Search

Informal peer consultation (IPC), also called curbside consultation, is a common practice in medicine. Research has shown that physicians use IPC but how this learning occurs during the process has not been studied. This basic qualitative study describes how pediatric hospitalists learn during IPC, framed by Kolb's (2015) Experiential Learning Theory of Growth and Development. Eleven pediatric hospitalists were interviewed. Deidentified transcripts were coded for key themes using inductive methods. The main prompt for informal peer consultation was the perception of uncertainty. Three themes describe the learning process: "Eliciting Perspectives," "Thinking Aloud Together," and "Experiencing Validation. A fourth theme, "Acknowledging Value," described the importance of IPC for modeling how to manage uncertainty with patients' caregivers and medical trainees. By describing the learning process, the results have implications for physicians who engage in IPC and may inform faculty-level professional development initiatives to improve the IPC process., (© 2024 Society of Hospital Medicine.)

Research in Pediatric Hospital Medicine is growing and expanding rapidly, and with this comes the need to expand single-site research projects into multisite research studies within practice-based research networks. This expansion is crucial to ensure generalizable findings in diverse populations; however, expanding Pediatric Hospital Medicine research projects from single to multisite can be daunting. We provide an overview of major logistical steps and challenges in project management, regulatory approvals, data use agreements, training, communication, and financial management that are germane to hospitalist researchers launching their first multisite project by sharing processes and lessons learned from running multisite research projects in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network within the Eliminating Monitor Overuse study portfolio. This description is relevant to hospitalist researchers transitioning from single-site to multisite research or those considering serving as site lead for a multisite project., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Objectives: Acknowledging that a successful career in hospital medicine (HM) requires specialized skills, residency programs have developed hospital medicine-focused education (HMFE) programs. Surveys of Internal Medicine residency leaders have described HMFE curricula but are limited to that specialty and lack perspectives from early career hospitalists (ECHs) who recently completed this training. As such, we surveyed multispecialty ECHs to evaluate their preferences for HMFE and to identify gaps in standard residency training and career development that HMFE can bridge. The objectives of our study were to describe multispecialty ECH needs and preferences for HMFE and to identify gaps in standard residency training and career development that HMFE can bridge., Methods: From February to March 2021, ECHs (defined as hospitalists within 0-5 years from residency) were surveyed using the Society of Hospital Medicine's listserv. Respondents identified as having participated in HMFE or not during residency (defining them as HMFE participants or non-HMFE participants)., Results: From 257 respondents, 84 (33%) ECHs met inclusion criteria. Half (n = 42) were HMFE participants. ECHs ranked clinical hospitalist career preparation (86%) and mentorship from HM faculty (85%) as the most important gaps in standard residency training and career development that HMFE can bridge. Other key components of HMFE included exposure to quality improvement, patient safety, and high-value care (67%); provision of autonomy through independent rounding (54%); and preparation for the job application process (70%)., Conclusions: Multispecialty ECHs describe HMFE as positively influencing their decision to pursue a hospitalist career and increasing their preparedness for practice. HMFE may be particularly well suited to foster advanced clinical skills such as independent rounding, critical thinking, and self-reflection. We propose an organizing framework for HMFE in residency that may assist in the implementation and innovation of HMFE programs nationwide and in the development of standardized HMFE competencies.

Objectives: Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellowship programs need to abide by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements regarding communication and supervision. Effective communication is critical for safe patient care, yet no prior research has explored optimal communication practices between residents, fellows, and attending hospitalists. Our objective is to explore communication preferences among pediatric senior residents (SRs), Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellows, and hospitalists on an inpatient team during clinical decision-making., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys adapted from prior research, 1 for each population: 200 hospitalists, 20 fellows, and 380 SRs. The instruments included questions about communication preferences between the SR, fellow, and hospitalist during clinical scenarios. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics and examined paired differences in percent agreement using χ2 tests, accounting for clustering by institution., Results: Response rates were: 53% hospitalists; 100% fellows; 39% SRs. Communication preferences varied based on role, scenario, and time of day. For most situations, hospitalists preferred more communication with the fellow overnight and when a patient or family is upset than expressed by fellows (P < .01). Hospitalists also desired more communication between the SR and fellow for an upset patient or family than SRs (P < .01), but all respondents agreed the SR should call the fellow for adverse events. More fellows and hospitalists felt that the SR should contact the fellow before placing a consult compared with SRs (95%, 86% vs 64%)., Conclusions: Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing preferences regarding communication, impacting supervision, autonomy, and patient safety. Training programs should consider such perspectives when creating expectations and communication guidelines., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Objective: To describe the development and implementation of a Peer Curbside Consult Service (PCCS) for a pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) division., Methods: We developed a pilot intervention with hospitalists at a freestanding children's hospital to provide peer consultation services for challenging clinical cases. Postconsultation surveys collected from both the requesting and consulting hospitalists provided feedback about the program. The 12-point Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist is used to describe the process for program creation and implementation., Results: The PCCS has provided 60 consultations in the first 2 years since implementation in April 2020 and supports a large PHM division with >75 members who practice at a tertiary care, freestanding children's hospital and 7 affiliate sites. Hospitalists request peer consultation for challenging clinical cases. The consultations were typically conducted in person or via telephone. Currently, 11 PHM faculty members within the division volunteer as consultants, with 2 assigned per week. Electronic postconsultation experience surveys were received from 70% of requesting and 89% of consultant hospitalists. We also provide preliminary data from this pilot intervention in the Supplemental Information., Conclusions: We successfully established a peer consult service that provided just-in-time clinical decision support across the various practice sites. Through transparent reporting using the TIDieR checklist, other divisions may be able to replicate and adapt their own peer consult program., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Introduction: Hospitalizations related to the consequences of substance use are rising yet most hospitalized patients with substance use disorder do not receive evidence-based addiction treatment. Opportunities to leverage the hospitalist workforce could close this treatment gap., Aim: To describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a hospitalist-directed addiction consultation service (ACS) to provide in-hospital addiction treatment., Setting: Six hundred fifty-bed university hospital in Aurora, Colorado., Program Description: Hospitalists completed buprenorphine waiver training, participated in a 13-part addiction lecture series, and completed a minimum of 40 hours of online addiction training. Hospitalists participated in shadow shifts with an addiction-trained physician. Dedicated addiction social workers developed relationships with local addiction treatment services., Program Evaluation Metrics: Physician-related metrics included education, training, and clinical time spent in addiction practice. Patient and encounter-related metrics included a description of ACS care provision., Results: Eleven hospitalists completed an average of 95 hours of addiction-related didactics. Once addiction training was complete, hospitalists spent an average of 30 days over 12 months staffing a weekday ACS. Between October 2019 and November 2020, the ACS completed 1620 consultations on 1350 unique patients. Alcohol was the most common substance (n = 1279; 79%), followed by tobacco (979; 60.4%), methamphetamines/amphetamines (n = 494; 30.5%), and opioids (n = 400; 24.7%). Naltrexone was the most frequently prescribed medication (n = 350; 21.6%), followed by acamprosate (n = 93; 5.7%), and buprenorphine (n = 77, 4.8%). Trauma was a frequent discharge diagnoses (n = 1564; 96.5%). Leaving prior to treatment completion was commonly noted (n = 120, 7.4%). The ACS completed 47 in-hospital methadone enrollments., Discussion: The hospitalist-directed ACS is a promising clinical initiative that could be implemented to expand hospital-based addiction treatment. Future research is needed to understand challenges to disseminating this model into other hospital settings, and to evaluate intended and unintended effects of broad implementation., (© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.)

Background: Few generalists engage in basic science research or feel comfortable teaching physiology at the bedside. This may reflect a lack of understanding or confidence teaching physiologic principles., Aim: To inspire general internists to relearn and teach physiology in clinical practice., Setting: An active biomedical research laboratory., Participants: We educated 67 faculty participants (4 primary care, 59 hospitalists, and 4 other specialties) from 24 medical centers, representing 17 states., Program Description: The 5-day course was structured around re-learning basic physiology principles and developing teaching skills. Participants engaged in hands-on experiments through 4 modules using aquatic species, each paired with a physiology content primer. Participants also developed teaching scripts based on their experiments., Program Evaluation: Post-course surveys revealed that 97% felt confident teaching physiology at the bedside, 100% felt the course enhanced their understanding of the mechanisms of disease, and there was a significant improvement in self-reported teaching ability., Discussion: An immersive, hands-on faculty development course that integrated physiology with clinical decision-making increased participants' comfort level and self-rated ability to teach and incorporate physiology in their clinical work. We believe faculty development is one potential solution to the growing chasm between clinicians and scientists in general medicine., (© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.)

Background and Objectives: In 2016, the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) approved pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) as the newest pediatric subspecialty. To characterize development of the field, this article aims to: (1) describe the responsibilities and practice settings of US pediatricians self-identifying as hospitalists; and (2) determine how exclusive PHM practice, compared with PHM practice in combination with general or subspecialty care, was associated with professional development interests., Methods: Pediatricians enrolling in the 2017-2018 American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) Maintenance of Certification program were offered a voluntary survey about their responsibilities, interests, and practice settings. Logistic regression was employed to characterize associations between exclusive PHM practice and: (1) interest in quality improvement (QI) leadership; (2) intention to take the PHM certifying exam; (3) satisfaction with allocation of professional time; and (4) intention to maintain more than one ABP certification., Results: The survey response rate was 70.0%; 1662 (13.1%) self-reported PHM practice. Four-hundred ninety-one (29.5%) practiced PHM exclusively, 518 (31.1%) practiced PHM and general pediatrics, and 653 (39.3%) practiced PHM and one or more subspecialties. Respondents reporting exclusive PHM practice were significantly more likely to report interest in QI leadership or consultation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.79), PHM exam certification (adjusted OR, 7.10; 95% CI, 5.45-9.25), and maintenance of more than one ABP certification (adjusted OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.89-3.68)., Conclusions: Hospitalists reported diverse clinical and nonclinical responsibilities. Those practicing PHM exclusively expressed high levels of interest in board certification and QI leadership. Ongoing monitoring of PHM responsibilities and practice settings will be important to support the professional development of the PHM workforce.

Objectives: The health care system faces ongoing challenges due to low-value care. Building on the first pediatric hospital medicine contribution to the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation Choosing Wisely Campaign, a working group was convened to identify additional priorities for improving health care value for hospitalized children., Methods: A study team composed of nominees from national pediatric medical professional societies was convened, including pediatric hospitalists with expertise in clinical care, hospital leadership, and research. The study team surveyed national pediatric hospitalist LISTSERVs for suggestions, condensed similar responses, and performed a literature search of articles published in the previous 10 years. Using a modified Delphi process, the team completed a series of structured ratings of feasibility and validity and facilitated group discussion. The sum of final mean validity and feasibility scores was used to identify the 5 highest priority recommendations., Results: Two hundred seven respondents suggested 397 preliminary recommendations, yielding 74 unique recommendations that underwent evidence review and rating. The 5 highest-scoring recommendations had a focus on the following aspects of hospital care: (1) length of intravenous antibiotic therapy before transition to oral antibiotics, (2) length of stay for febrile infants evaluated for serious bacterial infection, (3) phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, (4) antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia, and (5) initiation of intravenous antibiotics in infants with maternal risk factors for sepsis., Conclusions: We propose that pediatric hospitalists can use this list to prioritize quality improvement and scholarly work focused on improving the value and quality of patient care for hospitalized children., Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Schondelmeyer discloses funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Foundation; the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Background: Data suggest hospitalists are less adherent to quality indicators for decompensated cirrhosis, and gastroenterology consultation may improve adherence. We sought to evaluate the impact of inpatient attending specialty and gastroenterology consultation on quality of care for decompensated cirrhosis., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to gastroenterology or hospitalist service at the University of Michigan between 2016-2020. The primary outcome was adherence to nationally recommended inpatient quality indicators for ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Performance was calculated per patient admission as the proportion of quality indicators met vs quality indicators for which the patient was eligible. Quality indicator scores were compared between services using t-tests. We also evaluated the effect of gastroenterology consultation on quality indicator scores for patients admitted to hospitalist service. Clinical outcomes were compared using multivariable models adjusted for patient characteristics., Results: Two hundred eighty-eight admissions were included (155 to gastroenterology service; 133 to hospitalist service). Quality indicator score for all admissions was 69.9% (standard deviation [SD] ± 24.2%). Quality indicator scores were similar between gastroenterology (69.9%, SD ± 23.6%) and hospitalist (69.8%, SD ± 25.1%) services (P = .913). There was no difference in quality indicator subscores for each complication between services. Hospitalists placed a gastroenterology consultation in 53.4% of admissions, and it was associated with higher albumin administration for patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (57.1% vs 25%, P = .044). Patients admitted to gastroenterology service had higher readmissions within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio = 1.95) and shorter length of hospitalization (adjusted rate ratio = 0.85)., Conclusions: Hospitalists provided comparable quality of care to gastroenterologists for inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hip fractures typically occur in frail elderly patients. Preoperative specialty consults, in addition to hospitalist comanagement, are often requested for preoperative risk assessment., Objective: Determine if preoperative specialty consults meaningfully influence management and outcomes in hip fracture patients, while being comanaged by hospitalists DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Tertiary care hospital in Connecticut PATIENTS: 491 patients aged 50 years and older who underwent surgery for an isolated fragility hip fracture, defined as one occurring from a fall of a height of standing or less., Intervention: Presence or absence of a preoperative specialty consult MEASUREMENTS: Time to surgery (TTS), length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative complications RESULTS: 177 patients had a preoperative specialty consult. Patients with consults were older and had more comorbidities. Most consult recommendations were minor (72.8%); there was a major recommendation only for eight patients (4.5%). Multivariate analysis demonstrates that consults are more likely to be associated with a TTS beyond 24 hours (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.28 [2.79-6.56]) and 48 hours (OR 2.59 [1.52-4.43]), an extended LOS (OR 2.67 [1.78-4.03]), and a higher 30-day readmission rate (OR 2.11 [1.09-4.08]). A similar 30-day mortality rate was noted in both consult and no-consult groups., Conclusions: The majority of preoperative specialty consults did not meaningfully influence management and may have potentially increased morbidity by delaying surgery. Our data suggest that unless a hip fracture patient is unstable and likely to require active management by a consultant, such consults offer limited benefit when weighed against the negative impact of surgical delay.

Background: Decompensated cirrhosis is a common precipitant for hospitalization, and there is limited information concerning factors that influence the delivery of quality care in cirrhotic inpatients. We sought to determine the relation between physician specialty and inpatient quality care for decompensated cirrhosis., Design: We reviewed 247 hospital admissions for decompensated cirrhosis, managed by hospitalists or intensivists, between 2009 and 2013. The primary outcome was quality care delivery, defined as adherence to all evidence-based specialty society practice guidelines pertaining to each specific complication of cirrhosis. Secondary outcomes included new complications, length-of-stay, and in-hospital death., Results: Overall, 147 admissions (59.5%) received quality care. Quality care was given more commonly by intensivists, compared with hospitalists (71.7% vs. 53.1%, P = .006), and specifically for gastrointestinal bleeding (72% vs. 45.8%, P = .03) and hepatic encephalopathy (100% vs. 63%, P = .005). Involvement of gastroenterology consultation was also more common in admissions in which quality care was administered (68.7% vs. 54.0%, P = .023). Timely diagnostic paracentesis was associated with reduced new complications in admissions for refractory ascites (9.5% vs. 46.6%, P = .02), and reduced length-of-stay in admissions for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (5 days vs. 13 days, P = .02)., Conclusions: Adherence to quality indicators for decompensated cirrhosis is suboptimal among hospitalized patients. Although quality care adherence appears to be higher among cirrhotic patients managed by intensivists than by hospitalists, opportunities for improvement exist in both groups. Rational and cost-effective strategies should be sought to achieve this end.

