Search

Objective To compare the effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene (Evista®) and a continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) formulation containing estradiol and norethisterone acetate (Kliogest®) on lipid and fibrinogen levels of postmenopausal women. Methods Euralox 1 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. After a placebo wash-out, healthy postmenopausal women (n = 1008, average age 56.1 ± 4.9 years) with a health risk profile that suggested a potential benefit from either treatment were randomly assigned to either 60 mg raloxifene or ccHRT consisting of 2 mg estradiol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) per day for 6 months. Measurements Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with its fractions HDL2 and HDL3, the LDL/HDL ratio, triglycerides and fibrinogen were asessed at baseline and after 6 months or on early drop-out. Results Baseline values were comparable between the two grou...

A two-centre, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized 3-way crossover study was undertaken to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of celiprolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week single-blind placebo run-in/screening period, during which no antihypertensive medication was given, was followed by 3 consecutive 4-week treatment periods with placebo or celiprolol (200 mg or 400 mg daily). At the end of the 4-week placebo run-in/screening period, 26 hospital out-patients with a seated mean blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) of 161.4/101.7 mmHg and a mean pulse rate of 75 beats/min entered the double-blind crossover phase of the study. Results showed that there was no significant difference in seated mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure between 200 mg celiprolol daily (149.2/92.3 mmHg) and 400 mg celiprolol daily (149.1/92.5 mmHg). However, mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly (p less than 0.05) lower on celiprolol than on placebo (157.1/98.2 mmHg). Neither dose of celiprolol had a significant effect on seated pulse rate. No patient was withdrawn due to an adverse event and no laboratory assessment outside the normal range was reported to be of any clinical significance. It is concluded that oral celiprolol, 200 mg or 400 mg daily, is effective and well tolerated for controlling mild to moderate essential hypertension. Since both doses had very similar effects on blood pressure there is no advantage in this group of patients for the 400 mg daily dose of celiprolol.

Abrupt interruption or cessation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment may result in discontinuation or treatment interruption symptoms. Recent reports suggested these symptoms occur more frequently with shorter half-life SSRIs. Previous studies indicated a 5-8-day treatment interruption resulted in fewer discontinuation-emergent adverse events in fluoxetine-treated patients than in paroxetine-treated patients. This study examines the effects of shorter treatment interruption (3-5 days), as would occur if patients miss just a few doses of medication. Patients successfully treated for depression with fluoxetine or paroxetine underwent treatment interruption in a double-blind fashion. Treatment interruption-emergent symptoms were assessed using the Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms checklist. Other assessments included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale and a social functioning questionnaire. Of 150 patients enrolled, 141 completed the study. Following treatment interruption, fluoxetine-treated patients experienced fewer treatment interruption-emergent events than did paroxetine-treated patients. The paroxetine treatment group also experienced significant increases in depressive symptoms, clinical global severity scores and difficulty in social functioning; the fluoxetine treatment group did not. These results are consistent with reports suggesting abrupt interruption of treatment with paroxetine is more often associated with somatic and psychological symptoms than is abrupt interruption of fluoxetine. Patients treated with fluoxetine appeared to be protected by its longer half-life.