Search

Resumen Introduccion La cirugia endoscopica y laparoscopica combinada (CELS) ha surgido como un metodo para el tratamiento de lesiones colonicas benignas complejas que, de otro modo, requeririan una reseccion quirurgica. El objetivo de este estudio es describir las distintas tecnicas CELS y evaluar su seguridad, en un procedimiento escasamente difundido en nuestro entorno. Metodo Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, donde se evaluaron los resultados a corto plazo de pacientes diagnosticados de polipos no resecables endoscopicamente sometidos a CELS entre octubre del 2018 a junio del 2020. Se valoraron los resultados postoperatorios, la estancia hospitalaria y los hallazgos patologicos. Resultados Diecisiete pacientes consecutivos fueron sometidos a CELS durante el periodo de estudio. El tamano medio de la lesion fue de 3,5 cm (rango 2,5 a 6,5 cm), la localizacion mas recurrente fue el ciego (10 de 17). La tecnica CELS mas frecuente aplicada fue la reseccion en cuna laparoscopica asistida por endoscopia (11 de 17). En cuatro pacientes, esta reseccion se combino con otra tecnica CELS. Dos casos se sometieron a una reseccion del segmento laparoscopico asistido por endoscopia. El exito de CELS en nuestra serie fue en 14 de 17 (82,4%). La mediana del tiempo quirurgico y estancia hospitalaria fue de 85 min (rango 50 a 225 min) y de dos dias (rango uno a 15 dias), respectivamente. Solo un paciente presento infeccion del organo-cavitaria que no requirio cirugia adicional. Conclusiones CELS es una tecnica segura multidisciplinar, que requiere la colaboracion entre gastroenterologos y cirujanos. Se puede considerar como una alternativa a la reseccion de colon para polipos benignos complejos.

Background: Tissue ischemia is a key risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL). Indocyanine green (ICG) is widely used in colorectal surgery to define the segments with the best vascularization. In an experimental model, we present a new system for quantifying ICG saturation, SERGREEN software.Methods: This was a controlled experimental study with eight pigs. In the initial control stage, ICG saturation was analyzed at the level of two anastomoses in the right and left colon. Control images of the two segments were taken after ICG administration. The images were processed with the SERGREEN program. Then, in the experimental ischemia stage, the inferior mesenteric artery was sectioned at the level of the anastomosis of the left colon. Fifteen minutes after the section, sequential images of the two anastomoses were taken every 30’ for the following 2 h.Results: At the control stage, the mean scores were 134.2 (95% CI: 116.3-152.2) for the right colon and 147 (95% CI: 134.7-159.3) for the left colon (p = 0.174). The right colon remained stable throughout the experiment. In the left colon, saturation fell by 47.9 points with respect to the preischemia value (p Conclusions: The SERGREEN program quantifies ICG saturation in normal and ischemic situations and detects differences between them. A reduction in ICG saturation of 32.6% or more was correlated with complete tissue ischemia.

Aim The COVID‐19 pandemic has forced surgeons to adapt their standard procedures. The modifications introduced are designed to favour minimally invasive surgery. The positive results obtained with intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in the right colon and rectum prompt us to adapt these procedures to the left colon. We describe a ‘don't touch the bowel’ technique and outline the benefits to patients of the use of less surgically aggressive techniques and also to surgeons in terms of the lower emission of aerosols that might transmit the COVID‐19 infection. Methods This was an observational study of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in left colectomy. We describe the technical details of intracorporeal resection, end‐to‐end stapled anastomosis and extraction of the specimen through mini‐laparotomy in the ideal location. Results We present preliminary results of 17 patients with left‐sided colonic pathologies, 15 neoplasia and two diverticular disease, who underwent four left hemicolectomies, six sigmoidectomies and seven high anterior resections. Median operating time was 186 min (range 120–280). No patient required conversion to extracorporeal laparoscopy or open surgery. Median hospital stay was 4.7 days (range 3–12 days). There was one case of anastomotic leak managed with conservative treatment. Conclusion Intracorporeal resection and end‐to‐end anastomosis with the possibility of extraction of the specimen by a mini‐laparotomy in the ideal location may present benefits and also adapts well to the conditions imposed by the COVID‐19 pandemic. Future comparative studies are needed to demonstrate these benefits with respect to extracorporeal anastomosis.

Background The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) in obese patients. Methods Observational descriptive study evaluating the feasibility of TES in obese rectal tumors between June 2004 and January 2019. Patients were assigned to two groups: body mass index (BMI) Results From 775 patients, 681 were enrolled in the study, 145 (21.3%) of them obese. No statistically significant differences between groups were found with respect to overall morbidity (27, 18.6%).The obese patients presented trends towards shorter mean surgical time (65 min, IQR 48 min), less perforation in the peritoneal cavity (eight, 5.5%), and 133 (91.7%) presented a lower rate of lesion fragmentation. Conclusion There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes in obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). TES in those obese patients does not represent a factor of surgical difficulty.

Resumen Introduccion La fragilidad se asocia con una mayor morbimortalidad postoperatoria. El manejo multidisciplinar individualizado de estos pacientes puede mejorar la calidad asistencial. Los objetivos de este trabajo son conocer el porcentaje de pacientes fragiles con cancer colorrectal en nuestra poblacion y describir la morbimortalidad asociada a la cirugia y la evolucion del tratamiento paliativo. Metodos Estudio observacional prospectivo de pacientes con cancer colorrectal quirurgico (1 de febrero del 2018-30 de abril del 2019). Cribado de paciente fragil y clasificacion segun grados de fragilidad. Decision terapeutica (cirugia o tratamiento paliativo) segun grado de fragilidad y voluntades explicitas del paciente. Analisis de comorbilidad postoperatoria (segun Clavien-Dindo y Comprehensive Complication Index), mortalidad y seguimiento oncologico. Resultados Fueron visitados 193 pacientes con cancer colorrectal quirurgico, con una edad media de 74 anos (44-92). Cribado: 46 pacientes fragiles (24%), con una edad media de 80 anos (57-92). Se optimizo e intervino a 22 pacientes (48%), con una edad media de 78 anos (57-89). Efectos adversos relevantes del 27,7% (4 efectos adversos grado iv a, uno iv b y otro v, segun Clavien-Dindo). Comprehensive Complication Index de 17,5. Tratamiento paliativo en 24 pacientes (52%), con una edad media de 82 anos (59-92). Seguimiento medio de 7,8 meses, 2 muertes por progresion de la enfermedad (8,3%), 5 reconsultas por complicaciones del cancer colorrectal (20,1%). Conclusiones El manejo multidisciplinar e individualizado del paciente fragil con cancer colorrectal es clave para mejorar la calidad asistencial en el tratamiento de este grupo de pacientes.

Background and objectives The complexity of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment calls for a multidisciplinary approach. We therefore created a multidisciplinary team to manage surgical care. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients we evaluated and the outcomes of the surgical techniques used. Material and methods Descriptive cross-sectional study of 104 patients evaluated by our surgical case management team between September 2015 and July 2018. Results Surgery was used to treat 46% of the patients with HS who were evaluated. Most were men (73%) with no family history of HS (63%) and smokers or former smokers (76%). Gluteal HS comprised the largest phenotype group (41%) and the majority of cases were serious (Hurley stage II, 36%; stage III, 46%). The anatomical regions with the largest number of lesions were the axillae (51.9%) and the groin (41.3%). Surgery was most often performed in the axilla (38.3%), followed by the gluteus (23.4%). The most common drug treatment was a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin, Deroofing was the technique used most often (in 48% of the patients who underwent surgery). Postoperative outcomes were assessed as satisfactory overall in 63.4% of the cases. The HS lesion recurred in 20% and 12% developed wound dehiscence. Conclusions Our experience leads us to recommend forming multidisciplinary teams to improve communication between specialists, provide tailored treatment for the patient with HS, and improve follow-up.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has become the treatment of choice for benign rectal lesions and early rectal cancer (T1). The size classification of rectal polyps is controversial. Some articles define giant rectal lesions as those larger than 5 cm, which present a significantly increased risk of complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of TEM in these lesions.An observational descriptive study with prospective data collection evaluating the feasibility of TEM in large rectal adenomas was performed between June 2004 and September 2018. Patients were assigned to one of the three groups according to size: 5 cm, very large (5-7.9 cm) and ultra-large (≥ 8 cm). Descriptive and comparative analyses between groups were performed.TEM was indicated in 761 patients. Five hundred and seven patients (66.6%) with adenoma in the preoperative biopsy were included in the study. Three hundred and nine out of 507 (60.9%) tumors 5 cm, 162/507 (32%) very large tumors (5-7.9 cm) and 36/507 (7.1%) ultra-large tumors (≥ 8 cm) were reviewed. Morbidity increased with tumor size: 17.5% in tumors 5 cm, 26.5% in those 5-7.9 cm, and 36.1% in those 8 cm. Peritoneal perforation, fragmentation, free margins and stenosis were also more common in very large and ultra-large tumors (p 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the groups in the definitive pathology (p = 0.38).TEM in these large tumors is associated with higher rates of morbidity, peritoneal perforation, free margins and stenosis. Although these tumors do not require total mesorectal excision and are eligible for TEM, the surgery must be carried out by experienced surgeons.

Loop ileostomy reduces the rates of morbidity due to colorectal anastomotic dehiscence. For its part, ileostomy closure is associated with low mortality (0–4%) but substantial morbidity (11–37%). Incisional surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications (2–40%). A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of two study groups: control (conventional primary skin closure) and experimental (primary skin closure with a contralateral Penrose® drain). Seventy patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure between April 2013 and June 2017 were included (35 per branch). Four were later removed from the study. Six of the remaining 66 patients (per protocol analysis) were diagnosed with incisional SSI (9.1%); there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (control group: 9.7%; experimental group: 8.6%) or between the risk factors associated with incisional SSI. Rates of overall and relevant morbidity (Clavien ≥ III) were considerable (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively), and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. No patients died. Contralateral drainage does not significantly affect the results of primary ileostomy closure. The rate of incisional SSI was similar in the drainage and non-drainage groups, and the overall rate of 9.1% was in the low range of those reported in the literature. The absence of mortality (0%) and the non-negligible rates of overall and relevant morbidity (28.1% and 9.1%, respectively) in our series suggest that loop ileostomy is a safe procedure. However, the bowel reconstruction involves risks that must be borne in mind. The study was registered and approved by the clinical research ethics committee of the study center (reference number 2012076). Clinical trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (identification number NCT02574702 and reference: ILEOS-ISS_2013).

The aim of this study is to assess postoperative morbidity and mortality in tumors with a proximal margin 15 cm or more from the anal verge operated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).This observational study of consecutive rectal tumor patients undergoing TEM was carried out from July 2004 to June 2017. We compared the results of rectal tumors at distances of ≥15 cm (group A) and15 cm (group B) from the anal verge.During the study period 667 patients were included: 118 in group A and 549 in group B. In the comparative analysis there were no significant differences in morbidity (p = 0.23), mortality (p = 0.32) or free margin involvement (p = 0.545). Differences were observed in terms of lesion size (p 0.001), surgical time (p 0.001) and peritoneal cavity perforation, which were all increased in group A.TEM for lesions in the rectosigmoid junction is feasible and is not associated with higher morbidity or mortality.

PURPOSE The intrarectal suture is considered a high technically complex procedure. The study's objectives were to assess the feasibility of making an intrarectal knot, through an in vitro study and assessing whether the video tutorial facilitates learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS A detailed description of the technique. A comparative observational cross-sectional study in surgeons with no previous experience in intrarectal knots. RESULTS Twenty-one of these 32 participants passed the intrarectal knot test without video tutorial (T1) (65.6%), and 26 (81.2%) after the video tutorial (T2) (P=0.26). The mean time taken to tie the knot fell from 74 seconds (SD=46) in T1 to 41 seconds (SD=41) in T2 (P

BACKGROUND Despite the publication of the guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), attitudes to urinary catheter (UC) management vary widely in colorectal surgery. The aim of the present study was to define current practices in UC management in colorectal surgery. METHODS Cross-sectional observational study carried out in March-April 2019, based on the responses to a survey administered to public hospitals in Catalonia. Respondents were asked about their observance of ERAS programs, the percentage of laparoscopic procedures performed, and the time of UC withdrawal in surgery of the colon and rectum. RESULTS Forty-three of 45 hospitals contacted eventually responded (95.6%). As two hospitals reported that they did not perform colorectal surgery, the study is based on the results from 41 centers. Thirty-five (85.4%) reported following ERAS programs; 30 (73.2%) have coloproctology units, and 39 (95.1%) perform more than 70% of colorectal surgeries by laparoscopy. In colon surgery, 27 (65.9%) remove the UC at 24 h, and 12 (29.3%) on day 2 or day 3. In rectal surgery, 17 (58.6%) remove the UC on day 2-3. CONCLUSIONS Management of UC in colon and rectal surgery varies widely. There is clearly room for improvement in UC management, but needs to be thoroughly assessed in randomized multicenter studies.

Introduction Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe procedure and the rates of intra- and post-operative complications are low. The information in the literature on the management of these complications is limited, and so their importance may be either under- or overestimated (which may in turn lead to under- or overtreatment). The present article reviews the most relevant series of TEM procedures and their complications and describes various approaches to their management. Evidence acquisition A systematic review of the literature, including TEM series of more than 150 cases each. We analyzed the population characteristics, surgical variables and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Evidence gathering A total of 1043 records were found. After review, 1031 were excluded. The review therefore includes 12 independent cohorts of TEM procedures with a total of 4395 patients. The rate of perforation into the peritoneal cavity was 5.1%, and conversion to abdominal approach was required in 0.8% of cases. The most frequent complications were acute urinary retention (AUR, 4.9%) and rectal bleeding (2.2%). Less common complications included abscesses (0.99%) and rectovaginal fistula (0.62%). Mortality rates were low, with a mean value of 0.29%. Conclusions Awareness and knowledge of TEM complications and their management can play an important role in their treatment and patient safety. Here, we present a review of the most important TEM series and their complication rates and describe various approaches to their management.

Background Unfavorable adenocarcinoma after transanal endoscopic microsurgery requires "completion surgery" with total mesorectal excision. The literature on this procedure is very limited. Objective This study aims to assess the percentage of transanal endoscopic microsurgery that will require completion surgery. Design This is an observational study with prospective data collection and retrospective analysis from patients who were operated on consecutively. Settings The study was conducted at a single academic institution. Patients Patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery from June 2004 to December 2018 who later required total mesorectal excision were included. Main outcome measures All the patients followed the same protocol: preoperative study, indication of transanal endoscopic microsurgery with curative intent, performance of transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and completion surgery indication 3 to 4 weeks after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Results Seven hundred seventy-four patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery, 622 with curative intent (group I: adenoma, 517; group II: adenocarcinoma, 105). Completion surgery was indicated in 64 of 622 (10.3%) patients: group I, 40 of 517 (7.7%) and group II, 24 of 105 (22.9%). After applying exclusion criteria, completion surgery was performed in 55 patients (8.8%). Abdominoperineal resection was performed in 23 (45.1%); the initial lesion was within 6 cm of the anal verge in 19 of these 23 (82.6%). The clinical morbidity rate (Clavien Dindo> II) was 3 of 51 (5.9%). Total mesorectal excision was graded as complete in 42 of 49 (85.7%). The circumferential resection margin was tumor-free in 47 of 50 (94%). Median follow-up was 58 months. Local recurrence was recorded in 2 of 51 (3.9%) and systemic recurrence was recorded in 7 of 51 (13.7%); 5-year disease-free survival was 86%. Limitations The limitations are defined by the study's observational design and the retrospective analysis. Conclusion The indication of completion surgery after transanal endoscopic microsurgery is low, but is higher in the indication of adenocarcinoma. Compared with initial total mesorectal excision, completion surgery requires a higher rate of abdominoperineal resection, but has similar postoperative morbidity, total mesorectal excision quality, and oncological results. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B423. Ciruga complementaria en cncer de recto desfavorable despus de una tem se obtiene satisfactoriamente preservacin del esfnter, calidad de muestra de etm y resultados oncolgicos a largo plazo ANTECEDENTES:El adenocarcinoma con evolucion desfavorable luego de una de microcirugia endoscopica transanal (TEM) requiere "cirugia de finalizacion" con la excision total del mesorecto. La literatura sobre este procedimiento es muy limitada.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el porcentaje de microcirugia endoscopica transanal que requerio cirugia completa.DISENO:Estudio observacional con recoleccion prospectiva de datos y analisis retrospectivo de pacientes operados consecutivamente.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizo en una sola institucion academica.PACIENTES:Aquellos pacientes sometidos a microcirugia endoscopica transanal desde junio de 2004 hasta diciembre de 2018 que luego requirieron excison toztal del mesorecto.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Todos los pacientes siguieron el mismo protocolo: estudio preoperatorio, indicacion de microcirugia endoscopica transanal con intencion curativa, realizacion de microcirugia endoscopica transanal e indicacion de cirugia complementaria 3-4 semanas despues de la microcirugia endoscopica transanal.RESULTADOS:Setecientos setenta y cuatro pacientes fueron sometidos a microcirugia endoscopica transanal, 622 con intencion curativa (grupo I, adenoma: 517, grupo II, adenocarcinoma: 105). la cirugia complementaria fue indicada en 64/622 (10.3%), grupo I: 40/517 (7.7%) y grupo II 24/105 (22.9%). Despues de aplicar los criterios de exclusion, la cirugia complementaria se realizo en 55 pacientes (8,8%). La reseccion abdominoperineal fue realizada en 23 (45,1%); en 19 de estos casos 23 (82,6%) la lesion inicial se encontraba dentro los 6 cm del margen anal. La tasa de morbilidad clinica (Clavien-Dindo > II) fue de 3/51 (5,9%). La excision total del mesorecto se califico como completa en 42/49 (85,7%). El margen de reseccion circunferencial se encontraba libre de tumor en 47/50 (94%). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 58 meses. La recurrencia local se registro en 2/51 (3.9%) y la recurrencia sistemica en 7/51 (13.7%); La supervivencia libre de enfermedad a 5 anos fue del 86%.LIMITACIONES:Todas definidas por el diseno observacional y el analisis retrospectivo del mismo.CONCLUSION:La indicacion de completar la cirugia despues de una TEM es baja, pero es mas alta cuando la indicacion es por adenocarcinoma. En comparacion con la excision total del mesorecto inicial, la cirugia complementaria requiere una tasa mas alta de reseccion abdominoperineal, pero tiene una morbilidad postoperatoria, una calidad de excision total del mesorecto y resultados oncologicos similares. ConsulteVideo Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B423. (Traduccion-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Purpose Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is the most favored surgical treatment for rectal prolapse. Perineal approaches are recommended for frail patients and those with major comorbidities, and in young men to avoid genitourinary disorders. There are very few descriptions in the literature of transanal endoscopic surgery to treat complete rectal prolapse. The aim of this article is to describe our experience with this technique. Patients and methods Patients undergoing transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse repair between 2010 and 2019 were recruited for the study. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative variables were recorded. Surgical technique, 30-day morbidity and follow-up are described. Results Five patients have been included. The postoperative period was uneventful and all patients were discharged in 48 hours without complications. All showed improved symptoms at 1-year control, and none presented recurrence in a mean follow-up period of 6 years. Conclusions The transanal endoscopic procedure allows improved endoscopic vision, and the reconstruction is performed transpelvically by fixing the anastomosis suture to the pelvic wall to prevent recurrence. Therefore, we think it is a valid alternative to other perineal procedures in patients in whom abdominal surgery is contraindicated.

Background The role of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction is still debated. Here we assess the morbidity, mortality and long-term oncological outcomes as a bridge to surgery for patients with left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. Method Prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of patients with left-sided malignant colonic obstruction undergoing stenting. April 2006–April 2018. We assessed all patients with intent-to treat and per protocol analyses and long-term follow-up variables. Results Colonic stent was performed in 117 patients. Technical and clinical success of SEMS placement: 94.4% (111/117), only 4.3% perforation. Elective surgery resection following the strategy of SEMS was performed in 83.8% (98/117). A laparoscopic approach was: 25.6% (30/117); 76.9% in the last two years. Primary anastomosis rate: 92.8% (91/98), without protective stoma in any patients. Anastomotic leakage rate: 8.2% (8/97). Median follow-up: 44.5 months (range 0–109). The intent-to-treat analysis showed overall and disease-free survival rates of 63.3% (74/117) and 58.1% (68/117), and local and distant recurrence rates: 9.4% (11/117) and 58.1% (68/117). In the per protocol analysis, overall and disease-free survival rates: 63.2% (62/98) and 60.2% (58/98), and local and distant recurrence rates: 10.2% (10/98) and 36.7% (36/98). Disease progression was predominantly observed during the first 5 years' follow-up as disease recurrence; after five years' follow-up, 60% of the patients were disease-free. Conclusions According to the results of the study SEMS as a bridge to surgery achieves perioperative results comparable to non-occlusive colonic cancer surgery and does not adversely affect long-term oncological outcomes. Further investigations are needed.

Perforation in the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery represents a major challenge. It is usually treated by primary suture, though some authors propose laparoscopic repair with or without ostomy. It is unclear whether perforation increases the risk of tumor dissemination. The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of primary suture of peritoneal perforation and the long-term risk of dissemination, also, to determine risk factors for perforation and to propose a predictive model for lesions with risk of perforation. This is an observational study with prospective data collection at Parc Tauli University Hospital, Sabadell, of patients undergoing transanal surgery with perforation into the peritoneal cavity from June 2004 to September 2017. The main variable is postoperative morbidity and mortality. The long-term follow-up of local recurrence and peritoneal tumor dissemination is described, and a quantitative predictive model for peritoneal cavity perforation is proposed. Forty-five patients out of 686 (6.6%) presented perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Ten patients (22.2%) in the perforation group had morbidity, a rate similar to the non-perforated group. There was no peritoneal dissemination in patients with adenoma or with carcinoma treated with curative intent. In the quantitative predictive model, risk factors for perforation were proximal edge of tumor > 14 cm from anal verge (6 points), size ≥ 6 cm (2), age ≥ 85 years (4), anterior quadrant (3) , and sex (2). Total scores of ≥ 6 points predicted perforation. Primary suture after peritoneal cavity perforation during transanal surgery is safe and does not increase the risk of recurrence or peritoneal dissemination. Our predictive model provides guidance regarding the risk of perforation and the need to suture the defect after transanal surgery resection.

PURPOSE Completion proctectomy is the traditional approach in the rectal stump remaining after subtotal colectomy for benign disease. It is associated with high morbidity and urinary and sexual dysfunction. To reduce this risk, a minimally invasive approach is presented, intersphincteric intramesorectal proctosigmoidectomy by transanal endoscopic operation and laparoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who had undergone total or subtotal colectomy for benign disease, those with a rectosigmoid stump who had rejected intestinal reconstruction and with refractory symptoms or risk of degeneration were selected. The technique proposed and the morbidity outcomes are described. RESULTS Three patients underwent this minimally invasive approach, operative time was 130 to 150 minutes. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6.6 days. Genitourinary and sexual tests performed in the male patient showed no dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS This minimally invasive technique, with intersphincteric resection and dissection close to the rectal wall, theoretically reduces morbidity and the damage to the autonomic pelvic nerves.

Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is considered the technique of choice for selecting patients for transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ERUS in patients with rectal tumors who later underwent TEM, and to analyze the factors that influence this accuracy. Observational study including prospective data collection of patients with rectal tumors undergoing TEM with curative intent between June 2004 and May 2016. Preoperative staging by EUS (uT) was correlated with the pathology results after TEM (pT). The accuracy of the EUS was evaluated and a series of variables (tumor morphology, height, lesion size, quadrant, definitive pathology, the surgeon assessing the ERUS, and waiting time from the date of the ERUS until surgery) were analyzed as possible predictors of diagnostic accuracy. Six hundred and fifty-one patients underwent TEM, of whom 495 met the inclusion criteria. The overall accuracy of EUS was 78%, sensitivity 83.78%, specificity 20%, PPV 91.3%, and NPV 11%. Forty patients (8.08%) were understaged and 50 (10.9%) were overstaged. In the multivariate analysis, the surgeon’s experience emerged as the most important predictor of accuracy (p

The standard treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma is total mesorectal excision (TME), in many cases requires a temporary or permanent stoma. TME is associated with high morbidity and genitourinary alterations. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows access to tumors up to 20 cm from the anal verge, achieves minimal postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, and does not require an ostomy. The treatment of T2, N0, and M0 cancers remains controversial. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in association with TEM reduces local recurrence and increases survival. The TAU-TEM study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the oncological outcomes and the improvement in morbidity and quality of life achieved with TEM compared with TME. Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial includes patients with rectal adenocarcinoma less than 10 cm from the anal verge and up to 4 cm in size, staged as T2 or T3-superficial N0-M0. Patients will be randomized to two areas: CRT plus TEM or radical surgery (TME). Postoperative morbidity and mortality will be recorded and patients will complete the quality of life questionnaires before the start of treatment, after CRT in the CRT/TEM arm, and 6 months after surgery in both arms. The estimated sample size for the study is 173 patients. Patients will attend follow-up controls for local and systemic relapse. This study aims to demonstrate the preservation of the rectum after preoperative CRT and TEM in rectal cancer stages T2–3s, N0, M0 and to determine the ability of this strategy to avoid the need for radical surgery (TME). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01308190. Numero de registro del Comite de Etica e Investigacion Clinica (CEIC) del Hospital universitario Parc Tauli: TAU-TEM-2009-01.

An important drawback of local surgery for lesions in the anal canal is the difficulty of achieving en bloc full-thickness resections. The aim of this study is to evaluate TEM/TEO in lesions of this type from the point of view of morbidity, mortality and the quality of the pathology specimen. This is an observational study with prospective data collection from June 2004 to July 2018. Two groups are defined: group A (rectal tumors with proximal margin between 0 and ≤4 cm from anal verge) and group B (distal margin > 4 cm from anal verge). A technical description is provided; resections and postoperative complications in both groups are compared. During the study period, 757 patients underwent TEM/TEO. Finally, 692 patients were included, 192 patients in group A and 500 patients in group B. An en bloc surgical specimen was obtained in 176/192 patients (91.7%), although the defect was completely sutured in 132 (68.8%). In the comparative analysis, group A did not present significantly greater fragmentation of the resected piece [16/192 (8.3%) vs. 36/500 (7.2%), p = 0.630], although group A was associated with greater involvement of the surgical margin [28/192 (14.6%), 32/500 (6.4%), p = 0.001] and clinically relevant morbidity [16/192 (8.3%), 20/500 (4%), p = 0.034]. There was no mortality. The use of TEM/TEO to remove lesions originating in the anal canal is feasible. But we have to take into account that there is an increase in complications, technical difficulties and affected margins resection.

Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) is the standard surgical technique for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, rates of sexual dysfunction ofup to 50% have been described after TME, and rates of urinary dysfunction of up to 30%. Although other factors are involved, the main cause of postoperative genitourinary dysfunction is intraoperative injury to the pelvic autonomic nerves. The risk is particularly high in the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The aim of this study is to compare pre- and post-TME sexual dysfunction, depending on the surgical approach usedin the inferior mesenteric vessels: either directly on the IMA, or from the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) to the IMA. Prospective, randomized,controlled study of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, who will be randomly assigned to one of two groups depending on the surgical approach to the inferior mesenteric vessels. The main variable is pre- and postoperative sexual dysfunction; secondary variables are visualization and preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves, pre- and postoperative urinary dysfunction, and pre- and postoperative quality of life. The sample will comprise 90 patients, 45 per group. The aim is to demonstrate that the dissection route from the IMV towards the IMA favors the preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves and thus reducesrates of sexual dysfunction post-surgery. Ethical and Clinical Research Committee, Parc Tauli University Hospital: ID 017/315. ClinicalTrials.gov TAU-RECTALNERV-PRESERV-2018 (TRN: NCT03520088 ) (Date of registration 04/03/2018).

Since the introduction of screening for colorectal cancer, the use of transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM) has become increasingly popular. However, the technical difficulty of this surgery varies widely. The few studies of learning curve in TEM have produced very disparate results. The aim of this study is to distinguish between straightforward and complex procedures, in order to refer more difficult cases to centers with greater experience. Observational study with prospective data collection and retrospective analysis was carried out between June 2004 and January 2019. All TEMs performed on rectal tumors were included. The complexity of the procedure was defined according to the weighted mean surgical time for each surgeon. A predictive model of complexity was established, with a score higher than 5 indicating a complex lesion. During the study period, 773 TEMs were performed, 708 of which met the study’s inclusion criteria. One hundred and three tumors were defined as complex. Predictors of complexity were as follows: male sex (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.1–2.9, score: 1), tumor size > 5 cm (OR: 5.1, 95% CI 3.2–8.2, score: 4), TEM for recurrence (OR: 6.3, 95% CI 2.3–16.7, score: 5), and distance from the upper margin of the tumor to the anal verge > 15 cm (OR: 1.6, 95% CI 0.96–2.7, score: 1). Rather than establishing the learning curve merely in terms of the number of TEM procedures performed, it is important to consider the surgical difficulty of the interventions. To this end, it is essential to differentiate simple TEMs from the complex ones.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive procedure with low morbidity. The definition of risk factors for postoperative complications would help to identify the patients likely to require more care and surveillance in an ambulatory or 1-day surgery (A-OdS) program. The main endpoints are overall 30-day morbidity and relevant morbidity. The secondary objectives are to detect risk factors for complications, rehospitalization, and the time of occurrence of the postoperative complications, and to describe the adverse effects following hospitalization that the A-OdS program would avoid. This is an observational study of consecutive patients undergoing TEM between June 2004 and December 2016. Overall and relevant morbidity based on the Clavien–Dindo (Cl–D) classification were recorded, as were demographic, preoperative, surgical, and pathology variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors were carried out. Six hundred and ninety patients underwent surgery, of whom 639 were included in the study. Overall morbidity rate was 151/639 patients (23.6%); the clinically relevant morbidity rate was 36/639 (Cl–D > II) (5.6%) and mortality 2/639 (0.3%). The most frequent complication was rectal bleeding, recorded in 16.9% (108/639 patients) and grade I in 86/108 patients (78. 9%). The period with the greatest risk of complications was the first 2 days. The rehospitalization rate after 48 h was 7%. The risk factors for complications were as follows: tumor size > 6 cm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3–7.8), anti-platelet medication (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–5.1), and surgeon’s experience

Although the incidence of colorectal cancer increases with the patient’s age, the elderly continue to be less likely to be scheduled for surgery. Transanal endoscopic micro-surgery (TEM) is a surgical alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) in early stage rectal cancer and/or in selected patients that could decrease morbidity and mortality rates in this group of patients. Our main objective is to assess the safety and feasibility of TEM in elderly (75–84 years) and very elderly (≥ 85 years) patients. Observational study was conducted with prospective data collection of all consecutive patients who underwent TEM between April 2004 and January 2017. Patients were assigned to groups according to age. Descriptive and comparative analyses between groups were performed. We analyzed 693 patients, 429 patients

Aim To determine the percentage of residual lesion observed in the pathology study of transanal endoscopic surgery (TEM) specimens after endoscopic polypectomy of malignant rectal polyps with questionable margins, and the need for further surgery. Secondary aims: to determine the morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure and to identify the percentage of recurrence after excision by TEM. Methods Observational study with prospective data collection of all patients undergoing TEM after endoscopic polypectomy for malignant rectal polyps or non-invasive high-grade neoplasia, from January 2004 to December 2016. An en bloc full-thickness wall excision of the scar was performed. Variables recorded: histology of TEM specimen, 30-day morbidity and mortality according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, need for salvage surgery and recurrence. Results Fifty out of 690 patients undergoing TEM during the study period (36 adenocarcinomas, five non-invasive high-grade neoplasias and 9 neuroendocrine tumors) were included. Post-surgery histology showed residual lesion in 21 (42%) patients: 7 neuroendocrine tumors, 10 adenomas and 4 adenocarcinomas (two pT1, one pT2 and one pT3). The pT2 and pT3 patients (4%) underwent salvage surgery. No recurrence was observed, and mean follow-up was 29.1Â ± 21.6 months. The 30-day morbidity rate was 14%, but 4/7 with Clavien-Dindo grade I. Conclusions After endoscopic polypectomy of malignant rectal polyps with questionable margins, the presence of residual lesion in the pathology study of transanal resection specimens is high. TEM with full-thickness resection of these lesions is an appropriate treatment, allowing disease control and achieving minimal morbidity.

Resumen Introduccion Aunque los resultados de la colecistectomia laparoscopica estandar son excelentes, se continua intentando minimizar el numero de puertos con el objeto de disminuir el dolor postoperatorio, conseguir una recuperacion mas temprana y mejorar el resultado estetico del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar los resultados de los primeros 100 casos de colecistectomia por puerto unico practicados en un hospital de segundo nivel. Material y metodos Estudio prospectivo, observacional, unicentrico. Se intervino a 100 pacientes entre enero de 2010 y abril de 2012. Criterios de inclusion: pacientes mayores de 16 anos con colelitiasis sintomatica operados por colecistectomia simple mediante incision umbilical unica. Criterios de exclusion: antecedentes de colecistitis aguda, colangiopancreatografia retrograda endoscopica, pancreatitis o sospecha de coledocolitiasis, IMC > 35 y laparotomias previas. Se estudiaron distintas variables epidemiologicas, quirurgicas y de seguridad. Resultados La edad media de los pacientes fue de 39,89 ± 11,5 anos. El tiempo quirurgico medio fue de 67,94 ± 25,5 min. Presentaron complicaciones postoperatorias 2 pacientes: seroma y fuga biliar. En 2 casos fue necesaria la utilizacion de trocar accesorio. La estancia media fue de 1,13 ± 0,8 dias. El 35% de los pacientes fueron tratados en regimen de cirugia mayor ambulatoria. Todos los pacientes se mostraron muy satisfechos con el resultado estetico. Conclusiones La colecistectomia mediante incision umbilical unica es una buena tecnica cuando se utiliza en casos seleccionados y por cirujanos expertos. Puede facilitar la practica de la colecistectomia en regimen ambulatorio. No se han presentado complicaciones graves. El indice de satisfaccion estetica es muy elevado.

Introduction Despite the excellent results obtained with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the efforts for minimizing the ports needed to reduce postoperative pain, for a quicker recovery and to improve the patient's cosmetics continue. The aim of this study is to report the results of the first 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in a secondary care hospital. Material and methods Prospective, observational and unicentric study including 100 patients between January 2010 and April 2012. Inclusion criteria: symptomatic cholelythiasis patients over 16 years of age on whom a single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Exclusion criteria: history of acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis or suspected choledocholithiasis, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, BMI>35 and previous laparotomies. We studied epidemiological, surgical and safety variables. Results The mean patient age was 39.89±11.5 years. The mean time of the surgical procedure was 67.94±25.5 min. There were 2 cases of postoperative complications: a non-infected seroma and a biliar leak. In 2 cases the use of an accessory trocar was needed. The mean hospital stay was 1.13±0.8 days. A total of 35% patients were included in the major ambulatory surgery program. The overall patient satisfaction survey rating showed a high level of cosmetic satisfaction in 100% of patients. Conclusions Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a good technique when performed in selected cases by expert surgeons. It is feasible to include the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major ambulatory surgery program. We have not had serious complications. There is a high cosmetic satisfaction index with this technique.