1. A roadmap to better COVID-19 testing from the Coronavirus Standards Working Group
- Author
-
Patrick S. G. Chain, Deepa Eveleigh, Michael A. Crone, no mistake, Jo Vandesompele, Neil Almond, Mojca Milavec, Martin Kammel, Sebastien Fuchs, John J. Sninsky, Tim R. Mercer, Birgitte Simen, Russell Garlick, Peter M. Vallone, Gary Pestano, Cristina Tato, Heinz Zeichhardt, Mark Page, Lynne Sopchak, Thomas J. White, Po-E Li, Elizabeth Marlowe, Alina Deshpande, Marc L. Salit, Sara Suliman, Paul S. Freemont, Denise M. O'Sullivan, and Jim F. Huggett
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,business.industry ,Group (periodic table) ,Family medicine ,Medicine ,business ,medicine.disease_cause ,Coronavirus - Abstract
Testing has been central to our response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the accuracy of testing relies on standards, including reference materials, proficiency testing schemes, and information and reporting guidelines. The use of standards is a simple, inexpensive, and effective method to ensure reliable test results that inform clinical and public health decisions. Here we describe the central role of standards during the COVID-19 pandemic, where they have enabled population-scale screening, genomic surveillance and measures of immune protection measures. Given these benefits, the Coronavirus Standards Working Group (CSWG) was formed to coordinate standards in SARS-CoV-2 testing. This network of scientists has developed best-practices, reference materials, and conducted proficiency studies to harmonize laboratory performance. We propose that this coordinated development of standards should be prioritized as a key early step in the public health response to future pandemics that is necessary for reliable, large-scale testing for infectious disease.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF