1. Evaluation of sorption/solubility, softening, flexural strength and elastic modulus of experimental resin blends with chlorhexidine
- Author
-
Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Fernanda Miori Pascon, Andréia Bolzan de Paula, Luciana Tiemi Inagaki, Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani, and Vanessa Benetello Dainezi
- Subjects
Materials science ,Chlorhexidine ,Sorption ,030206 dentistry ,02 engineering and technology ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Composite Resins ,UDMA ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Solubility ,Flexural strength ,Elastic Modulus ,Materials Testing ,Knoop hardness test ,medicine ,Composite material ,0210 nano-technology ,General Dentistry ,Elastic modulus ,Softening ,medicine.drug - Abstract
To evaluate physical-chemical properties of experimental diacetate chlorhexidine (CHX)-added resin blends.Blends were formulated: G1)TEGDMA; G2)TEGDMA/0.1%CHX; G3)TEGDMA/0.2%CHX; G4)TEGDMA/UDMA; G5)TEGDMA/UDMA/0.1%CHX; G6)TEGDMA/UDMA/0.2%CHX; G7)TEGDMA/BisEMA, G8)TEGDMA/BisEMA/0.1%CHX; G9)TEGDMA/BisEMA/0.2%CHX. Icon(®) was the control group. For sorption/solubility (SS), cylindrical specimens (n=5) were prepared and their weight obtained. The specimens were immersed in deionized water for 7days at 37°C and their weight was verified again. SS were calculated using accepted formulas. For softening, cylindrical specimens (n=10) were prepared and initial Knoop hardness number (KHN) obtained. The specimens were immersed in absolute ethanol for 24h at 37°C and final KHN accomplished. Softening values were calculated by KHN reduction percentage. For elastic modulus (EM) and flexural strength (FS) bar specimens were prepared (n=10) and values obtained with a universal device (three point, 5mm distance, 0.5mm/min, load of 50N). The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=5%).TEGDMA/BisEMA blends and Icon(®) showed the lowest sorption from blends (p0.05), and Icon(®) was the most soluble material (p0.01). TEGDMA/UDMA/0.1%CHX showed the highest softening, similar to Icon(®) (p0.05). For EM, all blends were different than Icon(®) (p0.01). For FS, TEGDMA blends were similar to Icon(®), showing the lowest averages (p0.05).Monomers chemical characteristics influenced the physical-chemical properties of experimental blends more than CHX. Between the blends tested, UDMA blends presented satisfactory results for assays evaluated.Infiltrants CHX-added could arrest and reinforce initial caries lesions, and the antimicrobial effect could prevent new lesions in sound enamel adjacent to the infiltrated area.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF