Search

Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs), occurring even after the discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), may be associated with favorable disease outcomes, particularly in patients with melanoma and lung cancer. However, a few clinical cases have been described on the correlation between irAEs and ICIs efficacy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. This study reports the clinical case of a metastatic RCC patient who has experienced severe immune-related renal toxicity after 19 months of nivolumab use. Despite immunotherapy discontinuation, the patient has maintained clinical benefit and disease progression-free for 3 years. We examined the correlation between the occurrence and the severity of irAEs, treatment discontinuation and clinical benefits. The evidence on ICI retreatment following ICI discontinuation due to irAEs was also reviewed.Lay abstract Immunotherapy has profoundly changed the treatment scenario of cancer patients. However, similar to any oncological therapy, it may cause immune-related adverse events. Cancer patients experiencing immune-related adverse events have a higher probability of better survival outcomes. This correlation has been largely described in patients with melanoma and lung cancer, but only a few data have been reported for genitourinary tumor patients. Here, we report the clinical case of a metastatic renal cell carcinoma patient who has experienced a late-onset and severe immune-related renal toxicity after 19 months of immunotherapy, which led to treatment discontinuation. Despite this, the patient has maintained a clinical benefit and disease progression-free for more than 3.5 years. We reviewed the literature on the correlation between immunotherapy benefit and immune-related adverse events, considering the time of onset, the severity of the adverse events and the concepts of treatment discontinuation and retreatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the treatment landscape of different tumors and one of the emerging issues is the reintroduction of immunotherapy after discontinuation. Scarce evidence is currently available and different definitions have been used. The case of a patient with pretreated advanced urothelial cancer, who responded to immunotherapy retreatment after long-term benefit from the previous course, is reported. Based on a review of the different clinical scenarios, a definition of immunotherapy retreatment was proposed, as rechallenge or reintroduction, based on the reasons of discontinuation of the previous course. Clinical factors potentially associated with clinical benefit from immunotherapy retreatment are discussed, even thoughLay abstract Immunotherapy is an effective treatment option for several types of cancer. It is unclear whether a rechallenge with this treatment could be effective following its discontinuation due to disease progression, treatment toxicity or completion. This is a relevant issue as patients with metastatic cancer have few therapeutic options. Therefore, we share our clinical experience and a literature review about this topic. We report the clinical course of a patient affected by metastatic urothelial cancer whose disease responded to retreatment with immunotherapy after a previous long-term benefit from the same treatment, which was discontinued after 2 years having reached the maximum established treatment duration. We describe the different clinical scenarios of immunotherapy retreatment and factors potentially associated with a benefit from this therapeutic strategy.

Advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) has a poor prognosis and clinical data on the therapeutic options currently available, including immunotherapy, are generally limited highlighting an unmet clinical need. Moreover, the onset of rare adverse events raises the need of a better therapeutic management of limited treatment options. We report the clinical case of a 63-year-old man with the diagnosis of metastatic mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, a rare nccRCC, with sarcomatoid differentiation who developed two episodes of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) to first-line sunitinib. It appeared after 5 months the start of the targeted therapy and reappeared at the reintroduction of the therapy. PRES is a rare and unusual adverse event to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) therapies, which is characterized by acute neurological disorders along with typical changes on neurological imaging, especially MRI. Moreover, this rare histotype of RCC experienced a long-term response to immunotherapy which is lasting more than 2 years. This clinical case is interesting for its rarity as a rare neurological adverse event developed twice in a rare type of RCC which also experienced an unusual long-term benefit to immunotherapy.

In the scenario of systemic treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, one of the most relevant breakthroughs is represented by targeted therapies. Throughout the last years, inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-Ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) have been approved and are currently used in clinical practice. However, other promising molecular drivers are rapidly emerging as therapeutic targets. This review aims to cover the molecular alterations with a potential clinical impact in NSCLC, including amplifications or mutations of the mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor (MET), fusions of rearranged during transfection (RET), rearrangements of the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) genes, mutations of the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA), as well as amplifications or mutations of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Additionally, we summarized the current status of targeted agents under investigation for such alterations. This revision of the current literature on emerging molecular targets is needed as the evolving knowledge on novel actionable oncogenic drivers and targeted agents is expected to increase the proportion of patients who will benefit from tailored therapeutic approaches.

Simple Summary Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors’ (ICIs) improved overall survival in urothelial carcinoma patients, only a minority of them benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an unmet clinical need to identify biomarkers which are useful to select the patients who are most likely to respond to ICIs. This review describes the prognostic and predictive role, and potential clinical applicability, of patient- and tumour-related factors. These factors include new molecular classes, tumour mutational burden, mutational signatures, circulating tumour DNA, programmed death-ligand 1, inflammatory indices and clinical characteristics. This summary may help clinicians to assess patients who are considered for ICI treatment, and may drive further prospective research on these biomarkers. Abstract In recent years, the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma has significantly changed due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are the standard of care for second-line treatment and first-line platinum-ineligible patients with advanced disease. Despite the overall survival improvement, only a minority of patients benefit from this immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an unmet need to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers or models to select patients who will benefit from ICIs, especially in view of novel therapeutic agents. This review describes the prognostic and predictive role, and clinical readiness, of clinical and tumour factors, including new molecular classes, tumour mutational burden, mutational signatures, circulating tumour DNA, programmed death-ligand 1, inflammatory indices and clinical characteristics for patients with urothelial cancer treated with ICIs. A classification of these factors according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation currently indicates both a prognostic and predictive value for ctDNA and a prognostic relevance only for concomitant medications and patients’ characteristics.

Simple Summary Radium-223 is an alpha-emitting radioisotope that selectively binds to increased bone turnover areas, such as metastatic sites, acting as a bone-seeking calcium mimetic drug. Its therapeutic function in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients relies on its capability to prolong overall survival, improve quality of life, and delay the first skeletal-related event. However, in the last few years, many studies showed that the survival benefit in the real-life patients might be lower than that initially reported, probably due to a suboptimal selection of patients with poorer prognostic clinical characteristics. In this scenario, it has emerged the urgent need for the identification of reliable biomarkers able to potentially identify patients most likely to benefit from Radium-223 since baseline. With this aim, this preliminary study is the first to combine the prognostic power of baseline FDG-PET/CT and systemic inflammation indexes in a cohort of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing Radium-223 administration. Abstract Over the last years has emerged the urgent need for the identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers able to potentially identify metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients most likely to benefit from Radium-223 (Ra-223) since baseline. In the present monocentric retrospective study, we analyzed the prognostic power of systemic inflammation biomarkers and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET)-derived parameters and their potential interplay in this clinical setting. The following baseline laboratory parameters were collected in 59 mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic inflammation index (SII), while maximum Standardized Uptake Value, Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) were calculated in the 48 of them submitted to baseline FDG-PET. At the univariate analysis, NLR, dNLR, MTV, and TLG were able to predict the overall survival (OS). However, only NLR and MTV were independent predictors of OS at the multivariate analysis. Additionally, the occurrence of both increased NLR and MTV at baseline identified mCRPC patients at higher risk for lower long-term survival after treatment with Ra-223. In conclusion, the degree of systemic inflammation, the quantification of the metabolically active tumor burden and their combination might represent potentially valuable tools for identifying mCRPC patients who are most likely to benefit from Ra-223. However, further studies are needed to reproduce these findings in larger settings.