1. Utilization of pre-hospital pelvic circumferential compression devices for pelvic fractures: survey of U.S. level I trauma centers
- Author
-
Chad Corrigan, Stephanie Jarvis, Cassandra Reynolds, David Bar-Or, Richard P. Meinig, Matthew M. Carrick, Nimesh S. A. Patel, Mark Lieser, and Kristin Salottolo
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Future studies ,Pelvic fracture management ,business.industry ,Research ,Trauma center ,lcsh:Surgery ,Management guideline ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,lcsh:RD1-811 ,Guideline ,030230 surgery ,medicine.disease ,Trauma ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Emergency medicine ,Circumferential compression device ,medicine ,Pelvic fracture ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,business - Abstract
Introduction There is a lack of data on the use and effectiveness of pre-hospital pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) as a temporary intervention for pelvic fracture management; they are thought to decrease pelvic volume and hemorrhage but are not without risks. The purpose of this study is to examine pre-hospital PCCD practices at US Level I trauma centers. Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional survey of trauma medical directors at US Level I trauma centers. The aim of this study was to describe patterns of pre-hospital PCCD utilization for pelvic fractures. Responses were compared by region, length in time the center was designated Level I, trauma patient volume, pelvic management guideline followed and blood product guidelines. Data were compared using Fisher’s exact and chi-squared tests. Results Of the 158 Level I trauma centers invited, 25% responded. All Level I trauma centers use in-hospital PCCDs, whereas 71% of participant’s paramedic agencies trained on pre-hospital PCCD application. Of those, 44% trained to apply pre-hospital PCCDs to all suspected pelvic fractures. A higher proportion of high-volume centers (77%) than low-volume centers (25%) trained on pre-hospital PCCD placement, p = 0.06. PCCD practices were not dependent on the trauma center’s region, trauma volume, length in time as a Level I trauma center, or pelvic fracture guideline followed. Conclusions There is widespread application of in-hospital and pre-hospital PCCD at US Level I trauma centers, however pre-hospital PCCDs are not applied to all suspected pelvic fractures. Future studies should focus on efficacy, safety, and contraindications for pre-hospital PCCDs.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF