7 results on '"Catherine Haywood"'
Search Results
2. Improving the Engagement of Underrepresented People in Health Research Through Equity-Centered Design Thinking: Qualitative Study and Process Evaluation for the Development of the Grounding Health Research in Design Toolkit
- Author
-
Alessandra N Bazzano, Lesley-Ann Noel, Tejal Patel, C Chantel Dominique, Catherine Haywood, Shenitta Moore, Andrea Mantsios, and Patricia A Davis
- Subjects
Medicine - Abstract
BackgroundHealth inequalities are rooted in historically unjust differences in economic opportunities, environment, access to health care services, and other social determinants. Owing to these health inequalities, the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected underserved populations, notably people of color, incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals, and those unable to physically distance themselves from others. However, people most strongly impacted by health disparities, and the pandemic, are not frequently engaged in research, either as researchers or as participants, resulting in slow progress toward improving health equity. Establishing ways to foster the engagement of historically excluded people is crucial to improving health equity through patient-centered health research. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the use of equity-centered design thinking (EDT) for engaging community members in research prioritization related to COVID-19. The co-design methods and subsequent production of a toolkit that can be used for engagement were assessed through process evaluation and qualitative methods. MethodsProcess evaluation and qualitative inquiry, using reflexive thematic analysis, were undertaken to examine the use of EDT. Patient community members and stakeholders remotely partnered with design and health researchers in a year-long digital process to cocreate capacity-building tools for setting agenda for research regarding the impact of COVID-19 on health outcomes. Through a series of 3 workshops, 5 community partners engaged in EDT activities to identify critical challenges for the health and well-being of their communities. The subsequent tools were tested with 10 health researchers who provided critical input over the course of 2 workshops. Interviews with co-designers, project materials, and feedback sessions were used in the process evaluation and finalization of an equity-centered toolkit for community engagement in research. Data from the co-design process, meetings, workshops, and interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify salient themes. ResultsProcess evaluation illustrated how the EDT co-design process offered an approach to engage patient partners and community stakeholders in health-related research around COVID-19. The participants expressed satisfaction with design thinking approaches, including creative activities and iterative co-design, as a means of working together. Thematic analysis identified 3 key themes: the value of authentic partnerships, building trust and empathy through design, and fostering candid dialogue around health and social issues impacting historically underrepresented and underinvested communities. ConclusionsThe project addressed the need to test EDT strategies for fostering inclusive community engagement in health research agenda setting and provided an alternative to traditional top-down models. Despite the increasing use of human-centered design in health, few projects explicitly include equity in design thinking approaches. The use of methods and tools to intentionally engage underrepresented stakeholders in the process of research agenda setting and equitably sharing power between researchers and community members may improve health research, ultimately improving health equity.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Resilience Against Depression Disparities (RADD): a protocol for a randomised comparative effectiveness trial for depression among predominantly low-income, racial/ethnic, sexual and gender minorities
- Author
-
Jeanne Miranda, Sylvanna Maria Vargas, Ashley Wennerstrom, Nancy Alfaro, Thomas Belin, Krystal Griffith, Catherine Haywood, Felica Jones, Mitchell R Lunn, Diana Meyers, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Miranda Pollock, Cathy D Sherbourne, Benjamin F Springgate, Olivia K Sugarman, Emily Rey, Clarence Williams, Pluscedia Williams, and Bowen Chung
- Subjects
Medicine - Abstract
Introduction Depression is the leading cause of adult disability and common among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults. The current study builds on findings showing the effectiveness of depression quality improvement (QI) and delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) skills provided by community health workers in reducing depression. Depression QI approaches across healthcare and social/community services in safety-net settings have shown improvements in mental wellness, mental health quality of life and depression over 12 months. Further, a randomised study showed improved depression among low-income racial/ethnic minorities enrolled in a CBT-informed resiliency class (Building Resilience and Increasing Community Hope (B-RICH)). The current protocol describes a comparativeness effectiveness study to evaluate whether predominantly low-income, SGM racial/ethnic minority adults randomised to a CBT-informed resiliency class have improvements in depressive symptoms over and above community-engaged QI resources and training only.Methods and analysis The study approached three clusters of four to five programs serving predominantly SGM and racial/ethnic minority communities in the USA: two clusters in Los Angeles, California, and one in New Orleans, Louisiana. Clusters are comprised of one primary care, one mental health and two to three community agencies (eg, faith-based, social services/support, advocacy). All programs received depression QI training. The current study employed a community-partnered participatory research model to adapt the CBT-informed resiliency class, B-RICH+, to SGM communities. Study participants were screened and recruited in person from participating programs, and will complete baseline, 6- and 12-month survey follow-ups. Participants were depressed adults (8-item Patient Health Questionnaire ≥10; ≥18 years of age) who provided contact information. Enrolled participants were individually randomised to B-RICH+ or depression QI alone. Primary outcomes are depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes are mental health quality of life, mental wellness and physical health quality of life. Data collection for this study is ongoing.Ethics and dissemination The current study was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications and community conferences.Trial registration number https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02986126
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. ‘You have to be almost dead before they ever really work on you in prison’: A qualitative study of formerly incarcerated women’s health care experiences during incarceration in Louisiana, U.S
- Author
-
Anjali Niyogi, Meredith Sugarman, Dolfinette Martin, Catherine Haywood, Ashley Wennerstrom, and Christine Breland Lobre
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sociology and Political Science ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Community-based participatory research ,Prison ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Justice (ethics) ,Qualitative Research ,media_common ,Reproductive health ,business.industry ,Prisoners ,Health Policy ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Middle Aged ,Mental health ,Prisons ,Family medicine ,Women's Health ,Female ,Thematic analysis ,Psychology ,business ,Delivery of Health Care ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Qualitative research - Abstract
Globally, the rate of incarceration among women is rising, and in the U.S., women's incarceration has grown at twice the rate for men over the last four decades. Louisiana has the second highest rate of incarceration in the U.S. There is evidence that men in Louisiana prisons do not receive adequate healthcare, but little is known about their women counterparts. We aimed to document formerly incarcerated women's experiences with receiving healthcare during incarceration in Louisiana to inform policy and practice change. In partnership with two community-based organisations in New Orleans, Louisiana, between August 2016 and April 2018, we conducted semi-structured 1-hr interviews with 22 formerly incarcerated women who had been incarcerated in the state for at least one consecutive year. A convenience sample of participants was recruited through community-based organisations' re-entry and health programmes. Our interview guide included questions about experiences with accessing care, reproductive health needs, interactions with providers and preventive care during incarceration. We used applied thematic analysis techniques to interpret data. Over 90% of interviewees identified as Black. Their mean age was 50.7. The average length of incarceration was 8.4 years. Participants reported multiple barriers to accessing care including punishment for seeking care, long wait times, costs, lack of respect from providers and health concerns being dismissed. Participants reported limited mental health, preventive and dental services; an insufficient number of providers; and poor health outcomes as a result of delayed care. Overall, women did not have access to adequate, timely care during incarceration. Findings suggest a need for policy changes related to the provision of carceral healthcare services and external oversight of prison conditions and healthcare delivery. Further research into women's experiences of ageing during incarceration and tailored transitional health models is needed.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Promoting Community Health Worker Leadership in Policy Development: Results from a Louisiana Workforce Study
- Author
-
Ashley Wennerstrom, Catherine Haywood, Meredith Sugarman, and Pascaline Ezouah
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health (social science) ,Best practice ,Health Promotion ,Credentialing ,Health(social science) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Political science ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Staff Development ,Qualitative Research ,Community Health Workers ,Medical education ,030505 public health ,Public health ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Workforce development ,Louisiana ,Leadership ,Community health ,Workforce ,Professional association ,Public Health ,Thematic analysis ,0305 other medical science - Abstract
Community health workers (CHWs) are effective in improving public health, and many states are developing policy to support the workforce. In 2019, the Louisiana legislature created the CHW Workforce Study Committee (Committee) of at least half CHWs to study the workforce and provide the state with policy recommendations. The Committee followed national best practices in CHW engagement. A CHW and an academic team identified CHWs and employers statewide, administered a survey in partnership with a CHW professional association, and conducted in-depth interviews with CHWs and employers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey data and applied thematic analysis was used to interpret interview transcripts. Sixty-five CHWs and 37 employers participated in the survey. Twenty-one CHWs and 15 employers completed interviews. Survey data indicated that Louisiana CHW roles and activities are consistent with national research. Interviews revealed a lack of knowledge about CHWs among key stakeholders, CHW workforce challenges including lack of community and professional resources, and differing ideas about the value of common workforce development practices such as standardized training and credentialing. Findings suggest a need for widespread education about CHWs and support for CHW participation in professional associations to address common workforce challenges. CHW co-leadership and partnering with a CHW professional association enabled successful study execution and full participation of CHWs in the formation of Committee recommendations. A subset of Committee members, made up of at least half CHWs, continues to meet to expand and support the workforce.
- Published
- 2020
6. Creating Safe Spaces: A Community Health Worker-Academic Partnered Approach to Addressing Intimate Partner Violence
- Author
-
Yana Sutton, Barbara Lacen Keller, Catherine Haywood, Ashlee Walker, Ashley Wennerstrom, Maeve Wallace, Benjamin Springgate, Marva L. Lewis, Katherine P. Theall, Meredith Sugarman, and Trupania Bonner
- Subjects
Community-Based Participatory Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Social Problems ,Epidemiology ,Service delivery framework ,Population ,Intimate Partner Violence ,Community-based participatory research ,Participatory action research ,Community Networks ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Preventive Health Services ,medicine ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Culturally Appropriate Technology ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Sociology ,education ,Community Health Workers ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Public health ,05 social sciences ,New Orleans ,General Medicine ,Public relations ,Health equity ,Black or African American ,Community health ,Original Report: The Community and Patient Partnered Research Network ,Domestic violence ,Female ,business ,050104 developmental & child psychology - Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a persistent public health problem in the United States, with an estimated one in three women experiencing rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner within her lifetime. Non-Hispanic Black women disproportionately experience IPV, but there has been limited success in implementing culturally appropriate prevention programs and services for members of this population. Community health workers (CHWs) are trusted members of under-resourced communities who provide reliable health information and improve the cultural appropriateness of service delivery and may be a vital resource for developing new IPV interventions. Guided by the principles of community partnered participatory research, we developed the CHW-led Safe Spaces project, which aimed to establish a strong academic-community partnership to focus on issues related to experiences of IPV and the prevention of IPV in New Orleans. In this article, we describe the development of our partnership including the formation of an advisory board, creation of a broad-based stakeholder coalition, offering a community partnered participatory research training, conducting IPV education and outreach, and establishing a research agenda. Our processes are replicable and lessons learned may be relevant to other groups seeking to address IPV by leveraging the strengths of community-academic collaborations and CHWs.Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2):317-324; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.317.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Resilience Against Depression Disparities (RADD): a protocol for a randomised comparative effectiveness trial for depression among predominantly low-income, racial/ethnic, sexual and gender minorities
- Author
-
Juno Obedin-Maliver, Sylvanna M. Vargas, Bowen Chung, Diana Meyers, Thomas R. Belin, Pluscedia Williams, Clarence R Williams, Nancy Alfaro, Felica Jones, Miranda Pollock, Ashley Wennerstrom, Catherine Haywood, Olivia K. Sugarman, Krystal Griffith, Jeanne Miranda, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Emily Rey, Benjamin Springgate, and Mitchell R. Lunn
- Subjects
Gerontology ,Male ,Comparative Effectiveness Research ,LGBTQ ,Ethnic group ,Sexual and Gender Minorities ,0302 clinical medicine ,Clinical Protocols ,Health care ,Protocol ,Ethnicity ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Depression (differential diagnoses) ,Minority Groups ,Aged, 80 and over ,Depression ,racial/ ethnic minorities ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Resilience, Psychological ,Institutional review board ,Quality Improvement ,Community Mental Health Services ,3. Good health ,Mental Health ,depression and mood disorders ,Female ,0305 other medical science ,Adult ,Adolescent ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,Humans ,Poverty ,Aged ,030505 public health ,community partnered research ,Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ,business.industry ,Mental health ,United States ,Patient Health Questionnaire ,Sexual minority ,SGM ,Quality of Life ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
IntroductionDepression is the leading cause of adult disability and common among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults. The current study builds on findings showing the effectiveness of depression quality improvement (QI) and delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) skills provided by community health workers in reducing depression. Depression QI approaches across healthcare and social/community services in safety-net settings have shown improvements in mental wellness, mental health quality of life and depression over 12 months. Further, a randomised study showed improved depression among low-income racial/ethnic minorities enrolled in a CBT-informed resiliency class (Building Resilience and Increasing Community Hope (B-RICH)). The current protocol describes a comparativeness effectiveness study to evaluate whether predominantly low-income, SGM racial/ethnic minority adults randomised to a CBT-informed resiliency class have improvements in depressive symptoms over and above community-engaged QI resources and training only.Methods and analysisThe study approached three clusters of four to five programs serving predominantly SGM and racial/ethnic minority communities in the USA: two clusters in Los Angeles, California, and one in New Orleans, Louisiana. Clusters are comprised of one primary care, one mental health and two to three community agencies (eg, faith-based, social services/support, advocacy). All programs received depression QI training. The current study employed a community-partnered participatory research model to adapt the CBT-informed resiliency class, B-RICH+, to SGM communities. Study participants were screened and recruited in person from participating programs, and will complete baseline, 6- and 12-month survey follow-ups. Participants were depressed adults (8-item Patient Health Questionnaire ≥10; ≥18 years of age) who provided contact information. Enrolled participants were individually randomised to B-RICH+ or depression QI alone. Primary outcomes are depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes are mental health quality of life, mental wellness and physical health quality of life. Data collection for this study is ongoing.Ethics and disseminationThe current study was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications and community conferences.Trial registration numberhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02986126
- Published
- 2019
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.