1. Study on the criteria for assessing skull-face correspondence in craniofacial superimposition
- Author
-
Elizaveta Veselovskaya, Caroline Wilkinson, B. R. Campomanes-Álvarez, M.I. Huete, Paul T. Jayaprakash, Daniel Gaudio, Andrea Valsecchi, Sergio Damas, David Navega, Francisco Molinero, Joao Cardoso, Maryna Steyn, Alexey Abramov, Ann H. Ross, Oscar Ibáñez, Luca Lusnig, Kazuhiko Imaizumi, Daniel Humpire, Fabio Cavalli, Carmen Campomanes-Alvarez, Daniele Gibelli, Elena Figuero Ruiz, Rita Hardiman, Ricardo Vicente, Patricio Lestón, Federica Collini, Debora Mazzarelli, and Rimantas Jankauskas
- Subjects
media_common.quotation_subject ,Sample (statistics) ,computer.software_genre ,01 natural sciences ,Pathology and Forensic Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,Consistency (database systems) ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,0302 clinical medicine ,Discriminative model ,Photography ,Humans ,Medicine ,Quality (business) ,030216 legal & forensic medicine ,media_common ,business.industry ,Skull ,010401 analytical chemistry ,Forensic anthropology ,0104 chemical sciences ,Issues, ethics and legal aspects ,Identification (information) ,Face ,Face (geometry) ,Forensic Anthropology ,Autopsy ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,computer ,Natural language processing ,Craniofacial superimposition - Abstract
Craniofacial superimposition has the potential to be used as an identification method when other traditional biological techniques are not applicable due to insufficient quality or absence of ante-mortem and post-mortem data. Despite having been used in many countries as a method of inclusion and exclusion for over a century it lacks standards. Thus, the purpose of this research is to provide forensic practitioners with standard criteria for analysing skull-face relationships. Thirty-seven experts from 16 different institutions participated in this study, which consisted of evaluating 65 criteria for assessing skull-face anatomical consistency on a sample of 24 different skull-face superimpositions. An unbiased statistical analysis established the most objective and discriminative criteria. Results did not show strong associations, however, important insights to address lack of standards were provided. In addition, a novel methodology for understanding and standardizing identification methods based on the observation of morphological patterns has been proposed.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF