P53 suppresses tumour growth via its diverse cellular activities, including induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, differentiation and senescence (Vousden and Lu, 2002). Most of these effects reflect the transactivation of a number of genes by p53 acting as a transcription factor, but p53 also activates mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathways that are independent of p53 transcriptional activity (Green and Kroemer, 2009). Activation of p53 leads to apoptosis through either the death receptor pathway or the mitochondrial pathway (Selivanova, 2004). In the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, p53 induces several genes including Bax, APAF-1, Puma and Noxa (Miyashita and Reed, 1995; Burns and El-Deiry, 1999; Lowe and Lin, 2000; Nakano and Vousden, 2001; Robles et al, 2001). TP53 mutations may be associated with an aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis, and some p53 mutants counteract the effects of anticancer agents that attack tumours (Bunz et al, 1999; Poeta et al, 2007). Given the high frequency of p53 mutations in human tumours, reactivation of the p53 pathway has been widely proposed as beneficial for cancer therapy (Selivanova, 2010). In addition, several reported structural studies have shown that mutant p53 core domain unfolding is reversible and, as mutant p53 is expressed at high levels in many tumours, it therefore serves as a potential target for novel cancer therapy (Lambert et al, 2010). Its reactivation will restore p53-dependent apoptosis, among others, resulting in efficient eradication of tumour cells (Tovar et al, 2006). Wild-type p53 can be induced by small organic molecules such as nutlin-3 inhibiting the p53/MDM2 interaction (Vassilev et al, 2004). PRIMA-1 (p53 reactivation and induction of massive apoptosis) and its potent methylated analog, APR-246/PRIMA-1Met, are small molecules that have the ability to convert mt-p53 to an active conformation, thereby restoring its sequence-specific DNA binding and transcriptional activation (Bykov et al, 2002b). It was reported that PRIMA-1 induces cell death through multiple pathways encompassing transcription-dependent and -independent signaling (Chipuk et al, 2003). In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that p53 reactivating small molecules are less toxic to normal cells than to cancer cells and have no significant adverse or genotoxic effects (Stuhmer et al, 2005; Tovar et al, 2006). Although about half of all human malignancies harbour dysfunctional, mutated p53 proteins, approximately 90% of all ES retain wild-type p53, and the downstream DNA damage cell cycle checkpoints and p53 pathways remain functionally intact (de Kovar et al, 1993; Alava et al, 2000; Kovar et al, 2003b; Huang et al, 2005). Exposure of ES cells to Nutlin-3a, a small organic molecule known to reactivate wild-type 53, resulted in a robust apoptotic phenotype that required the presence of wild-type p53 but did not affect the growth of mutant p53 expressing cells (Pishas et al, 2011). TP53 mutation alone rates high among variables, including p16/p14ARF alteration and tumour stage, predicting poorer overall survival in Ewing sarcoma (de Alava et al, 2000; Lopez-Guerrero et al, 2011). Multivariate analysis identified alterations of TP53 as an adverse prognostic factor defining a subset of ES with highly aggressive behaviour and poor chemoresponse (Huang et al, 2005). Therefore, novel treatment options specifically targeting mutant p53 are highly warranted. There is a prospective COG (Children's Oncology Group, USA) study ongoing to validate a retrospective study which strongly suggested that mutant p53 ES constitutes a particularly bad prognostic group (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00898053). If data from the retrospective study is confirmed, this would strongly support the need for novel mutant p53 targeting therapeutic strategies in ES. In this study, we investigated whether the small pharmacological molecule APR-246 is able to reactivate mutant p53 in Ewing sarcoma cells in order to drive tumour cells into apoptosis. Using Ewing sarcoma patients' derived cell lines, we show that APR-246 is able to induce apoptosis to variable degrees independent of the p53 status. We observed that cell lines with similar p53 mutations as well as cell lines established from the same patient at different stages of the disease all exhibited variable responses to the drug. To interrogate the molecular basis for the differential responses to APR-246, we performed comparative transcriptomic analysis on the three STA-ET-7 cell lines established from the same patient. Data analysed revealed genes annotating to p53 and apoptosis pathways whose expression varies between the more APR-246-sensitive and the less APR-246-sensitive cell lines. We propose, therefore, that APR-246 will not be a suitable candidate to consider for targeting p53 mutant Ewing sarcoma.