Search

Context: Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a common neurophysiological response to joint injury. While athletic trainers (ATs) are constantly treating patients with AMI, it is unclear how clinicians are using the available evidence to treat the condition. Objective: To investigate ATs’ general knowledge, clinical practice, and barriers for treating AMI. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was utilized. The survey was distributed to a random sample of 3000 ATs from the National Athletic Trainers’ Association and through social media. 143 board certified ATs (age: 34.6 [10.3] y; experience: 11.7 [9.8] y) from various clinical settings and educational backgrounds were included in the analysis. Results: One hundred one respondents were able to correctly identify the definition of AMI. The majority of these respondents correctly reported that joint effusion (n = 95, 94.1%) and abnormal activity from joint receptors (n = 91, 90.1%) resulted in AMI. Of the 101 respondents, only 58 (57.4%) reported using disinhibitory interventions to treat AMI. The most frequently used evidence supported interventions were transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 38, 65.5%), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (n = 33, 56.9%), and focal joint cooling (n = 25, 43.1%). The interventions used correctly most often based on current evidence were neuromuscular electrical stimulation (n = 29/33, 87.9%) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (n = 26/38, 68.4%). Overall, difficulty quantifying AMI (n = 62, 61.24%) and lack of education (n = 71, 76.2%) were most frequently perceived as barriers. Respondents that did not use disinhibitory interventions perceived lack of experience treating AMI, understanding the terminology, and access to therapeutic modalities more often than the respondents that reported using disinhibitory interventions. Conclusion: Further education about concepts and treatment about AMI is warranted for ATs. Continued understanding of ATs’ clinical practice in regard to AMI may help identify gaps in athletic training clinical education.

Hamstrings muscle morphology is determinant of muscle function (i.e. strength). Among individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), less cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the ACLR-limb are associated with muscle weakness, and may contribute to lower rates of return to preinjury activity level and an increased risk for long-term sequelae. To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of differences in hamstrings morphology following ACLR is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe the morphology of the hamstring muscle complex after ACLR. We searched five databases for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings size and architecture in individuals with ACLR. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow fixed-effect size meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. Twenty-four studies were included for final review. Eight categories of morphological outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) volume, (2) cross-sectional area (CSA), (3) muscle length, (4) muscle thickness, (5) fascicle length, (6) pennation angle, (7) fiber area, and (8) fiber type. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower hamstrings volume in the ACLR-limb in both contralateral and control group comparisons, and lower CSA, length, and thickness in the ACLR-limb in contralateral comparisons. The semitendinosus and gracilis were most profoundly impacted. Limited moderate evidence demonstrated greater biceps femoris pennation angle in the ACLR-limb. Individuals with ACLR demonstrated large deficits in semitendinosus and gracilis muscle CSA and volume in the ACLR-limb compared contralaterally, with no differences observed in the biceps femoris or semimembranosus. Clinical implications regarding assessment and treatment of individuals with ACLR are discussed.

Differences in the excitability of motor generating neural pathways are reported following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that is associated with quadriceps dysfunction and theorized to prevent the full recovery of muscle function. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare quadriceps neural excitability between the involved ACLR limb, the uninvolved limb, and uninjured controls, and to determine at what time intervals these differences are present after surgery. We conducted a search of PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Web of Science, and extracted measures assessing difference of quadriceps spinal-reflexive, corticospinal, and intracortical excitability from studies that compared (1) involved limb to the uninvolved limb, (2) involved limb to a control limb, or (3) uninvolved limb to a control limb. We stratified time at 24 months, since this represents a period of heightened risk for reinjury. A modified Downs and Black checklist and Egger’s test were used to determine the methodological quality of individual studies and risk of bias between studies. Fourteen studies comprising 611 participants (371 individuals with a history of ACLR; median time from surgery: 31.5 months; range 0.5–221.1 months) were included in the review. Overall, the involved (g = 0.60, 95% CI [0.24, 0.96]) and uninvolved (g = 0.49, 95% CI [0.00, 0.98]) limbs exhibited greater motor threshold (MT) in comparison to uninjured controls. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were greater in the uninvolved limb in comparison to uninjured controls (g = 0.31, 95% CI [0.03, 0.59]). Lesser intracortical inhibition was exhibited in the uninvolved limb compared to uninjured controls (g = 0.54, 95% CI [0.14, 0.93]). When stratified by time from surgery, MEP amplitudes were greater in the uninvolved limb compared to uninjured controls (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.03, 0.63]) within the first 24 months after surgery. When evaluated more than 24 months after surgery, the involved limb exhibited greater Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) compared to uninjured controls (g = 0.38, 95% CI [0.00, 0.77]). MT were greater in the involved limb (g = 0.93, 95% CI [− 0.01, 1.88]) and uninvolved limb (g = 0.57, 95% CI [0.13, 1.02]) compared to uninjured controls. MEP amplitudes in the involved limb were lesser compared to uninjured controls when evaluated more than 24 months after ACLR (g = -1.11, 95% CI [− 2.03, − 0.20]). The available evidence supports that there are neural excitability differences within the corticospinal tract in individuals with ACLR when compared to uninjured controls. Future research should focus further on longitudinal assessments of neural excitability prior to and following ACLR. Identifying interventions aimed to facilitate corticospinal excitability after ACLR appears to be warranted to improve quadriceps function. Registered through PROSPERO CRD42020158714.

Context: Altered quadriceps activation is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and can persist for years after surgery. These neural deficits are due, in part, to chronic central nervous system alterations. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive modality, that is, believed to immediately increase motor neuron activity by stimulating the primary motor cortex, making it a promising modality to use improve outcomes in the ACLR population. Objective: To determine if a single treatment of tDCS would result in increased quadriceps activity and decreased levels of self-reported pain and dysfunction during exercise. Design: Randomized crossover design. Setting: Controlled laboratory. Patients: Ten participants with a history of ACLR (5 males/5 females, 22.9 [4.23] y, 176.57 [12.01] cm, 80.87 [16.86] kg, 68.1 [39.37] mo since ACLR). Interventions: Active tDCS and Sham tDCS. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of maximum electromyographic data of vastus medialis and lateralis, voluntary isometric strength, percentage of voluntary activation, and self-reported pain and symptom scores were measured. The 2 × 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance by limb were performed to explain the differences between time points (pre and post) and condition (tDCS and sham). Results: There was a significant time main effect for quadriceps percentage of maximum electromyographic of vastus medialis (F9,1 = 11.931, P = .01) and vastus lateralis (F9,1 = 9.132, P = .01), isometric strength (F9,1 = 5.343, P = .046), and subjective scores for pain (F9,1 = 15.499, P = .04) and symptoms (F9,1 = 15.499, P = .04). Quadriceps percentage of maximum electromyographic, isometric strength, and voluntary activation showed an immediate decline from pre to post regardless of tDCS condition. Subjective scores improved slightly after each condition. Conclusions: One session of active tDCS did not have an immediate effect on quadriceps activity and subjective scores of pain and symptoms. To determine if tDCS is a valid modality for this patient population, a larger scale investigation with multiple treatments of active tDCS is warranted.

Background While traditionally viewed as a beneficial adaptation to preserve stability in the presence of knee pathology, excessive muscle co-activation may be detrimental for joint health when extrapolated to repetitive movement patterns over time. Lesser hamstrings strength relative to the quadriceps (low H:Q strength ratio) may influence neuromuscular patterns about the knee, as it is reported to increase risk for lower extremity injury among healthy females. Research question Does the relationship between H:Q strength ratio and H:Q co-activation differ between sexes during walking and jogging? Methods We used a descriptive laboratory study to assess hamstrings and quadriceps strength and muscle activity patterns during the loading response of treadmill walking gait (1.34 m/s) and jogging (2.68 m/s) in healthy males (n = 11) and females (n = 12). Concentric-concentric peak isokinetic torque (60°/s) was used to derive the H:Q strength ratio, which was treated as an explanatory variable for H:Q co-activation indices (medial, lateral, composite) and constituent EMG amplitudes. Bivariate correlations (Pearson r or Spearman ρ) were used for analysis. Results In females, lesser H:Q strength ratios were associated with greater lateral co-activation (r=−.715, P = .007) and biceps femoris EMG amplitude (ρ=−.532, P = .046) during the loading response of walking gait. When controlling for sex differences in knee flexion, the relationship between lesser H:Q strength ratios and greater lateral co-activation was preserved (partial r=−.699, P = .012); yet, biceps femoris EMG was no longer correlated (partial r=−.331, P = .175). Significant relationships were not observed among male participants during walking or in either sex during jogging (all P > .05). Significance Collectively, these data provide evidence of a sex-specific neuromuscular pattern with implications for joint health. Excessive lateral co-activation may consequently promote a greater valgus moment and ligamentous strain. Future investigations would benefit from understanding the influence of hamstrings-dominant exercise programs on the neuromuscular patterns of the knee.

Context: Traditionally, quadriceps activation failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is estimated using discrete isometric torque values, providing only a snapshot of neuromuscular function. Sample entropy (SampEn) is a mathematical technique that can measure neurologic complexity during the entirety of contraction, elucidating qualities of neuromuscular control not previously captured. Objective: To apply SampEn analyses to quadriceps electromyographic activity in order to more comprehensively characterize neuromuscular deficits after ACLR. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: ACLR: n = 18; controls: n = 24. Interventions: All participants underwent synchronized unilateral quadriceps isometric strength, activation, and electromyography testing during a superimposed electrical stimulus. Main Outcome Measures: Group differences in strength, activation, and SampEn were evaluated with t tests. Associations between SampEn and quadriceps function were evaluated with Pearson product–moment correlations and hierarchical linear regressions. Results: Vastus medialis SampEn was significantly reduced after ACLR compared with controls (P = .032). Vastus medialis and vastus lateralis SampEn predicted significant variance in activation after ACLR (r2 = .444; P = .003). Conclusions: Loss of neurologic complexity correlates with worse activation after ACLR, particularly in the vastus medialis. Electromyographic SampEn is capable of detecting underlying patterns of variability that are associated with the loss of complexity between key neurophysiologic events after ACLR.

Objective To compare inter-limb differences in hamstring strength, muscle volume, and neural activity between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and healthy controls, and to identify associations between hamstring neuromuscular function and subjective knee function. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Laboratory. Participants Eleven participants with a history of ACLR (69.45 ± 22.48 months from surgery) and eleven healthy matched controls. Main outcome measure(s) Hamstring isokinetic torque at 60 and 240°•s−1, muscle volume, and medial and lateral hamstring electromyographic (EMG) activity during a single leg hop task were all evaluated during one study visit. Percent limb-differences (%LD) were calculated between each outcome measure; greater inter-limb differences indicated greater asymmetries between limbs. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used to determine associations between subjective knee function and each outcome measure. Results Individuals with ACLR had large magnitude inter-limb differences in medial hamstring EMG (p = .04; d = 0.94), biceps femoris short head volume (p = .02; d = 1.07) and semitendinosus (p = .03; d = 1.07) volume. Lower semimembranosus volume was associated with lower IKDC scores (r = 0.754; p = .012). Conclusions We observed greater inter-limb differences in medial hamstring EMG, and semitendinosus and long head of the biceps femoris volume, which may negatively influence knee function years after ACLR.