Search

Despite the little information about the facial papules due to Lichen planopilaris (LPP), we have many cases with facial skin roughness in which histological study has showed LPP. Additionally, in those patients treating for frontal fibrosing alopecia or scalp LPP there was no improvement in facial papules.

Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) is a vesiculobullous autoimmune disorder characterized by production of autoantibody against cellular adhesion molecules. The treatment of PV is based on the use of systemic corticosteroid along with immunosuppressive therapy, but sometimes there are limited resistant lesions not responding to conventional systemic therapy. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of intralesional rituximab versus triamcinolone in treatment of the refractory scalp and mucosal pemphigus lesions.2 refractory lesions of PV were selected in 21 patients, and they were randomly assigned to two groups to be treated with either intralesional triamcinolone or rituximab for 2 times at one-month interval. All of the patients were under treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine. Patients were visited at the baseline, 1 and 6 months after treatment, and all information including demographic characteristics of the patients, Pemphigus Vulgaris Lesion Severity Score (PVLSS), Epithelialization Index (EI) and patient's satisfaction (using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) were obtained. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software (ver18).The results showed that, both rituximab and triamcinolone were effective in treatment of the refractory PV lesions (p 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the effect of intralesional rituximab and triamcinolone (p 0.05). In addition, no side effect was observed in both groups.Regarding the results of the present study, the use of intralesional rituximab can be suggested for treatment of the resistant PV lesions as an alternative to intralesional triamcinolone or using more aggressive systemic therapy.

INTRODUCTION Aging is an inevitable process in life that can pose unsatisfactory changes in appearance. Recently, rejuvenation surgeries have opened an exciting new window toward people who are vulnerable according to their facial appearance. Periocular plastic microsurgeries are among the most common aesthetic surgeries with various outcomes. The current study was aimed to compare outcomes of blepharoplasty with and without peeling regarding lower eyelid rejuvenation. METHODS This is a randomized clinical trial study conducted on 30-patients referred for inferior lid rejuvenation in 2017-18. Patients were randomly divided into two 15-member subgroups of microinvasive blepharoplasty with and without peeling. Peeling for the group underwent blepharopeeling was performed all over the inferior periocular region using Phenol 89%. Then, skin and underlying muscle were incised superficially, and underlying fat tissue was excised. The other group underwent blepharoplasty without peeling. Patients were followed daily for 2 months to assess complications, patients' and physicians' satisfaction. RESULTS Two assessed groups were not statistically different regarding age and gender distribution (P-value = .417 and .666, respectively). Considering patients' opinion, symmetry, scar formation, skin laxity, swelling, and total satisfaction score were not different between two groups (P-value > .05) while physicians presented similar outcomes except for better scar formation status of peeling add-on therapy (P-value = .042). Rate of adverse effects was significantly higher among those under blepharoplasty plus peeling treatment (P-value