotherapy-naïve patients. The median time to radiographic progression was longer for chemotherapy-naïve (14.0 mo, 95% CI 8.1–33.3) than for chemotherapy-pretreated (7.2 mo, 95% CI 2.7–11.0) patients. Conclusions: Prolonged exposure to ODM-201 was well tolerated, with no additional safety concerns; disease suppression was sustained, especially in chemotherapy-naïve patients. These data support further development of ODM-201 in men with CYP17i-naïve CRPC. Patient summary: Extended ODM-201 therapy was well tolerated, with beneficial antitumour activity in men with advanced prostate cancer, indicating that ODM-201 may represent a new active treatment for men with CRPC. This extension trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) under identification number NCT01429064. Extended ODM-201 therapy showed encouraging antitumour activity in both chemotherapy-naïve and chemotherapy-treated men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Continued treatment with ODM-201 was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns, and may represent a new, effective treatment option for men with CRPC. © 2017 European Association of Urology

A large genotyping project within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) recently identified 41 associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and overall breast cancer (BC) risk. We investigated whether the effects of these 41 SNPs, as well as six SNPs associated with estrogen receptor (ER) negative BC risk are modified by 13 environmental risk factors for BC. Data from 22 studies participating in BCAC were pooled, comprising up to 26,633 cases and 30,119 controls. Interactions between SNPs and environmental factors were evaluated using an empirical Bayes-type shrinkage estimator. Six SNPs showed interactions with associated p-values (pint )

The enzyme manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) defends against oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS), whereas Xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) protein is involved in DNA repair. Polymorphisms in these genes have previously been associated with the outcome of breast cancer.Two gene polymorphisms, the MnSOD Val16Ala (rs4880AG) and the XPD Lys751Gln (rs13181AC), were analyzed in a cohort of 396 Finnish breast cancer patients by using PCR-RFLP-based methods in a prospective case-control study. The overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS), assessed by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis, were evaluated according to the adjuvant treatments and the rs4880 and rs13181 genotypes.In the combined analysis of rs4880 and rs13181 genotypes for patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) an increasing number of low-risk genotypes (rs4880 AA, rs4880 AG, or rs13181 AA) was significantly associated with better RFS, BCSS, and OS (n=64). In addition, there was improved BCSS and RFS among TAM-treated patients carrying the wild-type rs4880 A allele as compared with the other genotypes (n=64). The wild-type rs13181 AA genotype was similarly associated with better RFS and BCSS in the TAM-treated population (n=65).This is the first study to show that the MnSOD rs4880 and XPD rs13181 polymorphisms may influence the outcome of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant TAM monotherapy. Patients carrying the rs4880 A allele or rs13181 AA genotype may have a reduced ability to scavenge ROS and repair the DNA damage generated by TAM treatment.

Item does not contain fulltext Genes that alter disease risk only in combination with certain environmental exposures may not be detected in genetic association analysis. By using methods accounting for gene-environment (G x E) interaction, we aimed to identify novel genetic loci associated with breast cancer risk. Up to 34,475 cases and 34,786 controls of European ancestry from up to 23 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium were included. Overall, 71,527 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), enriched for association with breast cancer, were tested for interaction with 10 environmental risk factors using three recently proposed hybrid methods and a joint test of association and interaction. Analyses were adjusted for age, study, population stratification, and confounding factors as applicable. Three SNPs in two independent loci showed statistically significant association: SNPs rs10483028 and rs2242714 in perfect linkage disequilibrium on chromosome 21 and rs12197388 in ARID1B on chromosome 6. While rs12197388 was identified using the joint test with parity and with age at menarche (P-values = 3 x 10(-07)), the variants on chromosome 21 q22.12, which showed interaction with adult body mass index (BMI) in 8,891 postmenopausal women, were identified by all methods applied. SNP rs10483028 was associated with breast cancer in women with a BMI below 25 kg/m(2) (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38) but not in women with a BMI of 30 kg/m(2) or higher (OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.72-1.11, P for interaction = 3.2 x 10(-05)). Our findings confirm comparable power of the recent methods for detecting G x E interaction and the utility of using G x E interaction analyses to identify new susceptibility loci.

Background We have previously shown the prognostic importance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) using tumor samples from a large clinical trial cohort. In this study, we aimed to validate these findings and also investigate associations with trastuzumab benefit in HER2-overexpressing disease (HER2+). Patients and methods A prospective–retrospective study was conducted using samples from the FinHER adjuvant, phase III trial that enrolled 1010 early-stage BC patients, 778 of whom were HER2-nonamplified. Those with HER2+ disease (n = 232) were randomized to 9 weeks of trastuzumab or no trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy. Two pathologists independently quantified stromal TILs in 935 (92.6%) available slides. The primary end point of distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and interactions with trastuzumab were studied in Cox regression models. Results Confirming our previous findings, in TNBC (n = 134) each 10% increase in TILs was significantly associated with decreased distant recurrence in TNBC; for DDFS the hazard ratio adjusted for clinicopathological factors: 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.98, P = 0.02. In HER2+ BC (n = 209), each 10% increase in lymphocytic infiltration was significantly associated with decreased distant recurrence in patients randomized to the trastuzumab arm (DDFS Pinteraction = 0.025). Conclusions Higher levels of TILs present at diagnosis were significantly associated with decreased distant recurrence rates in primary TNBC. These results confirm our previous data and further support that TILs should be considered as a robust prognostic factor in this BC subtype. We also report for the first time an association between higher levels of TILs and increased trastuzumab benefit in HER2+ disease. Further research into why some TN and HER2+ BCs can or cannot generate a host antitumor immune response and how trastuzumab can favorably alter the immune microenvironment is warranted.

There are significant inter-individual differences in the levels of gene expression. Through modulation of gene expression, cis-acting variants represent an important source of phenotypic variation. Consequently, cis-regulatory SNPs associated with differential allelic expression are functional candidates for further investigation as disease-causing variants. To investigate whether common variants associated with differential allelic expression were involved in breast cancer susceptibility, a list of genes was established on the basis of their involvement in cancer related pathways and/or mechanisms. Thereafter, using data from a genome-wide map of allelic expression associated SNPs, 313 genetic variants were selected and their association with breast cancer risk was then evaluated in 46,451 breast cancer cases and 42,599 controls of European ancestry ascertained from 41 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The associations were evaluated with overall breast cancer risk and with estrogen receptor negative and positive disease. One novel breast cancer susceptibility locus on 4q21 (rs11099601) was identified (OR = 1.05, P = 5.6x10-6). rs11099601 lies in a 135 kb linkage disequilibrium block containing several genes, including, HELQ, encoding the protein HEL308 a DNA dependant ATPase and DNA Helicase involved in DNA repair, MRPS18C encoding the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein S18C and FAM175A (ABRAXAS), encoding a BRCA1 BRCT domain-interacting protein involved in DNA damage response and double-strand break (DSB) repair. Expression QTL analysis in breast cancer tissue showed rs11099601 to be associated with HELQ (P = 8.28x10-14), MRPS18C (P = 1.94x10-27) and FAM175A (P = 3.83x10-3), explaining about 20%, 14% and 1%, respectively of the variance inexpression of these genes in breast carcinomas. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the "CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer" program - grant # CRN-87521, the Ministry of Economy Innovation and Exportations-grant # PSR-SIIRI-701 and by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Ministere de l'Economie, de la Science et de l'Innovation du Quebec through Genome Quebec and The Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation for the PERSPECTIVE project. Jacques Simard is Chairholder of the Canada Research Chair in Oncogenetics. Silje Nord is financed by a carrier grant from the Norwegian Regional Health authorities (Grant number 2014061). BCAC is funded by Cancer Research UK [C1287/A10118, C1287/A12014] and by the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement number 223175 (grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS). Funding for the iCOGS infrastructure came from: the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565), the National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065 and 1U19 CA148112 - the GAME-ON initiative), the Department of Defence (W81XWH-10-1-0341), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer, Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. The Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS) was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the USA Government or the BCFR. The ABCFS was also supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the New South Wales Cancer Council, the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (Australia) and the Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium. J.L.H. is a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Principal Research Fellow. M.C.S. is a NHMRC Senior Research Fellow. The ABCS study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society [grants NKI 2007-3839; 2009 4363]; BBMRI-NL, which is a Research Infrastructure financed by the Dutch government (NWO 184.021.007); and the Dutch National Genomics Initiative. The work of the BBCC was partly funded by ELAN-Fond of the University Hospital of Erlangen. The BBCS is funded by Cancer Research UK and Breast Cancer Now and acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN). ES is supported by NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London, United Kingdom. IT is supported by the Oxford Biomedical Research Center. The BSUCH study was supported by the Dietmar-Hopp Foundation, the Helmholtz Society and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). The CECILE study was funded by Fondation de France, Institut National du Cancer (INCa), Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Ligue contre le Cancer Grand Ouest, Agence Nationale de Securite Sanitaire (ANSES), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR). The CGPS was supported by the Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund, the Danish Medical Research Council and Herlev Hospital. The CNIO-BCS was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer and grants from the Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer and the Fondo de Investigacion Sanitario (PI11/00923 and PI12/00070). The CTS was initially supported by the California Breast Cancer Act of 1993 and the California Breast Cancer Research Fund (contract 97-10500) and is currently funded through the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA77398). Collection of cancer incidence data was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885. HAC receives support from the Lon V Smith Foundation (LVS39420). The ESTHER study was supportd by a grant from the Baden Wurttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Arts. Additional cases were recruited in the context of the VERDI study, which was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe). The GENICA was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany grants 01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0 and 01KW0114, the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, the Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, as well as the Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany. The HEBCS was financilly supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund, Academy of Finland (266528), the Finnish Cancer Society, The Nordic Cancer Union and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. The HMBCS was supported by a grant from the Friends of Hannover Medical School and by the Rudolf Bartling Foundation. Financial support for KARBAC was provided through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Cancer Society, The Gustav V Jubilee foundation and and Bert von Kantzows foundation. The KBCP was financially supported by the special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital grants, Cancer Fund of North Savo, the Finnish Cancer Organizations, and by the strategic funding of the University of Eastern Finland. kConFab is supported by a grant from the National Breast Cancer Foundation, and previously by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Queensland Cancer Fund, the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia, and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. Financial support for the AOCS was provided by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [DAMD17-01-1-0729], Cancer Council Victoria, Queensland Cancer Fund, Cancer Council New South Wales, Cancer Council South Australia, The Cancer Foundation of Western Australia, Cancer Council Tasmania and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; 400413, 400281, 199600). G.C.T. and P.W. are supported by the NHMRC. RB was a Cancer Institute NSW Clinical Research Fellow. LMBC is supported by the 'Stichting tegen Kanker' (232-2008 and 196-2010). Diether Lambrechts is supported by the FWO and the KULPFV/10/016-SymBioSysII. The MARIE study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. [70-2892-BR I, 106332, 108253, 108419], the Hamburg Cancer Society, the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01KH0402]. MBCSG (Milan Breast Cancer Study Group) is supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) and by funds from the Italian citizens who allocated the 5/1000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to Italian laws (INT-Institutional strategic projects "5x1000"). The MCBCS was supported by the NIH grants CA192393, CA116167, CA176785 an NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer [CA116201], and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation. MCCS cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further supported by Australian NHMRC grants 209057, 251553 and 504711 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. Cases and their vital status were ascertained through the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), including the National Death Index and the Australian Cancer Database. The MEC was support by NIH grants CA63464, CA54281, CA098758 and CA132839. The work of MTLGEBCS was supported by the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the "CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer" program - grant # CRN-87521 and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade - grant # PSR-SIIRI-701. The NBCS has been supported by the Research Council of Norway grant 193387/V50 (to A-L Borresen-Dale and V.N. Kristensen) and grant 193387/H10 (to A-L Borresen-Dale and V.N. Kristensen), South Eastern Norway Health Authority (grant 39346 to A-L Borresen-Dale and 27208 to V.N. Kristensen) and the Norwegian Cancer Society (to A-L Borresen-Dale and 419616 - 71248 - PR-2006-0282 to V.N. Kristensen). It has received funding from the K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research (2012-2015). The OBCS was supported by research grants from the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Academy of Finland (grant number 250083, 122715 and Center of Excellence grant number 251314), the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the University of Oulu, the University of Oulu Support Foundation and the special Governmental EVO funds for Oulu University Hospital-based research activities. The Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry (OFBCR) was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the USA Government or the BCFR. The ORIGO study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (RUL 1997-1505) and the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI-NL CP16). The PBCS was funded by Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. The pKARMA study was supported by Marit and Hans Rausings Initiative against Breast Cancer. The RBCS was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (DDHK 2004-3124, DDHK 2009-4318). The SASBAC study was supported by funding from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A*STAR), the US National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The SBCS was supported by Yorkshire Cancer Research S295, S299, S305PA and Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. SEARCH is funded by a programme grant from Cancer Research UK [C490/A10124] and supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. SEBCS was supported by the BRL (Basic Research Laboratory) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012-0000347). SGBCC is funded by the NUS start-up Grant, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS) Centre Grant and the NMRC Clinician Scientist Award. Additional controls were recruited by the Singapore Consortium of Cohort Studies-Multi-ethnic cohort (SCCS-MEC), which was funded by the Biomedical Research Council, grant number: 05/1/21/19/425. SKKDKFZS is supported by the DKFZ. The SZBCS was supported by Grant PBZ_KBN_122/P05/2004. The TNBCC was supported by: a Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation. The UKBGS is funded by Breast Cancer Now and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), London. ICR acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. Sí

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that TILs are predictive of benefit to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2+ BC in the FinHER study, an adjuvant, phase III study in early-stage BC, where HER2+ patients were randomized to 9 weeks of trastuzumab or no trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy (Loi et al, ASCO 2012). We sought to further confirm this positive association as well as to understand the composition of TILs. METHODS: The association between TILs and response to trastuzumab with chemotherapy (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide with docetaxel with or without capecitabine) was evaluated in 156 HER2+ patients from the neoadjuvant GeparQuattro trial. The primary correlative endpoint was the association between TILs (quantified using the same method as previously published) with pathological complete response rates (pCR), adjusted for clinicopathological characteristics. To understand the composition of TILs, correlations between TILs and gene expression levels of 13 pre-defined immune markers were evaluated from 202 HER2+ samples from the FinHER study. These represented T and B cell infiltration (CD3D, IGKC), Th1 (IFNG, CD8A), chemoattractants (CXCL9, CXCL13), immunosuppression (VEGFA, FOXP3, IDO1) and T-cell checkpoint receptors and ligands (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, CD80). Prognostic associations and interactions with trastuzumab were studied in Cox regression models for distant-disease free survival (DDFS). Preclinical mice models of HER2 mammary cancer were used to investigate combination therapies. RESULTS: In the GeparQuattro trial data, each 10% increment in TILs was associated with higher rates of pCR (adjusted OR:1.14 95%CI:1.01-1.29;P = 0.037) after neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy supporting the findings from the FinHER study. Gene expression analyses using the FinHER samples revealed IDO1 and CXCL13 were most highly correlated with TILs (R = 0.58 and 0.51;p We next postulated that enhancing T-cell responses would be synergistic with trastuzumab. Trastuzumab in combination with several inhibitors of T-cell negative regulation (anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1) resulted in higher tumor regressions compared with monotherapy in a mouse transplant model of HER2+ mammary cancer. In particular, anti-PD1 (P = 0.02) and anti-PD-L1 (P = 0.008) were most effective. In a BALB/c-MMTV-neu transgenic mice mouse model (i.e. immune tolerant to HER2 antigen), the combination of trastuzumab and anti-PD1 antibody could significantly delay mammary gland tumor formation (p CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that TILs are associated with higher responses to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Furthermore, tumor-mediated immunosuppression is evident in the lymphocytic infiltrate with PD-1 and IDO1 significantly predictive of trastuzumab benefit. The addition of a T-cell checkpoint inhibitor in a preclinical model significantly enhanced trastuzumab responses. These combinations warrant evaluation in the clinical setting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S1-05.

Background: Tumor immune cell infiltrates influence prognosis of node negative breast cancer (BC), and intratumoral B-cells and T-cells are of importance for achieving response to chemotherapy in triple negative BC. The role of tumor infiltrating macrophages remains unclear, but they might promote tumorigenesis. We investigated the prognostic value of CD68 mRNA levels within the luminal, HER2-positive and triple negative subtypes in the FinHer trial patient population, and evaluated their predictive value on survival outcomes achieved with adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Methods: RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue of 917 (90.8%) patients out of the 1010 patients who participated in the FinHer trial. Intratumoral macrophage infiltration was assessed by measuring breast tumor CD68 mRNA content using RT-qPCR from representative FFPE tissue samples. Breast cancer molecular subtypes (luminal, HER2 positive and triple-negative) were approximated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and central CISH testing data obtained from the FinHer trial datafile. Prognostic significance of CD68 on distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meyer analysis and log-rank test. Results: Tumor CD68 mRNA expression was normally distributed with median expression of 33.56 (dCt). CD68 mRNA levels correlated weakly with estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA expression and ER protein levels (r = 0.11 and r = 0.15, respectively; p Conclusions: The study validates tumor CD68 concentration as a prognostic biomarker in HER2-positive early breast cancer. Patients with HER2-positive cancer and few tumor macrophages (low tumor CD68 mRNA content) benefitted from addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy, whereas patients with HER2-positive BC with high tumor macrophage content derived no benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Trastuzumab may be effective only for macrophage-poor HER2-positive cancers that are prone to antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), whereas it may have little efficacy for cancers that progress despite or due to high intratumoral macrophage content that interferes with ADCC. Other agents, such as T-DM1, might work better than trastuzumab in the subset of women who have HER2-positive BC with a high tumor macrophage content. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-08-06.

Background. Little information is available about survival outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant capecitabine-containing chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab. Patients and methods. One thousand and five hundred patients with early breast cancer were entered to the Finland Capecitabine trial (FinXX) between January 2004 and May 2007, and were randomly assigned to receive either three cycles of adjuvant TX (docetaxel, capecitabine) followed by three cycles of CEX (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, capecitabine; TX-CEX) or three cycles of docetaxel followed by three cycles of CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil; T-CEF). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The study protocol was amended in May 2005 while study accrual was ongoing to allow adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive cancer. Of the 284 patients with HER2-positive cancer accrued to FinXX, 176 (62.0%) received trastuzumab after amending the study protocol, 131 for 12 months and 45 for nine weeks. The median follow-up time was 6.7 years. Results. Patients with HER2-positive cancer who received trastuzumab had better RFS than those who did not (five-year RFS 89.2% vs. 75.9%; HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23–0.72; p = 0.001). Patients treated with trastuzumab for 12 months or nine weeks had similar RFS. There was no significant interaction between trastuzumab administration and the type of chemotherapy. Four (2.3%) patients treated with trastuzumab had heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction, three of these received capecitabine. Conclusion. Adjuvant trastuzumab improves RFS of patients treated with TX-CEX or T-CEF. Few patients had cardiac failure.

Gene expression profiling divides breast cancer into distinct molecular portraits according to the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER) and amplification/overexpression of the ERBB2/HER2/neu oncogene (1). Notably, HER2 amplification/overexpression (HER2-positive) predicts response to anti-HER2 therapy, suggesting that somatic alterations in breast cancer are associated with prognosis and potentially amenable to targeted therapy (2). This has inspired efforts to better understand the spectrum of somatic “driver” mutations and, in particular, targetable mutated kinases. An abundance of data suggests that genetic aberrations and activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway are important in determining breast cancer prognosis and the efficacy of standard chemo- and endocrine therapies (3). Furthermore, mutations in the PIK3CA gene, which encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of the class IA PI3K, are frequent in breast cancer (4–7). These mutations have been shown to be oncogenic in mammary epithelial cells by driving constitutive, growth factor–independent PI3K pathway activation (8,9). Despite being the focus of intense research interest, a clear association between PIK3CA mutations and a poorer prognosis has not been shown. To the contrary, PIK3CA mutations have been associated with statistically significantly better survival when compared with PIK3CA wild-type breast cancers in larger series obtained from single institutions (4,7–10). An association with resistance to endocrine therapy has also not been demonstrated (6,11,12). PIK3CA mutations have also been shown to be associated with trastuzumab resistance in preclinical models overexpressing HER2 (13–15). Clinical validation of this association could have important clinical utility given the emergence of a broadening array of anti-HER2 agents and the concept of dual anti-HER2 therapy (16–18). Hence, given their frequency, oncogenic capabilities, and the potential to induce resistance to commonly prescribed breast cancer treatments, the clinical relevance of PIK3CA mutations deserves further clarification. High levels of evidence on the clinical utility of prognostic and predictive biomarkers can be achieved from the use of archived tumor specimens from appropriate randomized clinical trial datasets (19). Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to clarify in a well-characterized, randomized clinical trial dataset the predictive relevance of PIK3CA mutations to trastuzumab efficacy and its prognostic abilities in both HER2-positive and HER2-negative disease. Given that PIK3CA genotyping can be performed with other somatic hotspot mutations, we also set out to determine prevalence and prognostic associations of other known cancer driver mutations. Our objective was to identify other potentially targetable genetic alterations that contribute to resistance to standard therapy in breast cancer.

Matriptase-2 (TMPRSS6) has been identified as a breast cancer risk factor. Here, we examined relationships between TMPRSS6 genetic variations and breast cancer risk and survival, and determined the gene and protein expressions in breast tumors and assessed their clinical importance. Thirteen TMPRSS6 polymorphisms were genotyped in 462 invasive breast cancer cases and 458 controls. Gene expression was analyzed from 83 tumors and protein expression from 370 tumors. We then assessed the statistical significance of associations among genotypes, clinicopathological characteristics and survival. The TMPRSS6 variant rs2543519 was associated with breast cancer risk (p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis showed that four variants had effects on survival—rs2543519 (p = 0.017), rs2235324 (p = 0.038), rs14213212 (p = 0.044) and rs733655 (p = 0.021)—which were used to create a group variable that was associated with poorer prognosis correlating with more alleles related to reduced survival (p = 0.006; risk ratio, 2.375; 95% confidence interval, 1.287–4.382). Low gene expression was related to triple-negative breast cancer (p = 0.0001), and lower protein expression was detected in undifferentiated (p = 0.019), large (p = 0.014) and ductal or lobular tumors (p = 0.036). These results confirm the association of TMRRSS6 variants with breast cancer risk and survival. Matriptase-2 levels decrease with tumor progression, and lower gene expression is seen in poor-prognosis-related triple-negative breast cancers. Our study is the first to show that matriptase-2 gene variants are related to breast cancer prognosis, supporting matriptase-2 involvement in tumor development.

Background: Presence of immune cell infiltrates in tumor may influence outcome of patients with node negative breast cancer (BC) (Schmidt et al 2008). High expression of CXCL13 (B lymphocyte chemoattractant chemokine) was strongly associated with favorable survival in one recent series consisting of BC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (Razis et al. 2012). Here we examined the clinical significance of breast tumor CXCL13 mRNA levels within the context of the FinHer trial, where patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of either docetaxel or vinorelbine followed by 3 cycles of FEC. Patients with HER2-positive BC had a second randomization for trastuzumab vs. control. Since intratumoral B cells are of particular importance for obtaining response to chemotherapy in triple negative BC (TNBC) and of limited value in luminal BC (Schmidt et al. 2012), and trastuzumab treatment is a confounding factor in HER2+ BC, we focused on TNBC. Methods: RNA was extracted from FFPE tumor tissue of 917 (90.8%) out of the 1010 patients who participated in the FinHer trial. CXCL13 mRNA expression was measured using RT-qPCR. The molecular subtypes (luminal, HER2-enriched and triple-negative) were determined using IHC and central chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) testing. Prognostic significance of factors was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) between groups was compared using the log-rank test. Results: Tumor CXCL13 mRNA expression showed a bimodal distribution and correlated negatively with tumor ESR1 mRNA levels (r = −0,31; p < 0.0001). 146 (15.9%) out of the 917cancers were classified as TNBC. High tumor CXCL13 mRNA levels above the median were strongly associated with favorable 5-yr DDFS in TNBC compared to low levels (85% vs. 60%; p < 0.0001). The prognostic value of tumor CXCL13 was evident in the subset of women with TNBC treated with vinorelbine (5-year DDFS 90% vs. 40%; p < 0.0001), whereas no significant association was found in the docetaxel arm (5-year DDFS 80% vs. 80%; p = 0.76). When only patients with TNBC and low CXCL13 mRNA levels were assessed, patients treated with docetaxel had better DDFS compared to those treated with vinorelbine (5-year DDFS 80% versus 40%; p < 0.0064). There was no DDFS difference between treatment arms in patients exhibiting high CXCL13 expression. Conclusions: Tumor CXCL13 mRNA expression is a favorable prognostic factor for women with TNBC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy providing further evidence that the host immune response may influence outcome of patients with early BC. The clinical significance of the host B cell immune response may vary substantially pending on the type of chemotherapy administered. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-06.

Background P.I157T is a CHEK2 missense mutation associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk. Previously, another CHEK2 mutation, the protein truncating c.1100delC has been associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. Here, we have investigated patient survival and characteristics of breast tumors of germ line p.I157T carriers. Methods We included in the analyses 26,801 European female breast cancer patients from 15 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We analyzed the association between p.I157T and the clinico-pathological breast cancer characteristics by comparing the p.I157T carrier tumors to non-carrier and c.1100delC carrier tumors. Similarly, we investigated the p.I157T associated risk of early death, breast cancer-associated death, distant metastasis, locoregional relapse and second breast cancer using Cox proportional hazards models. Additionally, we explored the p.I157T-associated genomic gene expression profile using data from breast tumors of 183 Finnish female breast cancer patients (ten p.I157T carriers) (GEO: GSE24450). Differential gene expression analysis was performed using a moderated t test. Functional enrichment was investigated using the DAVID functional annotation tool and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The tumors were classified into molecular subtypes according to the St Gallen 2013 criteria and the PAM50 gene expression signature. Results P.I157T was not associated with increased risk of early death, breast cancer-associated death or distant metastasis relapse, and there was a significant difference in prognosis associated with the two CHEK2 mutations, p.I157T and c.1100delC. Furthermore, p.I157T was associated with lobular histological type and clinico-pathological markers of good prognosis, such as ER and PR expression, low TP53 expression and low grade. Gene expression analysis suggested luminal A to be the most common subtype for p.I157T carriers and CDH1 (cadherin 1) target genes to be significantly enriched among genes, whose expression differed between p.I157T and non-carrier tumors. Conclusions Our analyses suggest that there are fundamental differences in breast tumors of CHEK2:p.I157T and c.1100delC carriers. The poor prognosis associated with c.1100delC cannot be generalized to other CHEK2 mutations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0758-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Our recent genome-wide association study identified a novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2 (rs865686). Methods: To further investigate the rs865686–breast cancer association, we conducted a replication study within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, which comprises 37 case–control studies (48,394 cases, 50,836 controls). Results: This replication study provides additional strong evidence of an inverse association between rs865686 and breast cancer risk [study-adjusted per G-allele OR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88; 0.91, P = 2.01 × 10−29] among women of European ancestry. There were ethnic differences in the estimated minor (G)-allele frequency among controls [0.09, 0.30, and 0.38 among, respectively, Asians, Eastern Europeans, and other Europeans; P for heterogeneity (Phet) = 1.3 × 10−143], but no evidence of ethnic differences in per allele OR (Phet = 0.43). rs865686 was associated with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) disease (per G-allele OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86–0.91; P = 3.13 × 10−22) but less strongly, if at all, with ER-negative (ER−) disease (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94–1.02; P = 0.26; Phet = 1.16 × 10−6), with no evidence of independent heterogeneity by progesterone receptor or HER2 status. The strength of the breast cancer association decreased with increasing age at diagnosis, with case-only analysis showing a trend in the number of copies of the G allele with increasing age at diagnosis (P for linear trend = 0.0095), but only among women with ER+ tumors. Conclusions: This study is the first to show that rs865686 is a susceptibility marker for ER+ breast cancer. Impact: The findings further support the view that genetic susceptibility varies according to tumor subtype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(10); 1783–. ©2012 AACR.

Journal article A recent two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified five novel breast cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 9, 10, and 11. To provide more reliable estimates of the relative risk associated with these loci and investigate possible heterogeneity by subtype of breast cancer, we genotyped the variants rs2380205, rs1011970, rs704010, rs614367, and rs10995190 in 39 studies from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), involving 49,608 cases and 48,772 controls of predominantly European ancestry. Four of the variants showed clear evidence of association (P â ¤ 3 Ã 10(-9) ) and weak evidence was observed for rs2380205 (P = 0.06). The strongest evidence was obtained for rs614367, located on 11q13 (per-allele odds ratio 1.21, P = 4 Ã 10(-39) ). The association for rs614367 was specific to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease and strongest for ER plus progesterone receptor (PR)-positive breast cancer, whereas the associations for the other three loci did not differ by tumor subtype. EC Seventh Framework Programme - grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-223175 peer-reviewed

Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2: et al., [Objective]: Clinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370. [Methods]: Centralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers). [Results]: We found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p = 0.74) or breast cancer (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p = 0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p = 0.14, breast cancer HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p = 0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p = 0.34, breast cancer HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p = 0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p = 0.38), breast cancer (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p = 0.38), and all other previously-reported associations. [Conclusions]: rs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers., The COGS project is funded through a European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme grant (agreement number 223175 — HEALTH-F2-2009-223175). The scientific development and funding for this project were in part supported by the US National Cancer Institute GAME-ON Post-GWAS Initiative (U19-CA148112). Funding for the project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 076113. This work was partially supported by Spanish Association against Cancer (AECC08), RTICC 06/0020/1060, FISPI08/1120, Mutua Madrileña Foundation (FMMA) and SAF2010-20493. Was supported by a grant RD12/00369/0006 and 12/00539 from ISCIII (Spain), partially supported by European Regional Development FEDER funds. Contract grant sponsor: Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, Spanish Health Research Fund; Carlos III Health Institute; Catalan Health Institute and Autonomous Government of Catalonia. Contract grant numbers: ISCIIIRETIC RD06/0020/1051, RD12/0036/008, PI10/01422, PI10/00748, PI13/00285 and 2009SGR290.

Purpose Capecitabine is an active agent in the treatment of breast cancer. It is not known whether integration of capecitabine into an adjuvant regimen that contains a taxane, an anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide improves outcome in early breast cancer. Patients and Methods Women with axillary node–positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either three cycles of docetaxel and capecitabine (TX) followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine (CEX; n = 753) or three cycles of docetaxel (T) followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF; n = 747). The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results During a median follow-up time of 59 months, 214 RFS events occurred (local or distant recurrences or deaths; TX/CEX, n = 96; T/CEF, n = 118). RFS was not significantly different between the groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.04; P = .087; 5-year RFS, 86.6% for TX/CEX v 84.1% for T/CEF). Fifty-six patients assigned to TX/CEX died during the follow-up compared with 75 of patients assigned to T/CEF (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.04; P = .080). In exploratory analyses, TX/CEX improved breast cancer–specific survival (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.95; P = .027) and RFS in women with triple-negative disease and in women who had more than three metastatic axillary lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. We detected little severe late toxicity. Conclusion Integration of capecitabine into a regimen that contains docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide did not improve RFS significantly compared with a similar regimen without capecitabine.

Background: Molecular subtyping of breast cancer has become an integral part of standard evaluation of breast cancer patients. Their assessment requires combining data from analyses on ER, PR, HER2 and cell proliferation markers. However, their immunohistochemical (IHC) testing carries an up to 20% risk of erroneous results. Similarly, assessment of cell proliferation by Ki-67 staining is hampered by lack of standardization of laboratory methods and agreement on cut-offs. Here we tested the prognostic value of objective quantitation of ESR1, PgR, HER2 and the proliferation markers RACGAP1 using RT-qPCR and compared the results with local and central IHC assessments. Methods: RNA was extracted from FFPE tumor tissue of 917 patients who participated in the FinHer trial. ESR1, PgR, HER2 and RACGAP1 mRNA expression were measured using RT-qPCR. The molecular subtypes (luminal, HER2−enriched and triple-negative) were determined. Prognostic significance of proliferation markers was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. The RT-qPCR results were compared with local and central IHC results. Results: HER2 mRNA showed a bimodal distribution with 197 (21.4%) out of the 917 tumors being above the predefined cut-off. HER2 mRNA expression increased in parallel with HER protein expression. Overall concordance of HER2 mRNA testing with central IHC and CISH was good, while local IHC testing suffered higher false positive rates. RACGAP1 mRNA expression was the greater the higher the histological grade. ESR1 and PgR mRNA correlated negatively with the histological grade (r=-0.38 and r=-0.33; p Conclusions: Molecular subtyping of breast cancer by RT-qPCR using RNA isolated from FFPE tissue proved successfully in this large patient cohort. RACGAP1 mRNA expression distinguished high and low risk luminal breast cancers. In a multivariate analysis mRNA-based molecular markers outperformed the immunohistochemical markers ER, PgR and Ki-67. Of note, quantitative assessment of the proliferation marker RACGAP1 was superior to semiquantitative assessment of Ki-67 from routine FFPE tissues using IHC. We conclude that quantitative assessment of ESR1, PgR, HER2 and RACGAP1 mRNA by RT-qPCR is a robust and reproducible method to assess these key tumor biological factors from archival FFPE tumor tissue. RACGAP1 is novel cell proliferation marker in breast cancer that warrants further validation. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-04.

Background: Using the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, the authors previously reported that the single nucleotide polymorphism 7q21-rs6964587 (AKAP9-M463I) is associated with breast cancer risk. The authors have now assessed this association more comprehensively using 16 independent case–control studies. Methods: The authors genotyped 14 843 invasive case patients and 19 852 control subjects with white European ancestry and 2595 invasive case patients and 2192 control subjects with Asian ancestry. ORs were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for study. Heterogeneity in ORs was assessed by fitting interaction terms or by subclassifying case patients and applying polytomous logistic regression. Results: For white European women, the minor T allele of 7q21-rs6964587 was associated with breast cancer risk under a recessive model (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13, p=0.04). Results were inconclusive for Asian women. From a combined analysis of 24 154 case patients and 33 376 control subjects of white European ancestry from the present and previous series, the best-fitting model was recessive, with an estimated OR of 1.08 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.13, p=0.001). The OR was greater at younger ages (p trend=0.01). Conclusion: This may be the first common susceptibility allele for breast cancer to be identified with a recessive mode of inheritance.

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1) as breast cancer susceptibility loci. The initial GWAS suggested stronger effects for both loci for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors. Using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), we sought to determine whether risks differ by ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), grade, node status, tumor size, and ductal or lobular morphology. We genotyped rs11249433 at 1p.11.2, and two highly correlated SNPs rs999737 and rs10483813 (r(2) = 0.98) at 14q24.1 (RAD51L1), for up to 46 036 invasive breast cancer cases and 46 930 controls from 39 studies. Analyses by tumor characteristics focused on subjects reporting to be white women of European ancestry and were based on 25 458 cases, of which 87% had ER data. The SNP at 1p11.2 showed significantly stronger associations with ER-positive tumors [per-allele odds ratio (OR) for ER-positive tumors was 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10-1.16 and, for ER-negative tumors, OR was 1.03, 95% CI = 0.98-1.07, case-only P-heterogeneity = 7.6 x 10 25]. The association with ER-positive tumors was stronger for tumors of lower grade (case-only P = 6.7 x 10 23) and lobular histology (case-only P = 0.01). SNPs at 14q24.1 were associated with risk for most tumor subtypes evaluated, including triple-negative breast cancers, which has not been described previously. Our results underscore the need for large pooling efforts with tumor pathology data to help refine risk estimates for SNP associations with susceptibility to different subtypes of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that breast cancer risk factors are associated with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression status of the tumors. METHODS: We pooled tumor marker and epidemiological risk factor data from 35,568 invasive breast cancer case patients from 34 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Logistic regression models were used in case-case analyses to estimate associations between epidemiological risk factors and tumor subtypes, and case-control analyses to estimate associations between epidemiological risk factors and the risk of developing specific tumor subtypes in 12 population-based studies. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In case-case analyses, of the epidemiological risk factors examined, early age at menarche (≤12 years) was less frequent in case patients with PR(-) than PR(+) tumors (P = .001). Nulliparity (P = 3 × 10(-6)) and increasing age at first birth (P = 2 × 10(-9)) were less frequent in ER(-) than in ER(+) tumors. Obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) in younger women (≤50 years) was more frequent in ER(-)/PR(-) than in ER(+)/PR(+) tumors (P = 1 × 10(-7)), whereas obesity in older women (>50 years) was less frequent in PR(-) than in PR(+) tumors (P = 6 × 10(-4)). The triple-negative (ER(-)/PR(-)/HER2(-)) or core basal phenotype (CBP; triple-negative and cytokeratins [CK]5/6(+) and/or epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR](+)) accounted for much of the heterogeneity in parity-related variables and BMI in younger women. Case-control analyses showed that nulliparity, increasing age at first birth, and obesity in younger women showed the expected associations with the risk of ER(+) or PR(+) tumors but not triple-negative (nulliparity vs parity, odds ratio [OR] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.19, P = .61; 5-year increase in age at first full-term birth, OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.05, P = .34; obesity in younger women, OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.94, P = .09) or CBP tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that reproductive factors and BMI are most clearly associated with hormone receptor-positive tumors and suggest that triple-negative or CBP tumors may have distinct etiology.

Information on detailed treatment costs and the economic burden of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare. The current study provides treatment costs and outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC), as well as estimates of the future burden from the perspective of Finnish health care. These results offer a baseline against which the impact of emerging treatments may be evaluated.Information on treatment modalities, survival, and the cost of treatment was retrospectively gathered from mRCC patients (n = 83) receiving first-line interferon-alpha (IFN). Predictions of the number of new cases, premature deaths, and productivity losses were made using local epidemiological data, which were projected to the future using population growth forecasts. The future costs of mRCC treatment and the budget impact of sunitinib were estimated through modeling.Patients survived 11.9 months (median; 95% CI 9.2-14.7) after initiation of active IFN treatment, accruing an average total treatment cost of 951 euros. Most of the treatment costs were due to hospitalization and active IFN treatment. The aging of the population leads to nearly a 2% increase in the absolute number of new diagnoses annually, while at the same time it results in declining productivity losses. The estimated five-year population cost of IFN-based treatment was 16M euros-26M euros. Adding sunitinib to the first-line treatment protocol increased this cost by 13M eruos-41M euros.Despite the limited number of patients, metastatic renal cell carcinoma places a considerable economic burden on Finnish society. Treatment costs are likely to increase substantially due to the adoption of new and more expensive medications, the aging population, and enhanced survival times.

The risk of seroconversion for multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) types over time was studied in a cohort of 532 women with cervical HPV infection, prospectively followed-up for >10 y. Of the women who were HPV-antibody positive for at least 1 of the HPV types (6, 11 (low risk, lr), 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 (high risk, hr)) at baseline, 73-98% seroconverted for 1 or more HPV types over time. Baseline lrHPV-seropositive women had 2.3-fold risk (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-4.7) for hrHPV seroconversion, but the opposite was not the case. Cross-protection by the natural HPV16 or HPV18 infection against other types of the HPV species A9 or A7 was not seen. These data suggest that protection against other HPV genotypes (as indicated by the lack of seroconversion) may not be provided by humoral HPV antibodies derived from a natural infection. Instead, these unvaccinated, HPV-antibody-positive women continue to be susceptible to infections by the other HPV genotypes over time.

Background: Truncating mutations in ATM have been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer but the effect of missense variants remains contentious. Methods: We have genotyped five polymorphic (minor allele frequency, 0.9-2.6%) missense single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in ATM (S49C, S707P, F858L, P1054R, and L1420F) in 26,101 breast cancer cases and 29,842 controls from 23 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Results: Combining the data from all five SNPs, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.05 for being a heterozygote for any of the SNPs and 1.51 for being a rare homozygote for any of the SNPs with an overall trend OR of 1.06 (Ptrend = 0.04). The trend OR among bilateral and familial cases was 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.23; Ptrend = 0.02). Conclusions: In this large combined analysis, these five missense ATM SNPs were associated with a small increased risk of breast cancer, explaining an estimated 0.03% of the excess familial risk of breast cancer. Impact: Testing the combined effects of rare missense variants in known breast cancer genes in large collaborative studies should clarify their overall contribution to breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(9); 2143–51. ©2010 AACR.