1. Development and Validation of a Lookup Table for the Prediction of Metastatic Prostate Cancer According to Prostatic-specific Antigen Value, Clinical Tumor Stage, and Gleason Grade Groups
- Author
-
Fred Saad, Michele Marchioni, Zhe Tian, Alberto Briganti, Elio Mazzone, Francesco Montorsi, Alexander Haese, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Sebastiano Nazzani, Hartwig Huland, Felix Preisser, Markus Graefen, Marco Bandini, Felix K.-H. Chun, Derya Tilki, Preisser, Felix, Bandini, Marco, Nazzani, Sebastiano, Mazzone, Elio, Marchioni, Michele, Tian, Zhe, Chun, Felix K H, Saad, Fred, Briganti, Alberto, Haese, Alexander, Montorsi, Francesco, Huland, Hartwig, Graefen, Marku, Tilki, Derya, and Karakiewicz, Pierre I
- Subjects
Male ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,Calibration (statistics) ,Urology ,030232 urology & nephrology ,End results database ,Logistic regression ,Cohort Studies ,Random Allocation ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Neoplasm Metastasis ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Gleason grade group ,Surveillance ,business.industry ,Area under the curve ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,Prostate-Specific Antigen ,Lookup table ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Prostate-specific antigen ,Confidence interval ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cohort ,Surgery ,Neoplasm Grading ,business ,Metastatic risk - Abstract
Background Prostate cancer (PCa) staging is crucial in clinical decision making and treatment assignment. Objective To develop a predictive tool that is capable of predicting the probability of metastases at initial PCa diagnosis. Design, setting, and participants Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010–2014), we identified patients with newly diagnosed PCa and available clinical tumor stage, prostatic-specific antigen value (PSA), and Gleason grade group (GGG), and with or without metastases. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We relied on PSA, clinical tumor stages, and GGG to discriminate between M1 and M0 patients. Patients were randomly divided according to the registry of origin between development (n = 102 469) and validation (n = 98 755) cohorts. Logistic regression modeling coefficients were used to devise a lookup table to discriminate between M0 and M1 stages. Receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve was tested for model accuracy, within the validation cohort. A total of 2000 bootstrap resamples were applied to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration plots were used to test the performance of the lookup table. Results and limitations Of 201 224 patients, 3.5% harbored metastatic PCa (mPCa). PSA >40 ng/ml, GGG5, and GGG4, in that order, represented the strongest predictors of mPCa. Overall, PSA, clinical tumor stage, and GGG were 94.3% (95% CI: 94.2–94.3%) accurate in predicting the probability of mPCa, in the external validation cohort. Up to 39.4% probability of mPCa, the model demonstrated accurate predictions in the calibration plot. In DCA, a net benefit was recorded up to a threshold probability of approximately 54%. Conclusions The proposed lookup table for the prediction of the probability of mPCa may represent a useful clinical tool based on its high accuracy, excellent calibration, and robust nature of predictions. Patient summary Our study provides a highly accurate lookup table for the prediction of the probability of metastatic prostate cancer patients. This clinical tool can be useful in staging decisions.
- Published
- 2020