1. Choice of faecal immunochemical test matters: comparison of OC-Sensor and HM-JACKarc, in the assessment of patients at high risk of colorectal cancer
- Author
-
Jaren Allen, Richard F A Logan, Natasha Djedovic, Joanne R Morling, Simon Oliver, David J. Humes, A Banerjea, Caroline J Chapman, Abby Ford, and Katie Hardy
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Colorectal cancer ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Diagnostic accuracy ,Gastroenterology ,Feces ,Hemoglobins ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Clinical decision making ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Referral and Consultation ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Immunoassay ,business.industry ,Biochemistry (medical) ,Colonoscopy ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Increased risk ,Specimen collection ,Occult Blood ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Risk stratification ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Detection rate ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business - Abstract
Objectives Currently, NICE recommends the use of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) at faecal haemoglobin concentrations (f-Hb) of 10 μg Hb/g faeces to stratify for colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in symptomatic populations. This f-Hb cut-off is advised across all analysers, despite the fact that a direct comparison of analyser performance, in a clinical setting, has not been performed. Methods Two specimen collection devices (OC-Sensor, OC-S; HM-JACKarc, HM-J) were sent to 914 consecutive individuals referred for follow up due to their increased risk of CRC. Agreement of f-Hb around cut-offs of 4, 10 and 150 µg Hb/g faeces and CRC detection rates were assessed. Two OC-S devices were sent to a further 114 individuals, for within test comparisons. Results A total of 732 (80.1%) individuals correctly completed and returned two different FIT devices, with 38 (5.2%) CRCs detected. Median f-Hb for individuals diagnosed with and without CRC were 258.5 and 1.8 µg Hb/g faeces for OC-S and 318.1 and 1.0 µg Hb/g faeces for HM-J respectively. Correlation of f-Hb results between OC-S/HM-J over the full range was rho=0.74, p Conclusions We found large variations in f-Hb when different FIT devices were used, but a smaller variation when the same FIT device was used. Our data suggest that analyser-specific f-Hb cut-offs are applied with regard to clinical decision making, especially at lower f-Hb.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF