Search

ObjectivesEvaluation of rituximab and glucocorticoids as therapy to induce remission after relapse in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) in a prospective observational cohort of patients enrolled into the induction phase of the RITAZAREM trial.MethodsPatients relapsing with granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis were prospectively enrolled and received remission-induction therapy with rituximab (4×375 mg/m2) and a higher or lower dose glucocorticoid regimen, depending on physician choice: reducing from either 1 mg/kg/day or 0.5 mg/kg/day to 10 mg/day by 4 months. Patients in this cohort achieving remission were subsequently randomised to receive one of two regimens to prevent relapse.Results188 patients were studied: 95/188 (51%) men, median age 59 years (range 19–89), prior disease duration 5.0 years (range 0.4–34.5). 149/188 (79%) had previously received cyclophosphamide and 67/188 (36%) rituximab. 119/188 (63%) of relapses had at least one major disease activity item, and 54/188 (29%) received the higher dose glucocorticoid regimen. 171/188 (90%) patients achieved remission by 4 months. Only six patients (3.2% of the study population) did not achieve disease control at month 4. Four patients died in the induction phase due to pneumonia (2), cerebrovascular accident (1), and active vasculitis (1). 41 severe adverse events occurred in 27 patients, including 13 severe infections.ConclusionsThis large prospective cohort of patients with relapsing AAV treated with rituximab in conjunction with glucocorticoids demonstrated a high level of efficacy for the reinduction of remission in patients with AAV who have relapsed, with a similar safety profile to previous studies.

Objective To identify risk alleles relevant to the causal and biologic mechanisms of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV). Methods A genome-wide association study and subsequent replication study were conducted in a total cohort of 1,986 cases of AAV (patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis [Wegener's] [GPA] or microscopic polyangiitis [MPA]) and 4,723 healthy controls. Meta-analysis of these data sets and functional annotation of identified risk loci were performed, and candidate disease variants with unknown functional effects were investigated for their impact on gene expression and/or protein function. Results Among the genome-wide significant associations identified, the largest effect on risk of AAV came from the single-nucleotide polymorphism variants rs141530233 and rs1042169 at the HLA–DPB1 locus (odds ratio [OR] 2.99 and OR 2.82, respectively) which, together with a third variant, rs386699872, constitute a triallelic risk haplotype associated with reduced expression of the HLA–DPB1 gene and HLA–DP protein in B cells and monocytes and with increased frequency of complementary proteinase 3 (PR3)–reactive T cells relative to that in carriers of the protective haplotype. Significant associations were also observed at the SERPINA1 and PTPN22 loci, the peak signals arising from functionally relevant missense variants, and at PRTN3, in which the top-scoring variant correlated with increased PRTN3 expression in neutrophils. Effects of individual loci on AAV risk differed between patients with GPA and those with MPA or between patients with PR3-ANCAs and those with myeloperoxidase-ANCAs, but the collective population attributable fraction for these variants was substantive, at 77%. Conclusion This study reveals the association of susceptibility to GPA and MPA with functional gene variants that explain much of the genetic etiology of AAV, could influence and possibly be predictors of the clinical presentation, and appear to alter immune cell proteins and responses likely to be key factors in the pathogenesis of AAV.

Background Abatacept (ABA) is a recombinant fusion protein including extracellular domain of human CTLA4 and hinge– CH2–CH3 of the Fc domain of human IgG. Objectives This phase 2 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of ABA 125 mg subcutaneous (SC) versus placebo SC given every week on skin fibrosis using the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc; clinicaltrials.gov NCT02161406). Methods A 12-month, investigator-initiated, multicenter double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted between September 2014 and February 2018 at 27 US, Canadian and UK sites. Eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ABA or matching placebo, stratified by duration of dcSSc (≤18 vs >18 to ≤36 months). Key inclusion criteria included dcSSc with disease duration of ≤ 36 months (defined as first non−Raynaud phenomenon) and mRSS ≥ 10 and ≤ 35 units for disease duration of ≤ 18 months and mRSS ≥ 15 and ≤ 45 units with evidence of active disease for disease duration of >18-36 months. Escape therapy was allowed at 6 months for worsening SSc. Primary outcomes include safety and change in mRSS over 12 months (ΔmRSS). Secondary endpoints include ΔFVC%, ΔHAQ-DI, Δpatient and Δphysician global assessment, and ACR CRISS1 (composite measure in dcSSc). The primary endpoint of ΔmRSS was assessed using a linear mixed model (see Table) with primary end point data censored after initiation of escape therapy. Results 88 subjects were randomized (44/group) and formed the mITT group; 34 (77%) and 35 (80%) completed the 12-month double-blind treatment period in ABA and placebo groups, respectively. At baseline, the mean age was 49 years, 75% were female, mean disease duration was 1.59 years, 60% had disease duration ≤ 18 months, mRSS was 22.4, mean FVC% was 84.3%, and mean HAQ-DI was 1.0. Compliance with both drugs was >98%. ABA was well tolerated with comparable adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs of special interest (e.g., infections and malignancies) between treatments. There were 3 deaths during the treatment— 2 in ABA (both scleroderma renal crisis-days 11 and 46) and 1 in placebo (sudden cardiac arrest- day 310). The primary endpoint showed an adjusted mean improvement of mRSS of -6.24 in ABA vs. -4.49 in placebo, p= 0.28 (Table). The secondary outcome measures were statistically significant and clinically meaningful (HAQ-DI and physician global assessment) or showed numerical results favoring ABA (Table). A larger proportion of placebo subjects required escape immunosuppressive therapy vs. ABA (36% vs. 16%, p=0.03). Estimates are from a linear mixed model with treatment group, month (3, 6, and 12), treatment x month interaction, duration of dcSSc (≤18 vs >18 to ≤36 months), and baseline outcome measure as fixed effects and participant as a random effect (except for ACR CRISS). For ACR CRISS, treatment differences were assessed by the non-parametric Van Elteren test. Multiple imputation was used for ACR CRISS analysis. Conclusion In patients with early dcSSc, ABA was well tolerated, but ΔmRSS was not statistically significant. Secondary outcome measures showed evidence in favor of ABA, including greater requirement of escape therapy in the placebo group. mRSS showed large variability, despite recruiting an early dcSSc population. References [1] Khanna D, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol2016, 68:299-311 Acknowledgement Project was supported by NIH/NIAID Clinical ACE grant (5UM1AI110557-05) and an investigator-initiated grant by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Disclosure of Interests Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc, Grant/research support from: Bayer, BMS, Pfizer, Horizon, Consultant for: Actelion Acceleron, Arena, Bayer, BI, BMS, CSL Behring, Corbus, Cytori, GSK, Genentech/Roche, Galapagos, Employee of: Elcos Sciences, Inc, Cathie Spino: None declared, Erica Bush: None declared, Sindhu Johnson: None declared, Lorinda Chung Grant/research support from: United Therapeutics, Consultant for: Reata, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Eicos, Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, Inventiva, CSF Behring, Consultant for: Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Jerry Molitor Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant for: Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Viginia Steen Consultant for: CSL Behring, Corbus and Bayer, Paid instructor for: Advisory Board: CSL Behring, Roach, Bayer and Reata, Robert Lafyatis Grant/research support from: Kiniksa, Elpidera, Regeneron, PRISM biolab, Consultant for: Sanofi, Genentech, Formation, Biocon, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Merck, Robert Simms: None declared, Suzanne Kafaja: None declared, Tracy Frech: None declared, Vivian Hsu: None declared, Robin Domsic Consultant for: Eicos Sciences Inc/Civi Biopharma and Boehringer-Ingelheim., Janet Pope Consultant for: Eli Lilly and Company, Jessica Gordon Grant/research support from: Corbus Pharmaceuticals Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Maureen Mayes Grant/research support from: Maureen Mayes is a clinical trial investigator for Boehringer-Ingelheim; Galapagos, Reata, Sanofi, Merck-Serono, Consultant for: Maureen Mayes is a member of scientific advisory boards for Galapagos NV (Pharma), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas: Grant Review Board for Actelion., Speakers bureau: Maureen Mayes received personal fees for being a conference speaker on the use of autoantibodies in connective tissue diseases for Medtelligence, Elena Schiopu Grant/research support from: Bristol Meyers Squibb and Bayer, Amber Young: None declared, Nora Sandorfi: None declared, Jane Park: None declared, Faye Hant: None declared, Elana Bernstein Grant/research support from: I have an investigator-initiated research grant from the Pfizer ASPIRE Rheumatology Program., Consultant for: I am the medical monitor for SLS III, which is sponsored by Genentech, Soumya Chatterjee: None declared, Flavia Castelino Consultant for: Genentech, Boehringer, Ali Ajam Consultant for: Focus Point Global, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: Inventiva, F Hoffman La-Roche, Sanofi, BMS, Pfizer, Consultant for: Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Roche, Sanofi, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Pfizer, BMS, Chemomab, Sanipedia, Speakers bureau: Actelion, BMS; MSD, Janssen, Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Prof. Distler received research funding from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Mitsubishi Tanabe to investigate potential treatments of scleroderma and its complications, Consultant for: Prof. Distler has/had consultancy relationship within the last 3 years with Actelion, AnaMar, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, espeRare foundation, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, Lilly, medac, MedImmune, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Pharmacyclics, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Serodapharm and UCB in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma and its complications. In addition, he had/has consultancy relationship within the last 3 years with A. Menarini, Amgen, Abbvie, GSK, Mepha, MSD, Pfizer and UCB in the field of arthritides and related disorders, Ora Gewurz-Singer: None declared, David Fox Grant/research support from: Regeneron, Gilead, Seattle Genetics, Consultant for: Grant reviewer for Pfizer, Daniel Furst Grant/research support from: F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of vasculitis in individuals older than 50 years in Western countries. To shed light onto the genetic background influencing susceptibility for GCA, we performed a genome-wide association screening in a well-powered study cohort. After imputation, 1,844,133 genetic variants were analyzed in 2,134 case subjects and 9,125 unaffected individuals from ten independent populations of European ancestry. Our data confirmed HLA class II as the strongest associated region (independent signals: rs9268905, p = 1.94 × 10−54, per-allele OR = 1.79; and rs9275592, p = 1.14 × 10−40, OR = 2.08). Additionally, PLG and P4HA2 were identified as GCA risk genes at the genome-wide level of significance (rs4252134, p = 1.23 × 10−10, OR = 1.28; and rs128738, p = 4.60 × 10−9, OR = 1.32, respectively). Interestingly, we observed that the association peaks overlapped with different regulatory elements related to cell types and tissues involved in the pathophysiology of GCA. PLG and P4HA2 are involved in vascular remodelling and angiogenesis, suggesting a high relevance of these processes for the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this type of vasculitis.

Objective This collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons developed an evidence-based guideline for the perioperative management of antirheumatic drug therapy for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing elective total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee arthroplasty, and methodologists was convened to construct the key clinical questions to be answered in the guideline. A multi-step systematic literature review was then conducted, from which evidence was synthesized for continuing versus withholding antirheumatic drug therapy and for optimal glucocorticoid management in the perioperative period. A Patient Panel was convened to determine patient values and preferences, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using a group consensus process through a convened Voting Panel of rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. The strength of the recommendation reflects the degree of certainty that benefits outweigh harms of the intervention, or vice versa, considering the quality of available evidence and the variability in patient values and preferences. Results The guideline addresses the perioperative use of antirheumatic drug therapy including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in adults with RA, SpA, JIA, or SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It provides recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications, and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. The guideline includes 7 recommendations, all of which are conditional and based on low- or moderate-quality evidence. Conclusion This guideline should help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative antirheumatic medication management at the time of elective THA or TKA. These conditional recommendations reflect the paucity of high-quality direct randomized controlled trial data.