Background: Clinical research has developed slowly in most academic hospitalist programs, possibly because of a failure to recognize the important role of specialists in the diagnosis and management of complex medical patients as well as their expertise in clinical research. Ideally, a successful hospital-based clinical research program will need to partner hospitalists with specialists., Purpose: The University of Michigan's Specialist-Hospitalist Allied Research Program (SHARP) was designed to jumpstart hospital-based clinical and translational research at a major academic medical center by pairing specialists and hospitalists to ask and answer novel research questions., Description: SHARP is codirected by a hospitalist and a subspecialist and includes key personnel such as a hospitalist investigator, a clinical research nurse, a research associate, and a clinical epidemiologist. The program is guided by an oversight committee that includes institutional research leadership. Two initial projects have already been supported. The first, a collaboration between infectious disease specialists and hospitalists, is a prospective trial of antiseptic agents and techniques to reduce false-positive blood cultures. The second pairs geriatricians and clinical pharmacists with hospitalists to prospectively study techniques to reduce medication errors around the time of hospital discharge. Although initial pilot projects are single-institution studies, SHARP's goal is to expand its clinical research to include multicenter investigation. Metrics to evaluate SHARP include the number of successfully completed projects, extramural grants submitted and funded, and peer-reviewed publications., Conclusion: A successful hospital-based clinical research program combines hospitalists and specialists in a collaborative environment to identify optimal strategies for delivering inpatient care., (Copyright 2008 Society of Hospital Medicine.)

Having your hospital hire specialist hospitalists can provide much-needed relief for EDs that can't fill their call panels. However, be aware of the limitations of such a strategy: Only specialties that are needed on a regular basis, i.e., general surgeons or orthopedists, will make economic sense. There may be some patient resistance to unfamiliar physicians in sensitive areas such as obstetrics and gynecology. A surgical hospitalist may not have the intimate knowledge of a patient that their regular surgeon would have.

Examine how hospitals and specialty groups can design financially efficient alternatives to traditional practice models while maintaining high-quality tertiary services.

In-house physicians can alleviate many headaches, such as keeping the ED staffed and making sure a doctor is on hand when a patient's regular physician is unavailable. Success depends on resolving turf wars between hospitalists and other docs, dearly defining duties and workload, and designing pay to reward both volume and quality.

Background: After the Norwegian hospital reform of 2002, there has been increased acceptance of private-sector health-care providers. Still, the use of specialist services in private practice is less well documented. This article explores the use of private specialist health care in the south-east of Norway., Material and Methods: The article is based on several sources of data, including data from the Norwegian Patient Register and from the National Insurance Administration on reimbursements. Also a survey was sent out to a sample of general practitioner; in-depth interviews were carried out with a sample of hospital physicians and private specialists., Results: The article shows that private specialists with contract with Helse Øst provided 151 consultations per 1000 inhabitants over the period September to November 2003, while the public outpatient clinics provided 186 consultations. The service provision varies geographically and between specialties. In one county the use of private specialists is 174 consultations per 1000 inhabitants; in another it is 80 per 1000 inhabitants. Private-sector specialists within the fields of eye, ear-nose-throat and skin provided two thirds of all outpatient services in their respective fields., Interpretation: The results indicate that the services of specialists in private practice should be more focused on and discussed in relation to integrated healthcare and the relationship between specialised hospital services and primary healthcare.

Background/Aims Although a management fee for hospitalist service was established in Korea, the number of hospitalists required for the system to run remains outmatched. Methods In January 2020 and February 2022, before and after the establishment of the hospitalist fee system respectively, cross-sectional online surveys were conducted among internal medicine board-certified hospitalists. Results There were 59 and 64 respondents in the 2020 and 2022 surveys, respectively. The percentage of respondents who cited financial benefits as a motive for becoming a hospitalist was higher in the 2022 survey than in the 2020 survey (34.4% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.001). The annual salary of respondents was also higher in the 2022 survey than in the 2020 survey (mean, 182.9 vs. 163.0 million in South Korean Won; p = 0.006). A total of 81.3% of the respondents were willing to continue a hospitalist career in the 2022 survey. In multivariate regression analysis, the possibility of being appointed as a professor was found to be an independent predictive factor of continuing a hospitalist career (odds ratio, 4.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–14.75; p = 0.037). Conclusions Since the establishment of the hospitalist fee system, monetary compensation has improved for hospitalists. The possibility of being appointed as a professor could predict long-term work as hospitalists.

Abstract Background The subspecialty of Hospital Medicine (HM) has grown rapidly since the mid-1990s. Diversity and inclusion are often studied in the context of healthcare equity and leadership. However, little is known about the factors potentially associated with choosing this career path among US medical students. Methods We analyzed the results of the Annual Association of American Medical Colleges Survey administered to Graduating medical students from US medical schools from 2018 to 2020. Results We analyzed 46,614 questionnaires. 19.3% of respondents (N = 8,977) intended to work as a Hospital Medicine [HM] (unchanged from 2018 to 2020), mostly combined with specialties in Internal medicine (31.5%), Pediatrics (14.6%), and Surgery (9.1%). Students interested in HM were significantly more likely to identify as female, sexual orientation minorities (Lesbian/Gay or Bisexual), Asian or Black/African-American, or Hispanic. Role models and the ability to do a fellowship were strong factors in choosing HM, as was higher median total debt ($170,000 vs. $155,000). Interest in higher salary and work/life balance negatively impacted the likelihood of choosing HM. There were significant differences between students who chose IM/HM and Pediatrics/HM. Conclusion About one in five US medical students is interested in HM. The probability of choosing future HM careers is higher for students who identify as sexual or racial minorities, with a higher amount of debt, planning to enter a loan forgiveness program, or are interested in doing a fellowship.

Background: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) have high hospital admission rates. Hospitalists, clinicians that work in inpatient medical settings, may have a unique opportunity to intervene on behalf of these patients, yet their experience with and attitudes towards treating patients with OUD need further exploration. Methods: We conducted qualitative analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews with hospitalists between January and April 2021 in Philadelphia, PA. Participants were hospitalists in one major metropolitan university hospital and one urban community hospital in a city with a high prevalence of OUD and overdose deaths. Participants were asked about their experiences, successes, and difficulties in treating hospitalized patients with OUD. Results: Twenty-two hospitalists were interviewed. Participants were majority female (14, 64%) and White (16, 73%). We identified the following common themes: lack of training/experience with OUD, a lack of community OUD treatment infrastructure, a lack of inpatient OUD/withdrawal treatment resources, the “X-waiver” as a barrier to prescribing buprenorphine, the “ideal” patient to start on buprenorphine, and the hospital as an ideal intervention setting. Conclusions: Hospitalization due to acute illness or complication of drug use represents a potential intervention point to initiate treatment for patients with OUD. While hospitalists exhibit willingness to prescribe medications, provide harm reduction education, and link patients to outpatient addiction treatment, they identify training and infrastructure barriers that must first be addressed.

Background/Aims Frailty increases the risks of in-hospital adverse events such as delirium, falls, and functional decline in older adults. We assessed the feasibility and clinical relevance of frailty status in Korean older inpatients using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Korean version of the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, & Loss of Weight scale (K-FRAIL) questionnaires. Methods Frailty status was measured using the Korean-translated version of the CFS and K-FRAIL questionnaire within 3 days from admission in 144 consecutive patients aged 60 years or older. The correlation between CFS and K-FRAIL score was assessed. The criterion validity of CFS was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. As outcomes, delirium, bedsore, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and unplanned 30-day readmission were measured by reviewing medical records. Results The mean age of the study population was 70.1 years (range, 60 to 91), and 75 (52.1%) were men. By linear regression analysis, CFS and K-FRAIL were positively correlated (B = 0.72, p < 0.001). A CFS cutoff of ≥ 5 maximized sensitivity + specificity to classify frailty using K-FRAIL as a reference (C-index = 0.893). Higher frailty burden by both CFS and K-FRAIL was associated with higher LOS and bedsores. Unplanned readmission and in-hospital mortality were associated with higher CFS score but not with K-FRAIL score, after adjusting for age, gender, polypharmacy, and multimorbidity. Conclusions Frailty status by CFS was associated with LOS, bedsores, unplanned readmission, and in-hospital mortality. CFS can be used to screen high-risk patients who may benefit from geriatric interventions and discharge planning in acutely hospitalized older adults.

ABSTRACT Objective: We assessed metrics related to inpatient glycemic control using InsulinAPP, an application available for free in Brazil, on the hospitalist-managed ward of our hospital. Subjects and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) admitted from November 2018 to October 2019. InsulinAPP recommends NPH and regular insulins three times a day, in bolus-correction or basal-bolus schemes. Parameters that included BG within range of 70-180 mg/dL, insulin treatment regimen and frequency of hypoglycemia were evaluated. Results: A total of 147 T2D individuals (23% medicine and 77% surgery) were included (mean age 62.3 ± 12.7 years, HbA1c: 8.3 ± 3.0%). The initial insulin regimen was 50% bolus-correction, 47% basal-bolus and 3% with sliding scale insulin. During hospitalization, 71% patients required a bolus-basal regimen. In the first 10 days of the protocol, 71% BG measurements were between 70-180 mg/dL and 26% patients experienced one or more episodes of hypoglycemia < 70 mg/dL, and 5% with BG < 54 mg/dL. Conclusion: The results of this retrospective study indicate the InsulinAPP application using human insulin formulations was effective and safe for the management of hyperglycemia on a hospitalist-managed ward, with more than 70% BG measurements within the therapeutic range and a low rate of hypoglycemia.

Hospital physicians care for most seriously ill patients in the United States. We employed dimensional analysis to describe communication about death and dying in audio-recorded admission encounters between seriously ill patients and hospitalists. Acknowledging or not acknowledging the possibility of dying emerged as a key process. Acknowledgment was rare, and depended on synergistic communication behaviors between patient and physician. Facilitators included patients cuing for information and disclosing emotional distress, and physicians exploring the patient's understanding of his or her illness and emotional distress. When hospitalists focused on acute issues, stated that they were awaiting test results, and deferred to other physicians, discussion moved away from acknowledgment. Meaningful discussion of end-of-life issues, including goals and values, fears about death and dying, prognosis, and options for palliative care followed open acknowledgment. This acknowledgment process can serve as a guide for providers to sensitively and honestly discuss essential end-of-life issues.

A hospitalist is the most responsible physician for inpatient care without the responsibility for care post discharge. In Canada, the majority of hospitalists are family physicians which raises concerns in the context of a shortage of family physicians in the community. In this commentary, advantages and disadvantages of the hospitalist model are discussed, with a focus on the necessity of family physician hospitalists. Finally, some challenges for maintaining the family physician hospitalist model going forward are presented.

A hospitalist system in Korea began in August 2016. Patient safety issues, resident law, and reduction of resident numbers in Korea are leading to an increase in the demand for hospitalist in Korea. The roles and responsibilities of GI hospitalists have not been established. Therefore, cooperation among the Korean society of gastroenterology, each hospital, and government is necessary. In particular, it is important to prepare an education program for gastroenterology hospitalists.