Search

Objectives: To describe the perception of migraine by neurologists in France, to compare perceptions between neurologists who did and did not suffer from migraines and to describe treatments used for their own migraines., Background: Patients with migraine are usually undertreated, as treatment guidelines are frequently not followed and, therefore, resulting treatment satisfaction is low. One reason for this may be inappropriate perceptions of physicians concerning the seriousness of the pathology and the need to treat. However, available information on physician perceptions of migraine is limited., Methods: This was an observational, epidemiological survey conducted both in hospital- and community-based neurologists in France. Participating neurologists completed an anonymous questionnaire which collected data on demographics, migraine status, and perceptions of migraine. Neurologists who considered themselves migraineurs also provided data on migraine impact, treatment and on treatment satisfaction. Distributions of responses to questions on migraine perceptions were compared between migraineur and nonmigraineur neurologists., Results: The study included 368 neurologists, of whom 179 (48.6%) were migraineurs themselves. Some 92.3% of participants claimed to be very or quite interested in migraine. Migraine was considered a real illness by 96.5% of neurologists and to be very or quite disabling by 96.6%. Around half perceived migraine as a challenging condition to manage with respect to unrealistic patient expectations (46.2%), time-consuming treatment (48.9%), and complications because of anxious or depressive comorbidity (59.9%) or medical nomadism (consulting multiple physicians for the same condition; 47.0%). No significant differences in any perception items were observed between migraineur and nonmigraineur neurologists. In total, 83.1% of neurologists were satisfied with acute headache treatments and 60.4% with prophylactic headache treatments. The most frequently reported treatments for neurologist's own migraines were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (used by 57.0%) and triptans (50.3%)., Conclusions: French neurologists are interested and concerned about migraine but find it challenging to treat. Migraine perceptions do not differ between neurologists who do and do not suffer from migraines themselves. Neurology training needs to prepare medical students adequately for the challenges of migraine treatment in terms of patient communication and psychiatric issues.

The practice of therapeutic trials is indispensable in the management of bronchial carcinoma if one hopes to improve the results. We have questioned 134 doctors in the Alsace region who are involved in the diagnosis and treatment of bronchial cancer. We asked how they would wish to be treated if they had a small cell cancer, and if they would agree to participate in a therapeutic trial should the occasion arise. Four different clinical situations of small cell carcinoma localised to the hemithorax were presented, illustrating current controversy on the best treatment or treatments to apply. The 4 proposed protocols were refused by 50% to 84% of the doctors questioned in different cases. The greater the level of consensus on a therapeutic treatment in a given clinical situation the greater the level of refusal to participate in a randomised protocol was. The fact that at least half of the specialist doctors questioned would refuse to be included in a current therapeutic protocol which is underway for patients in Europe leads to the suggestion that before the application for new protocols experts surrogates should give their opinion in association with ethical committee.