1. Determining best outcomes from community-acquired pneumonia and how to achieve them
- Author
-
Lesley Bennett and Jane Hadfield
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Standardized approach ,Mortality rate ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Pneumonia ,0302 clinical medicine ,Patient satisfaction ,030228 respiratory system ,Community-acquired pneumonia ,Health care ,Medicine ,Effective treatment ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Care bundle ,business ,Intensive care medicine - Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common acute medical illness with a standard, effective treatment that was introduced before the evidenced-based medicine era. Mortality rates have improved in recent decades but improvements have been minimal when compared to other conditions such as acute coronary syndromes. The standardized approach to treatment makes CAP a target for comparative performance and outcome measures. While easy to collect, simplistic outcomes such as mortality, readmission and length of stay are difficult to interpret as they can be affected by subjective choices and health care resources. Proposed clinical- and patient-reported outcomes are discussed below and include measures such as the time to clinical stability (TTCS) and patient satisfaction, which can be compared between health institutions. Strategies to improve these outcomes include use of a risk stratification tool, local antimicrobial guidelines with antibiotic stewardship and care bundles to include early administration of antibiotics and early mobilization.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF