1. Comparing the Relative Strengths of EEG and Low-Cost Physiological Devices in Modeling Attention Allocation in Semiautonomous Vehicles
- Author
-
Daniel M. Roberts, Carryl L. Baldwin, Ryan McKendrick, Dean Cisler, and Pamela M. Greenwood
- Subjects
Computer science ,electrocardiography ,Real-time computing ,Electroencephalography ,Affect (psychology) ,050105 experimental psychology ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,Task (project management) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Behavioral Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Heart rate variability ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Latency (engineering) ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,Biological Psychiatry ,Original Research ,eye-tracking ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,low-cost technology ,business.industry ,alpha-band ,semiautonomous vehicles ,05 social sciences ,Heart rate monitor ,Automation ,attention ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology ,Neurology ,Eye tracking ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Neuroscience - Abstract
As semiautonomous driving systems are becoming prevalent in late model vehicles, it is important to understand how such systems affect driver attention. This study investigated whether measures from low-cost devices monitoring peripheral physiological state were comparable to standard EEG in predicting lapses in attention to system failures. Twenty-five participants were equipped with a low-fidelity eye-tracker and heart rate monitor and with a high-fidelity NuAmps 32-channel quick-gel EEG system and asked to detect the presence of potential system failure while engaged in a fully autonomous lane changing driving task. To encourage participant attention to the road and to assess engagement in the lane changing task, participants were required to: (a) answer questions about that task; and (b) keep a running count of the type and number of billboards presented throughout the driving task. Linear mixed effects analyses were conducted to model the latency of responses reaction time (RT) to automation signals using the physiological metrics and time period. Alpha-band activity at the midline parietal region in conjunction with heart rate variability (HRV) was important in modeling RT over time. Results suggest that current low-fidelity technologies are not sensitive enough by themselves to reliably model RT to critical signals. However, that HRV interacted with EEG to significantly model RT points to the importance of further developing heart rate metrics for use in environments where it is not practical to use EEG.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF