Search

Objectives and methods: We conducted a population-based study including 19 303 individuals diagnosed with MGUS in Sweden from 1985 to 2013, with the aim to determine whether a prior history of autoimmune disease, a well-described risk factor for MGUS is a risk factor for progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoproliferative diseases (LPs). Using the nationwide Swedish Patient registry, we identified MGUS cases with versus without an autoimmune disease present at the time of MGUS diagnosis and estimated their risk of progression. Results: A total of 5612 (29.1%) MGUS cases had preceding autoimmune diseases. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we found the risk of progression from MGUS to MM (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94) and LPs (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94) to be significantly lower in MGUS cases with prior autoimmune disease (compared to MGUS cases without). Conclusions: In this large population-based study, a history of autoimmune disease was associated with a reduced risk of progression from MGUS to MM/other LPs. Potential underlying reason is that MGUS caused by chronic antigen stimulation is biologically less likely to undergo the genetic events that trigger progression. Our results may have implications in clinical counseling for patients with MGUS and underlying autoimmune disease. (Less)

Objective: We describe real-world evidence (RWE) from the nationwide Swedish and Danish registries that provide important information on incidence and outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). Method: First line treatment data on more than 10.000 MM patients from Denmark and Sweden between 2005–2018 are presented. Key results from research conducted within the Swedish and Danish myeloma registries are summarized, describing subgroups of patients with comorbidity, myeloma complications, and early relapse. Results: We show that national guidelines, generated on results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are rapidly implemented and improve overall survival (OS). We find that both the incidence of MM and the median age at diagnosis is higher in national registries compared to results from referral centres, indicating a more complete coverage. This highlights the need of validation of prognostic scoring systems and indices in e.g., SMM and high-risk MM in a real- world-population. We show that these subgroups are unlikely to be captured in RCTs with narrow inclusion and exclusion criteria, that they have worse survival, and are in need of new treatment approaches. Conclusion: National registries that include all MM patients are an important source of knowledge on epidemiology, treatment and outcome with implications for the planning of MM care. Despite the introduction of new and better treatments, rapidly implemented in our countries, our registries uncover subgroups of patients that still have inferior outcome. Our RWE can help to identify important research questions to be studied in further clinical trials also in patients currently not included in RCTs.

High proportion of patients with multiple myeloma suffer from comorbidities which may alter clinical management. Therefore, our aims were to evaluate the prevalence of comorbidities and their impact on survival. We included patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma 1990-2013 in Sweden and all diagnoses from each patient from 1985. A total of 13 656 patients with multiple myeloma were included in the study, thereof 7404 (54%) had comorbidity at diagnosis. The risk of death was increased for those with one comorbidity at diagnosis compared to those without any comorbidity (hazard ratio = 1.19; 95% confidence interval:1.14-1.25); this risk was higher for those with two (1.38; 1.30-1.47) and three or more comorbidities (1.72; 1.62-1.83). Furthermore, the risk of death was increased in patients with prior history of cancer, arrhythmia, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung disease, psychological disease, peptic ulcer, neurological disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and inflammatory bowel disease. This large study shows that over 50% of multiple myeloma patients have a comorbidity at diagnosis and survival decreased with increasing numbers of comorbidities. This emphasizes the importance of comorbidities when evaluating patients and deciding on treatment strategies for individuals with multiple myeloma.

Background Elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients are underrepresented in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Prospective registries provide insight into real-world patient characteristics, treatment and outcome. The Danish Multiple Myeloma Registry (DMMR) and the Swedish Myeloma Registry (SMR), established in 2005 and 2008 respectively, are nationwide prospective registries with near 100% coverage. Methods We describe baseline characteristics, treatment and survival for patients diagnosed with active myeloma in the DMMR January 1st 2005-February 18th 2020, and the SMR January 1st 2008-December 31st 2019. We performed a retrospective comparison of patients aged ≥75 years at diagnosis to MM patients Results In total, we report on 4647 Swedish and Danish MM patients ≥75 years at diagnosis compared with MM patients 75 years, while the MAIA trial (Dara-Rd vs Rd) has the largest proportion of elderly patients among these studies (43.6%). However, in the MAIA trial only 29% of patients presented with ISS III, compared to 46% of patients ≥75 years in our real-world population. Similarly, 35% of patients in VISTA and 38% in ALCYONE had ISS III. The FIRST trial had a composition more similar to the Swedish and Danish registry population with 35% of patients >75 years, and 48% of these patients with ISS stage III. The treatment strategies in the elderly were similar in Denmark and Sweden. Melphalan and prednisolone (MP) were replaced by bortezomib-based regimes from around 2012, while lenalidomide-based treatment increased in recent years. Median relative survival (RS) for patients ≥75 years in Denmark increased from 25 months to 36 months for patients diagnosed 2005-2007 and 2015-2016, respectively. Similarly, in Sweden the median RS increased from 24 months to 42 months for patients ≥75 years diagnosed 2008-2009 and 2016-2017, respectively. Conclusion The real-world MM population is older and has a higher proportion of patients with ISS III disease than patients included in the pivotal RCTs, and compared to the younger patient cohort. Future studies in MM patients should take this into account.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib-containing induction before salvage high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplantation (salvage ASCT) and maintenance with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after salvage ASCT in multiple myeloma.METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial included patients with first relapse of multiple myeloma after upfront ASCT who were re-induced with four cycles of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. Two months after salvage, ASCT patients were randomised to either observation or maintenance therapy with iv carfilzomib 27 → 56 mg/sqm and p.o. dexamethasone 20 mg every second week. The study enrolled 200 patients of which 168 were randomised to either maintenance with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (n = 82) or observation (n = 86).RESULTS: Median time to progression (TTP) after randomisation was 25.1 months (22.5-NR) in the carfilzomib-dexamethasone maintenance group and 16.7 months (14.4-21.8) in the control group (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.71; P = .0004). The most common adverse events during maintenance were thrombocytopenia, anaemia, hypertension, dyspnoea and bacterial infections.CONCLUSION: In summary, maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and dexamethasone after salvage ASCT prolonged TTP with 8 months. The maintenance treatment was in general well-tolerated with manageable toxicity.

The incidence of multiple myeloma is characterized by a steep increase with advancing age. Dramatic improvements in survival have been reported in clinical trials; however, elderly patients are generally underrepresented in these. The aims of this study are to review patterns of incidence and survival in multiple myeloma in the general population. We searched PubMed for population-based studies on trends in incidence and survival published between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2017 and based on regional or national cancer registries and report the following results of the review. The age-adjusted incidence of multiple myeloma has increased during the second half of the twentieth century in some countries but remained stable in areas with high case ascertainment and access to universal medical care. The crude incidence is increasing globally due to an aging population. Survival rates have improved, and 5-year relative survival rates are now around 50% and over 60% in patients 65-70 years or younger. Preliminary data suggest a 3-fold increase in the prevalence of multiple myeloma. We conclude that the number of multiple myeloma patients is increasing in the general population due to (i) aging populations and (ii) more patients living longer due to modern drugs.

Lenalidomide (Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). It is possible that single‐agent Len may be effective as prolonged treatment regimen in RRMM once patients demonstrate an initial response to Len+Dex induction. Patients with RRMM who responded to first‐line Len+Dex in an observational study (NCT01430546) received up to 24 cycles of either Len (25 mg/day) or Len+Dex (25 mg/day and 40 mg/week) as prolonged treatment in a subsequent phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01450215). In the observational study (N = 133), median time to response was 1.7 (range 0.6–9.6) months. A complete response to all treatments received in both studies was observed in 11% of patients; very good partial response and partial response rates were 31% and 38%, respectively. Corresponding response rates in the subgroup of patients who did not enter the phase 2 trial (n = 71) were 3%, 18%, and 39%, respectively. Rates of disease progression at 2 years in the phase 2 trial were 47% versus 31% for Len versus Len+Dex (P = 0.14). After 36 months median follow‐up in surviving patients, median time to progression was not reached with Len+Dex and was 24.9 months (95% confidence interval 12.5–not calculable, P < 0.001) with Len. Three‐year OS among the total observational study population was 61% (95% CI, 52–69%). The corresponding rate among patients who entered the phase 2 clinical trial was 73% (95% CI, 60–83%) and was significantly lower among those patients who achieved ≥PR but did not proceed into the phase 2 trial (55%; P = 0.01). In the phase 2 trial, OS was 73% in both treatment arms (P = 0.70). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with prolonged (phase 2 trial) versus short‐term (observational study) Len administration but remained manageable. Prolonged treatment with Len with or without Dex provides sustained, clinically relevant responses and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Epub ahead of print, Epidemiology and outcome of myeloma are mainly reported from large university centers and collaborative groups, and do not represent ‘real-world’ patients. The Swedish Myeloma Registry is a prospective population-based registry documenting characteristics, treatment and outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma, including asymptomatic and localized forms, with the purpose of improving disease management and outcome. This report presents information on patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015, including data on first-line treatment in patients diagnosed up to 2014, with a follow up until December 2016. We present age-adjusted incidence, patients’ characteristics at baseline, treatment, response, and survival. Baseline data were available with a 97% coverage in 4904 patients (median age 71 years, males 70 years, females 73 years; 72% were 65 years or older), and at 1-year follow up in 3558 patients with symptomatic disease (92% of patients initially reported). The age-adjusted incidence was 6.8 myeloma cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year. Among initially symptomatic patients (n=3988), 77% had osteolytic lesions or compression fractures, 49% had anemia, 18% impaired kidney function, and 13% hypercalcemia. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation was given to 77% of patients aged up to 66 years, and to 22% of patients aged 66–70 years. In the study period, 68% received bortezomib, thalidomide, and/or lenalidomide as part of the first-line treatment, rising from 31% in 2008 to 81% in 2014. In active myeloma, the median relative survival of patients aged 65 years or under was 7.7 years, and 3.4 years in patients aged 66 years and over. Patients diagnosed with myeloma in more recent years were associated with significantly higher rates of complete or very good partial remission (P

Purpose Despite therapeutic advances, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) continue to experience disease relapse and treatment resistance. The gene ABCB1 encodes the drug transporter P-glycoprotein, which confers resistance through drug extrusion across the cell membrane. Lenalidomide (Len) is excreted mainly via the kidneys, and, given the expression of P-gp in the renal tubuli, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ABCB1 gene may influence Len plasma concentrations and, subsequently, the outcome of treatment. We, therefore, investigated the influence of ABCB1 genetic variants on Len treatment outcomes and adverse events (AEs). Methods Ninety patients with relapsed or refractory MM, who received the second-line Len plus dexamethasone in the Rev II trial, were genotyped for the ABCB1 SNPs 1199G amp;gt; A (Ser400Asn, rs2229109), 1236C amp;gt; T (silent, rs1128503), 2677G amp;gt; T/A (Ala893Ser, rs2032582), and 3435C amp;gt; T (silent, rs1045642) using pyrosequencing, and correlations to response parameters, outcomes, and AEs were investigated. Results No significant associations were found between genotype and either best response rates or hematological AEs, and 1236C amp;gt; T, 2677G amp;gt; T or 3435C amp;gt; T genotypes had no impact on survival. There was a trend towards increased time to progression (TTP) in patients carrying the 1199A variant, and a significant difference in TTP between genotypes in patients with standard-risk cytogenetics. Conclusions Our findings show a limited influence of ABCB1 genotype on lenalidomide treatment efficacy and safety. The results suggest that 1199G amp;gt; A may be a marker of TTP following Len treatment in standard-risk patients; however, larger studies are needed to validate and clarify the relationship. Funding Agencies|Swedish Cancer Society; Swedish Research Council; AFA Insurance; Linkoping University; ALF Grants, Region Ostergotland; Celgene Corporation

Objective: We describe survival in patients with oligo- and non-secretory multiple myeloma (MM). We refer to the whole group as non-measurable MM and compare it with secretory MM. Methods: Oligo-secretory MM was defined as M protein in serum

Secondary immunodeficiencies occur as a consequence of various diseases, including hematological malignancies, and the use of pharmacological therapies, such as immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and biological drugs. Infections are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Recent advances in treatment have prolonged the duration of remission and the time between relapse phases in MM and CLL patients. However, managing multiple relapses and the use of salvage therapies can lead to cumulative immunosuppression and a higher risk of infections. The pathogenesis of immune deficiency secondary to lymphoproliferative malignancy is multifactorial including disease- and treatment-related factors. Supportive treatment, including early vaccination, anti-infective prophylaxis, and replacement immunoglobulin, plays a key role in preventing infections in MM and CLL. This article provides an overview of the basic immunology necessary to understand the pathogenesis of secondary immunodeficiency and the infectious complications in MM and CLL. We also discuss the evidence supporting the role of prophylactic replacement immunoglobulin treatment in patients with antibody failure secondary to MM and CLL and the indications for its use. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) and plasma cell leukemia (PCL) are uncommon (3-6%) types of plasma cell disease. The risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) is probably important for the outcome of SP. PCL is rare and has a dismal outcome. In this study, we report on incidence and survival in PCL/SP, and progression to MM in SP, using the prospective observational Swedish Multiple Myeloma Register designed to document all newly diagnosed plasma cell diseases in Sweden since 2008. Both solitary bone plasmacytoma (SBP) (n=124) and extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) (n=67) have better overall survival (OS) than MM (n=3549). Progression to MM was higher in SBP than in EMP (35% and 7% at 2 years, respectively), but this did not translate into better survival in EMP. In spite of treatment developments, the OS of primary PCL is still dismal (median of 11 months, 0% at 5 years). Hence, there is a great need for diagnostic and treatment guidelines as well as prospective studies addressing the role for alternative treatment options, such as allogeneic stem cell transplantation and monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of PCL.

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma. To estimate the risk of bacterial and viral infections in multiple myeloma patients, we used population-based data from Sweden to identify all multiple myeloma patients (n=9 253) diagnosed from 1988 to 2004 with follow-up to 2007 and 34 931 matched controls. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of infections. Overall, multiple myeloma patients had a 7-fold (hazard ratio =7.1; 95% confidence interval = 6.8-7.4) risk of developing any infection compared to matched controls. The increased risk of developing a bacterial infection was 7-fold (7.1; 6.8-7.4), and for viral infections 10-fold (10.0; 8.9-11.4). Multiple myeloma patients diagnosed in the more recent calendar periods had significantly higher risk of infections compared to controls (p

The outcome for multiple myeloma patients has improved since the introduction of bortezomib, thalidomide and lenalidomide. However, studies comparing new and conventional treatment include selected patient groups. We investigated consecutive patients (n = 1638) diagnosed in a defined period and compared survival with a gender- and age-matched cohort Swedish population (n = 9 340 682). Median overall survival for non-high-dose treated patients was 2·8 years. The use of bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide in first line therapy predicted a significantly longer overall survival (median 4·9 years) compared to conventional treatment (2·3 years). Among non-high-dose treated patients receiving at least 2 lines with bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, 69% and 63% have survived at 3 and 5 years as compared to 48% and 22% with conventional drugs and 88% and 79% in the matched cohort populations, respectively. The median overall survival in high-dose treated patients was 6·9 years. Of these patients, 84% survived at 3 years and 70% at 5 years as compared to 98% and 95% in the matched cohort population. Overall survival in the best non-high-dose treated outcome group is closing the gap with the matched cohort. Upfront use of new drugs is clearly better than waiting until later lines of treatment.

Survival in multiple myeloma (MM) has improved significantly during recent decades both in younger and older patients.1,2 The improved survival is considered to be primarily due to new treatment options in MM, including high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation,3 the immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors.4,5 Recently, second malignancies have gained great clinical and scientific attention in MM as three randomized clinical trials reported an increase in second malignancies associated with lenalidomide maintenance treatment.6 In a newly published meta-analysis, exposure to lenalidomide plus oral melphalan was found to significantly increase hematologic second malignancies.7 Previously we showed that MM patients had a 26% increased risk of developing any second malignancy when compared to the general population, and an 11-fold increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).8 In the United States, second or higher-order malignancies are the third most common cancer diagnoses.9 With improved survival in MM patients, second malignancies are expected to increase in the near future and possibly contribute to problems of disease management. Importantly, it has been shown that the cumulative risk of death from MM outweighs the risk of death due to second malignancies.6 For the individual patient who develops a second malignancy, however, the outcome is of great importance. We conducted a large population-based cohort study, including all patients diagnosed with MM in Sweden, over a period of more than 50 years. This study aimed to investigate the effects of second malignancies on survival and assess changes following the introduction of modern myeloma therapy. Furthermore, as AML/MDS is over-represented in MM patients, we assessed patterns of survival specifically in these patients.

The associations between immune-related conditions and multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have previously been investigated with inconsistent results. In a large population-based study, we identified 19 112 patients with MM, 5403 patients with MGUS, 96 617 matched control subjects, and 262 931 first-degree relatives. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of MM and MGUS with immune-related conditions by use of logistic regression. A personal history of all infections combined was associated with a significantly increased risk of MM (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), and a personal history of all conditions in the categories infections (OR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5-1.7), inflammatory conditions (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), and autoimmune diseases (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.4) was associated with a significantly increased risk of MGUS. Several specific immune-related conditions elevated the risk of MM and/or MGUS. A family history of autoimmune disease was associated with a significantly increased risk of MGUS (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 1.00-1.2), but not MM. Our findings suggest that immune-related conditions and/or their treatment are of importance in the etiology of MGUS and possibly MM. The association of both personal and family history of autoimmune disease with MGUS indicates the potential for shared susceptibility for these conditions.

