Search

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative management strategy to hasten postoperative recovery. We examined the effects of a pilot implementation of ERAS for pediatric patients on anesthetic outcomes. We performed a prospective case–control study utilizing an ERAS protocol in patients aged

To assess the impact of modifications in preoperative instructions on parental understanding of preoperative fasting guidelines. A prospective postoperative parental survey was conducted to assess parental understanding of preoperative fasting requirements in patients undergoing surgery before and after institution of instructions that included visual aids. Data regarding demographics, procedure type, and time to surgery from preoperative visit were also captured. Survey data were compared between pre- and post-intervention groups using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. 173 parents in the pre-intervention group and 162 parents in the post-intervention group were included in the analysis. Parent identification of aspiration risk as the reason for fasting almost doubled after intervention (72.2% vs. 38.2%). There was some evidence of demographic differences between groups; however, in an adjusted model, there was strong evidence (p

Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare epithelial disorders caused by abnormal or absent structural proteins at the epidermal-dermal junction. As a result, patients experience blisters and wounds from mild shearing forces. Some forms of EB are complicated by resultant scarring and contractures. The perioperative anesthetic management of patients with EB is complex and requires a systems-based approach to limit harm. We reviewed our experience with providing general anesthesia to patients at our tertiary EB referral center, including adverse events related to anesthetic care, outcomes in the immediate perioperative period, and details of anesthetic management. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with EB anesthetized at the Children's Hospital Colorado between January 2011 and December 2016. A subset of pediatric anesthesiologists cared for all patients using a standardized clinical care pathway. Patient demographics, detailed anesthetic methods, immediate perioperative outcomes, and adverse events were characterized. Results Over a 6-year period, 37 patients underwent 202 general anesthetics. Most patients (75.7%) had dystrophic EB (DEB). Female patients comprised 48.6%. The majority (56.7%) traveled >50 miles to receive care, and many (35.1%) traveled >150 miles for their care. Common adaptations to care included avoidance of electrocardiogram leads (88.6%) and temperature probes (91.6%). Nasal fiberoptic intubation (n = 160) was performed, or natural airway/mask (n = 27) was maintained for most patients. Supraglottic devices were not used for airway management during any of the anesthetics. Anesthesia preparation time was longer (average 25.8 minutes [standard deviation {SD} = 12.7]) than our average institutional time (14 minutes). Succinylcholine was never used, and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants were used in only 1.5% of patient encounters. Blood was transfused in 16.3% of cases and iron infused in 24.8%. Average length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit was comparable to our institutional average (average 40.1 [SD = 28.6] vs 39 minutes). New skin or mucosal injury occurred in 8 encounters (4%), and desaturation occurred in 43 cases (21.3%). There were no major adverse events. Conclusions By using a specialized team and a standardized clinical care pathway, our institution was able to minimize adverse events caused by the anesthetic and surgical care of patients with EB. We recommend natural airway or nasal fiberoptic airway management, meticulous avoidance of shear stress on the skin, and a multidisciplinary approach to care. Supportive therapy such as perioperative blood transfusions and iron infusions are feasible for the treatment of chronic anemia in this population.

INTRODUCTION: Although enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) provide a safe and effective way to improve the recovery of children undergoing bladder reconstruction, ERPs have not been widely adopted in pediatric urology. We describe a quality improvement initiative and outcomes after implementing a 24-element ERP at a single, freestanding children’s hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Multiple stakeholder meetings were planned and executed, initially with pediatric practitioners with ERP experience to understand potential implementation barriers then with anesthesiologists, nurses, case managers, and other ancillary staff to draft our institution-specific ERP. A standardized order set was generated to improve ERP adherence. ERP adherence audits and cyclic performance evaluations held every 6–9 months facilitated continuous pathway refinement. Patient outcomes were compared with a pre-ERP historic cohort. RESULTS: Time from initial ERP planning to first implementation was 7 months. ERP was implemented in twenty consecutive patients undergoing bladder reconstruction (median age 11.3 years, range 4.1–21.1) who were compared to twenty consecutive pre-ERP patients (median age 11.4 years, range 7.7–25.1). Median post-operative length of stay (LOS) significantly decreased from 9 days (range 2–31) pre-ERP to 4 days (range 3–29) post-ERP (p

IntroductionLower urinary tract reconstruction in paediatric urology represents a physiologically stressful event that is associated with high complication rates, including readmissions and emergency room visits. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a set of multidisciplinary, perioperative strategies designed to expedite surgical recovery without adversely impacting readmission or reoperation rates. Early paediatric urology data demonstrated ERAS reduced complications in this population.Methods and analysisIn 2016, a working group of paediatric urologists and anaesthesiologists convened to develop an ERAS protocol suitable for patients undergoing lower urinary tract reconstruction and define study process measures, patient-reported outcomes and clinically relevant outcomes in paediatric and adolescent/young adult patients. A multicentre, prospective, propensity-matched, case–control study design was chosen. Each centre will enrol five pilot patients to verify implementation. Subsequent enrolled patients will be propensity matched to historical controls. Eligible patients must be aged 4–25 years and undergoing planned operations (bladder augmentation, continent ileovesicostomy or appendicovesicostomy, or urinary diversion). 64 ERAS patients and 128 controls will be needed to detect a decrease in mean length of stay by 2 days. Pilot phase outcomes include attainment of ≥70% mean protocol adherence per patient and reasons for protocol deviations. Exploratory phase primary outcome is ERAS protocol adherence, with secondary outcomes including length of stay, readmissions, reoperations, emergency room visits, 90-day complications, pain scores, opioid usage and differences in Quality of Recovery 9 scores.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been registered with authors’ respective institution review boards and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. It will provide robust insight into the feasibility of ERAS in paediatric urology, determine patient outcomes and allow for iteration of ERAS implementations as new best practices and evidence for paediatric surgical care arise. We anticipate this study will take 4 years to fully accrue with completed follow-up.Trial registration numberNCT03245242.

Summary Background With increasing awareness of the opioid epidemic, there is a push for providers to minimize opioid prescriptions. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a comprehensive multidisciplinary perioperative protocol that includes minimization of opioid analgesia in favor of non-opioid alternatives and regional analgesia. While ERAS protocols have consistently been shown to decrease inpatient opioid utilization, the impact on opioid prescribing practices and use after discharge in pediatric surgical patients is unclear. Objective This study aims to assess the impact of an ERAS protocol on outpatient opioid prescription patterns after pediatric lower urinary tract reconstructive surgery. We hypothesize that implementation of an ERAS protocol leads to fewer outpatient opioid prescriptions as measured by number and total quantity of oral morphine milligram equivalents by body weight per patient. Methods All patients who underwent bladder augmentation, creation of a continent catheterizable channel, bladder neck reconstruction or closure, or revision of prior reconstructive procedures at our tertiary care facility between 2011 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients were divided into pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts based on whether surgery occurred before or after ERAS implementation. The Colorado Prescription Drug Monitoring Program was used to track filling of postoperative opioid prescriptions for patients covered by the database. Results A total of 167 urologic reconstructive surgeries were analyzed, including 83 before ERAS and 84 after ERAS implementation. Patients in the ERAS cohort received and filled more outpatient opioid prescriptions at time of discharge (82.6% historical vs 93.9% ERAS, p = 0.015; 76.1% vs 57.9%, p = 0.012). There were no differences in prescription total morphine milligram equivalents normalized to body mass, total days supplied, or 90-day opioid prescription refill rates. Discussion We found an unexpected increase in postoperative outpatient opioid prescriptions following implementation of an ERAS protocol for lower urinary tract reconstructive surgery. Possible reasons include worry about pain crisis at home in the setting of decreased hospital length of stay in the ERAS cohort or generalized upward drift in opioid prescribing patterns over time. ERAS protocols in other subspecialties reveal mixed findings but consistently suggest standardization of outpatient opioid prescribing patterns leads to a decrease in opioid prescriptions. Conclusions Patients received more, not fewer, outpatient opioid prescriptions following major urologic reconstructive surgery after implementation of an ERAS protocol. Purposeful efforts should be made to standardize opioid prescriptions at discharge based on meaningful clinical criteria. Download : Download high-res image (233KB) Download : Download full-size image Summary Figure . Diagram of patient inclusion for pre-ERAS historical controls and ERAS cohorts, including numbers of patients identified who underwent the target procedures and those removed as they were not local to the states covered by the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). ERAS = Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

Improvements in anesthetic drugs and monitoring techniques over the past several decades have significantly reduced the anesthetic risks for pediatric patients. Neonates and infants are at increased risk for cardiovascular and pulmonary complications, and recent reports have led to concern that these young patients may be at risk for long-term detrimental neurodevelopmental effects as well. Although studies are currently under way to answer the question of anesthetic neurotoxicity in children, surgeons and anesthesiologists must work with parents to determine the best course of action for these vulnerable patients.

A rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the B3GALT6 gene on chromosome 1p36 results in deficiency of β-1,3-galactosyltransferase 6, an enzyme critical for glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. Defects in this gene result in a phenotype that has features of both skeletal dysplasia and a connective tissue disorder. The anesthetic considerations for children with this disorder have not previously been described. We report a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to the perioperative care of a child with B3GALT6 mutations with severe phenotypic expression.

Perioperative care of patients with Xeroderm Pigmentosum (XP), a rare disorder of DNA repair [1,2], presents many anesthetic challenges. Firstly, harmful ultraviolet radiation can be detected in perioperative areas. Also, anesthetic type must be carefully considered, as exposure to volatile anesthetics may hasten the development of neurodegeneration (Masuda et al., 2002; Reitz and Lanz, 1993; Miyazaki et al., 2007; Fjouji et al., 2013) [3-6]. Furthermore, muscle relaxants can produce a prolonged effect (Soen et al., 2006) [7]. Airway management may be difficult secondary to skin changes and growths (Zarrouki et al., 2017; Hajijafari et al., 2014; Meyer, 1982) [8-10]. Even the risk of using imaging modalities should be considered. Given the above exposure risks, we present considerations for preparing to care for patients with XP in the perioperative period and information on where to purchase supplies to prepare the perioperative area.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal approach to the care of the surgical patient focused on reducing the stress response and associated physiologic changes that accompany surgery. Over the past 20 years, ERAS programs have been found to result in reduced LOS and complications in adult patients. Despite abundant adult literature describing implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery programs, pediatric data in this area is sparse. This educational review describes the history and elements of ERAS protocols, reviews the available evidence in adult and pediatric populations, compares and contrasts ERAS with the PSH, and offers strategies for implementation and ideas for future directions of ERAS in children.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a set of peri-operative strategies to increase speed of recovery. ERAS is well established in adults but has not been well studied in children.The purpose of the current study was to establish the safety and efficacy of an ERAS protocol in pediatric urology patients undergoing reconstructive operations. It was hypothesized that ERAS would reduce length of stay and decrease complications when compared with historical controls.Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to prospectively enroll patients aged18 years if they had undergone urologic reconstruction that included a bowel anastomosis. ERAS included: no bowel preparation, administration of pre-operative oral carbohydrate liquid, avoidance of opioids, regional anesthesia, laparoscopy when feasible, no postoperative nasogastric tube, early feeding, and early removal of intravenous fluids (IVF). Recent (2009-2014) historical controls were propensity matched in a 2:1 ratio on age, sex, ventriculoperitoneal shunt status and whether the patient was undergoing bladder augmentation. Outcomes were protocol adherence, length of stay (LOS), emergency department (ED) visits, re-admission within 30 days, re-operations and adverse events occurring within 90 days of surgery.A total of 26 historical and 13 ERAS patients were included. Median ages were 10.4 (IQR 8.0-12.4) and 9.9 years (IQR 9.1-11), respectively (P = 0.94) (see Summary Table). There were no significant between-group differences in prior abdominal surgery (38% vs 62%), rate of augmentation (88% vs 92%) or primary diagnosis of spina bifida (both 62%). ERAS significantly improved use of pre-operative liquid load (P 0.001), avoidance of opioids (P = 0.046), early discontinuation of IVF (P 0.001), and early feeding (P 0.001). Protocol adherence improved from 8/16 (IQR 4-9) historically to 12/16 (IQR 11-12) after implementation of ERAS. LOS decreased from 8 days to 5.7 days (P = 0.520). Complications of any grade per patient decreased from 2.1 to 1.3 (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.97). There were fewer complications per patient across all grades with ERAS. No differences were seen in emergency department (ED) visits, re-admissions and re-operations.Implementation improved consistency of care delivered. Tenets of ERAS that appeared to drive improvements included maintenance of euvolemia through avoidance of excess fluids, multimodal analgesia, and early feeding.ERAS decreased length of stay and 90-day complications after pediatric reconstructive surgery without increased re-admissions, re-operations or ED visits. A multicenter study will be required to confirm the potential benefits of adopting ERAS.

Background: Miscommunication between departments during patient handoffs can lead to errors in treatment due to omission of critical information, misunderstanding of critical information, or delay in care. Handoff communication errors between day and night shifts have been shown to cause patient harm(1). However, interdepartmental handoff errors with patient harm has yet to be studied(2). The 2015 results from our hospital’s AHRQ Culture of Patient Safety Survey showed that 34.7% of respondents indicated that they agree (29.8%) or …

Background Assessment of pediatric anesthesia trainees is complicated by the random nature of adverse patient events and the vagaries of clinical exposure. However, assessment is critical to improve patient safety. In previous studies, a multiple scenario assessment provided reliable and valid measures of the abilities of anesthesia residents. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of relevant simulated pediatric perioperative scenarios and to determine their effectiveness in the assessment of anesthesia residents and pediatric anesthesia fellows. Methods Ten simulation scenarios were designed to reflect situations encountered in perioperative pediatric anesthesia care. Anesthesiology residents and fellows consented to participate and were debriefed after each scenario. Two pediatric anesthesiologists scored each scenario by key action checklist. The psychometric properties (reliability, validity) of the scores were studied. Results Thirty-five anesthesiology residents and pediatric anesthesia fellows participated. The participants with greater experience administering pediatric anesthetics generally outperformed those with less experience. Score variance attributable to raters was low, yielding a high interrater reliability. Conclusions A multiple-scenario, simulation-based assessment of pediatric perioperative care was designed and administered to residents and fellows. The scores obtained from the assessment indicated the content was relevant and that raters could reliably score the scenarios. Participants with more training achieved higher scores, but there was a wide range of ability among subjects. This method has the potential to contribute to pediatric anesthesia performance assessment, but additional measures of validity including correlations with more direct measures of clinical performance are needed to establish the utility of this approach.