1. Standard and emerging CMR methods for mitral regurgitation quantification
- Author
-
Ever D Grech, Norman Briffa, Pankaj Garg, Alexander M.K. Rothman, Andrew J. Swift, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Gareth Archer, Rod Hose, Rob J. van der Geest, Alaa Elhawaz, Jun-Mei Zhang, Ian Hall, Natasha Barker, Jeroen J. Bax, Liang Zhong, Nigel Lewis, Abdallah Al-Mohammad, Benjamin Fidock, Jim M. Wild, Saul G. Myerson, Sven Plein, and Estefania De Garate
- Subjects
CMR, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ,Reproducibility of results ,VENC, Velocity Encoding ,medicine.medical_treatment ,RVSV, ight Ventricular Stroke Volume ,SV, Stroke Volume ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,STJ, Sino-Tubular Junction ,Severity of Illness Index ,Article ,MVR, Mitral Valve Replacement ,AoPC, Aortic Phase-Contrast Forward Volume ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Predictive Value of Tests ,medicine ,Left ventricular Stroke volume ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Mitral valve insufficiency ,Observer Variation ,MR, Mitral Regurgitation ,Reproducibility ,Mitral regurgitation ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Mitral valve replacement ,4D, 4 Dimensional ,Stroke volume ,LVSV, Left Ventricular Stroke Volume ,Aortic forward flow ,Concordance correlation coefficient ,CCC, Concordance Correlation Coefficient ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,FOV, Field of View - Abstract
Background There are several methods to quantify mitral regurgitation (MR) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The interoperability of these methods and their reproducibility remains undetermined. Objective To determine the agreement and reproducibility of different MR quantification methods by CMR across all aetiologies. Methods Thirty-five patients with MR were recruited (primary MR = 12, secondary MR = 10 and MVR = 13). Patients underwent CMR, including cines and four-dimensional flow (4D flow). Four methods were evaluated: MRStandard (left ventricular stroke volume - aortic forward flow by phase contrast), MRLVRV (left ventricular stroke volume - right ventricular stroke volume), MRJet (direct jet quantification by 4D flow) and MRMVAV (mitral forward flow by 4D flow - aortic forward flow by 4D flow). For all cases and MR types, 520 MR volumes were recorded by these 4 methods for intra−/inter-observer tests. Results In primary MR, MRMVAV and MRLVRV were comparable to MRStandard (P > 0.05). MRJet resulted in significantly higher MR volumes when compared to MRStandard (P, Highlights • In primary mitral regurgitation, direct quantification has significant limitations • MRMVAV method is the most consistent method quantification across all groups. • All CMR methods are agreeable in secondary and valvular intervention groups
- Published
- 2021