1. Improving the efficacy and reliability of <scp>rTMS</scp> language mapping by increasing the stimulation frequency
- Author
-
Carolin Weiss Lucas, J. Pieczewski, Roland Goldbrunner, Christian Grefkes, Volker Neuschmelting, Kristina Jonas, and Charlotte Nettekoven
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Intraclass correlation ,speech mapping ,brain stimulation ,error rate ,Stimulation ,Language mapping ,Audiology ,Lateralization of brain function ,Young Adult ,Region of interest ,noninvasive ,Humans ,Speech ,Medicine ,pain ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,ddc:610 ,tolerability ,Research Articles ,Reliability (statistics) ,picture naming ,Cerebral Cortex ,Brain Mapping ,Psycholinguistics ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ,virtual lesion ,Pattern Recognition, Visual ,Neurology ,Tolerability ,TMS ,Brain stimulation ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Anatomy ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5–10 Hz is widely used for language mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability, number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved language mapping. 15 right‐handed, healthy subjects (m = 8, median age: 29 yrs) were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2–5 days. In each session, 10, 30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors (20 ± 12%) compared to 50 Hz (12 ± 8%; p, The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for language mapping is still hampered by a limited sensitivity and specificity, by an overall poor reliability and by stimulation‐associated discomfort. We, here, found that increasing the stimulation intensity up to 30 and 50 Hz can improve language mapping results as compared to the most commonly used protocol of 10 Hz rTMS.
- Published
- 2021