Search

To immunolocalize corneal keratan sulfate (KS) and its core protein lumican, aggrecan, type I and type III collagens in sclerocornea specimens and compare their expression and distribution to age-matched healthy corneas and scleras. Sclerocornea specimens (n = 3) and age-matched normal corneoscleral rim specimens (n = 3) were studied by light microscopy and histochemically. KS, lumican, aggrecan, type I and type III collagens were immunolocalized in the specimens using indirect immunofluorescence. The fluorescence intensity in each specimen was scored from 0 to 4, with 0 representing no fluorescence and 4 representing intense fluorescence. The sclerocornea specimens showed histologic features typical of sclerocornea. KS and lumican immunolabeling in the corneal stroma in sclerocornea was decreased, whereas aggrecan immunolabeling was increased compared to that seen in normal cornea and normal sclera. KS and lumican staining was more intense in the posterior part of sclerocornea specimens, whereas aggrecan staining was distributed throughout the stroma. The staining intensity and distribution of type I collagen in sclerocornea was similar to that seen in normal cornea. Type III collagen was faint to absent in both normal cornea and sclerocornea but strong labeling was noted in normal sclera. The immunophenotype of sclerocornea is similar to that of normal cornea but with reduced labeling intensity of KS and lumican and increased labeling intensity of aggrecan. This change could potentially contribute to the abnormal fibril assembly in sclerocornea.

OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the potential value of obtaining routine fungal cultures of donor rims at the time of corneal transplantation and instituting prophylactic therapy in culture-positive cases, even in the absence of clinical evidence of established microbial keratitis or endophthalmitis. METHODS Interventional case report and literature review. RESULTS A 69-year-old Saudi man underwent penetrating keratoplasty with donor tissue that was culture-positive for Candida glabrata. The postoperative course was complicated by slight override of the graft associated with an associated epithelial defect, but there was no evidence of microbial keratitis or significant anterior chamber inflammation. Following repair of the graft override on postoperative day 42, the epithelial defect healed. The subsequent clinical course was unremarkable until postoperative day 146, when a deep stromal infiltrate was present at the graft-host junction, associated with a dense endothelial plaque. Cultures of the anterior chamber were positive for Candida glabrata. Treatment with topical and intracameral amphotericin B and systemic fluconazole, along with topical corticosteroids and intracameral t-PA, was successful in eradicating the corneal infiltrate and resolving intraocular inflammation. Four months after treatment was initiated, there was no evidence of recurrent fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION This case provides support for the practice of obtaining routine fungal cultures of donor rims at the time of corneal transplantation and for the implementation of prophylactic antifungal therapy in culture-positive cases.