1. Non-Invasive Central Venous Pressure Measurement Using Enclosed-Zone Central Venous Pressure (ezCVPTM)
- Author
-
Yoshihiro Dohi, Kazuhiro Nitta, Teiji Ukawa, Takayuki Hidaka, Haruka Morimoto, Shinji Kishimoto, Ken Ishibashi, Toshio Tsuji, Tatsuya Maruhashi, Satoru Kurisu, Yukihito Higashi, Kensuke Noma, Haruki Hashimoto, Yukihiro Fukuda, Chikara Goto, Shogo Matsui, Masato Kajikawa, Hitoshi Susawa, Yasuki Kihara, Yoji Sumimoto, and Ayumu Nakashima
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Central venous pressure measurement ,business.industry ,Non invasive ,Central venous pressure ,General Medicine ,Gold standard (test) ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Cardiology ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Background Central venous pressure (CVP) is measured to assess intravascular fluid status. Although the clinical gold standard for evaluating CVP is invasive measurement using catheterization, the use of catheterization is limited in a clinical setting because of its invasiveness. We developed novel non-invasive technique, enclosed-zone (ezCVPTM) measurement for estimating CVP. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of ezCVP and the relationship between ezCVP and CVP measured by a catheter.Methods and Results:We conducted 291 measurements in 97 patients. Linear regression analysis revealed that ezCVP was significantly correlated with CVP (r=0.65, P 10 mmHg were 0.81 or 0.88, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio of ezCVP for the CVP ≥8.8 mmHg and CVP >10 mmHg were 0.59, 0.96 and 14.8 with a cut-off value of 11.9 and 0.79, 0.97 and 26.3 with a cut-off value of 12.7. Conclusions These findings suggest that ezCVP measurement is feasible and useful for assessing CVP.
- Published
- 2020