Search

Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a disease of the cardiomyocyte in which dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction may lead to heart failure, valvular disease, and sudden death. Little is known about healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with oHCM. This study investigated the clinical and economic burden of oHCM in patients with or without symptoms associated with oHCM.We used the US IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental database to identify patients with oHCM (January 2009-March 2019). Control patients without cardiomyopathy were matched to each patient with oHCM based on age, sex, region, and index year (3:1 ratio). One-year HRU and cost data were compared between all oHCM, symptomatic oHCM, and asymptomatic oHCM subgroups, and their respective controls.Among 11,401 eligible patients with oHCM (mean age 57 years, 42% female), 5,667 (50%) were symptomatic (23% chest pain, 57% dyspnea, 29% fatigue, 17% syncope). oHCM was associated with significant increases in all-cause hospitalizations, hospital days, outpatient visits, and total healthcare costs (mean ± standard deviation: $26,929 ± 77,720 vs. $6,808 ± 25,712,The use of claims data relies on International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnosis codes, which might be inaccurate. Only commercially insured patients were included.In a real-world population, oHCM was associated with substantial increases in HRU and incremental costs of ∼$20,000/year when compared with matched controls-a difference that increased to ∼$35,000/year among symptomatic patients. Further studies are warranted to understand the potential impact of specific therapies on HRU and the economic burden of oHCM.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYObstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a medical condition in which the heart muscle becomes abnormally thick and can cause partial blockage of blood flow out of the heart. Some patients experience symptoms (such as shortness of breath, chest pain, and fatigue) from this condition while others do not. Little is known about the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with oHCM, and if there are any differences between patients with oHCM who experience symptoms versus those who are asymptomatic. Therefore, we performed a study to investigate the clinical and economic burden of oHCM in patients with or without symptoms associated with oHCM. Based on insurance claims data, ∼50% of all patients with diagnosed oHCM are symptomatic. Symptomatic patients experience nearly 8 times as many hospitalizations and cost the healthcare system$35,000 per year more than matched controls. In contrast, asymptomatic patients with oHCM have a much smaller difference in HRU and costs (∼$3,600/year) compared with matched controls. The results of this study suggest that effective therapies for oHCM may provide economic value, even if the impact of therapy is limited solely to the relief of symptoms.

BackgroundNon-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are recommended for COVID-19 mitigation. However, the effectiveness of NPIs in preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission remains poorly quantified.MethodsWe conducted a test-negative design case-control study enrolling cases (testing positive for SARS-CoV-2) and controls (testing negative) with molecular SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results reported to California Department of Public Health between 24 February-26 September, 2021. We used conditional logistic regression to assess predictors of case status among participants who reported contact with an individual known or suspected to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (“high-risk exposure”) within ≤14 days of testing.Results643 of 1280 cases (50.2%) and 204 of 1263 controls (16.2%) reported high-risk exposures ≤14 days before testing. Adjusted odds of case status were 2.94-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.66-5.25) higher when high-risk exposures occurred with household members (vs. other contacts), 2.06-fold (1.03-4.21) higher when exposures occurred indoors (vs. not indoors), and 2.58-fold (1.50-4.49) higher when exposures lasted ≥3 hours (vs. shorter durations) among unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated individuals; excess risk associated with such exposures was mitigated among fully-vaccinated individuals. Mask usage by participants or their contacts during high-risk exposures reduced adjusted odds of case status by 48% (8-72%). Adjusted odds of case status were 68% (32-84%) and 77% (59-87%) lower for partially- and fully-vaccinated participants, respectively, than for unvaccinated participants. Benefits of mask usage were greatest when exposures lasted ≥3 hours, occurred indoors, or involved non-household contacts.ConclusionsNPIs reduced the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection following high-risk exposure. Vaccine effectiveness was substantial for partially and fully vaccinated persons.KEY POINTSSARS-CoV-2 infection risk was greatest for unvaccinated participants when exposures to known or suspected cases occurred indoors or lasted ≥3 hours.Face mask usage when participants were exposed to a known or suspect case reduced odds of infection by 48%.