Search

BACKGROUND Several studies have already reported good short-term results with a pyrocarbon unipolar radial head prosthesis (Pyc-uRHP). The aim was to evaluate the evolution from mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a Pyc-uRHP. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center study. We followed up all the patients who underwent Pyc-uRHP surgery in our original study at 2 years of follow-up (52 patients), reaching a minimum of 7 years of clinical and radiologic follow-up. This study included 26 patients who underwent a clinical examination assessing mobility, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the visual analog scale score and radiologic evaluation with anteroposterior and profile radiographs at a mean follow-up of 110 months (range, 78-162 months). The radiologic study analyzed signs of proximal osteolysis, stem loosening, capitellar wear, and humeroulnar osteoarthritis. RESULTS No patients required revision. Eight patients required reoperation: coronoid screw removal in 1 and arthrolysis for stiffness in 7. The mean time to reoperation was 11 months. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score at last follow-up was 96 ± 9 (of 100), with a pain score of 42 ± 7 (of 45), mobility score of 19 ± 2 (of 20), stability score of 10 (of 10), and function score of 25 (of 25). Comparison with clinical data from the mid-term delay did not reveal any significant difference. All patients presented with proximal osteolysis around the neck but without progression. No stem loosening was noted. The rates of humeroulnar osteoarthritis (12% at mid-term vs. 80% at last follow-up, P < .0001) and capitellar lesions (34% at mid-term vs. 80% at last follow-up, P = .001) increased significantly. CONCLUSION We have shown that a Pyc-uRHP at 9 years' follow-up provided stable and satisfactory clinical results. Osteolysis of the radial neck was always present but it did not evolve, and no stem loosening was noted. Finally, we have shown a clear worsening of radiologic humeroulnar osteoarthritis and capitellar lesions that remained asymptomatic.

Aims The outcomes with metal head hemiarthroplasties (HA) are contrasted, especially in young, active patients. An innovative Pyrocarbon interface was introduced in 2014 in order to decrease potential glenoid wear. The aim of this study is to evaluate survival and short-term results of HA with a pyrocarbon head. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-centre study: 30 consecutive patients underwent HA with pyrocarbon humeral head and were assessed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The mean age at surgery was 54 ± 13 years; 38% of patients (n = 13) had undergone surgery at least once on the affected shoulder. Depending on the aetiology, 4 groups were analyzed: group 1 (osteonecrosis, n = 12), group 2 (primary gleno humeral osteoarthritis, n = 10), group 3 (fracture sequelae, n = 4) and group 4 (revision, n = 4). Results A significant improvement in clinical results was documented at mean follow-up of 38 months: mean Constant score (preop 35 ± 15 vs. postop 67 ± 19 points; Conclusion HemiPYC provided satisfactory clinical outcomes without glenoid wear at short-term follow-up. Disappointing results were recorded in the case of severe fracture sequelae. Mid and long-term studies should be carried out to confirm these results. Level of evidence Level IV; Retrospective Study

The aim was to evaluate the results of radial head prostheses (RHP) in Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI) and to compare results after RHP between acute and chronic ELI. Thirty-one patients treated with RHP for ELI were selected from a multicenter retrospective series of 310 RHP, with follow-up greater than two years. Two groups were acute ELI group (n=19, average diagnosis = 5+/−9 days) and chronic ELI group (n=12, average diagnosis 8.4+/−7.1 months). RHP was associated in some cases with K-wires: during acute ELI to stabilize the distal radio-ulnar joint (n=4) or during chronic ELI with ulnar osteotomy or palliative surgery (n=4). Clinical and radiologic evaluation was performed including analysis of the complications and revisions rates, pain level, range of motion, and MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) and DASH score (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). At last follow-up (71+/−38 months), survival of RHP in the acute ELI group was 84% (16/19) and 92% (11/12) in the chronic ELI group without statistically significant difference. Flexion (acute=131degrees+/−13.4 vs chronic=22+/−12.8, p=0.041) and supination (ELI=71+/−16.8 vs chronic=58+/−17.4; p=0.045) were better in acute ELI group. The DASH score was also better in the acute group (15+/−9.1 versus 24+/−15.2, p=0.048). There was more advanced stage of humero-radial osteoarthritis in the chronic ELI group (0.7+/−0.5 versus 1.4+/−0.6, p=0.041). RHP in acute ELIs provide better clinical results, although RHPs are part of the therapeutic arsenal to treat chronic ELI.

AimsWe aimed to address the question on whether there is a place for shoulder stabilization surgery in patients who had voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood and adolescence, and later becoming involuntary and uncontrollable.MethodsConsecutive patients who had an operation for recurrent posterior instability before the age of 18 years were studied retrospectively. All patients had failed conservative treatment for at least six months prior to surgery; and no patients had psychiatric disorders. Two groups were identified and compared: voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood which became uncontrollable and involuntary (group VBI); and involuntary posterior instability (group I). Patients were reviewed and assessed at least two years after surgery by two examiners.ResultsIn all 38 patients (40 shoulders) were included: group I (20 shoulders), with involuntary posterior instability (onset at 14 years of age (SD 2.3), and group VBI (20 shoulders), with initially voluntary posterior instability (onset at 9 years of age (SD 2.6) later becoming involuntary (16 years of age (SD 3.5). Mean age at surgery was 20 years (SD 4.6 years; 12 to 35). A posterior bone block was performed in 18 patients and a posterior capsular shift in 22. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (2 to 18). Recurrence of posterior instability was seen in nine patients, 30% in group VBI (6/20 shoulders) and 15% in group I (3/20 shoulders) (p > 0.050). At final follow-up, the shoulder's of two patients in each group had been revised. No differences between either group were found for functional outcomes, return to sport, subjective, and radiological results.ConclusionAlthough achieving stability in patients with so-called voluntary instability, which evolves into an involuntary condition, is difficult, shoulder stabilization may be undertaken with similar outcomes to those patients treated surgically for involuntary instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1760–1766.

Background In palliative surgery on the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ), ulnar head resection and the Sauve–Kapandji procedure are often followed by instability and radio-ulnar convergence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of the DRUJ after modified matched distal ulnar resection performed alone or with partial or complete wrist arthrodesis. Hypothesis A modification of matched distal ulnar resection, consisting in reconstruction of the sixth compartment and dorsalisation of the extensor carpi ulnaris, minimises these complications, regardless of the cause and associated procedures. Patients and methods A single-centre retrospective study was conducted in 46 patients (50 wrists) who underwent modified matched distal ulnar resection. The 50 wrists fell into three groups: total wrist arthrodesis according to Millender, n = 21 (TWA group); radius to proximal row arthrodesis, n = 17 (RPRA group); and isolated matched distal ulnar resection, n = 12 (IMDUR group). Seventy per cent of patients had rheumatoid arthritis. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic assessment, with an analysis of radio-ulnar convergence, DRUJ stability, and ulno-carpal impingement, as well as of ulnar translation of the carpus in the IMDUR group. Results After the mean follow-up of 8.2 ± 5.4 years, 62% of patients were pain-free, with a mean VAS pain score of 1.3 ± 2.1, and 90% of patients said they would have the procedure again. Clinical and radiographic instability due to excessively proximal resection was noted in 2 (4%) wrists, of which 1 required repeat surgery. Ulno-carpal impingement due to excessively distal resection occurred in 2 (4%) wrists. No significant ulnar translation of the carpus was noted in the IMDUR group (DiBenedetto: 0.011 ± 1.9). Range of motion was similar in the three groups (mean pronation = 77 ± 17°; and mean supination = 79 ± 8°) (p > 0.05). Mean grip strength was 85 ± 35% compared to the other side. Discussion Our modification of matched distal ulnar resection minimises the complications specific of other ulnar head resection techniques or of the Sauve–Kapandji procedure, namely, radio-ulnar convergence and DRUJ instability. Level of proof IV; retrospective comparative study.

Background: Despite a new trend to systematically use reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in elderly population regardless of the indication, total anatomical shoulder arthroplasty can get good functional results in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of uncemented short-stem anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients older than 70 years and to compare these results to a matched population with an uncemented short-stem RSA. Methods: In this retrospective monocentric study, clinical outcomes were based on constant score (Cst), subjective shoulder value (SSV) score, and range of motion. The aim of radiographic analysis was to identify glenoid component loosening and humeral bone remodeling around the uncemented short stem. Results: At an average follow-up of 44 ± 12.5 months, 32 uncemented short-stem TSA in 31 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included and were compared to 32 uncemented RSA. Fifty three percent of the patients had “a forgotten prosthesis”. ROM was significantly improved in all cases. Cst reached 73 ± 9 pts and SSV 90 ± 10.8% (P

Background: While patient age, tear size, and muscle fatty infiltration are factors known to affect the rate of tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, the effect of tendon delamination is less known. Purpose: To assess the effect of tendon delamination on rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic single-row (SR) repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Consecutive patients (N = 117) with chronic full-thickness rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic SR repair with the tension-band cuff repair. The mean ± SD age at the time of surgery was 60 ± 8 years. There were 25 small, 63 medium, and 29 large tears. Tendon delamination was assessed intraoperatively under arthroscopy with the arthroscope placed in the lateral portal. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with nondelaminated (n = 80) and delaminated (n = 37) cuff tears. The 2 groups were comparable for age, sex, body mass index, preoperative pain, strength, and a Constant-Murley score. Repair integrity was evaluated with sonography (mean, 24 months after surgery; range, 6-62 months) and classified into 3 categories: type A, indicating complete, homogeneous, and thick coverage of the footprint; type B, partial coverage with a thin tendon; and type C, no coverage of the footprint. Results: The prevalence of tendon delamination observed under arthroscopy was 32% (37 of 117), which increased with tear size and retraction: from 15% in small tears to 32% in medium tears and 45% in large tears ( P = .028). Postoperatively, 83 patients had complete coverage of footprint (type A = 71%) and the cuff was considered healed, whereas 26 had partial coverage or a thin tendon (type B = 22%) and 8 had no coverage (type C = 7%). Overall, the rate of complete healing was 78% in nondelaminated cuff tears and 57% in the case of tendon delamination ( P = .029). In large retracted tears, the healing rate dropped from 81% in the absence of delamination to 39% when the tendons were delaminated ( P = .027). Conclusion: Tendon delamination increases with tear size and retraction. Patients with chronic delaminated and retracted rotator cuff tears (stage 2 or 3) are at risk of failure after SR cuff repair, whereas patients with small delaminated rotator cuff tears (stage 1) involving only the supraspinatus can be treated with an SR cuff repair with a high chance of tendon healing. These results suggest that SR cuff repair may be insufficient to treat delaminated chronic cuff tears. To improve the anatomic outcomes of rotator cuff repairs, surgeons should consider treating delaminated tears with a double-row or double-layer repair.

Introduction Surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures is recommended in an active population to avoid loss of strength, especially in supination and flexion. Hypothesis A double incision repair technique with immediate postoperative mobilization for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures is safe and provides good results after 2 years in active patients. Material and methods Seventy-four men (47 ± 7 years) with acute tears of the distal biceps tendon tears were included in this retrospective single-center study. All patients were operated using the double-incision repair technique described by Morrey. The tendon was inserted with transosseous sutures into the biceps tuberosity. Patients were allowed to perform immediate postoperative active mobilization. A minimum follow-up of two years was required including clinical and radiological evaluation. Results Sixteen patients were lost to follow up leaving 58 (78%) patients for analysis with a mean follow-up of 53 ± 19 months. At final follow-up, the mean evaluation for pain on the VAS scale was 0.22 ± 0.7. Mean range of motion results included extension −1° ± 2°, flexion 138° ± 6°, pronation 72° ± 16° and supination 81° ± 10°. The strength ratio in flexion was 94 ± 8% and in supination 90.5 ± 12% compared to the contralateral limb. Subjective elbow value and DASH score were respectively 94 ± 6% and 7.5 ± 9%. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied and all except one returned to their previous sport. We noticed 2 heterotopic ossifications and one patient needed a reoperation for a radioulnar synostosis. Neither re-rupture nor nerve injury were observed. Discussion A double incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair is a minimally invasive procedure with reliable results. Morrey's modification of the initial procedure associated with early mobilization is associated with a low rate of complications and limited the occurrence of synostosis or ossifications. Level of evidence IV, case series, with no comparison group.

BACKGROUND Revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has increased, especially in young patients with high functional expectations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of revision TEA with a single semiconstrained prosthesis. METHODS Thirty-four revision TEAs were performed with a Coonrad/Morrey prosthesis in 32 patients; 2 patients had bilateral procedures. The mean patient age was 61 years (range, 22 to 76 years), and the revision TEA was performed at a mean time of 7.8 years (range, 1.6 to 21 years) after the primary TEA. Etiologies for revisions were humeral and ulnar aseptic loosening (n = 14), ulnar aseptic loosening (n = 8), humeral aseptic loosening (n = 6), septic arthritis (n = 4), and unstable unlinked prostheses (n = 2). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with systematic preoperative infection workup and quantification of bone loss. The mean follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 2 to 21 years). RESULTS The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at the last follow-up was excellent in 6 cases, good in 18 cases, fair in 8 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with a mean improvement (and standard deviation) between the preoperative values at 42.4 ± 16.1 points and the postoperative values at 81.8 ± 12 points (p < 0.001). The mean pain scores improved significantly from 6.7 ± 1.3 points preoperatively to 1.4 ± 1.4 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). The flexion-extension arc increased significantly (p = 0.02) from 74° ± 27° preoperatively to 100° ± 31° postoperatively. The total number of complications was 29 in 19 revision TEAs (56%). Twenty of the 29 complications simply required monitoring without surgical intervention. Six repeat surgical procedures were required, and 3 implant revisions (9%) were performed. CONCLUSIONS Revision TEA with a semiconstrained prosthesis can provide good clinical results that can be maintained during follow-up. The rate of complications is high. Proper evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio is essential for each revision TEA and should be discussed with the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an option to conserve limb function after resection of proximal humerus malignancy. An allograft-composite RSA is an alternative to a tumor prosthesis, and can restore proximal humeral bone stock. The aim of the present study was to assess medium-term radiographic and clinical results for such composite implants. Methods: Patients with malignant proximal humerus tumor treated by resection and reconstruction by composite RSA were retrospectively analyzed at a minimum 24 months’ follow-up. Clinical assessment used Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and ADLER score. Standard radiographic work-up assessed allograft absorption and screened for implant loosening. Results: Eleven patients were included, with a mean age of 51 years (range, 19-87 years) and mean 30 months’ follow-up (range, 24-84 months). Mean tumor resection was 10 cm (range, 6-17 cm). Etiologies comprised chondrosarcoma (n=6), osteosarcoma (n=2), B-cell lymphoma (n=1) and single metastasis (n=2). Bony increased-offset allograft was associated to humerus reconstruction in 8 cases, and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in 5 cases. Mean Constant score was 49 points, SSV 52%, and ADLER score 20 points. Increased glenoid implant offset associated to tendon transfer significantly improved anterior elevation and external rotation. Radiographic allograft consolidation to the native humerus was acquired in 73% of cases, while osteolysis in the epiphyseal-metaphyseal zone was found in 64%. There were no cases of humeral implant loosening. Glenoid allograft absorption was systematic (8/8 cases), without inducing loosening of the implant baseplate. Conclusion: Composite reverse shoulder arthroplasty is functionally effective after massive resection. However, allograft absorption is a drawback, casting doubt on continued use on the glenoid side. Level of evidence: IV.

OBJECTIVEThe best predictors of height gain due to surgical correction are the number of fused vertebrae and the degrees of the corrected Cobb angle. Existing studies of predictive models measured the radiographic spinal height and did not report the clinical height gain. The aims of this study were to determine the best predictive factors of clinical height gain before surgical correction, construct a predictive model using patient population data for machine learning, and test the performance of this model on a validation population.METHODSThe authors reviewed 145 medical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgery that included placement of posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis between 2012 and 2016. Standing and sitting clinical heights were measured before and after surgery in patients who had been surgically treated under similar conditions. Multivariate analysis was then performed and the results were used to develop a predictive model for height gain after surgery. The data from the included patients were randomly assigned to a learning set or a test set.RESULTSIn total, 116 patients were included in the analysis, for whom the average postoperative clinical height gain in a standing position was 4.2 ± 1.8 cm (range 0–11 cm). The best prediction model was calculated as follows: standing clinical height gain (cm) = 1 − 0.023 × sitting clinical height (cm) − 0.19 × Risser stage + 0.058 × Cobb preoperative angle (°) + 0.021 × T5–12 kyphosis (°) + 0.14 × number of levels fused. In the validation cohort, 91% of the predicted values had an error of less than one-half of the actual height gain.CONCLUSIONSThis predictive model formula for calculating the potential postoperative height gain after surgical treatment can be used preoperatively to inform idiopathic scoliosis patients of what outcomes they may expect from posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (taking into account the model’s uncertainty).

We evaluated survival and midterm results of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA) in arthritic patients younger than 65 years.Fifty-eight PISAs (InSpyre; Tornier-Wright, Bloomington, MN, USA), implanted in 56 patients between 2010 and 2015, were prospectively observed. The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 13 years. The cause was primary osteoarthritis (18), fracture sequelae (16), post-instability arthritis (15), aseptic necrosis (3), inflammatory disease (2), and failed hemiarthroplasty (4); 34 shoulders (61%) had previously undergone surgery. Glenoid erosion was assessed in 4 grades according to the Sperling classification. Humeral erosion was also assessed in 4 grades. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predisposing risk factors for both humeral and glenoid erosion.At a mean follow-up of 47 ± 15 months, survival rate was 90%. Six patients (10%) required conversion to reverse total shoulder prosthesis for painful glenoid erosion (n = 2) and humeral erosion with greater tuberosity stress fractures (n = 4). The mean Constant score and subjective shoulder value significantly increased from 36 ± 14 points to 70 ± 15 points and 32% ± 14% to 75% ± 19%, respectively (P.001). Humeral medialization was observed in 78% of the cases with increased pain score. Uncorrected anteroposterior implant subluxation (12 cases) was associated with lower Constant score (50 points vs. 72 points; P = .02) and lower subjective shoulder value (53% vs. 78%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, no risk factors for glenoid or humeral erosion were found.At midterm follow-up, PISA does not protect from progressive glenoid erosion and can lead to greater tuberosity erosion and stress fractures. Longer follow-up is required to see whether PISA survival will be superior to that of hemiarthroplasty.

Introduction The present study aimed to describe the technique of ultrasound traumatic elbow lesion assessment performed by an orthopedic surgeon. Methods Nine patients were included in a single-center study. Clinical examination assessed pain, ranges of elbow motion, neurovascular status and elbow ligament testing. Ultrasound was associated to radiography between days 7 and 15, screening for lesions of the bone, medial ligament (in 30-90° flexion), lateral ligament (elbow at 90° in cobra position) and epitrochlear and epicondylar muscle insertions. Ultrasound scanning time and echogenicity were assessed. Results Four radial head osteochondral fractures were detected on ultrasound in addition to the 4 fractures seen on radiography, without significant difference (p = 0.071). Clinical examination found 2 cases of valgus laxity and 5 of varus laxity. Ultrasound, performed blind to radiography, found 1 medial collateral ligament anterior bundle lesion (in 1 of the 2 patients with valgus laxity) and 4 lateral collateral ligament ulnar bundle lesions (in 4 of the 5 patients with varus laxity). There were no epicondylar or epitrochlear tendon lesions. Scanning time decreased significantly over the study period, from a mean 30 minutes in the first 5 cases to a mean 24.8 minutes in the last 5 (p = 0.046). Three patients could not be put in the cobra position, and 3 showed poor echogenicity. Discussion Ultrasound assessment of traumatic elbow lesions could be performed by an orthopedic surgeon on a well-defined protocol. Lesions on ultrasound matched clinical symptomatology. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility remain to be assessed. Level of evidence IV.