Search

Abstract Background Among people living with HIV, elite controllers (ECs) maintain an undetectable viral load, even without receiving anti-HIV therapy. In non-EC patients, this therapy leads to marked improvement, including in immune parameters, but unlike ECs, non-EC patients still require ongoing treatment and experience co-morbidities. In-depth, comprehensive immune analyses comparing EC and treated non-EC patients may reveal subtle, consistent differences. This comparison could clarify whether elevated circulating interferon-alpha (IFNα) promotes widespread immune cell alterations and persists post-therapy, furthering understanding of why non-EC patients continue to need treatment. Methods Levels of IFNα in HIV-infected EC and treated non-EC patients were compared, along with blood immune cell subset distribution and phenotype, and functional capacities in some cases. In addition, we assessed mechanisms potentially associated with IFNα overload. Results Treatment of non-EC patients results in restoration of IFNα control, followed by marked improvement in distribution numbers, phenotypic profiles of blood immune cells, and functional capacity. These changes still do not lead to EC status, however, and IFNα can induce these changes in normal immune cell counterparts in vitro. Hypothesizing that persistent alterations could arise from inalterable effects of IFNα at infection onset, we verified an IFNα-related mechanism. The protein induces the HIV coreceptor CCR5, boosting HIV infection and reducing the effects of anti-HIV therapies. EC patients may avoid elevated IFNα following on infection with a lower inoculum of HIV or because of some unidentified genetic factor. Conclusions Early control of IFNα is essential for better prognosis of HIV-infected patients.

Abstract Background A complete understanding of the different steps of HIV replication and an effective drug combination have led to modern antiretroviral regimens that block HIV replication for decades, but these therapies are not curative and must be taken for life. “Elite controllers” (ECs) is a term for the 0.5% of HIV-infected persons requiring no antiretroviral therapy, whose status may point the way toward a functional HIV cure. Defining the mechanisms of this control may be key to understanding how to replicate this functional cure in others. Methods In ECs and untreated non-EC patients, we compared IFNα serum concentration, distribution of immune cell subsets, and frequency of cell markers associated with immune dysfunction. We also investigated the effect of an elevated dose of IFNα on distinct subsets within dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and CD4+ and CD8 + T cells. Results Serum IFNα was undetectable in ECs, but all immune cell subsets from untreated non-EC patients were structurally and functionally impaired. We also show that the altered phenotype and function of these cell subsets in non-EC patients can be recapitulated when cells are stimulated in vitro with high-dose IFNα. Conclusions Elevated IFNα is a key mediator of HIV pathogenesis.

Abstract Biallelic pathogenic variants in the SLC34A3 gene, encoding for the NPT2c cotransporter, cause Hereditary Hypophosphatemic Rickets with Hypercalciuria (HHRH). However, the associated phenotype is highly variable. In addition, mice deleted for Slc34a3 exhibit a different phenotype compared to humans, without urinary phosphate leakage. The mechanisms by which SLC34A3 variants disrupt phosphate/calcium metabolism are un-completely understood. In this study we explored these mechanisms in vitro using SLC34A3 variants identified in patients with urinary phosphate leakage. We analyzed the consequences of these variants on NPT2c function and the link with the phenotype of the patients. We studied 20 patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis and low serum phosphate concentration harboring variants in the SLC34A3 gene. Half of the patients carried homozygous or composite heterozygous variants. Three patients had in addition variants in SLC34A1 and SLC9A3R1 genes. All these patients benefited from a precise analysis of their phenotype. We generated 13 of these mutants by site-directed mutagenesis. Then we carried out transient transfections of these mutants in HEK cells and measured their phosphate uptake capacity under different conditions. Among the 20 patients included, 3 had not only mutations in NPT2c but also in NPT2a or NHERF1 genes. Phosphate uptake was decreased in 8 NPT2c mutants studied and normal for 5. Four variants were initially categorized as variants of uncertain significance. Expression of the corresponding mutants showed that one did not modify phosphate transport, two reduced it moderately and one abolished it. Co-transfection of the NPT2c mutants with the wild-type plasmid of NPT2c or NPT2a did not reveal dominant negative effect of the mutants on NPT2c-mediated phosphate transport. A detailed analysis of patient phenotypes did not find a link between the severity of the disorder and the level of phosphate transport impairment. NPT2c mutations classified as ACMG3 identified in patients with renal phosphate leak should be characterized by in vitro study to check if they alter NPT2c-mediated phosphate transport since phosphate uptake capacity may not be affected. In addition, research for mutations in NHERF1 and NPT2a genes should always be associated to NPT2c sequencing.