Search

Purpose: Bi-parametric prostate MR (bp-MR) is a valuable tool for detection and characterization of prostate cancer (PCa). Recent studies suggested that PSA-density (PSA-D) in combination with multi-parametric prostate MR as well as bp-MR may achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy than either alone. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of bp-MR, PSA-D and their combination in biopsy-naïve patients. Methods and materials: We retrospectively analyzed 334 consecutive patients who underwent prostate MR on a 3T scanner. Only patients (n = 114) who underwent TRUS-biopsy within 30 days following MR with no previous prostate biopsies were considered. Our protocol included T2-weighted and DWI sequences. A Likert score based on PI-RADS v2 was used for bp-MR evaluation. Lesions were graded histopathologically using the ISUP score. We assessed three scenarios: detection of lesions independently of ISUP score (ISUP ≥ 1), detection of both intermediate and clinically significant lesions (ISUP ≥ 2) and detection of clinically significant lesions alone (ISUP ≥ 3). Predictive value of bp-MR and PSA-D was evaluated by ROC curves and logistic regression analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In all evaluated scenarios, bp-MR showed a significantly higher predictive power (AUC = 0.87-0.95) compared to the performance of PSA-D (AUC = 0.73–0.79), while their combination (AUC = 0.91-0.95) showed no statistically significant improvement compared to bp-MR alone. Conclusion: Our results confirm that bp-MR is a powerful tool in detection of clinically significant PCa. Contrary to findings in the recent literature, PSA-D does not appear to significantly improve its diagnostic performance.

Objectives To prospectively determine the diagnostic accuracy of a biparametric 3T magnetic resonance imaging protocol (BP-MRI) for prostatic cancer detection, compared to a multiparametric MRI protocol (MP-MRI), in a biopsy naive patient population. Methods Eighty-two untreated patients (mean age 65 ± 7.6 years) with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and/or altered prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels underwent a MP-MRI, including T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (with the correspondent apparent diffusion coefficient maps) and dynamic contrast enhanced sequence, followed by prostate biopsy. Two radiologists reviewed both the BP-MRI and the MP-MRI protocols to establish a radiological diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristics curves were obtained to determine the diagnostic performance of the two protocols. Results The mean PSA level was 8.8 ± 8.1 ng/ml. A total of 34 prostatic tumors were identified, with a Gleason score that ranged from 3 + 3 to 5 + 4. Of these 34 tumors, 29 were located within the peripheral zone and 5 in the transitional zone. BP-MRI and MP-MRI showed a similar performance in terms of overall diagnostic accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.91 and 0.93, respectively (p = n.s.). Conclusions BP-MRI prostate protocol is feasible for prostatic cancer detection compared to a standard MP-MRI protocol, requiring a shorter acquisition and interpretation time, with comparable diagnostic accuracy to the conventional protocol, without the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Introduction To evaluate if advanced neuroimaging research is mainly conducted by imaging specialists, we investigated the number of first authorships by radiologists and nonradiologist scientists in articles published in the field of advanced neuroimaging in the past 10 years. Methods Articles in the field of advanced neuroimaging identified in this retrospective bibliometric analysis were divided in four groups, depending on the imaging technique used. For all included studies, educational background of the first authors was recorded (based on available online curriculum vitae) and classified in subgroups, depending on their specialty. Finally, journal impact factors were recorded and comparatively assessed among subgroups as a metric of research quality. Results A total number of 3831 articles were included in the study. Radiologists accounted as first authors for only 12.8 % of these publications, while 56.9 % of first authors were researchers without a medical degree. Mean impact factor (IF) of journals with non-MD researchers as first authors was significantly higher than the MD subgroup (p < 10−20), while mean IF of journals with radiologists as first authors was significantly lower than articles authored by other MD specialists (p < 10−11). Conclusions The majority of the studies in the field of advanced neuroimaging in the last decade is conducted by professional figures other than radiologists, who account for lessthan the 13 % of the publications. Furthermore, the mean IF value of radiologists-authored articles was the lowest among all subgroups. These results, taken together, should question the radiology community about its future role in the development of advanced neuroimaging.