Introduction: Today, a number of therapeutic options are available as the patient with myeloma relapses from initial treatment with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). For patients who experience a durable response to primary ASCT, retreatment with high-dose melphalan is recommended by many current guidelines. Yet, toxicity is an important aspect in the choice of relapse treatment, and a second ASCT in this setting could be associated with enhanced toxicity. As the goal for the treatment for relapsed myeloma should be disease control while maintaining quality of life, lower doses of melphalan might be preferable. Methods and Objectives: In this retrospective study, we account for the outcome of 66 patients with myeloma in first systemic relapse after ASCT, who were treated with intermediate-dose melphalan, 100 mg/m2, and stem cell support (MEL 100). The aim was to evaluate this treatment in relation to prior response duration after initial ASCT and with respect to response rate, toxicity and survival. Results: The overall response rate was 62%. There was limited, mostly haematological, toxicity, and no treatment–related mortality was observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months, and the median overall survival was 24 months. Patients with time to progression of 34 months or more (n = 17; ≥75th percentile) after initial ASCT had a median PFS of 12.5 months after MEL 100. Conclusion: For patients with a long-lasting response after ASCT, MEL 100 could be a therapeutic option with low toxicity and with efficacy comparable to newer immunomodulatory drugs.

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of fractures. On the basis of small numbers, patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have been reported to have an increased fracture risk. Using population-based data from Sweden, we assessed the risks of fractures in 5326 MGUS patients diagnosed from 1958 to 2006, compared with 20 161 matched controls. MGUS patients had an increased risk of any fracture at 5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-1.92) and 10 (HR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.49-1.74) years. The risk was significantly higher for axial (skull, vertebral/pelvis, and sternum/costae) compared with distal (arm and leg) fractures (P < .001). On the basis of 10 years of follow-up, there was an increased risk of vertebral/pelvic (HR = 2.37; 95% CI, 2.02-2.78), sternal/costae (HR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.5-2.48), arm (HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.43), leg (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26-1.56), and other/multiple fractures (HR = 4.25; 95% CI, 3.29-5.51). Risks for fractures did not differ by isotype or M protein concentration at diagnosis. MGUS patients with (versus without) fractures had no excess risk of MM or Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Our results suggest that bone alterations are present in early myelomagenesis. Our findings may have implications for the development of better prophylaxis for bone disease in MGUS, and they provide novel clues on pathogenesis of MM bone disease.

Familial clustering of the precursor condition, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been observed in case reports and in smaller studies. Using population-based data from Sweden, we identified 4458 MGUS patients, 17505 population-based controls, and first-degree relatives of patients (n = 14621) and controls (n = 58387) with the aim to assess risk of MGUS and lymphoproliferative malignancies among first-degree relatives of MGUS patients. Compared with relatives of controls, relatives of MGUS patients had increased risk of MGUS (relative risk [RR] = 2.8; 1.4-5.6), multiple myeloma (MM; RR = 2.9; 1.9-4.3), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM; RR = 4.0; 1.5-11), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; RR = 2.0; 1.2-2.3). Relatives of patients with IgG/IgA MGUS had a 4.0-fold (1.7-9.2), 2.9-fold (1.7-4.9), and 20-fold (2.3-170) elevated risk of developing MGUS, MM, and LPL/WM, respectively. Relatives of IgM MGUS patients had 5.0-fold (1.1-23) increased CLL risk and nonsignificant excess MM and LPL/WM risks. The results were very similar when we assessed risk by type of first-degree relative, age at MGUS (above/below 65 years), or sex. Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma was not increased among MGUS relatives. Among first-degree relatives of a nationwide MGUS cohort, we found elevated risks of MGUS, MM, LPL/WM, and CLL, supporting a role for germline susceptibility genes, shared environmental influences, or an interaction between both.

There are limited data on survival patterns among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.We compared the survival of 4,259 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, collected from hematology outpatient units in Sweden, with the survival of the general population by computing relative survival ratios. We also compared causes of death in these patients with those in 16,151 matched controls.One-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year relative survival ratios were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), 0.93 (0.91-0.95), 0.82 (0.79-0.84), and 0.70 (0.64-0.76), respectively. Younger age at diagnosis of the gammopathy was associated with a significantly lower excess mortality compared to that in older patients (p0.001). The excess mortality among patients with gammopathy increased with longer follow-up (p0.0001). IgM (versus IgG/A) gammopathy was associated with a superior survival (p=0.038). Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance had an increased risk of dying from multiple myeloma (hazards ratio (HR)=553; 95% CI 77-3946), Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (HR=infinity), other lymphoproliferative malignancies (6.5; 2.8-15.1), other hematologic malignancies (22.9; 8.9-58.7), amyloidosis (HR=infinity), bacterial infections (3.4; 1.7-6.7), ischemic heart disease (1.3; 1.1-1.4), other heart disorders (1.5; 1.2-1.8), other hematologic conditions (6.9; 2.7-18), liver (2.1; 1.1-4.2), and renal diseases (3.2; 2.0-4.9).Our finding of decreased life expectancy in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, which was most pronounced in the elderly and explained by both malignant transformation and non-malignant causes, is of importance in the understanding and clinical management of this disease. The underlying mechanisms may be causally related to the gammopathy, but may also be explained by underlying disease that led to the detection of the hematologic disease. Our results are of importance since they give a true estimation of survival in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosed in clinical practice.

There are emerging data to suggest a role for genetic factors in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM). Based on small numbers, certain solid tumors have been reported to occur more frequently among blood relatives of patients with MM. Using population-based data, we assessed risks for hematologic malignancies, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and solid tumors among first-degree relatives of patients with MM. We included 13,896 patients with MM and 54,365 matched controls. Also we identified first-degree relatives of patients with MM (n = 37,838) and controls (n = 151,068). Using a marginal survival model, we estimated relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for hematologic and solid tumors among family members of patients with MM and controls as measures of familial aggregation. Compared with relatives of controls, relatives of patients with MM had an increased risk of developing MM (RR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.9), MGUS (2.1; 1.5-3.1), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (2.1; 1.0-4.2), any solid tumor (1.1; 1.0-1.1) and bladder cancer (1.3; 1.0-1.5). No significantly increased risk was found for other hematologic or solid malignancies. Our findings support a role for a shared susceptibility (genetic, environmental or both) that predisposes to MM, MGUS, ALL and bladder cancer.

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy with high mortality rate. Treatment outcomes have improved since the introduction of new drugs such as the IMiD lenalidomide, but relapse rates and resistance is still a problem. The gene ABCB1 encodes the drug transporter p-glycoprotein (p-gp) which confers resistance through extrusion of drugs over the cell membrane. Lenalidomide is subject to limited metabolism and excreted mainly via the kidneys. In vitro studies have shown lenalidomide to be an ABCB1 substrate, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affecting gene expression, transporter function and/or activity may affect drug distribution and the subsequent outcome and risk of adverse events. However, in vivo studies of the effect of ABCB1 on lenalidomide pharmacokinetics are contradictory. Our aim was to investigate the influence of ABCB1 SNPs on lenalidomide treatment outcome and adverse events (AE). Materials & Methods: In the observational part of two connected studies, 133 Lenalidomide naïve patients at 1st relapse/refractory MM were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for up to 9 cycles of 4 weeks. In the prospective 2nd part, 62 patients that had achieved at least partial response according to IMWG-criteria followed by at least two additional treatment cycles were randomized to either lenalidomide/dexamethasone or lenalidomide as a single drug. 90 patients (of which 47 was further randomized to the 2nd part) had samples available for genotyping of the ABCB1 SNPs 1199G>A (Ser400Asn, rs2229109), 1236C>T (rs1128503), 2677G>T/A (Ala893Ser, rs2032582) and 3435C>T (rs1045642) using Pyrosequencing. Correlations to overall survival, time to progression (TTP), response parameters and AE were investigated, and a p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results: No significant correlations to hematological AE or response rates were found, and no impact on survival for 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A or 3435C>T, neither in the whole population nor in patients randomized to the 2nd part. The results were similar also when risk (according to FISH) was considered. There was a trend towards improved TTP for patients carrying the 1199A variant; mean TTP 3.2 years (95%CI 2.3-4.1) vs 2.2 years (95%CI 1.8-2.6) for G/A and G/G, respectively (p=0.076). This trend was confirmed in the multivariable cox regression analysis; HR=0.280 (95%CI 0.74-1.054), p=0.06. The difference in TTP was significant in the non-high risk subgroup; mean TTP 4.3 years (95%CI 3.7-4.9) vs 2.3 years (95%CI 1.8-2.8), p=0.034, for G/A and G/G, respectively. Conclusion: No evidence was found for a large impact of 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A or 3435C>T on lenalidomide treatment outcome or risk of hematological AE. 1199G>A may be a potential marker of TTP in non-high risk MM but further studies in a larger cohort is needed to clarify the relationship and whether this is due to altered drug transport or efflux independent mechanisms. Citation Format: Ingrid Jakobsen Falk, Johan Lund, Henrik Gréen, Astrid Gruber, Evren Alici, Birgitta Lauri, Cecilie Blimark, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist, Agneta Swedin, Karin Forsberg, Conny Carlsson, Mats Hardling, Lucia Ahlberg, Hareth Nahi, Kourosh Lotfi. The impact of ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the outcome in lenalidomide treated multiple myeloma patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5030. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5030

Background The indication for use of lenalidomide in second line of therapy has been based upon two phase III studies comparing lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. placebo and dexamethasone (Weber 2007, Dimopoulos 2007) showing a TTP of 11.1 and 11.3 months respectively. In 2009 Stadtmauer et al showed that patients with only one prior therapy had significantly longer median TTP compared with those treated in later lines (17.1 months vs. 10.6 months). Here we report outcomes from the REVII trial in 2nd line treatment of MM, a two part study with first an observational part with standard treatment of lenalidomide combined with corticosteroids and then, a randomized part, where patients that had responded in the first part, were randomized to lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone or lenalidomide as a single drug. Methods 132 patients with multiple myeloma in first relapse were included in the first, observational part of the study, and treated with up to 9 cycles of lenalidomide combined with betamethasone or dexamethasone according to local routines. Patients that had achieved at least partial response and had consolidation treatment with at least two additional cycles were offered to take part in the second part of the study. In the second part 63 patients were randomized to be treated with either lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone (LenDex) or lenalidomide as a single drug (Len) for a maximum of 24 cycles. In the first part of the study the primary endpoint was time to response and secondary endpoints were quality of life, safety and cytogenetic markers as gain 1q21, t(4;14), t(11;14) and del17p. In the second part, primary endpoint was time to progression and secondary endpoint was safety. In the second part we also performed detailed NK/T-cells phenotype analyses. Survival data were calculated from first entry in the observational study. Data cutoff was 1st of July 2015, with a median follow-up of 21.4 months. Results A very high proportion of patients achieved PR or better (≥PR 84%). Of the patients 3% were primary refractory and 12% achieved a minor response or stable disease. Very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) was achieved in 44% of the patients. First response, at least PR, was achieved after a median of 7 weeks and best response after a median of 10 weeks. After randomizations no differences in responses between the Len and the LenDex group were found. Late responses were common and 7 of the patients received their best response after more than one year of treatment. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. 61% of the participants were still alive at the data cut off. OS in the first part was 32 months and 78% of the patients in the second part were still alive at data cut off. Median time to progression (TTP) for the whole study was 16 months and for the first and second part 10 and 30 months respectively. After randomization TTP in the Len-group was 25 months and in the LenDex median TTP was not reached, 54% of the participants were still alive after 36 months of treatment. The difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0,48). Patients with gain1q21 had median OS of 31 months while 77% of patients with no gain 1q21 where still alive at the same time (p=0.054). TTP for patients with or without gain of 1q21 was 11 months vs. 28 months respectively (p=0.014). Patients with either gain 1q21, t(4;14) and/or del17p had a TTP of 11 months while patients with none of these chromosomal aberrations had a TTP of 30 months (p=0.0058). NK/T-cells phenotype data will be presented at the congress. Discussion Len/Dex was associated with a very high response rate at 2nd line treatment of MM. On achieving at least PR, continuing with dexamethasone in addition to len does not add any benefit for the patients regarding responses, TTP or OS. As expected, chromosomal abnormalities had a negative impact on TTP and OS. Disclosures Waage: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Gimsing:Amgen: Honoraria. Mellqvist:Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma and Novartis: Honoraria. Nahi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 1872 Poster Board I-897 Background Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of venous thrombosis. Additionally, MM has been associated with arterial thrombosis. Interestingly, excess risk of venous thromboembolism has been observed among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Methods Using population-based data from Sweden, we assessed the risks of venous and arterial thrombosis in 18,627 MM and 5,326 MGUS patients, compared to 70,991 and 20,161 matched controls, respectively. Hazard ratios for thrombosis, at 1, 5, and 10 years follow-up were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results> At 1, 5 and 10 years after MM diagnosis, there was an increased risk of venous thrombosis: hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 7.5 (6.4–8.9), 4.6 (4.1–5.1), and 4.1 (3.8–4.5), respectively. The corresponding results for arterial thrombosis were 1.9 (1.8–2.1), 1.5 (1.4–1.6), and 1.5 (1.4–1.5). At 1, 5 and 10 years after MGUS diagnosis, hazard ratios were 3.6 (2.6–4.9), 2.2 (1.8–2.6), and 2.1 (1.8–2.5) for venous thrombosis. The corresponding risks for arterial thrombosis were 1.7 (1.5–1.9), 1.3 (1.2–1.4), and 1.3 (1.3–1.4). IgG/IgA (but not IgM) MGUS patients had increased risks for venous and arterial thrombosis with hazard ratios 4.5 (2.8–7.2) and 1.6 (1.3–1.9) 1 year and 2.2 (1.7–2.8) and 1.2 (1.1–1.4) 5 years after diagnosis. Risks for thrombosis did not vary by M-protein concentration (above/below 10.0 g/L) at diagnosis. MGUS patients with (versus without) thrombosis had no excess risk of MM progression. Conclusion In this large study including more than 5,000 MGUS patients and 18,000 MM patients, and their matched controls, we found that both MGUS and MM patients had an increased risk of venous as well as arterial thrombosis. Among MGUS patients, an excess risk of thrombosis was observed in patients with IgG/IgA MGUS, but not IgM. Future studies are needed to clarify underlying mechanisms of our findings. Such efforts will be of relevance for physicians managing MGUS and MM patients and have potential implications for the development of better thrombosis prophylaxis strategies. Disclosures: Mellqvist: Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jansen-Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) of the axis is a challenging procedure which may be performed by a percutaneous or a transoral approach. There are few reports of PVP at the C2 level. We report a case of unstable C2 fracture treated with the percutaneous approach. The fracture was the first manifestation of multiple myeloma in a previously healthy 47-year-old woman. After local radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the fracture was still unstable and the patient had been continuously wearing a stiff cervical collar for 9 months. Complication-free PVP resulted in pain relief and stabilization and use of the cervical collar could be discontinued. At 18 months follow-up the patient remained free from pain, the fracture was stable and she had returned to work. The purpose of this article is to present the technical facts and to highlight the benefits and potential complications of the procedure. The technical characteristics of the procedure, the indication and results of the present case are discussed together with previously reported cases of PVP treatment at C2.

Introduction The Swedish Myeloma Registry (SMR) is a prospective observational registry designed to document real-world management and outcomes in newly diagnosed myeloma, with the purpose to improve the quality of the management of patients in Sweden. Population-based registries may provide complementary information on the management of patients to that of clinical intervention trials. With high representation and excellent data quality we can present valuable information in a whole population and reduce the impact of selection on outcome and reduce the subsequent problem with extrapolating data from clinical intervention studies on non-study populations. Methods The registry comprises web-reported data on all patients diagnosed with myeloma, plasmocytoma, and plasma cell leukemia from 2008 in Sweden, at time of diagnosis and after one year of follow-up. Coverage is analyzed through the compulsory Swedish Cancer Registry. Survival is achieved from the Swedish Tax Agency. Missing data are actively requested. This first report contains data on patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2011 with follow-up after one year on patients with symptomatic disease 2008-2010, with a follow-up through the end of 2012. Analyses of incidence, patient characteristics at baseline, proportion of patients given intensive treatment, obtaining very good partial remission (VGPR) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Results Clinical data at baseline was available for 2494 patients (96% coverage)and 1- year follow-up data on 1427 patients (90% of all symptomatic cases initially reported), from 70 different centers in Sweden. The age adjusted incidence was 6.5 myeloma cases per 100 000 inhabitants and year. The median age was 70 years for men, and 73 years for women (34% younger than 66 years). At diagnosis, 76% were reported as symptomatic myeloma, 18% as smouldering myeloma, 5% plasmocytoma and 1% plasma cell leukemia. IgG-myeloma was most common (59%), followed by IgA (21%), Bence-Jones (13%), non-secretory (4%), IgD and IgM both less than 1%. Among symptomatic myeloma (n=1910), 76% had osteolytic lesions or compression fractures at diagnosis. Anemia (defined as hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dl) was seen in 33%, impaired kidney function (s-creatinin levels above 173 mmol/l) in 18%, and hypercalcemia in 21% at the time of diagnosis. In patients were ISS was available, 23%, 45% and 32% were in stage I, II, and III, respectively. Previous MGUS was known in 13 % of patients. Overall, 81 % of patients 65 years or younger received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 4% of the elderly population. In the patients aged 65 years and younger, 63% of patients received one of the newer drugs in the first year of treatment, for the patients 66 to 80 years the number was 56%, and 25% of patients above 80 years. Throughout the study period, an increase in VGPR-rate on initial treatment was observed, more pronounced in younger patients (65 years, the VGPR-rate increased from 17 to 27%. After a median of follow-up time of three years, OS was 63%. There was a significant difference in absolute and relative survival between younger and older patients. In symptomatic myeloma, patients 65 years or younger had an expected 3-year survival of 76% and in patients 66 years and above it was 50% (Figure). The relative 3-year survival for patients with asymptomatic patients was 81%. Discussion SMR is an instrument for increased quality in the management of plasma cell neoplasms in Sweden. This first report from the registry shows very high coverage and good adherence to guidelines in all regions of Sweden, both in diagnostics and treatment. A great effort is made to make the SMR complete and to present population-based data on management and outcome in Sweden. Longer follow-up is needed to address the question of the impact of new treatment options on the survival. The registry gives a great opportunity to perform population-based research of high quality based on the acceptance of the registry among treating physicians. Disclosures: Turesson: Celgene Corp: Honoraria.

Abstract 2970 Evaluating real life outcomes in Multiple Myeloma (MM) pts in order to understand treatment outcome in clinical practice is very important. The introduction of novel agents (Bortezomib, Thalidomide, Lenalidomide) has been shown to increase overall survival (OS). Can MM be regarded as a chronic disease, defined as a similar OS as a matched normal population at diagnosis, after the introduction of novel agents? All pts diagnosed with MM since earliest Jan 2000 until latest Jun 2011 from 6 university clinics, 3 regional centers and 4 local hospitals in Sweden were included. Near complete response (nCR) was defined as an immeasurable M-protein in the blood and urine by standard electrophoresis. Partial response (PR) was defined as a 50% reduction in M-protein, no response (NR) as less than 50% reduction and progress was considered when the increase was ≥ 25%. The Swedish population (n = 9 340 682 in 2009) was used to select a gender and 5-yrs age strata matched cohort based on 2008–2010 observed death rates. In the total MM population n=1 843, 201 (11%) pts were excluded due to non treatment demanding disease setting the study population to n=1 642. The median follow up of pts still alive was 30 months. The median age was 70 yrs and 45% women. The most common subtype was IgG (59%) followed by IgA (22%), BJ (15%) and Other (4%). High dose treatment (HDT) was given to 517 (32%) pts. The median number of given treatment lines in both the HDT and the non-HDT population was two but the number of pts receiving more treatment lines were declining rapidly. The response distribution for the HDT population nCR/PR/NR was 47/41/12% in 1st line (induction and high-dose melphalan) and 25/42/33% in 2nd line. In the non-HDT population the response distribution was 14/42/44% in 1st line and 11/31/58% in 2nd line. Non-HDT pts receiving novel agents in 1st line had significantly higher nCR rates compared to pts receiving older drugs, 22% vs. 12% as well as pts receiving novel agents in 2nd line with nCR rates of 16% vs. 6%. In the HDT population the median time to progression/time to next treatment (TTP/TTNT) was 21.0/29.7 months in 1st line and 8.1/12.7 in 2nd line. In the non-HDT population the median TTP/TTNT was 11.0/16.8 months in 1st line and 7.3/11.4 in 2nd line. There was a significantly increased TTP/TTNT in 1st and 2nd line depending on the increased depth of the response for both the HDT and non-HDT populations. The median OS for HDT pts was 6.7 yrs 95% CI[6.1;7.6] and correlated with 1st line response (nCR 7.6, PR 6.1 and NR 6.2 yrs). When comparing HDT pts to the matched normal population the 1-year survival was 97% vs. 99%, 3-year survival 86% vs. 98% and 5-year survival 66% vs. 95%. The median OS for non-HDT pts (n=1080) was 2.7 yrs 95% CI[2.5;3.0] and increased with better response in 1st line; nCR 3.4, PR 3.0 and NR 1.9 yrs. Kaplan-Mayer analysis showed that the use of novel agents in 1st line (n=316, median age 72.1 yrs) predicted a significantly longer OS compared to conventional treatment (n=764, median age 75.4), median 4.9 vs 2.3 yrs. When comparing pts that received at least two lines of treatment, pts treated with novel agents in 1st line followed by novel agents in 2nd had not reached the median survival but had a lower CI of 6.3 yrs, novel agents in 1st line followed by old agents in 2nd line had a median OS of 4.3 yrs old agents in 1st line followed by novel agents in 2nd line had a median of OS 3.3 yrs and old agents in 1st line followed by old agents in 2nd line had a median of OS 3.0 yrs. Compared to the matched normal population non-HDT pts receiving novel agents in both 1st and 2nd line the 1-year survival was 90 % vs. 96%, 3-year survival 71% vs. 86% and 5-year survival 67% vs. 77%. The number of pts receiving 2nd and 3rd line treatment declined rapidly. Non-HDT pts treated with novel agents in 1st line had a superior response and OS compared to the group treated with standard chemotherapy. Pts treated with novel agents in 2nd line as well seem to have a further improved survival compared to other alternatives. In comparison to a normal population, matched for gender and age at diagnosis, the survival is still shorter. However, if novel agents were used in an optimal treatment sequence the survival could potentially be higher. There is still a need for further development in MM treatment before one can call it a chronic disease. Figure 1: HDT treated pts compared to a matched normal population Figure 1:. HDT treated pts compared to a matched normal population Figure 2: Non-HDT pts receiving old or novel agents in 1st line compared to a matched normal population. Figure 2:. Non-HDT pts receiving old or novel agents in 1st line compared to a matched normal population. Disclosures: Liwing: Janssen-Cilag: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mellqvist:Janssen, Celgene: Honoraria. Näsman:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy. Aschan:Janssen-Cilag: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract 945 Background Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). No large population-based evaluation has been made to assess the risk of infections in MM patients compared to the normal population. Therefore, we performed a large study, using population-based data from Sweden, to estimate the risk of bacterial and viral infections among 9,610 MM patients compared to 37,718 matched controls. Methods We gathered information on all MM patients reported to the nationwide Swedish Cancer Registry from 1988 to 2004, with follow-up to 2007. For each MM patient, four population-based controls (matched by age, sex, and county of residence) were identified randomly from the Swedish population database. Information on occurrence and date of infections was obtained from the centralized Swedish Patient registry that captures information on individual patient-based discharge diagnosis from inpatient (with very high coverage) and outpatient care (since 2000). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the overall, one- and five-year risk of infections. In addition, the effect of gender, age and calendar period of diagnosis was evaluated. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the occurrence of different infections. Results Overall, MM patients had a 6-fold (HR= 5.9; 95% CI=5.7-6.1) risk of developing any infection compared to matched controls (Figure). The increased risk of developing a bacterial infection was 6-fold (HR=5.9; 95%; CI=5.6-6.1), and for viral infections 9-fold (HR=9.0; 95% CI=8.0-10.1), compared to controls. More specifically, MM patients had an increased risk (p MM patients diagnosed in the more recent calendar periods had significantly higher risk of infections, reflected in a 1.6-fold (95% CI=1.5-1.7) and 2-fold (95% CI=1.9-2.1) increased risk in patients diagnosed during 1994–1999 and 2000–2004, compared to patients diagnosed 1986–1993. Females had a significantly lower risk of infections compared to males (p Discussion In this large population-based study including over 9,000 MM patients and 35,000 matched controls, we found that bacterial and viral infections represent a major threat to myeloma patients. We found the risk of specific infections like pneumonia, and septicemia to be over ten times higher in patients than in controls during the first year after MM diagnosis. Importantly, the risk of infections increased in more recent years. The effect on infectious complications due to novel drugs in the treatment of MM needs to be established and trials on prophylactic measures are required. Disclosures: Mellqvist: Janssen, Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract 4053 Background: Based on clinical case reports and small hospital-based patient series, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been reported to increase morbidity due to bacterial infections; however, no comprehensive evaluation has been conducted. Patients and methods: Using population-based data from Sweden, we assessed the risks of viral and bacterial infections (reported to the Patient-Registry) in 5,326 MGUS patients diagnosed 1958–2006, compared to 20,161 matched population-based controls. We fit Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) as measures of risk. Results: At 5 years of follow-up MGUS patients had a 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–2.3) increased risk of developing any infection compared to controls; at 10 years of follow-up, the risk was very similar (HR=2.2; 95% CI 2.0–2.3). MGUS patients had a 2.2-fold (95% CI 2.0–2.4) and 2.1-fold (95% CI 2.0–2.3) increased risk of developing bacterial infections at 5 and 10 years, respectively. A significantly increased risk (P2.5 g/dL at diagnosis had higher risks of infections compared to those Summary and Conclusions: Based on over 5,000 MGUS patients, we found a 2-fold higher risk of developing bacterial and viral infections, compared to controls. The risk was highest among MGUS patients with high M-protein concentrations at diagnosis (>2.5 g/dL); however, the risk was still significantly increased among those with a concentration Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background. Evidence from multiply affected families, case-control and population-based registry studies implicate a role for genetic factors in multiple myeloma (MM). Previous studies based on small numbers have suggested excess risk of MGUS in relatives of MM patients. Aims of this large nationwide MGUS study were to quantify risks of developing MGUS and lymphoproliferative malignancies in first-degree relatives and to define characteristics of familial aggregation. Methods. We identified 4488 MGUS patients diagnosed in all major hematology/oncology outpatient units in Sweden (1967–2005), with linkable relatives. Using the population-based central Multigenerational Registry, we obtained 17628 frequency-matched controls and first-degree relatives of cases (n=14689) and controls (n=58698). Relatives of MGUS cases and controls were linked with hospital-based outpatient registries and the central Swedish Cancer Registry to define occurrence of MGUS and lymphoproliferative tumors. Measures of familial aggregation were calculated by a marginal survival model using relatives as the cohort. Results. Compared with controls, relative risk (RR) of MGUS was significantly increased (RR=2.84; 95% CI 1.45–5.57) in relatives of MGUS cases. Relatives of MGUS cases (vs. controls) also had excess risk of MM (RR=2.87; 95% CI 1.92–4.27), Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM) (RR=4.94; 95% CI 1.32–18.46), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (RR=2.05; 95% CI 1.22–3.43). Risk-estimates were similar for various types of first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, offspring); the same was true when we estimated risks by age at MGUS of cases (above vs. below 65 yrs), and sex of relatives. Age at onset of MGUS and lymphoproliferative tumors was virtually the same for case and control relatives. There was no increased risk (RR∼1) of NHL or HL among relatives of MGUS cases. Conclusions. Among first-degree relatives of a large nationwide MGUS cohort in Sweden, we found 2- to 3-fold elevated risks of developing MGUS, MM, WM, and CLL. These results suggest the operation of shared common germ line susceptibility genes in the pathway to MGUS and certain lymphoproliferative tumors. Better characterization of early genetic lesions mediating monoclonal plasma-cell proliferation, survival, and migration in the bone marrow microenvironment will ultimately enhance our understanding of MGUS, MM, WM, and CLL pathophysiology, provide clues to etiology, and allow identification of novel molecular targets.

Background: Evidence from multiply affected families, case-control and population-based registry studies implicate a role for genetic factors in multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this large population-based familial case-control study was to quantify risks of MM, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and other lymphoproliferative disorders among first-degree relatives of MM patients. Methods: We identified 13,963 MM patients diagnosed in Swedish hospitals 1958–2005, with linkable relatives. Using the population-based central Population- and Multigenerational registries, we obtained 54,610 matched controls and first-degree relatives of MM patients (n=37,838) and controls (n=151,068). Relatives of MM patients and controls were linked with hospital-based outpatient registries and the central Swedish Cancer Registry to define occurrence of MGUS and lymphoproliferative malignancies. Measures of familial aggregation were calculated by a marginal survival model using relatives as the cohort. Results: First-degree relatives of MM patients had a significantly increased risk of developing MM [relative risk (RR)=2.1; (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6–2.9)] and MGUS [2.1 (1.5–3.1)]. The risk estimates were very similar when we conducted analyses by gender of proband, by type of first-degree relative (parent, sibling, offspring), and by age at MM diagnosis (below/above 65 yrs) for probands. Among relatives of MM patients, we found no excess risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. Conclusions: In this large population-based study, we found relatives of MM patients to have a 2-fold excess risk of developing MM and MGUS compared with relatives of controls. Our findings support the theory that there are common, shared susceptibility genes that predispose to MM and MGUS. Better characterization of early genetic lesions mediating monoclonal plasma-cell proliferation, survival, and migration in the bone marrow microenvironment will potentially provide clues to pathogenesis and allow identification of novel molecular targets.