Search

Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz,1 Jordi Bruix,2 George D Demetri,3 Axel Grothey,4 Marisca Marian,5 Jennifer Bartsch,6 Dawn Odom6 1Interdisciplinary Tumor Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; 2Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic. IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain; 3Ludwig Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 4Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, West Cancer Center, OneOncology, Germantown, TN, USA; 5Oncology, Pharmaceuticals Division of Bayer AG, Basel, Switzerland; 6Department of Biostatistics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USACorrespondence: Ralf-Dieter HofheinzInterdisciplinary Tumor Center, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, 68167, GermanyTel +49 621 383 2855Fax +49 621 383 2488Email ralf.hofheinz@umm.dePurpose: The efficacy and safety of regorafenib have been demonstrated in phase 3 trials for multiple tumor types, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (CORRECT [NCT01103323]; CONCUR [NCT01584830]), advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (GRID [NCT01271712]), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (RESORCE [NCT01774344]). The objective of this post hoc exploratory analysis was to explore the impact of regorafenib on delaying health-related quality of life (HRQOL) deterioration across these tumor types.Patients and Methods: HRQOL data (assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D questionnaires) were pooled for all trials to determine time until definitive deterioration (TUDD), defined as the patient’s first minimal clinically important deterioration in HRQOL score from baseline that does not resolve, using stratified Kaplan–Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for relevant trial, cancer type, and baseline covariates. Additional analyses based on cancer type were conducted by pooling mCRC trials (CORRECT and CONCUR) and pooling the two mCRC trials with the HCC trial (RESORCE).Results: A total of 1699 patients with HRQOL data were pooled across the four trials. The results showed that regorafenib significantly delayed TUDD compared with placebo across all three tumor types. Median time to deterioration across the five scales ranged from 16.3 to 24.1 weeks for regorafenib and 8.6 to 12.1 weeks for placebo. The results from the individual studies, the pooled mCRC trials, and the pooled mCRC and HCC trials were similar to the overall pooled results.Conclusion: A pooled analysis of four phase 3 trials demonstrated that regorafenib delayed a clinically relevant exploratory endpoint, defined as TUDD, compared with placebo across three different tumor types (mCRC, GIST, and HCC), which supports a novel benefit of the impact of regorafenib with respect to patients with these three types of cancers by allowing initial declines in HRQOL to resolve and patients the opportunity to continue treatment.Keywords: gastrointestinal cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, hepatocellular cancer, quality of life, regorafenib

Nach neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie (RCT) wird bei 10–20 % der Patienten mit lokal fortgeschrittenem Rektumkarzinom eine pathologische Komplettremission nachgewiesen. Kann bei selektionierten Patienten mit klinisch exzellentem Tumoransprechen nach RCT auf eine radikale Operation im Sinne einer Watch-and-wait(W&W)-Strategie verzichtet werden? Die vorliegende Studie beinhaltet die Auswertung populationsbezogener Datensammlungen sowie prospektiver klinischer Studien zum Organerhalt nach RCT. Bei Standard-RCT und Restaging nach ca. 6 bis 8 Wochen mittels Rektoskopie und MRT zeigen sich klinische Komplettremissionen in einer Grosenordnung von 10–20 %. Bei Verzicht auf eine radikale Operation fur diese selektionierte Subgruppe mit biologisch hochresponsiven Tumoren ist bei engmaschiger Nachsorge ein lokales Tumorwiederwachstum innerhalb der ersten beiden Jahre in 20–30 % zu erwarten. Dieses Wiederwachstum ist in >90 % der Falle luminal detektierbar, auf die Darmwand begrenzt und einer kurativen Salvage-Operation zuganglich. Derzeit werden intensivierte RCT-Regime getestet. Studien zur totalen neoadjuvanten Therapie (TNT) zeigen signifikant erhohte Komplettremissionsraten, ein verbessertes krankheitsfreies Uberleben, und mogen richtungsweisend fur das Konzept des selektiven Organerhalts sein. Es bedarf weiterer prospektiver Studien mit ausreichenden Patientenzahlen und Nachbeobachtungszeiten, um die onkologische Sicherheit sowie das Risiko-Nutzen-Verhaltnis fur Patienten, die sich fur eine W&W-Option entscheiden, einzuordnen.

Few data exist on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (Awad L ZE, Mesbah M Boston, MA. Applying survival data methodology to analyze quality of life data, in Mesbah M, Cole BF, Ting Lee M-L (eds): Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002). The QOLIXANE study is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter substudy of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer (PARAGON) registry, which evaluated QoL in patients with mPC receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in real-life setting. QoL was prospectively measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every month thereafter. Therapy and efficacy parameters were prospectively collected. Main objectives were the rate of patients without deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL (GHS/QoL) at 3 and 6 months. Six hundred patients were enrolled in 95 German study sites. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.2), while median time to deterioration of GHS/QoL was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.6). With a baseline GHS/QoL score of 46 (SD, 22.8), baseline QoL of the patients was severely impaired, in most cases due to loss in role functioning and fatigue. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 61% and 41% of patients had maintained GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively. However, in the QoL response analysis, 35% and 19% of patients had maintained (improved or stable) GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively, while 14% and 9% had deteriorated GHS/QoL with the remaining patients being nonevaluable. In the Cox regression analysis, GHS/QoL scores strongly predicted survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (P < .0001). Patients with mPC have poor QoL at baseline that deteriorates within a median of 4.7 months. Treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with maintained QoL in relevant proportions of patients. However, overall, results remain poor, reflecting the aggressive nature of the disease.

Die Behandlungsstrategien beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom verandern sich derzeit deutlich. Die in den Leitlinien fur lokal fortgeschrittene Tumoren empfohlene Therapie einer neoadjuvanten Radio(chemo)therapie mit anschliesender Chirurgie und ggf. adjuvanter Therapie wird zunehmend zugunsten folgender Konzepte verlassen: prolongierte neoadjuvante (Chemo‑)Therapie (oft als „totale neoadjuvante Therapie“, TNT, bezeichnet); Verzicht auf Strahlentherapie bei Patienten mit einem niedrigen Lokalrezidivrisiko; „Watch-and-wait-Konzept“ bzw. Organerhalt bei Patienten mit einem kompletten klinischen Ansprechen nach einer neoadjuvanten Radiochemotherapie. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden – ausgehend vom gegenwartigen Status quo auf dem Boden aktueller Publikationen – insbesondere die TNT und der Verzicht auf die Strahlentherapie diskutiert. Leitlinienkonform kann bei einem Rektumkarzinom, welches in einer qualitatsgesicherten Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) Kriterien einer Niedrigrisikosituation fur ein Lokalrezidiv aufweist, auf eine neoadjuvante Radio(chemo)therapie verzichtet werden und eine sofortige totale mesorektale Exzision indiziert werden.

Nintedanib is a triple angiokinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a/-b. Thereby, it targets angiogenic escape mechanisms. The trial TyRosine kinase Inhibitor for the treatment of Chemorefractory Colorectal Cancer (TRICC-C) trial evaluates the addition of nintedanib to mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). TRICC-C is a randomised controlled, double-blinded, phase II trial in mCRC patients that received a first-line non-oxaliplatin containing chemotherapy. Patients received mFOLFOX6 + nintedanib (F + N) (2 × 200 mg p.o./d, d1-d14) or mFOLFOX6 + placebo (F + P), in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was median progression free survival (mPFS) and secondary overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Fifty-three patients (27 F + N; 26 F + P) were randomised between 12/2012 and 5/2016 (scheduled n = 180). The trial was terminated prematurely due to slow accrual. The trial did not reach its primary endpoint but mPFS, median overall survival (mOS) and disease control rate (DCR) were numerically higher in the F + N arm compared to the F + P arm; however, the difference was not significant (mPFS: F + P: 4.6 months vs F + N: 8.1 months; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.32-1.30; P = .2156; mOS: F + P: 9.9 months vs F + N: 17.1 months; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.48-2.23; P = .9387; DCR: F + P: 50% vs F + N: 66,7%; P = .2709). Toxicity was moderate and only different for neutropenia (F + P: 11.5%, F + N: 19.2%) and gastrointestinal disorders (F + P: 65.4%, F + N: 84.6%). Final results show safety and a nonsignificant trend towards improved PFS and DCR for the combination of mFOLFOX6 + nintedanib in the second-line therapy of mCRC.

Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, depth and duration of clinical response is not uniform. We assessed tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a response marker in patients with GI cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods Detailed clinical and response data were collected from six patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR GI cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Efficacy was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Tumors and matched normal tissue were profiled by targeted next generation sequencing (127 gene panel, size 0.8 Mb). Impact of included mutation types, germline filtering methodology and different variant allele frequency thresholds on TMB estimation was assessed. Results Objective radiographic responses were observed in all six patients, and complete response was achieved in two of the six patients. Responses were durable (minimum 25 months). TMB estimates were clearly above the two recently reported cut-offs for metastatic colorectal cancer of 12 or 37 mutations per megabase for five of six patients, respectively, while one patient had borderline TMB elevation. TMB did not show an association with extent and duration of response but was influenced by included mutation types, germline filtering method and variant allele frequency threshold. Conclusion Our case series confirms the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR GI cancers and illustrates the vulnerability of TMB as predictive marker in a subset of patients.

ZusammenfassungZur Indikationsstellung und Stratifizierung der perioperativen Therapie des lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinoms ist die Magnetresonanztomografie unverzichtbar. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden der Stellenwert der MRT-Diagnostik und die qualitativen Voraussetzungen dargestellt.

Background: Effective treatments are needed to improve outcomes for high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. The activity and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib were evaluated in adult patients with recurrent or progressive BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. Methods: This study is part of an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 Rare Oncology Agnostic Research (ROAR) basket trial at 27 community and academic cancer centres in 13 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the USA). The study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2. Patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily orally until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. In the high-grade glioma cohort, patients were required to have measurable disease at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma response criteria and have been treated previously with radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients with low-grade glioma were required to have measurable non-enhancing disease (except pilocytic astrocytoma) at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology low-grade glioma criteria. The primary endpoint, in the evaluable intention-to-treat population, was investigator-assessed objective response rate (complete response plus partial response for high-grade glioma and complete response plus partial response plus minor response for low-grade glioma). This trial is ongoing, but is closed for enrolment, NCT02034110. Findings: Between April 17, 2014, and July 25, 2018, 45 patients (31 with glioblastoma) were enrolled into the high-grade glioma cohort and 13 patients were enrolled into the low-grade glioma cohort. The results presented here are based on interim analysis 16 (data cutoff Sept 14, 2020). In the high-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 12·7 months (IQR 5·4–32·3) and 15 (33%; 95% CI 20–49) of 45 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including three complete responses and 12 partial responses. In the low-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 32·2 months (IQR 25·1–47·8). Nine (69%; 95% CI 39–91) of 13 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including one complete response, six partial responses, and two minor responses. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 31 (53%) patients, the most common being fatigue (five [9%]), decreased neutrophil count (five [9%]), headache (three [5%]), and neutropenia (three [5%]). Interpretation: Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma, with a safety profile consistent with that in other indications. BRAFV600E testing could potentially be adopted in clinical practice for patients with glioma. Funding: Novartis.

PURPOSE Total neoadjuvant therapy is a new paradigm for rectal cancer treatment. Optimal scheduling of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy remains to be established. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial using a pick-the-winner design on the basis of the hypothesis of an increased pathologic complete response (pCR) of 25% after total neoadjuvant therapy compared with standard 15% after preoperative CRT. Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer were assigned to group A for induction chemotherapy using three cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin before fluorouracil/oxaliplatin CRT (50.4 Gy) or to group B for consolidation chemotherapy after CRT. Secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, and surgical morbidity. RESULTS Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (156 in group A and 150 in group B). CRT-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity was lower (37% v 27%) and compliance with CRT higher in group B (91%, 78%, and 76% v 97%, 87%, and 93% received full-dose radiotherapy, concomitant fluorouracil, and concomitant oxaliplatin in groups A and B, respectively); 92% versus 85% completed all induction/consolidation chemotherapy cycles, respectively. The longer interval between completion of CRT and surgery in group B (median 90 v 45 days in group A) did not increase surgical morbidity. A pCR in the intention-to-treat population was achieved in 17% in group A and in 25% in group B. Thus, only group B ( P < .001), but not group A ( P = .210), fulfilled the predefined statistical hypothesis. CONCLUSION Up-front CRT followed by chemotherapy resulted in better compliance with CRT but worse compliance with chemotherapy compared with group A. Long-term follow-up will assess whether improved pCR in group B translates to better oncologic outcome.

Background: Adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) remains a tumor entity with a poor prognosis. While meaningful advances have been made in the treatment of other solid tumors in the past years, numerous phase III studies in gastric cancer have had negative outcomes. Successes of targeted therapies so far include the ­introduction of trastuzumab in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer, and second-line anti-angiogenic treatment with the anti-VEGF-2 receptor antibody ramucirumab. Taxanes have become established in the perioperative setting and in second-line treatment and have set new standards. However, evidence for improved overall survival in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer with taxanes is not convincing. Methodology: Expert consensus discussion on the scientific and clinical evidence for sequential systemic treatment for advanced gastric and EGJ cancer, taking into account data clinical outcomes from randomized controlled phase II and phase III trials. Summary: In first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, taxanes in combination with a platinum- and 5-fluorouracil-based regimen are generally not recommended because they lack a survival benefit and confer high toxicity. However, taxanes in first-line can be a treatment option for patients presenting with high tumor burden and strong pressure to achieve remission. Since the publication of several positive studies in second- and third-line therapy, sequential therapy is playing an increasingly important role in metastatic gastric and EGJ cancer. Key Message: Standard of care for the first-line treatment of gastric cancer is a platinum-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy doublet combination. The standard of care after failure of platinum-based first-line therapy is ramucirumab in combination with paclitaxel. Data supporting this combination after previous taxane therapy are not yet available.

Acne-like skin reactions frequently occur in patients undergoing treatment with drugs inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Recently, the effects of vitamin K1 containing cream (Reconval K1) as prophylactic skin treatment in addition to doxycycline were explored in a double-blind randomized phase II trial (EVITA) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab. EVITA demonstrated a trend towards less severe skin rash in Reconval K1-treated patients using the tripartite WoMo skin reaction grading score as a thorough tool for quantification of drug related skin reactions. This gender-specific analysis of the EVITA trial evaluated the application of the WoMo score for assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related skin toxicities according to treatment arm and gender. To show the robustness of results parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. All three parts of the WoMo score independently demonstrated the superiority of the treatment arm (Reconval K1) regarding a significant reduction in acneiform skin reactions in women. Men did not benefit from Reconval K1 cream at any time point in none of the WoMo score analyses. The treatment effect in women was confirmed by the use of skin rash categories based on the final WoMo overall score and mixed effect longitudinal multiple linear regression analysis. The WoMo score represents a sensitive tool for studies exploiting treatments against EGFR mediated acne-like skin rash. Part C of the WoMo score seems to be sufficient for quantification of drug related skin toxicities in further studies. Standard WoMo skin reaction score values for future studies are provided., publishedVersion

Summary Background VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1–5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117. Findings Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607–0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5–6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5–5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768–1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801–1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9–11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5–11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1). Interpretation Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare and rank preoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment modalities for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction, in terms of overall survival and other patient‐relevant outcomes, by conducting a network meta‐analysis.

Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is a mainstay in the treatment of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGA). Trastuzumab improved survival when added to chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic EGA. We investigated the combination of trastuzumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment in patients with locally advanced EGA. A multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative FLOT (24-hours 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 , leucovorin 200 mg/m2 , oxaliplatin 85 mg/mg2 , docetaxel 50 mg/m2 , trastuzumab 6 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg d1, repeated d15 for four cycles preoperatively and postoperatively followed by 9 cycles of trastuzumab monotherapy) in patients with HER-2 positive EGA. Patients had ≥cT2, any N, M0 EGA. The primary endpoint was the rate of centrally assessed pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints comprised disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, toxicity and surgical morbidity. Fifty-six evaluable patients (median age 62 years) were included; n = 40 had tumors originating from the esophagogastric junction; T stage was (cT2/3/4/unknown): 4/42/8/2; n = 50 patients had cN+ disease. Main adverse events grades 3-4: leukopenia (17.9%), neutropenia (46.6%) and diarrhea (17.0%). All patients underwent tumor resections. R0 resection rate was 92.9%. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage. One postoperative death occurred. pCR was found in 12 patients (21.4%) and a further n = 14 patients (25.0%) had near complete response. Median DFS was 42.5 months and the 3-year OS rate was 82.1%. The primary endpoint of achieving a pCR >20% was reached. No unexpected safety issues were observed. Survival data are promising.

Background: Music therapy or sound interventions were shown to confer beneficial effects in patients with cancer for instance in terms of pain or fear relief and improvement of other patient reported outcomes. Cardiovascular parameters, especially heart rate variability (HRV) were found to have prognostic implications in cancer patients. In this trial we aimed to investigate the effects of a sound intervention on cardiovascular parameters compared to rest in patients with cancer. Methods and results: Using a randomized cross-over design, 52 patients (male 13, female 39) with cancer were recruited to receive both a 15-minute sound intervention and a 15-minute rest intervention within 4 weeks with at least a one-week blanking period. Cardiovascular parameters (among others HRV, aortic pulse wave velocity [PWV], augmentation index [Aix], aortic blood pressure [BP], heart rate [HR]) were assessed immediately before (pre) and after (post) the intervention had taken place. HRV (Root mean square of successive RR interval differences [RMSSD, ms]) significantly increased, during sound intervention (median RMSSD pre 24 [range 5-112] vs post 22 [range 9-141], P = .03). Likewise, median PWV, as a direct marker of arterial stiffness, was significantly reduced by sound intervention ([m/s] pre 8.5 [range 5.6-19.6] vs post 8.3 [range 5.6-15.6], P = .04). For both parameters no statistically significant change during rest was observed. HR was lowered by both, rest ( P Conclusion: In comparison with rest, a single sound intervention in patients with cancer improved cardiovascular parameters commonly associated with increased stress levels. Studies with longer follow-up and multiple interventions are warranted. Trial Registration: ISRCTN registry 70947363.

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases and cancer share several similarities, including common risk factors. In the present investigation we assessed the relationship between cholesterol levels and mortality in a cardiooncological collective. In total, 551 patients receiving anticancer treatment were followed over a median of 41 (95% CI 40, 43) months and underwent regular cardiological surveillance. A total of 140 patients (25.4%) died during this period. Concomitant cardiac diseases were more common in patients who deceased (53 (37.9%) vs. 67 (16.3%), p &lt, 0.0001), as well as prior stroke. There were no differences in the distribution of classical CV risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes or nicotine consumption. While total cholesterol (mg/dL) was significantly lower in patients who deceased (157 ± 59 vs. 188 ± 53, p &lt, 0.0001), both HDL and LDL cholesterol were not differing. In addition, cholesterol levels varied between different tumour entities, lowest levels were found in patients with tumours of the hepatopancreaticobiliary system (median 121 mg/dL), while patients with melanoma, cerebral tumours and breast cancer had rather high cholesterol levels (median &gt, 190 mg/dL). Cholesterol levels were significantly lower in patients who died of cancer, lowest cholesterol levels were observed in patients who died of tumours with higher mitotic rate (mesenchymal tumours, cerebral tumours, breast cancer). Cox regression analysis revealed a significant mortality risk for patients with stem cell transplantation (HR 4.31) and metastasised tumour stages (HR 3.31), while cardiac risk factors were also associated with a worse outcome (known cardiac disease HR 1.58, prior stroke/TIA HR 1.73, total cholesterol HR 1.70), with the best discriminative performance found for total cholesterol (p = 0.002).

Purpose Providing state-of-the-art palliative care is crucial in all areas of in- and outpatient settings. Studies on the implementation of palliative care standards for dying patients are rare. Methods N = 141 physicians from all internal departments were polled anonymously about the treatment of dying patients using a self-designed questionnaire. Furthermore, we evaluated the terminal care of n = 278 patients who died in internal medicine departments at University Hospital Mannheim between January and June, 2019 based on clinical data of the last 48 h of life. We defined mandatory criteria for good palliative practice both regarding treatment according to patients' records and answers in physicians' survey. Results Fifty-six physicians (40%) reported uncertainties in the treatment of dying patients (p p p p p Conclusion Guideline-based palliative care for dying patients was found to be implemented more likely and consistent within the oncology department. These results point to a potential lack of training of fellows in non-oncological departments in terms of good end-of-life care.

Background Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) have a dismal prognosis, even when treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. We hypothesised that adding the epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab to standard first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin would improve PFS and RR in unfavourable CUP. Methods This open-labelled, multicentre Phase 2 study included patients with unfavourable, untreated adeno- or undifferentiated CUP. Patients were randomised to receive either paclitaxel/carboplatin (group A) or paclitaxel/carboplatin plus cetuximab (group B) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles followed by cetuximab maintenance in group B. The primary endpoint was PFS in the two groups. Secondary endpoints were RR, toxicity and overall survival (OS). Results One-hundred-and-fifty patients were randomised (group A = 72, group B = 78). The median PFS and OS for all patients were 3.8 and 8.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9–4.8 and 6.8–9.5). There was no significant difference in PFS (3.7 vs 4.6 months, HR 0.98) or OS (8.1 vs 7.4, HR 1.1) between the two treatment groups. Response rate tended to be better for chemotherapy plus cetuximab compared to chemotherapy alone (22% vs 15%). Adverse events grade ≥3 were comparable between the two groups, except for significantly increased skin toxicity in the cetuximab arm. Conclusions Cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve PFS, OS and RR in metastatic CUP compared to paclitaxel/carboplatin alone. Addition of cetuximab resulted in additional skin toxicity. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00894569.

Background: More effective treatments are needed to improve outcomes in HGG and LGG. Activating BRAF mutations occur in ~3% of glioblastomas and 15% of LGGs. BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib + MEK inhibitor trametinib combination is FDA-approved in BRAF V600-positive melanoma, NSCLC, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 basket study (NCT02034110) of dabrafenib + trametinib in pts with BRAF V600E mutation-positive rare cancers; here we report results for the HGG and LGG cohorts. Adult pts with histologically confirmed recurrent/progressive HGG (Grade III, IV) or LGG (Grade I, II) per WHO 2007 classification received oral dabrafenib, 150 mg twice daily, and oral trametinib, 2 mg once daily, until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) using RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety; molecular characterization of baseline tumor samples was an exploratory endpoint. Results: As of Sept 14, 2020, 45 pts (23 male) were enrolled in the HGG cohort; 35 discontinued, 6 remained on treatment, 4 were in follow up. The majority had glioblastoma (69%), followed by anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and anaplastic astrocytoma (each 11%); of pts with known IDH/MGMT status, 3/29 pts had IDH1 mutations and 8/17 had MGMT promoter methylation. Prior therapies included radiotherapy (98%), surgery, and chemotherapy (93% each). Median (range) follow-up was 12.7 (1.1-56.1) months (mo); ORR was 33% (3 CR, 12 PR); median DOR was 36.9 mo (95% CI, 7.4-44.2). Median PFS and OS were 3.8 mo (95% CI, 1.8-9.2) and 17.6 mo (95% CI, 9.5-45.2), respectively. The LGG cohort enrolled 13 pts (4 male); 7 discontinued, 5 remained on treatment, 1 was in follow up. Most common histologies were ganglioglioma (31%), diffuse astrocytoma, and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (each 15%); of pts with known IDH/MGMT status, 1/8 pts had IDH1 mutation and 0/2 had MGMT promoter methylation. Prior therapies included surgery (92%), radiotherapy (62%), and chemotherapy (38%). Median (range) follow-up was 32.2 (0.8-71.8) mo; ORR was 69% (1 CR, 6 PR, 2 MR); median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. Overall, 54/58 pts (93%) experienced adverse events (AEs) across cohorts, most commonly (≥30%) fatigue (50%), headache (43%), nausea (34%), and pyrexia (33%); 31 pts (53%) had grade ≥3 AEs, most commonly (≥5%) fatigue, decreased neutrophil count (9% each), headache, and neutropenia (5% each). Next-generation sequencing showed a heterogenous landscape and low tumor mutation burden. Conclusions: Dabrafenib + trametinib demonstrated promising efficacy in pts with BRAF V600E mutation-positive recurrent/refractory HGG and LGG. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile for other indications. Citation Format: Vivek Subbiah, Alexander Stein, Martin van den Bent, Antje Wick, Filip Y. de Vos, Nikolas von Bubnoff, Myra E. van Linde, Albert Lai, Gerald W. Prager, Mario Campone, Angelica Fasolo, Jose A. Lopez-Martin, Tae Min Kim, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Jean-Yves Blay, Daniel C. Cho, Anas Gazzah, Damien Pouessel, Jeffrey Yachnin, Aislyn Boran, Paul Burgess, Palanichamy Ilankumaran, Eduard Gasal, Patrick Y. Wen. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAF V600E-mutant high-grade (HGG) and low-grade glioma (LGG) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT025.

// Melanie Kripp 1, * , Nicole Prasnikar 2, * , Ursula Vehling-Kaiser 3 , Julia Quidde 4 , Salah-Eddin Al-Batran 5 , Alexander Stein 4 , Kai Neben 6 , Carla Verena Hannig 7 , Hans Werner Tessen 8 , Tanja Trarbach 9 , Axel Hinke 10 and Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz 11 1 Medizinische Klinik 3, Hamatologie und Onkologie, Universitatsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany 2 Hamatologie, Internistische Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany 3 Tagesklinik fur Hamatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, Landshut, Germany 4 Universitares Cancer Center, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 5 Universitares Centrum fur Tumorerkrankungen, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany 6 Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany 7 Onkologisches Gemeinschaftspraxis, Bottrop/Dorsten, Germany 8 Onkologische Kooperation Harz, Goslar, Germany 9 Zentrum fur Tumorbiologie und Integrative Medizin, Klinikum Wilhelmshaven, Wilhelmshaven, Germany 10 WiSP Wissenschaftlicher Service Pharma GmbH, Langenfeld, Germany 11 Interdisziplinares Tumorzentrum, Universitatsmedizin Mannheim, Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Melanie Kripp, email: melanie.kripp@medma.uni-heidelberg.de Keywords: doxycycline, erythromycin, panitumumab, skin toxicity, WoMo score Received: July 12, 2017 Accepted: August 08, 2017 Published: September 23, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: Dermatologic toxicities, especially akne-like skin rash, are the most common side-effects associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Preemptive treatment with oral tetracyclines is recommended as a standard. Topical prophylactic options have thus far not been compared to tetracyclines. In the current study, we sought to establish an alternative topical treatment. Patients and methods: In this multicentre, randomized, open-label phase II study patients with (K)Ras-wildtype colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab were randomized (1:1) to receive either doxycycline 100 mg b.i.d. (standard arm) or erythromycin ointment 2% followed by doxycycline in case of insufficient activity. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients developing no skin toxicity ≥ grade 2 at any time during the first 8 weeks of panitumumab treatment. Skin toxicity was assessed using the NCI CTCAE v 4.0. Secondary endpoints comprised the assessment of skin toxicity using a more thorough grading system (WoMo score), evaluation of skin-related (DLQI) and global quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30). Results: In total, 88 patients were included in this trial. 69% of the patients in the erythromycin arm suffered from skin toxicity of grade ≥ 2 versus 63% in the standard arm ( P = n.s. ). However, as per WoMo score significantly more patients in the erythromycin arm developed moderate or severe skin toxicity at earlier time points. Skin related and overall quality of life was comparable between both arms. Conclusions: Based on this data erythromycin cannot be regarded as an alternative to doxycycline as prevention of EGFR-related skin toxicity.

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2–1.0%. Summary: Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Background. Up to 88% of oncological patients apply complementary therapies and up to 77% apply complementary mistletoe therapy in the context of integrative oncological approaches. An evidence-based consultation of oncological health professionals regarding complementary therapies used in Germany is missing. Therefore, a new S3-Guideline for Complementary Medicine in the Treatment of Oncological Patients is under development and is anticipated to be finalized in November 2020. It will be based on evidence-based publications and systematic reviews on complementary therapies in oncology. A recently published two-part systematic review on mistletoe treatment in oncology has been reevaluated. Methods. The latest published systematic two-part review on mistletoe has been systematically proofread and checked in compliance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool. Results. The here discussed two-part review is incomplete, lacks sound accuracy including insufficient assessment of the risk of bias, and contains imprecise statements. In addition, it does not sufficiently comply with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the AMSTAR 2 tool. Conclusion. In view of the approaching release of a new guideline in the field of complementary therapies in oncology, the present statement draws attention to a lack of profound methodology of conductance of a recently released systematic review on mistletoe. In consequence, a comprehensive overview of published mistletoe studies, i.e., a meta-analysis with a sound methodology of conductance, is necessary.

Importance Total neoadjuvant therapy has been increasingly adopted for multimodal rectal cancer treatment. The optimal sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy needs to be established. Objective To report the long-term results of the secondary end points prespecified in the Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial) for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 311 patients who were recruited from the accrued CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial population from June 15, 2015, to January 31, 2018, from 18 centers in Germany. Patients with cT3-4 and/or node-positive rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from June 15, 2015, to January 31, 2018. The follow-up analysis was conducted between January 31, 2018, and November 30, 2020. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to group A for 3 cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin before fluorouracil/oxaliplatin CRT (50.4 Gy), or to group B for CRT before chemotherapy. Total mesorectal excision was scheduled on day 123 after the start of total neoadjuvant therapy in both groups. Main Outcomes and Measures The end points assessed in this secondary analysis included long-term oncologic outcomes, chronic toxicity, patient-reported outcome measures for global health status (GHS) and quality of life (QoL), and the Wexner stool incontinence score. Results Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 were evaluable, including 156 in group A (mean [SD] age, 60 [11] years; 106 men [68%]) and 150 in group B (mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years; 100 men [67%]). After a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 35-60 months), the 3-year disease-free survival was 73% in both groups (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.63-1.45,P = .82); the 3-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (6% vs 5%,P = .67) and distant metastases (18% vs 16%,P = .52) were not significantly different. Chronic toxicity grade 3 to 4 occurred in 10 of 85 patients (11.8%) in group A and 8 of 66 patients (9.9%) in group B at 3 years. The GHS/QoL score decreased after total mesorectal excision but returned to pretreatment levels 1 year after randomization with no difference between the groups. Stool incontinence deteriorated 1 year after randomization in both groups and only improved slightly at 3 years, but never reached baseline levels. Conclusions and Relevance This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial showed that CRT followed by chemotherapy resulted in higher pathological complete response without compromising disease-free survival, toxicity, QoL, or stool incontinence and is thus proposed as the preferred total neoadjuvant therapy sequence if organ preservation is a priority. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02363374

Background To investigate the importance of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (≥ cT3 or N+) staged ypT0–2 ypN0 on final histological work-up after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical resection. Methods The clinical course of patients with rectal cancer and ypT0–2 ypN0 stages after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical resection was analyzed from 1999 to 2012. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether adjuvant chemotherapy was administered or not. Overall survival, distant metastases, and local recurrence were compared between both groups. Results Fifty-four patients with adjuvant (ACT) and 50 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical resection for rectal cancer were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 68 ± 33.7 months. One patient without adjuvant chemotherapy and none in the ACT group developed a local recurrence. Five patients in the NACT group and three patients in the ACT group had distant recurrences. Median disease-free survival for all patients was 65.5 ± 34.5 months. Multivariate analysis showed adjuvant chemotherapy to be the most relevant factor for disease-free and overall survival. Patients staged ypT2 ypN0 showed a significantly better disease-free survival after application of adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease-free survival in ypT0–1 ypN0 patients showed no correlation to the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical resection in rectal cancer improved disease-free and overall survival of patients with ypT0–2 ypN0 tumor stages in our study. In particular, ypT2 ypN0 patients seem to profit from adjuvant treatment.

To evaluate the association between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and progression-free and overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel. Men with mCRPC receiving cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2, every 3 weeks) plus oral prednis(ol)one (10 mg/day) were enrolled in the non-interventional, prospective QoLiTime study. Main outcome measures were progression-free survival and overall survival, in all patients and in those who showed a ≥ 50 or a ≥ 30% decrease in PSA relative to baseline after four cycles of cabazitaxel, as well as quality-of-life parameters. Of the 527 men (median age 72 years), 266 received ≥ 4 cycles of cabazitaxel and had PSA response data. After four cycles, 34.6% of men achieved a PSA decrease ≥ 50% and 49.6% a decrease ≥ 30%. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 (95% CI 6.2, 9.5) months, and overall survival was 19.5 (95% CI 16.0, 30.9) months, corresponding to 1-year event rates of 39.4 and 78.8%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was longer in PSA responders versus non-responders (15.7 vs 5.5 months at 50% cut-off; 15.7 vs 5.3 months for 30% cut-off; both P

Background: Oxaliplatin is a platinum-based antineoplastic agent used for the treatment of colorectal cancer and other gastrointestinal tumors. In combination with 5-fluorouracil for instance it is given in the so-called FOLFOX regimen in patients with colorectal cancer in the adjuvant as well as the palliative treatment setting. Cumulative neuropathy is a common cause of treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities are generally tolerable and managed by dose reductions and/or supportive treatment. While chronic cardiotoxic effects of cytostatics are well described, there are few reports on acute cardiotoxic reactions. Case Report: The present case describes the sudden development of a transient coronary vasospasm in a 56-year-old male patient mimicking an acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction during systemic treatment with oxaliplatin. Conclusion: Oxaliplatin is one of the most commonly used cytostatics for gastrointestinal cancer. Coronary vasospasm has never been reported for oxaliplatin. Thus it is crucial to keep in mind that acute cardiotoxic side effects may occur, even with chemotherapeutic agents without a prior evidence-based description of such events.

Median overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has reached up to 30months in recent clinical trials of first line therapies. Following disease progression after the standard in both, 1st and 2nd line, combination chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, many patients maintain a good performance status and a significant proportion is motivated to undergo further therapy. Choices of treatment beyond the second line setting for mCRC are therefore becoming increasingly important. New options have entered the therapeutic field recently: Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor approved for mCRC patients who have progressed on chemotherapy (including fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), plus VEGF inhibitor(s) and - if RAS wild-type - an anti-EGFR inhibitor. Regorafenib significantly improved OS, compared to placebo, in two phase III trials (CORRECT and CONCUR) in mCRC patients. Trifluridine/Tipiracil, an oral fluoropyrimidine, also resulted in significantly improved OS when compared to placebo in the phase III RECOURSE trial, which was conducted in a similar patient population to CORRECT. Reintroduction of previously administered therapy is another valid and commonly used approach, especially for those regimens which were discontinued before progression, e.g. if associated with cumulative toxicities, such as peripheral neuropathy or due to treatment breaks. Re-challenge of drugs to which patients developed resistance is also feasible although evidence for this strategy is limited.

ZusammenfassungDas Magenkarzinom und das Karzinom des ösophagogastralen Überganges werden in 55 – 65 % der Fälle im lokal fortgeschrittenen bzw. metastasierten Stadium diagnostiziert und in der Regel mit einer perioperativen bzw. palliativen Chemotherapie behandelt. Im metastasierten Stadium muss der HER2-Status als positiver prädiktiver Faktor für eine Therapie mit Trastuzumab vor Therapieeinleitung zuverlässig bestimmt werden. Leider ist diese Bestimmung aber nicht trivial und sowohl mit dem Problem der ausgesprochenen Tumorheterogenität für HER2 als auch mit Problemen des HER2-Auswertungsalgorithmus behaftet. Wir berichten über einen 80 Jahre alten Patienten, welcher bei neu aufgetretenen Schluckbeschwerden mit einem fortgeschrittenen Adenokarzinom des ösophagogastralen Überganges diagnostiziert wurde (uT3 uN+ cM0; Siewert II). Die initiale auswärtige HER2-Testung verlief negativ (HER2-Score 1 +) wurde aber in domo an umfangreicheren Biopsien wiederholt. Nach nachgewiesener fokaler, aber starker HER2-Positivität (HER2-Wert 3 +, ~10 % der Tumorzellen positiv) wurde eine Kombinationstherapie von Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluoruracil/Folinsäure und Trastuzumab eingeleitet, welche zur Besserung der Beschwerden und zu einer Remission führte. Die hier vorliegende Diskrepanz der zwei durchgeführten HER2-Testungen wurde verursacht durch eine Heterogenität der HER2-Expression, welche in den initialen, eher spärlichen Biopsien nicht erfasst wurde. Außerdem könnten Unterschiede zwischen dem bekannten, weitverbreiteten HER2-Auswertungsalgorithmus des Mammakarzinoms und dem mit Unschärfe behafteten, weniger oft verwendeten Magenkarzinom-Algorithmus eine Rolle gespielt haben. Dieser Fallbericht beschreibt einen Patienten mit gutem Ansprechen auf eine anti-HER2-Therapie in Kombination mit einer Chemotherapie bei einem offensichtlich nur in geringfügigen Anteilen HER2-positiven fortgeschrittenen Karzinom des ösophagogastralen Übergangs und illustriert, welche Probleme mit der HER2-Testung verbunden sind, gerade wenn nur wenig tumortragende Biopsien gewonnen werden konnten.

Introduction Treatment options for patients with platinum refractory metastatic germ cell tumours (GCT) relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are limited and survival is poor. Antibodies directed against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are currently assessed within clinical trials. We present updated data on our experience with checkpoint inhibitors as a compassionate use off-label treatment attempt for highly-pretreated patients with GCT and provide an overview of the current literature on PD-L1 expression in this rare tumour entity. Patients and methods We analysed all patients with platinum refractory GCT treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institutions between 2015 and 2017. Data were retrieved retrospectively from the patient charts. Results Seven patients were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Four patients received single-dose treatment and died shortly afterwards due to tumour progression; the remaining three patients received treatment for at least 6 months. No significant treatment toxicity was observed. Long-term tumour response was achieved in two of the three patients, both of them highly positive for PD-L1 staining. Interpretation We consider checkpoint inhibition to be efficient in carefully selected patients with platinum refractory GCT. However, predictive markers associated with tumour response are not yet known and larger prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Valid HER2 testing is essential for optimal therapy of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer and the correct use of first-line chemotherapy. While testing for HER2 status in breast cancer is routinely performed, this is not the case for HER2 testing in gastric cancer and it is usually only performed on clinician request. An interdisciplinary German expert group (pathologists and clinicians) took the challenges of HER2 testing in gastric cancer as an opportunity to address essential aspects and questions for the practical use of HER2 testing in this indication. The recommendations made in this manuscript reflect the consensus of all participants and reflect their opinions and long-term experience in this field.

AIM To assess whether multiparametric MRI (mMRI) can serve as a tool for evaluating response to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in advanced-stage rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients underwent a mMRI protocol at 3T before and after CRT. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the MRI measurements and inter-reader correlation was assessed. Changes in functional parameters in relation to regression, as well as pT stage were analyzed. The perfusion parameters plasma flow (PF) and mean transit time (MTT) were calculated offline using the established UMM Perfusion tool. RESULTS Apparent diffusion coefficient values were significantly different among the different tumor RGs before CRT (p=0.041). Changes of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI values did not reflect treatment response (PF: p=0.5; MTT: p=0.74). CONCLUSION The results of our study population indicate that a high initial apparent diffusion coefficient value may be predictive of response to therapy following CRT.

Many cancer patients (PTS) suffer from somatic or non-somatic symptoms. Studies have shown positive effects of music intervention (MI) on aspects of quality of life or symptom management. Since there are poor data available about patient’s needs regarding the use of MI as an adjunct to cancer treatment, n = 548 tumor PTS were polled anonymously at the outpatient department of the University Hospital Mannheim Tumor Center using a self-designed questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. 486 data sets were eligible for analysis. 240 of the PTS were male and median age was 63 years. 38% had metastatic disease. 81% (n = 386) were currently receiving anti-tumor treatment. The majority of the PTS stated to have somatic symptoms. However, some of the PTS reported non-somatic symptoms like anxiety, loneliness, and depression. N = 187 (40%) of the PTS reported interest in complementary MI. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, especially PTS with non-somatic complaints and PTS, actively playing or making music showed significantly more interest in complementary MI, hoping for a relaxing therapeutic effect. PTS who play instruments would prefer more active forms of MI. 40% of PTS reported interest in additional MI during cancer treatment. PTS with non-somatic symptoms as well as patients affine to music might benefit from the use of MI potentially reducing their symptom burden. The inconsistent and heterogeneous data from randomized trials underline the importance of systematic research approaches with more relevant and standardized endpoints.

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib confers an overall survival benefit in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer; however, the adverse event profile of regorafenib has limited its use. Despite no supportive evidence, various dosing schedules are used clinically to alleviate toxicities. This study evaluated the safety and activity of two regorafenib dosing schedules. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study done in 39 outpatient cancer centres in the USA, adults aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum that was refractory to previous standard therapy, including EGFR inhibitors if KRAS wild-type, were enrolled. Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and had no previous treatment with regorafenib. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) into four groups with two distinct regorafenib dosing strategies and two clobetasol usage plans, stratified by hospital. Regorafenib dosing strategies were a dose-escalation strategy (starting dose 80 mg/day orally with weekly escalation, per 40 mg increment, to 160 mg/day regorafenib) if no significant drug-related adverse events occurred and a standard-dose strategy (160 mg/day orally) for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Clobetasol usage plans (0·05% clobetasol cream twice daily applied to palms and soles) were either pre-emptive or reactive. After randomisation to the four preplanned groups, using the Pocock and Simon dynamic allocation procedures stratified by the treating hospitals, we formally tested the interaction between the two interventions, dosing strategy and clobetasol usage. Given the absence of a significant interaction (p=0·74), we decided to pool the data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobetasol and compared the two dosing strategies (dose escalation vs standard dose). The primary endpoint was the proportion of evaluable patients (defined as those who were eligible, consented, and received any protocol treatment) initiating cycle 3 and was analysed per protocol. Superiority for dose escalation was declared if the one-sided p value with Fisher’s exact test was less than 0·2. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02368886. This study is fully accrued but remains active. FINDINGS: Between June 2, 2015, and June 22, 2017, 123 patients were randomly assigned to treatment, of whom 116 (94%) were evaluable. The per-protocol population consisted of 54 patients in the dose-escalation group and 62 in the standard-dose group. At data cutoff on July 24, 2018, median follow-up was 1·18 years (IQR 0·98–1·57). The primary endpoint was met: 23 (43%, 95% CI 29–56) of 54 patients in the dose-escalation group initiated cycle 3 versus 16 (26%, 15–37) of 62 patients in the standard-dose group (one-sided p=0·043). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were fatigue (seven [13%] patients in the dose-escalation group vs 11 [18%] in the standard-dose group), hand-foot skin reaction (eight [15%] patients vs ten [16%] patients), abdominal pain (nine [17%] patients vs four [6%] patients), and hypertension (four [7%] patients vs nine [15%] patients). 14 patients had at least one drug-related serious adverse event: six patients in the dose-escalation group and eight patients in the standard-dose group. There was one probable treatment-related death in the standard-dose group (myocardial infarction). INTERPRETATION: The dose-escalation dosing strategy represents an alternative approach for optimising regorafenib dosing with comparable activity and lower incidence of adverse events and could be implemented in clinical practice on the basis of these data. FUNDING: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.

Gastroesophageal cancer is the fourth most frequent malignant disease and, despite significant advances in chemotherapy, the prognosis of unresectable or recurrent gastroesophageal cancer is poor. The majority of patients, nearly two-thirds, are over the age of 65 years at diagnosis. Elderly patients are a heterogeneous population and aging occurs at different rates in different individuals. The chronological age of a patient does not necessarily reflect the physiological age. However, elderly patients are more likely to have a number of concomitant diseases and impaired organ function, which should be considered when making treatment decisions. Therefore, treatment in older adults requires particular caution, and physiologic age rather than chronologic age should be considered when deciding for or against systemic therapy. Older patients are generally underrepresented in clinical trials and many elderly patients do not receive effective combination therapies due to concerns with tolerability. Age itself is not a negative predictive factor and treatment should not be omitted just on the basis of chronological age. Older patients who fulfill the standard inclusion criteria of clinical trials seem to have a similar advantage from palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma as younger patients; however, large prospective trials in the elderly population are needed to guide clinicians in making evidence-based decisions.

Objective Data from a trial of first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI (folinic acid, infusional 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) in metastatic colorectal cancer were retrospectively analysed to investigate the effects of primary tumour location and early tumour shrinkage on outcomes. Methods Patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer from a single-arm, open-label phase II study (NCT00508404) were included. Tumours located from the splenic flexure to rectum and in the caecum to transverse colon were defined as left- and right-sided, respectively. Baseline characteristics were summarised by primary tumour location and the effects of primary tumour location on outcomes—including objective response rate, resection rate, depth of response, duration of response and progression-free survival—were analysed. Progression-free survival and objective response rate were analysed by early tumour shrinkage status. Results Primary tumour location was determined in 52/69 (75%) patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer; 45 (87%) had left-sided disease. Median progression-free survival was longer in patients with left-sided tumours (11.2 vs. 7.2 months for right-sided disease) and more of these patients experienced early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% (53% vs. 29%). Early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% was associated with improved progression-free survival irrespective of tumour location. More patients with early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% achieved a partial or complete response. Objective response rate, duration of response, depth of response and resection rates were similar in patients with left- and right-sided tumours. Conclusions This analysis has confirmed a prognostic effect of primary tumour location in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI. Early tumour shrinkage was associated with improved progression-free survival irrespective of tumour location. In right-sided disease, early tumour shrinkage may identify a subgroup of patients who might respond to panitumumab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00508404.

Background: Advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is treated with palliative chemotherapy of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF). Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with antibodies panitumumab (P) or cetuximab with chemotherapy enhanced overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer or squamous cell cancer of head and neck. With prospective serum and tumour biomarkers, we tested if P added to CF (CFP) improved OS in confirmed advanced ESCC. Methods: 146 patients, not curatively resectable and not qualified for definitive radio-chemotherapy were randomised 1:1 to CF (cisplatin [100 mg/m² i.v., day 1] and 5-fluorouracil [1000 mg/m²/day i.v., days 1-4]), versus CF plus P [9 mg/kg, i.v., day 1], each q3-week cycle) until progressive disease or inacceptable toxicity. Safety was reviewed by a pre-planned Monitoring Board after 40, 70 and 100 patients completing at least one cycle. After 53 patients enrolled, cisplatin was amended from 100 to 80 mg/m². Findings: The academic phase 3 trial was terminated early for futility on an interim efficacy analysis: median OS favoured CF over CFP, regardless of cisplatin dose (HR 1·77, 95%CI 1·06-2·98; p=0·028). In the final analysis, median OS was 10·2 vs 9·4 months for CF vs CFP, respectively (HR 1·17, 95%CI 0·79-1·75; p=0·43). Most deaths were related to disease progression, 44 (56·4%) in CF and 34 (43·6%) in CFP. Objective responses (27/73 [37·0%]) were identical in both arms. Most common severe adverse events were kidney injury (3 [4·3%] vs 7 [9·7%]), general deterioration (5 [7·1%] vs 5 [6·9%]), and dysphagia (4 [5·7%] vs 4 [5·6%]) in CF vs CFP, respectively. High levels of soluble (s)EGFR were associated with worse PFS. sEGFR was induced under CFP. Interpretation: Cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is an established palliative regimen in unselected advanced or metastatic ESCC patients. EGFR inhibition added to CF did not improve survival. Biomarker results support further liquid biomarker studies. Trial Registration Number: The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01627379) and EudraCT (2010-020606-15). Funding: The trial was funded by AIO-Studien-gGmbH. Partial financial support and panitumumab were provided by Amgen Inc. Declaration of Interest: MM has travel support and advisory role for Amgen. FL reports personal fees from Amgen. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest during the conduct of the study. Ethical Approval: The clinical study protocol was reviewed and approved by the responsible ethics committees of all participating sites. The trial was conducted in accordance with the principles of the International Conference on Harmonisation on Good Clinical Practice. All patients gave written informed consent before enrolment and any trial-specific procedures.

Background: To investigate tumour biomarker status and efficacy of first-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Methods: 154 patients received first-line panitumumab + FOLFIRI every 14 days. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Data were analysed by tumour RAS (KRAS/NRAS) and BRAF status, and baseline amphiregulin (AREG) expression. Results: Objective responses occurred more frequently in RAS wild type (WT) (59%) vs RAS mutant (MT) (41%) mCRC and in RAS WT/BRAF WT (68%) vs RAS or BRAF MT (37%) disease. Median response duration was longer in RAS WT (13.0 months) vs RAS MT (5.8 months) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.16). Median progression-free survival was longer in RAS WT vs MT (11.2 vs 7.3 months; HR, 0.37) and was also longer in RAS WT/BRAF WT vs RAS or BRAF MT (13.2 vs 6.9 months; HR, 0.25). Incidence of adverse events was similar regardless of RAS/BRAF status, and no new safety signals were noted. Among patients with RAS WT tumours, ORR was 67% with high AREG expression and 38% with low AREG expression. Conclusions: First-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI was associated with favourable efficacy in patients with RAS WT and RAS WT/BRAF WT vs MT mCRC tumours and was well tolerated.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and stomach remains one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Although there is increasing data on the mutational landscape of esophagogastric cancer, phase III trials often yield negative results, and there is a paucity of approved targeted agents. For the time being, the subset of patients carrying HER2-positive metastatic tumors can receive trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy. Furthermore, ramucirumab has been found to be active both as a single agent and in combination with paclitaxel. Herein, we give an overview of currently approved targeted treatments for locally advanced/resectable as well as unresectable/metastatic EGJ/gastric adenocarcinoma, summarizing the underlying clinical studies. Moreover, further potential targets still under investigation are presented.

TPS7086 Background: Approximately 50% of all cancer subjects suffer from cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome accompanied by an inadequate food intake and predicting mortality, poor therapeutic response, diminished functional capacity, and reduced QoL. Especially in the advanced stages, parenteral nutrition (PN) is often required and accompanied by an increased risk of blood stream infections associated with increased mortality and other serious medical conditions such as sepsis. Furthermore, the switch from oral food intake to PN changes the patient’s everyday life leading to reduced autonomy and flexibility (e.g. due to dependency on home nursing services). This study aims at evaluating the incidence of catheter-related infections (CRI) and the frequency of self-administered parenteral nutrition at home (HPN) in patients receiving standard PN via A) traditional two- or three-chamber bags (often requiring addition of vitamins and/or medications by home care service) or B). the multi-chamber bags Eurotubes (minimizing additional supplements and enabling self-administration by patients at home). In addition, one group of patients will receive low glucose HPN via Eurotubes to investigate a possible benefit on clinical outcome. Methods: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated, phase IV trial. Overall, 350 patients with inoperable metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors who have an indication for parenteral nutrition will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1:1 ratio to Arm A (Standard PN using Eurotubes) or Arm B (Standard PN using 2/3-chamber bags), or to Arm A-1 (low glucose using Eurotubes). Patients will be assessed (physical exam, ECOG, weight, QoL, lab tests, AEs, HPN documentation) every 4 weeks during the 12 months HPN treatment period. Co-primary endpoints are incidence of CRI and patient autonomy (rate of self-administered PN at home). Secondary endpoints comprise weight change, change in albumin and CRP levels, overall survival, QoL, and safety. Recruitment has just started; first patient in was on February 5th, 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04105777 .

Background 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. The pharmacological effect of 5-FU is influenced by genetic polymorphisms as well as differently dosed regimens. Currently, 5-FU is generally administered as a continuous infusion via an implanted port system using a body surface area (BSA)-based dose calculation. In order to optimize treatment, the area under the curve (AUC) can be estimated to allow for individual dose adjustment. A 5-FU AUC range between 20 and 30 [mg×h×L] is recommended. The aim of the current study was to assess if blood for AUC analysis could also be drawn at the side where the port system had been placed. Methods We collected EDTA blood samples of patients receiving infusional 5-FU simultaneously from different sampling points (right/left cubital vein). 5-FU concentrations were measured in a steady-state equilibrium based on nanoparticle immunoassay (My5-FU; Saladax). Results A total of 39 patients took part in this study. About half of the patients did not reach the target 5-FU concentration window (37% were under- and 16% of the patients were overdosed). Calculated median AUC was 23.3 for the right arm (range 5.8–59.4) and a median of 23.4 for the left arm (range 5.3–61.0). AUC values showed no difference between right compared to left arms (p=0.99). Conclusions In all, these results confirm that a high percentage of patients are not treated with 5-FU doses reaching suggested AUC levels of 20–30. The location of venepuncture, however, had no impact on the results of plasma 5-FU concentration.

BACKGROUND There is a lack of treatment options for HGG and LGG patients. BRAFV600E mutations are uncommon in glioma, with a poor long-term prognosis. Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition extends progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in BRAF V600E–mutated melanoma, non small-cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. METHODS This phase 2, open-label trial (NCT02034110) evaluated dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor, 150mg BID) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor, 2mg QD) in patients with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including HGG and LGG. Eligible patients had histologically-confirmed recurrent or progressive glioma (LGG:WHO grade 1 or 2; HGG:WHO grade 3 or 4), with HGG patients required to have received radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) using RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and safety. RESULTS Interim analysis (IA) #14 (data cutoff: April 2, 2018) reported additional 3 months follow-up, with 49 patients enrolled (HGG, n=39; LGG, n=10) and 3 patients not evaluable for response. In HGG patients, ORR was 27% (10/37; 95%CI: 13.8%-44.1%), including CR (n=1), PR (n=9), and SD (n=11), with 16 patients currently ongoing treatment. In LGG patients, ORR was 56% (5/9; 95%CI: 26.8%-79.3%), including PR (n=5) and SD (n=4), with 6 patients currently ongoing treatment. OS, PFS, and DOR will be presented (IA#15). In HGG patients, adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (33%), headache (31%), rash (28%), and pyrexia (23%); grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (8%) and fatigue (5%). In LGG patients, AEs included headache (70%), fatigue, pyrexia (60% each), nausea, and arthralgia (50% each); grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (20%). CONCLUSIONS Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with recurrent or refractory BRAF V600E‒mutated HGG or LGG, with manageable AEs and no new safety signals.

Summary Background Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with infusional fluorouracil, total mesorectal excision surgery, and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil was established by the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial as a standard combined modality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Here we compare the previously established regimen with an investigational regimen in which oxaliplatin was added to both preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study we randomly assigned patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, clinically staged as cT3–4 or any node-positive disease, to two groups: a control group receiving standard fluorouracil-based combined modality treatment, consisting of preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions plus infusional fluorouracil (1000 mg/m 2 on days 1–5 and 29–33), followed by surgery and four cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m 2 on days 1–5 and 29); or to an investigational group receiving preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions plus infusional fluorouracil (250 mg/m 2 on days 1–14 and 22–35) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29), followed by surgery and eight cycles of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 15), leucovorin (400 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 15), and infusional fluorouracil (2400 mg/m 2 on days 1–2 and 15–16). Randomisation was done with computer-generated block-randomisation codes stratified by centre, clinical T category (cT1–3 vs cT4), and clinical N category (cN0 vs cN1–2) without masking. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomisation and non-radical surgery of the primary tumour (R2 resection), locoregional recurrence after R0/1 resection, metastatic disease or progression, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Survival and cumulative incidence of recurrence analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle; toxicity analyses included all patients treated. Enrolment of patients in this trial is completed and follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00349076. Findings Of the 1265 patients initially enrolled, 1236 were assessable (613 in the investigational group and 623 in the control group). With a median follow-up of 50 months (IQR 38–61), disease-free survival at 3 years was 75·9% (95% CI 72·4–79·5) in the investigational group and 71·2% (95% CI 67·6–74·9) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·79, 95% CI 0·64–0·98; p=0·03). Preoperative grade 3–4 toxic effects occurred in 144 (24%) of 607 patients who actually received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin during chemoradiotherapy and in 128 (20%) of 625 patients who actually received fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy. Of 445 patients who actually received adjuvant fluorouracil and leucovorin and oxaliplatin, 158 (36%) had grade 3–4 toxic effects, as did 170 (36%) of 470 patients who actually received adjuvant fluorouracil. Late grade 3–4 adverse events in patients who received protocol-specified preoperative and postoperative treatment occurred in 112 (25%) of 445 patients in the investigational group, and in 100 (21%) of 470 patients in the control group. Interpretation Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (at the doses and intensities used in this trial) significantly improved disease-free survival of patients with clinically staged cT3–4 or cN1–2 rectal cancer compared with our former fluorouracil-based combined modality regimen (based on CAO/ARO/AIO-94). The regimen established by CAO/ARO/AIO-04 can be deemed a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Funding German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe).