Search

In the MYF2001 trial, treatment of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-relapsed/refractory intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks demonstrated encouraging median overall survival of 29.9 months. To provide historical context, external real-world data (RWD) were collected from a study of 96 patients who had discontinued ruxolitinib and were subsequently treated with best available therapy (BAT) at Moffitt Cancer Center. A closely matched cohort was identified using the MYF2001 eligibility criteria, including patients with MF who had discontinued ruxolitinib due to lack or loss of response. Overall survival was measured from time of JAK inhibitor discontinuation to death or censored at last follow-up. To improve comparability, propensity score weighting approaches using average treatment effect for overlap population (ATO) and stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used for 10 critical baseline covariates. Fifty-seven patients treated with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg from MYF2001 and 38 patients treated with BAT from RWD were analyzed with improved balanced baseline covariates after propensity score adjustment, showing significantly lower risk of death with imetelstat compared with BAT (hazard ratio: 0.35; p = 0.0019). With sIPTW, results were similar. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. In conclusion, treatment with imetelstat was associated with longer overall survival compared to BAT (30 vs 12 months, respectively) in closely matched patients with MF after JAK inhibitor failure, warranting further evaluation of imetelstat in this poor-prognosis patient population.

PURPOSE Patients with myelofibrosis who are relapsed or refractory (R/R) to Janus-associated kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have poor clinical outcomes including dismal overall survival (OS) that ranges between 13 and 16 months. Imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, was evaluated in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis R/R to JAKi in a phase II multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02426086 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive either imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg or 4.7 mg/kg intravenous once every 3 weeks. Spleen response (≥ 35% spleen volume reduction) and symptom response (≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score) rates at week 24 were coprimary end points. Secondary end points included OS and safety. RESULTS Study enrollment was closed early, and patients treated with 4.7 mg/kg were permitted to continue treatment with 9.4 mg/kg. At week 24, spleen and symptom response rates were 10.2% and 32.2% in the 9.4-mg/kg arm and 0% and 6.3% in the 4.7-mg/kg arm. Treatment with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg led to a median OS of 29.9 months and bone marrow fibrosis improvement in 40.5% and variant allele frequency reduction of driver mutations in 42.1% of evaluable patients. Fibrosis improvement and variant allele frequency reduction correlated with OS. Target inhibition was demonstrated by reduction of telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse transcriptase level and correlated with spleen response, symptom response, and OS. Most common adverse events on both arms were grade 3 or 4 reversible cytopenias. CONCLUSION In this phase II study of two imetelstat doses, 9.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinical benefits in symptom response rate, with an acceptable safety profile for this poor-risk JAKi R/R population. Biomarker and bone marrow fibrosis assessments suggested selective effects on the malignant clone. A confirmatory phase III study is currently underway.

PURPOSE Patients with lower-risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who are RBC transfusion dependent and have experienced relapse after or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) have limited treatment options. High telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse-transcription expression in clonal hematopoietic cells have been reported in patients with MDS. Imetelstat, a first-in-class competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity, targets cells with active telomerase. We report efficacy, safety, and biomarker data for patients with LR MDS who are RBC transfusion dependent and who were relapsed/refractory to ESAs. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this two-part phase II/III study (MDS3001), the primary end point was 8-week RBC transfusion independence (TI) rate, with key secondary end points of 24-week RBC TI rate, TI duration, and hematologic improvement-erythroid. RESULTS Data from the phase II part of the study are reported. Of 57 patients enrolled and treated (overall population), 38 were non-del(5q) and hypomethylating agent and lenalidomide naïve (subset population). The 8- and 24-week RBC TI rates in the overall population were 37% and 23%, respectively, with a median TI duration of 65 weeks. In the subset population, 8- and 24-week RBC TI rates were 42% and 29%, respectively, with a median TI duration of 86 weeks. Eight-week TI rate was observed across all subgroups evaluated. Cytogenetic and mutational data revealed a reduction of the malignant clones, suggesting disease modification activity. The most common adverse events were cytopenias, typically reversible within 4 weeks. CONCLUSION Imetelstat treatment results in a meaningful, durable TI rate across a broad range of heavily transfused patients with LR MDS who are ineligible for or relapsed/refractory to ESAs. Biomarker analyses indicated effects on the mutant malignant clone.

Introduction: Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor that targets cells with high telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression, characteristics observed in MDS patients (pts) across all disease stages. IMerge (MDS3001, NCT02598661) is a Phase 2/3 global study of imetelstat for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent (TD) pts with non-del 5q LR-MDS ESA-R/R, who have limited treatment options. The results from the Phase 2 part indicated that imetelstat achieved durable transfusion independence (TI) with a manageable safety profile. Among 38 pts with median follow-up of 24 months, ≥8-week (w), ≥24-w, ≥1-year (y) TI rates were 42%, 32% and 29%, respectively (Steensma JCO 2020, Platzbecker ASH 2020). Aims: To assess the correlation between imetelstat's on-target activity with clinical benefits and safety data as of 10-May 2021 in the Phase 2 part of IMerge. Methods: Peripheral blood samples pre and after 1 and 2 cycles of imetelstat administration were collected to analyze hTERT level by Taqman RT-PCR assay. ≥50% hTERT reduction by imetelstat was considered optimal pharmacodynamic (PD) effect. Correlation analyses between the optimal PD and efficacy, including TI rates ≥8-w, ≥24-w, and ≥1-y, duration of the longest TI, and OS, as well as hematological and liver function lab parameters were performed. Results: hTERT analyses on 35/38 pts with matched pre- and post-1 to 2 cycles of treatment samples available demonstrated on-target activity/optimal PD effect of imetelstat in 54.3% (19/35) of pts. Pts who achieved optimal PD had significantly higher rates of TI compared to pts who did not achieve optimal PD: 63.2% (12/19) vs 25% (4/16) had ≥8-w TI (p=0.0411); 57.9% (11/19) vs 12.5% (2/16) had ≥24-w TI (p=0.0125); and 52.6% (10/19) vs 6.3% (1/16) had ≥1-y TI (p=0.0125) (Fig A). Pts who achieved optimal PD effect had a greater reduction in transfusions (both absolute change in transfusion units and % of change in transfusion burden) in the best 8-week interval compared to pts who did not. In addition, pts who achieved optimal PD had a significantly longer median TI duration (68.4 w, 95% CI 4.9, 92.4) compared to those who did not (5.5 w, 95% CI 2.3, 6.6) with a hazard ratio of 0.364 (95% CI 0.167, 0.794, log-rank p value=0.0087, Fig B). Furthermore, median OS was 57.0 months (95% CI 34.6, -) in pts who achieved optimal PD vs 40.7 months (95% CI 26.9, -) in pts who did not, and the 4-year OS rate was 58.4% vs 31.0%, respectively, although not statistically significant. Pts who achieved optimal PD also had lower rates of Grade 3+neutropenia (52.6%), thrombocytopenia (57.9%), or liver function elevations (5.3%) compared to pts who did not achieve optimal PD (68.8%, 68.8% and 18.8%, respectively), although the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Optimal PD effect of imetelstat treatment was demonstrated by ≥50% hTERT reduction. A significant correlation was observed between optimal PD effect of imetelstat and durable TI and improved 4-year OS rate, effectively linking imetelstat activity to clinical efficacy. Additionally, pts who achieved an optimal PD effect by imetelstat treatment did not have higher rates of cytopenias or liver enzyme elevations compared to pts without optimal PD effect. Enrollment is ongoing for the Phase 3 part of IMerge, a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs. placebo. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Santini: Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fenaux: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Raza: Celgene Inc: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Genoptix: Speakers Bureau; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Janssen R&D: Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onconova Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Germing: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Font: CELGENE-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses. Diez-Campelo: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Patnaik: Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sherman: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Berry: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Platzbecker: Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, is under clinical development but not approved for treatment of MDS

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-threatening myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly and debilitating symptoms, such as fatigue, pruritus, night sweats, fever, bone pain, and weight loss that impact quality of life (QoL). Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, demonstrated clinical benefits in terms of symptom response and potential improvement in overall survival in a pilot study in MF patients (pts) (Tefferi et al, NEJM 2015) and in IMbark, a Phase 2 study in MF pts relapsed or refractory (R/R) to a Janus associated kinase (JAK) inhibitor (Mascarenhas et al, ASH 2018 #685). Aims: We assessed the effects of imetelstat on MF symptom burden and QoL in IMbark, and the correlations of MF-related symptoms measured by modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) 2.0 and other patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints. Methods: IMbark (MYF2001; NCT02426086) is a two-dose, randomized, single-blinded, Phase 2 study of imetelstat in R/R intermediate-2/high-risk MF pts, who received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg or 4.7 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Symptom response, one of the co-primary endpoints, was defined as ≥50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) from baseline to Week 24 as measured by the modified MFSAF 2.0 e-diary. The TSS was calculated as the 7-day average of daily TSS, which is the summation of 6 individual symptom scores (night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, early satiety, bone or muscle pain). Correlation of TSS with other PROs was explored: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Brief Pain Inventory (BP-I), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results: All 107 pts enrolled in IMbark were symptomatic, with baseline mean TSS scores of 25.7 in the 9.4 mg/kg arm (N=59) and 24.6 in the 4.7 mg/kg arm (N=48), indicating a high symptom burden. Pts in both arms had ≥96.5% mean compliance rates with completion of the e-diary. Treatment with imetelstat demonstrated a statistically significant dose-related improvement in TSS symptom response rate at Week 24 for 9.4 mg/kg vs 4.7 mg/kg (32.1% vs 6.3%, p=0.001) and at any time (52.5% vs 27.1%, p=0.010). A higher proportion of pts in the 9.4 mg/kg arm than in the 4.7 mg/kg arm achieved ≥50% reduction in 5 individual symptoms, including night sweats, itchiness, abdominal pressure, pain under left ribs, and early satiety. Based on EORTC QLQ-C30, improvements at Week 24 relative to baseline were seen in the imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg arm for global health status, all 5 function subscales, and all 3 symptoms. Notably for fatigue (a common MF symptom which was not measured in MFSAF v2.0), pts in the 9.4 mg/kg arm had improvement at Week 24 relative to baseline, compared to the pts in the 4.7 mg/kg arm (LS means -13.3 vs -3.1, p=0.042). The TSS symptom responses were shown to correlate with other PROs. Compared to pts in the 4.7 mg/kg arm, TSS symptom responders in the 9.4 mg/kg arm achieved significantly greater improvements in the global health status (p=0.004), fatigue (p=0.009), pain (p=0.033), and most of the functional scales in EORTC QLQ-C30. Pain scores per the modified MFSAF v2.0 correlated with the pain scores in EORTC QLQ-C30 and BP-I (correlation coefficients 0.5-0.6). More than 90% of TSS symptom responders in the 9.4 mg/kg arm also characterized their condition as having had either "very much improvement" (36.4%) or "somewhat improvement" (54.6%) in PGIC. Conclusion: These data show a dose-related, clinically meaningful improvement in overall and individual MF symptoms as measured by MFSAF 2.0 with imetelstat treatment in pts who are JAK inhibitor R/R. TSS symptom responders treated with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg also had improvement in QoL as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30. The data further support the robustness of overall and individual symptom improvement in pts with MF as evidenced by the correlation of modified MFSAF v2.0 with other PROs such as EORTC QLQ-C30, PGIC, and BP-I. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution); Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy. Komrokji:Geron: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Research Funding. Reiter:Gilead: Other: travel support ; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; AOP: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Celgene,: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Deciphera: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Blueprint: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support , Research Funding. Scott:Agios, BMS: Honoraria; BMS, Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion, Incyte, Novartis, Regeneron: Consultancy. Baer:AbbVie: Other: Institutional research funding; Astellas: Other: Institutional research funding; Forma: Other: Institutional research funding; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; Kite: Other: Institutional research funding; Oscotec: Other: Institutional research funding; Takeda: Other: Institutional research funding. Hoffman:Dompe: Research Funding; Protagonist: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forbius: Consultancy. Odenike:AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals, NS Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Oncology, Oncotherapy, Agios, CTI/Baxalta, Aprea: Other: Institutional research funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; Impact Biomedicines: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sherman:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Huang:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vannucchi:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor currently in clinical development for hematologic myeloid malignancies. IMbark (MYF2001; NCT02426086) was a 2-dose (9.4 mg/kg or 4.7 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks), randomized Phase 2 study of imetelstat in intermediate-2/high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) relapsed or refractory to prior Janus kinase inhibitor treatment. Comparing the 9.4 mg/kg arm to the 4.7 mg/kg arm, the rate of symptom response (total symptom score [TSS] reduction ≥50%) at Week 24 was 32.2% and 6.3%, respectively (Mascarenhas et al, ASH 2018 #685), and median overall survival (OS) was 28.1 months (mos) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.8, 31.6) for the 9.4 mg/kg arm and 19.9 mos for the 4.7 mg/kg arm (95% CI: 17.1, 33.9) with an overall study follow up of 42 mos (Mascarenhas et al, EHA 2020, EP1107). Dose-dependent on-target pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of imetelstat was observed and it correlated with clinical responses and longer OS (Mascarenhas et al, EHA 2020 EP1098). Here we report the results of imetelstat exposure-response analyses from IMbark to further evaluate the benefit/risk profile and justify 9.4 mg/kg every 21 days as the optimal dosing regimen for the planned Phase 3 study of imetelstat in refractory MF. Methods: The average plasma concentration (Cavg) of imetelstat was used to define the exposure. The Cavg values of 107 patients (pts) were grouped into 4 quartiles (Q1-4) representing different levels of imetelstat exposure regardless of the protocol-specified dose arm assignment. Optimal PD effect of imetelstat was defined as ≥50% reduction in telomerase activity or human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) from baseline. The exposure-response relationships between exposure quartiles and PD effect, symptom response, OS, and laboratory safety parameters were assessed. Results: The association between the 4 exposure quartiles and dose levels showed that 89% of pts in Q1 (the lowest exposure quartile) were treated with 4.7 mg/kg, while 96% of pts in Q4 (the highest exposure quartile) were treated with 9.4 mg/kg. The pts in the 4.7 mg/kg arm who had higher exposure in Q3 and Q4 were mainly those with dose escalation to 9.4 mg/kg, and pts in the 9.4 mg/kg arm who had lower exposure in Q1-Q2 were mainly those with dose delay, reduction, or interruption. 51.9% of pts in Q1, 63% in Q2 (vs Q1, p=0.5826), 77.8% in Q3 (vs Q1, p=0.0861), and 80% in Q4 (vs Q1, p=0.0439) achieved the optimal PD effect, respectively, indicating exposure-dependent on-target activity of imetelstat. The symptom response rate for pts in exposure quartile Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 was 7.4%, 18.5% (vs Q1, p=0.4203), 18.5% (vs Q1, p=0.4203), and 38.5% (vs Q1, p=0.0091), respectively. Median OS was 18.9 mos in Q1, 23.6 mos in Q2 (hazard ratio [HR]=0.663; 95% CI: 0.350, 1.259; log-rank p=0.2097), 24.6 mos in Q3 (HR=0.656; 95% CI 0.348, 1.236; p=0.1920) and 30.6 mos in Q4 (HR=0.467; 95% CI: 0.236, 0.925; p=0.0260), respectively. The exposure-response analyses showed that pts in the highest exposure quartile were more likely to have better clinical outcome. The relationship between exposure quartiles and hematological and liver function safety parameters was assessed. There were no significant differences between each imetelstat exposure quartile group on the change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, and neutrophil counts; or in the rate of Grade 3+ neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevations in alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin. Pts with higher imetelstat exposure had similar rates of Grade 3+ adverse events as pts with lower exposure, suggesting that the lower dose does not improve safety. Conclusions: In summary, the exposure-response analysis results indicated 9.4 mg/kg and 4.7 mg/kg covered the therapeutic window of imetelstat in MF pts. Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 21 days treatment yielded higher exposure, leading to higher rate of pts achieving the optimal PD effect, consistently better clinical benefits, such as higher symptom response and significantly longer median OS, and had a similar safety profile as 4.7 mg/kg with regard to hematologic and liver function parameters. This exposure-response analysis of benefit/risk profile supports 9.4 mg/kg every 21 days as the optimal dosing regimen for the planned imetelstat Phase 3 study in refractory MF. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy; Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution). Komrokji:Acceleron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Niederwieser:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Research Funding; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reiter:Gilead: Other: travel support ; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; AOP: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Celgene,: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Deciphera: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Blueprint: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support , Research Funding. Scott:Agios, BMS: Honoraria; Alexion, Incyte, Novartis, Regeneron: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis: Research Funding. Baer:AbbVie: Other: Institutional research funding; Astellas: Other: Institutional research funding; Forma: Other: Institutional research funding; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; Kite: Other: Institutional research funding; Oscotec: Other: Institutional research funding; Takeda: Other: Institutional research funding. Hoffman:Protagonist: Consultancy; Dompe: Research Funding; Forbius: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Odenike:AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Impact Biomedicines: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals, NS Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Oncology, Oncotherapy, Agios, CTI/Baxalta, Aprea: Other: Institutional research funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sherman:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Berry:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Sun:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-threatening myeloproliferative neoplasm. Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor and fedratinib, a JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, are the only approved treatment options for MF. Despite the benefits reported with ruxolitinib in the front-line setting, a high proportion of patients discontinue treatment, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year discontinuation rates are 49%, 71%, and 86%, respectively (Abdelrahman et al, 2015). For patients who discontinue treatment with ruxolitinib, the median overall survival (OS) is dismal and ranges from 13 to 16 months (Kuykendall et al, 2018; Newberry et al, 2017; Schain et al, 2019; Palandri et al, 2019; Mcnamara et al, 2019). There remains a great unmet need for patients who are non-responsive to and have discontinued treatment with a JAK inhibitor. Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, has shown meaningful clinical improvement in symptom response and improved OS in IMbark, a Phase 2 study in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF who have relapsed after or are refractory to JAK inhibitors (Mascarenhas et al, ASH 2018 #685; Mascarenhas et al, EHA 2020 #EP1107). Nineteen (32.2%) patients in the 9.4 mg/kg arm and 3 (6.3%) patients in the 4.7 mg/kg arm achieved symptom response (total symptom score [TSS] reduction ≥50%) at Week 24. As of clinical cutoff (7 February 2020), with an overall study follow up of 42 months, median OS was 28.1 months for the 9.4 mg/kg arm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.8, 31.6) and 19.9 months for the 4.7 mg/kg arm (95% CI: 17.1, 33.9). The improvement in OS for patients treated with 9.4mg/kg imetelstat was further supported by analyses of IMbark patients with closely matched real world controls (Kuykendall et al, EHA 2019 #PS1456). Taken together, these findings support continued study of imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg dose in a well-designed Phase 3 randomized controlled study in patients with refractory MF. Methods: Study MYF3001 is an open label, randomized (2:1), multicenter, Phase 3 study of imetelstat compared with best available therapy (BAT) in approximately 320 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF (primary MF, post-essential thrombocythemia-MF, or post-polycythemia vera-MF) who are refractory to JAK inhibitor treatment. Approximately 214 patients will be randomized to Arm A to receive imetelstat, and approximately 106 patients will be randomized to Arm B to receive BAT. Eligible patients will be stratified based on: a) intermediate-2 or high-risk per Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS); and b) platelet count at study entry (platelets ≥75 x 109/L and The primary endpoint of the study is OS. Secondary endpoints include symptom response rate at week 24, progression-free survival, spleen response rate at week 24, clinical response assessment per modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG MRT) criteria, time to and duration of response, reduction in the degree of bone marrow fibrosis, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes. One interim analysis based on OS is planned. Biomarkers relevant to the mechanism of action of imetelstat will be assessed to demonstrate target inhibition and their association with OS and clinical responses. Mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones leading to disease modification. The study will be conducted at approximately 150 centers in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Middle East. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution); Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy. Harrison:Promedior: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Mesa:Promedior: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; LaJolla Pharmaceutical Company: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy. Komrokji:Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Koschmieder:Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Geron Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Incyte/Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; CTI Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; AOP Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Promedior: Other. Vannucchi:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Berry:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sherman:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Rizo:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal stem cell disease characterized by marrow fibrosis and a heterogeneous disease phenotype with a variable degree of splenomegaly, cytopenias, and constitutional symptoms that significantly impact quality of life and survival. Both cytogenetic abnormalities and gene mutations in MF carry prognostic significance. Development of novel agents for treatment of MF to target the underlying malignant clones remains a significant area of unmet need. IMbark (MYF2001; NCT02426086) is a randomized Phase 2 study of imetelstat (9.4 mg/kg or 4.7 mg/kg) in intermediate-2/high-risk MF relapsed/refractory to prior Janus kinase inhibitor treatment. Comparing the 9.4 mg/kg arm to the 4.7 mg/kg arm, the rate of symptom response (total symptom score [TSS] reduction ≥50%) was 32.2% and 6.3%, respectively (Mascarenhas et al ASH 2018 #685), and median overall survival (OS) was 28.1 months (mos) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.8, 31.6) and 19.9 mos (95% CI: 17.1, 33.9) with an overall study follow up of 42 mos (Mascarenhas et al, EHA 2020, EP1107). Dose-dependent target inhibition as evaluated by reduction of telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse transcriptase level correlated with clinical responses and longer OS; also, reduction in variant allele frequency (VAF) of driver mutations by imetelstat was reported (Mascarenhas et al EHA 2020 #EP1098). Aims: To evaluate imetelstat activity on depletion of malignant cells (cytogenetically abnormal clones and mutation burden); to assess the relationships between baseline cytogenetic status and change in mutation VAF with clinical benefits such as spleen volume reduction, symptom response, bone marrow fibrosis improvement, and OS. Methods: Cytogenetic analyses were performed on bone marrow aspirates. Peripheral blood samples pre and post imetelstat administration were collected and granulocytes were isolated to analyze mutations and VAF by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the Illumina TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel. Bone marrow fibrosis was assessed by a central pathologist. Results: 83 patients (pts) had baseline cytogenetic results available; 45 (54.2%) had an abnormal karyotype, including 32 (71.1%) with a sole abnormality, the most prevalent being deletions 13q- (24.4%) and 20q- (8.8%), and 5 (11.1%) with a complex karyotype. Spleen and symptom responses were observed in pts with or without abnormal karyotype. Of the 24 pts that had identified cytogenetic abnormalities at baseline and with matched post-treatment cytogenetic results available, 5 (20.8%) achieved ≥50% reduction in their cytogenetically abnormal clones, and interestingly they all had sole deletion 13q-. 49 pts had matched pre- and post-imetelstat treatment (3-14 mos) NGS data and had at least one mutation at baseline. 46.2% of pts (12/26) in the 9.4 mg/kg vs 17.4% (4/23) in the 4.7 mg/kg arm (p=0.0321) achieved ≥20% VAF reduction in any of the mutated genes present at baseline. In addition, pts who achieved ≥20% VAF reduction had higher rates of spleen response (12.5% vs 3%), symptom response (31.3% vs 24.2%) or bone marrow fibrosis improvement (54.4% vs 25%) compared to pts who did not have VAF reduction regardless of dose level (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, a prolonged median OS was seen (Fig. 1B) in pts who achieved ≥20% VAF reduction (31.6 mos, 95% CI: 21.5, NE) vs those with no VAF reduction (22.8 mos, 95% CI: 17.1, 31.6). The 3-year survival rate was 45.5% for pts who achieved ≥20% VAF reduction vs 14.9% for pts with no VAF reduction. Conclusions: Clinical responses to imetelstat treatment were observed regardless of baseline cytogenetic status, and a subset of pts achieved ≥50% reduction in cytogenetically abnormal clones. Significant dose-dependent reductions of mutation burden by imetelstat were noted and correlated with improved overall clinical benefits including higher rates of spleen and symptom responses, bone marrow fibrosis improvement, and prolonged OS. Together with the clinical data that suggest improvement in median OS in these pts, the data presented here further demonstrate that imetelstat has disease-modifying activity by targeting malignant cells, as evidenced by depletion of cytogenetically abnormal clones and reduction in mutation burden. These results will be confirmed in the planned Phase 3 study in refractory MF. Figure Disclosures Mascarenhas: Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy; Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution). Komrokji:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Research Funding. Reiter:Gilead: Other: travel support ; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; AOP: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Celgene,: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Deciphera: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Blueprint: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support , Research Funding. Scott:Alexion, Incyte, Novartis, Regeneron: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis: Research Funding; Agios, BMS: Honoraria. Baer:Astellas: Other: Institutional research funding; Forma: Other: Institutional research funding; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; Kite: Other: Institutional research funding; Oscotec: Other: Institutional research funding; Takeda: Other: Institutional research funding; AbbVie: Other: Institutional research funding. Hoffman:Protagonist: Consultancy; Forbius: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dompe: Research Funding. Odenike:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals, NS Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Oncology, Oncotherapy, Agios, CTI/Baxalta, Aprea: Other: Institutional research funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Impact Biomedicines: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sherman:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Berry:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

TPS7056 Background: Current treatment options for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent (TD) patients (pts) with lower risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) relapsed after or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have limited efficacy and durability; new approaches are needed. Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor that targets cells with short telomeres and active telomerase, characteristics observed in MDS pts across all disease stages. IMerge (MDS3001) is a Phase 2/3 global study of imetelstat for TD pts with non-del(5q) LR MDS post ESA therapy. The results from Phase 2 part indicated that imetelstat achieved durable RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) and the most frequently reported adverse events were manageable and reversible grade ≥3 cytopenias. Among 38 pts with median follow-up of 24 months, 8-week, 24-week and 1-year TI rates were 42%, 32% and 29%, respectively; these responses were seen across different LR MDS subtypes. Median TI duration was 20 months and the longest TI was 2.7 years. A high and durable hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) rate of 68% for a median duration of 21 months were also achieved. Reduction of variant allele frequency of mutations by imetelstat treatment was observed in some pts and correlated with clinical benefits (Platzbecker et al EHA 2020; Steensma et al JCO 2020). These results support the Phase 3 part of the trial. Methods: IMerge is two-part, Phase 2/3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02598661). The Phase 3 part of the study is open for enrollment to adult pts with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low or intermediate-1 risk, non-del(5q) MDS who are TD, are relapsed after or refractory to ESAs, and have not received treatment with lenalidomide or hypomethylating agents. The study is a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs placebo that will enroll approximately 170 pts and will be conducted at approximately 120 centers in North America, Europe, Asia and Middle East. Imetelstat is administered as 2-hour IV infusion every 4 weeks at 7.5 mg/kg. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of RBC-TI lasting ≥8 weeks. Secondary endpoints include safety, rate of RBC-TI ≥24 weeks, time to RBC-TI start, RBC-TI duration, rate of HI-E, the amount and relative change in RBC transfusions, rate of CR or PR, overall survival, progression of MDS, pharmacokinetics, and quality of life. Biomarkers relevant to the mechanism of action of imetelstat will be assessed to demonstrate target inhibition and their association with clinical responses. Cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones leading to disease modification. The study is currently recruiting pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02598661.

Background: Current treatment options for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent (TD) patients with lower risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) relapsed after or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have limited efficacy and durability; new approaches are needed. Imetelstat is a 13-mer lipid-conjugated oligonucleotide that targets the RNA template of human telomerase and is a competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity (Asai et al, Cancer Res 2003; Herbert et al, Oncogene 2005). Preclinical, in vivo xenograft models (Dikmen et al, Cancer Res 2005; Hochreiter et al, Clin Cancer Res 2006) and preliminary clinical data from a pilot study (Tefferi et al, Blood Cancer J 2016) supported initiation of a study in TD LR MDS patients. The Phase 2 part of IMerge demonstrated an 8-week RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate of 42%, 24-week RBC-TI rate of 32%, with median duration of TI being 88 weeks. The responses were seen across different subtypes of LR MDS (Platzbecker et al, EHA 2020, S183). No new safety signal was identified. These results support the Phase 3 part of the trial. Methods: IMerge is two-part, Phase 2/3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02598661). The Phase 2 portion of the study described above is closed for enrolment. The Phase 3 portion of the study is open for enrollment of adult patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low or intermediate-1 risk, non-del(5q) MDS, who are TD, are relapsed after or refractory to ESAs, and have not received treatment with lenalidomide or hypomethylating agents. The study is a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs. placebo that will enroll approximately 170 patients and will be conducted at approximately 130 centers in North America, Europe, Asia and Middle East. Imetelstat will be administered as 2-hour IV infusion every 4 weeks at 7.5 mg/kg. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of RBC-TI lasting ≥8 weeks. Secondary endpoints include safety, rate of RBC-TI ≥24 weeks, time to RBC-TI start, RBC-TI duration, rate of hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E), the amount and relative change in RBC transfusions, rate of complete response or partial response, overall survival, progression of MDS, pharmacokinetics, and effect of treatment on quality of life. Biomarkers relevant to the mechanism of action of imetelstat will be assessed to demonstrate target inhibition and their association with clinical responses. Cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones leading to disease modification. Disclosures Platzbecker: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding. Steensma:CRISPR: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy; Arena: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; H3 Biosciences: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka: Consultancy; Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Font:Abbvie: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Diez-Campelo:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Jang:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sherman:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Berry:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Santini:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria.

This phase 2 study evaluated whether substituting bortezomib for vincristine in frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy could improve efficacy in non-germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (non-GCB DLBCL), centrally confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Hans method). In total, 164 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive six 21-day cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), and doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), all IV day 1, prednisone 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1-5, plus either bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 4, 8, 11 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib [VR-CAP]; n = 84) or vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (maximum 2 mg) IV day 1 (R-CHOP; n = 80). There were no significant differences between VR-CAP and R-CHOP in complete response rate (64.5%, 66.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.91; P = .80), overall response rate (93.4%, 98.6%; OR, 0.21; P = .11), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; P = .76), or overall survival (HR, 0.89; P = .75). Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; 88%, 89%), serious AEs (38%, 34%), discontinuations due to AEs (7%, 3%), and deaths due to AEs (2%, 5%) were similar with VR-CAP and R-CHOP. Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy rates were 6% and 3%, respectively. VR-CAP did not improve efficacy vs R-CHOP in non-GCB DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01040871.

The major limitation for the development of curative cancer therapies has been an incomplete understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving cancer progression. Human models to study the development and progression of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have not been established. Here, we show that BMI1 collaborates with BCR-ABL in inducing a fatal leukemia in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice transplanted with transduced human CD34+ cells within 4-5 months. The leukemias were transplantable into secondary recipients with a shortened latency of 8-12 weeks. Clonal analysis revealed that similar clones initiated leukemia in primary and secondary mice. In vivo, transformation was biased toward a lymphoid blast crisis, and in vitro, myeloid as well as lymphoid long-term, self-renewing cultures could be established. Retroviral introduction of BMI1 in primary chronic-phase CD34+ cells from CML patients elevated their proliferative capacity and self-renewal properties. Thus, our data identify BMI1 as a potential therapeutic target in CML.

Mantle-cell lymphoma is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Both ibrutinib and temsirolimus have shown single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. We undertook a phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma confirmed by central pathology in 21 countries who had received one or more rituximab-containing treatments. Patients were stratified by previous therapy and simplified mantle-cell lymphoma international prognostic index score, and were randomly assigned with a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive daily oral ibrutinib 560 mg or intravenous temsirolimus (175 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; 75 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of subsequent 21-day cycles). Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by a masked independent review committee with the primary hypothesis that ibrutinib compared with temsirolimus significantly improves progression-free survival. The analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01646021) and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT (number 2012-000601-74).Between Dec 10, 2012, and Nov 26, 2013, 280 patients were randomised to ibrutinib (n=139) or temsirolimus (n=141). Primary efficacy analysis showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (p0·0001) for patients treated with ibrutinib versus temsirolimus (hazard ratio 0·43 [95% CI 0·32-0·58]; median progression-free survival 14·6 months [95% CI 10·4-not estimable] vs 6·2 months [4·2-7·9], respectively). Ibrutinib was better tolerated than temsirolimus, with grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events reported for 94 (68%) versus 121 (87%) patients, and fewer discontinuations of study medication due to adverse events for ibrutinib versus temsirolimus (9 [6%] vs 36 [26%]).Ibrutinib treatment resulted in significant improvement in progression-free survival and better tolerability versus temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. These data lend further support to the positive benefit-risk ratio for ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.Janssen ResearchDevelopment, LLC.

Background/Aims: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options outside of chemotherapy. Improved therapies with novel mechanisms of action are desperately needed to fill this need. Both hTERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, and BCL-2, an apoptotic regulator, are overexpressed in AML, correlating with disease severity and poor prognosis respectively. Imetelstat is a novel, first-in-class competitive inhibitor of telomerase with clinical activity in hematologic malignancies. Venetoclax, an approved BCL-2 inhibitor for CLL, has shown a promising clinical benefit in AML patients. Preclinical evidence shows that downregulation of hTERT induces apoptosis via disruptions of hTERT and BCL-2 interaction; we hypothesize that inhibiting both targets would yield greater anti-tumor activity in AML compared to treatment with either agent alone. Methods: AML cell lines and AML patient’s PBMC samples were treated with imetelstat or venetoclax alone, or in combination, and viable and apoptotic populations of cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Telomerase activity, hTERT expression and mitochondrial dysfunction were investigated for mechanism of action. Furthermore, an in vivo study in the MOLM-13 AML disseminated model was conducted to assess efficacy and survival. Results: A dose-dependent synergistic activity in inducing apoptosis was observed in multiple AML cell lines when combining imetelstat with venetoclax. In the MOLM-13 cell line, single-agent imetelstat and venetoclax had modest apoptotic activity after 48 hours (22% and 30% respectively), but the combination achieved 88% at 48 hours and nearly 100% at 96 hours. Similarly enhanced apoptotic activity was also observed in PBMCs purified from 4 AML patient whole blood samples. Molecular analyses showed combining imetelstat with venetoclax reduced hTERT expression and telomerase activity much more strongly than either agent alone. Furthermore, in vivo studies showed all mice tolerated the combination of imetelstat with ABT-199 well, with increased life span as compared to the vehicle control (68.1%, p=0.0001), to imetelstat (39.6%, p=0.0011) alone, or to venetoclax (23.3%, p=0.0001) alone. In the combination group, 40% of treated mice were alive 77-days after treatment discontinued whereas all mice of the other single agent arms died within two weeks, demonstrating a significant survival benefit. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first investigation combining imetelstat with venetoclax in AML, and the results demonstrated a synergistic effect on induction of apoptosis in cell lines and patient samples in vitro, which translated into prolonged survival in xenograft models, thus providing a strong rationale for clinical exploration of this combination. Citation Format: Joshua J. Rusbuldt, Leopoldo Luistro, Diana Chin, Melissa Smith, Amy Wong, Margarita Romero, Aleksandra Rizo, Jacqueline Bussolari, Fei Huang, Amy (Kate) Sasser. Telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in combination with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases survival in vivo in acute myeloid leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1101. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1101

Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic disorders characterized by 1 or more peripheral blood cytopenias.Anemia is the most common cytopenia associated with low-grade MDS (based on the International Prognostic Scoring System). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are commonly used as frontline treatment of anemia in patients (pts) with low-grade MDS; red blood cell transfusions are also important in supportive care. The present database analysis was conducted to understand the transfusion burden and outcomes among pts in the United States who were diagnosed with low- or unspecified-grade MDS and treated with ESA. Methods: A retrospective analysis of theOptum integrated claims and Electronic Medical Record database ("Optum Database") identified pts aged ≥ 18 years with an index diagnosis of MDS (low-grade, ICD 9 code: 238.72; high-grade, ICD 9 code: 283.73; del(5q), ICD 9 code: 238.74; or unspecified-grade, ICD 9 code: 238.75) between 2006 and 2014 who had 365 days of retrospective data preceding index diagnosis. Pts with baseline acute myeloid leukemia were excluded. Demographics and clinical outcomes were analyzed by descriptive summary. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to define overall survival (OS) and time to transfusion dependence or transfusion independence. Results: Among the 8,493 pts in the Optum Database who met the inclusion criteria, MDS was categorized as low-grade in 2,136 (25.2%), high-grade in 367 (4.3%), del(5q) in 198 (2.3%), and unspecified-grade in 5,792 (68.2%); median follow-up was 2.3 years. In each MDS category, roughly half of pts were male, and the majority were white and non-Hispanic. Median ages at diagnosis were 75, 74, 74, and 76 years, and 977 (46%), 224 (61%), 83 (42%), and 2,071 (36%) received ≥ 1 treatment in the low-grade, high-grade, del(5q), and unspecified-grade MDS categories, respectively. Frontline therapy with ESA was the mainstay of treatment for pts with low-grade (n = 732; 75%) and unspecified-grade (n = 1,284; 62%) MDS. Average durations of frontline treatment with ESA were 228.1 and 204.5 days in pts with low-grade and unspecified-grade MDS, respectively. Median OS among low- and unspecified-grade MDS pts receiving frontline ESA was 5.4 and 4.6 years, respectively. Of the pts who received frontline ESA, 53 (7.2%) with low-grade and 107 (8.3%) with unspecified-grade MDS were transfusion dependent (≥ 2 transfusions in the 16 weeks prior to treatment initiation). Transfusion dependence in pts receiving frontline ESA was associated with shorter median OS vs transfusion independence (1.7 years vs 5.7 years in low-grade MDS, P < 0.0001; 1.7 years vs 5.2 years in unspecified-grade MDS, P < 0.0001;Figure 1). Among the 160 frontline ESA pts with low-/unspecified-grade MDS who were transfusion dependent, 108 (68%) became transfusion independent (defined as ≥ 60 days without transfusion; 37 of 53 with low-grade MDS; 71 of 107 with unspecified-grade MDS); median time to transfusion independence was 137 and 139 days in pts with low-grade and unspecified-grade MDS, respectively. Most pts with low- or unspecified-grade MDS who received frontline ESA (52% and 51%, respectively) went on to receive second-line treatment, and treatment with ESA was the most common second-line therapy (42% and 40%, respectively). 163 (8.7%) of post-front-line ESA pts were transfusion dependent. Among pts with low-/unspecified-grade MDS who received second-line therapy, median OS was shorter for those who were transfusion dependent after frontline treatment with ESA vs those who were transfusion independent (1.97 years vs 4.5 years, respectively, P < 0.001). 92 (56%) of these transfusion-dependent pts became transfusion independent in a median of 181 days. Conclusions: ESA therapy was the most common treatment approach, both frontline and second-line, for pts with low- or unspecified-grade MDS; however, treatment with ESA did not always eliminate the need for transfusion. Similar to previous reports in pts with low-grade MDS, survival outcomes were substantially worse if pts were transfusion dependent prior to frontline or second-line treatment or became transfusion dependent following frontline treatment. These data indicate the critical importance for treatments to reduce transfusion burden among pts with MDS, in both the frontline and relapsed settings. Disclosures Mehra: Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Potluri:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Other: Contracted to perform research; SmartAnalyst, Inc.: Employment. He:Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizo:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mundle:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bussolari:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership.

The catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hTERT) is highly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Transcriptional factors and epigenetic modifications regulate this expression. Studies suggest hypermethylation promotes hTERT overexpression. Imetelstat is a competitive telomerase inhibitor. Decitabine (DAC) and azacitidine (AZA) are DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTIs) used in the treatment of AML. Combining imetelstat and DNMTI may be an improved treatment option for AML. We investigated effects of DAC and AZA on hTERT expression and cell viability in AML cell lines OCI-AML3 and OCI-AML5, and evaluated growth inhibition when combined with imetelstat. OCI-AML3 had higher baseline expression of hTERT compared with OCI-AML5. Dose-dependent downregulation of hTERT expression was observed with DAC and AZA treatments. OCI-AML5 was more sensitive to DAC (1 μM, 46% viability) than OCI-AML3 (1 μM, 95% viability) whereas sensitivity to AZA was similar in both cell lines (1 μM, 29% vs 33% viability). After removal of the drugs, growth inhibition was not sustained and cell proliferation rebounded. Single-agent imetelstat reduced both hTERT expression and telomerase activity but resulted in only limited growth inhibition in these cell lines. It was hypothesized that combining DNMTI with imetelstat may exert more potent growth inhibition. To test this, both cell lines were treated with DAC or AZA for 72 hours followed by different concentrations of imetelstat for 2 to 4 weeks. Dose-dependent synergistic activity was demonstrated for DAC followed by imetelstat: OCI-AML3 cell viability changed from 95% with DAC to 61% and 10% after 2 and 4 weeks of imetelstat, respectively; OCI-AML5 cell viability changed from 46% with DAC to 6% and 1% after 2 and 4 weeks of imetelstat, respectively. In contrast, no enhanced activity was observed in either cell line with AZA followed by imetelstat, but imetelstat was able to slow the growth rebound after AZA removal. Additional studies are ongoing to further understand the mechanism of action of this drug combination in AML and to evaluate different combination sequences of DNMTI with imetelstat for optimal anticancer activity. In summary, DAC and AZA reduced hTERT expression and differentially inhibited cell viability in AML cell lines. Although at the same concentration AZA was more active than DAC in OCI-AML3 and OCI-AML5 lines, the sustainability of growth inhibition after washout differed. Growth rebounded after removal of AZA or DAC treatment. Dose-dependent synergistic activity demonstrated by DAC followed by imetelstat was not seen with AZA followed by imetelstat. Distinctly different mechanisms of action of DAC and AZA may underlie their differential activity when combined with imetelstat, warranting further investigation. Citation Format: Joshua Rusbuldt, Jacqueline Bussolari, Aleksandra Rizo, Fei Huang. Impact of hypomethylating agents on hTERT expression and synergistic effect in combination with imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, in AML cell lines. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2731.

High expression of BMI1 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, the effects of down-modulation of BMI1 in normal and leukemic CD34+ AML cells were studied using a lentiviral RNA interference approach. We demonstrate that down-modulation of BMI1 in cord blood CD34+ cells impaired long-term expansion and progenitor-forming capacity, both in cytokine-driven liquid cultures as well as in bone marrow stromal cocultures. In addition, long-term culture-initiating cell frequencies were dramatically decreased upon knockdown of BMI1, indicating an impaired maintenance of stem and progenitor cells. The reduced progenitor and stem cell frequencies were associated with increased expression of p14ARF and p16INK4A and enhanced apoptosis, which coincided with increased levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species and reduced FOXO3A expression. In AML CD34+ cells, down-modulation of BMI1 impaired long-term expansion, whereby self-renewal capacity was lost, as determined by the loss of replating capacity of the cultures. These phenotypes were also associated with increased expression levels of p14ARF and p16INK4A. Together our data indicate that BMI1 expression is required for maintenance and self-renewal of normal and leukemic stem and progenitor cells, and that expression of BMI1 protects cells against oxidative stress.

Introduction MCL is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with a poor overall prognosis. For patients who fail initial therapy, conventional chemotherapy achieves only short-term remissions. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, once-daily, oral, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase that has been shown to be highly active for previously treated MCL patients (overall response rate [ORR] ~65%; complete response [CR] ~20%) in single-arm phase 2 studies. Temsirolimus has demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) vs investigator's choice. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label study (MCL3001 [RAY]), ibrutinib was compared with temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MCL who had received ≥1 prior rituximab-containing therapy. Methods Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive oral ibrutinib (560 mg once-daily) or intravenous temsirolimus (175 mg: Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1; 75 mg: Days 1, 8, and 15 of subsequent cycles). Stratification factors were number of prior lines of therapy (1-2 vs ³3) and simplified MCL international prognostic index (sMIPI) risk (low [0-3] vs intermediate [4-5] vs high [6-11]). Patients in both arms received treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point of the study was PFS, as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Secondary end points included ORR, overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), time to worsening of lymphoma symptoms (measured by FACT-Lym lymphoma subscale), and safety. Results Overall, 280 patients were randomized to ibrutinib (n = 139) or temsirolimus (n = 141). Baseline disease characteristics and demographics were generally well balanced. Median age (range) was 68 years (34-88) and median number (range) of prior lines of therapy was 2 (1-9). Approximately two-thirds of the patients had intermediate- or high-risk disease. At the time of this analysis, median follow-up was 20.0 months. Ibrutinib was superior to temsirolimus for the primary end point of IRC-assessed PFS, with a statistically significant 57% reduction in the risk of progression or death (Figure 1). The median PFS was 14.6 months for the ibrutinib arm and 6.2 months for the temsirolimus arm, respectively. At a landmark of 2 years, the PFS rate is 41% in the ibrutinib arm vs 7% in the temsirolimus arm. PFS results were consistent across most assessed subgroups. Investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with the IRC results. IRC-assessed ORR was significantly higher for ibrutinib vs temsirolimus (71.9% vs 40.4%; p < 0.0001) with a CR rate of 18.7% vs 1.4%, respectively. Median OS was not reached with ibrutinib vs 21.3 months with temsirolimus, showing a positive trend toward patients in the ibrutinib arm (reduced risk of death by 24% [HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.09]). However, these results may have been confounded by 23% of patients that initially received temsirolimus crossing over to receive ibrutinib. A greater proportion of patients treated with ibrutinib vs temsirolimus avoided worsening of lymphoma symptoms throughout the study; 27% of ibrutinib patients had worsening vs 52% of temsirolimus patients. Median TTNT was not reached with ibrutinib vs 11.6 months with temsirolimus. Median treatment duration was 14.4 months for ibrutinib and 3.0 months for temsirolimus. Overall, 6.5% of subjects discontinued treatment due to AEs in the ibrutinib arm and 25.5% of subjects discontinued treatment due to AEs in the temsirolimus arm. The most common TEAEs with ibrutinib were diarrhea, fatigue, and cough, whereas with temsirolimus, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and diarrhea were most commonly observed (Table 1). Grade ³3 TEAEs were reported for 67.6% of ibrutinib patients vs 87.1% of temsirolimus patients; most frequent were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. When adjusted for exposure, TEAE incidence was consistently lower for the ibrutinib arm vs the temsirolimus arm. Conclusions Ibrutinib is superior to temsirolimus for PFS and ORR, and showed preferable tolerability. The results of this phase 3 trial confirm the efficacy and favorable safety profile of ibrutinib shown in phase 2 studies. Future concepts will investigate ibrutinib-based combination approaches for patients with R/R MCL. Disclosures Rule: Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel reimbursement; J&J: Consultancy, Other: Travel reimbursement, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel reimbursement. Rusconi:Roche: Honoraria. Joao:Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Witzens-Harig:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Hess:Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen, Roche, , Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy. Balasubramanian:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Equity Ownership. Bandyopadhyay:Janssen: Employment. Sun:Janssen/J&J: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goldberg:Janssen: Employment. Bothos:Janssen: Employment. Traina:Janssen: Employment. Enny:Janssen: Employment. Rizo:Janssen: Employment. Vermeulen:Janssen: Employment.

Objective. With the emergence of the concept of the leukemia stem cell, assays to study them remain pivotal in understanding (leukemic) stem cell biology.Methods. We have cultured acute myeloid leukemia CD34(+) cells on bone marrow stroma. Long-term expansion was monitored and self-renewal was addressed by replating of Leukemic-cobblestone area-forming cells (L-CAs). Also, lentiviral vectors were generated that could target L-CAs.Results. A strong expansion was observed in about 75% of the acute myeloid leukemia cases (n = 30) and long-term cultures could be maintained for up to 24 weeks on MS5 bone marrow stromal cells. Cells that were able to initiate leukemic cobblestone areas resided in the CD34(+) population and were absent from the CD34(-) population. Self-renewal within these L-CAs was determined by sequential passaging of these L-CAs onto new MS5 stromal layers, which resulted in the generation of second, third, and fourth L-CAs, which were able to sustain long-term expansion and generated high numbers of immature undifferentiated suspension cells. CD34(+) cells that were able to initiate long-term cultures all coexpressed MEIS1 and HOXA9, and expressed elevated BMI1 levels.Conclusion. We present a novel long-term leukemic stem/progenitor assay in which new drugs can be tested and in which genes can be overexpressed or downmodulated using a lentiviral approach in order to obtain more insight into the process of leukemic transformation and self-renewal. (c) 2007 ISEH-Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Many adult tissue stem cells, such as the cells of the hematopoietic system, gastrointestinal epithelium, brain, epidermis, mammary gland and lung have now been identified, all of them fulfilling a crucial role in supplying organisms with mature cells during normal homeostasis as well as in times of tissue generation or repair. Two unique features characterize adult stem cells: the ability to generate new pluripotent stem cells (to self-renew) and the ability to give rise to differentiated progeny that has lost its self-renewal capacity. Our understanding of the mechanisms that determine whether, where and when a stem cell will self-renew or differentiate is still limited, but recent advances have indicated that the stem cell microenvironment, or niche, provides essential cues that direct these cell fate decisions. Moreover, loss of control over these cell fate decisions might lead to cellular transformation and cancer. This review addresses the current understandings of the molecular mechanisms that regulate hematopolietic stem cell self-renewal in the niche and how leukemic transformation might change the dependency of leukemic stem cells on their microenvironment for self-renewal and survival.

Introduction: Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily, oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase is highly effective in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients with an ORR of 68% (Wang M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:507-516). Similar efficacy results were observed in a recent phase 2 study in MCL patients who progressed after rituximab containing chemotherapy and bortezomib therapy (SPARK study, NCT01599949). However, despite the very promising efficacy data, some patients with MCL do not respond to ibrutinib. Here, we report analyses of potential mechanisms associated with primary resistance to ibrutinib therapy in the SPARK study. Methods: In this phase 2, international, multicenter, single-arm study, patients with MCL received 560 mg/day oral ibrutinib continuously until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who had PD at the first disease evaluation were considered to have primary resistant disease. DNA was extracted from baseline/pretreatment tumor samples (biopsy or CD19-enriched cells from PBMC) and enriched libraries were constructed with probesets specific for the coding region of 97 genes possibly involved in ibrutinib response and resistance, using the Ovation Target Enrichment system (NUGEN). Deep sequencing (150bp, single end reads) was performed on an Illumina HiSeq instrument . Sequences were aligned to the hg19 reference genome, variants were called using samtools and filters were applied to identify possible somatic mutations (minor allele frequency < 1% in dbSNP, > 5% and < 95% variant allele, > = 10 total reads). Results: Twenty five (22.7%) of the 120 patients enrolled in this study had Independent Review Committee (IRC)-confirmed disease progression. In these primary treatment resistant patients, the median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range 1-5 lines); 37% of patients had high risk MIPI score; 64% had bulky disease (longest diameter ≥ 5 cm), 52% had extranodal disease; 32% had bone marrow involvement and 20% had blastoid subtype. None of these baseline clinical parameters were found to be predictive for primary treatment resistance. The median duration of treatment was 1.54 months. Sequence data could be collected from 23 of the 25 patients, with an average of 9 million reads. After data filtering as described above, 27 genes were found with nonsynonymous variants in at least 2 or more patients. The majority of these variants were previously unreported in dbSNP or COSMIC databases. No mutations previously described in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with acquired resistance to ibrutinib (BTK C481S, PLCg2 R665W) were seen in these patients, although one patient had a different mutation in PLCg2. Genes previously implicated in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) pathogenesis (Pasqualucci L, et al. Nature Genetics. 2011;43:830-837) such as MLL2 and CREBBP were also found to be mutated in these patients. In addition, mutations in PIM1 and ERBB4 kinase genes were more frequent in patients with PD compared with those non-resistant to therapy. PIM1 kinase has been associated with increased proliferation, survival, and migration of tumor cells, and somatic mutations in this gene have been described in several cancers including hematologic malignancies. Interestingly, several of the mutations detected affect NF-kB signalling inhibition which is thought to contribute to ibrutinib’s mechanism of action. These results will be updated at the time of final presentation. Conclusion: Sequence analyses were conducted on tumor DNA from the fraction of patients with primary resistance to ibrutinib treatment in this study. These studies have revealed a number of known and novel mutations, including genes involved in NF-kB signalling. Among others, the mutational status of PIM1 kinase and ERBB4 kinase genes may be of interest with respect to primary resistance to ibrutinib therapy in MCL. Disclosures Balasubramanian: Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schaffer:Janssen: Employment. Deraedt:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Davis:Janssen: Employment. Aquino:Janssen R&D: Employment. Yuan:Johnson & Johnson : Employment, Equity Ownership. Kranenburg:Janssen Biologics: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Dreyling:Janssen, Pfizer (support of IITs (institutional): Research Funding; Janssen, Pfizer (speaker's honoraria): Honoraria. Rule:Pharmacyclics, J&J: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Celgene, Onyx, OnyPep, : Research Funding; Onyx, Janssen: Honoraria. Zhuang:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizo:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lenz:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Despite recent advances, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains difficult to treat with frequent chemoresistance in the relapsed or refractory setting. Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily, oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, demonstrated durable single-agent efficacy in a previous phase 2 study of patients with MCL who had received 1 to 5 prior therapies (Wang M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:507-516). In that study, the investigator-assessed overall response rate was 68% (complete response rate, 21%). The current study reports on the efficacy and safety of single-agent ibrutinib specifically in patients with MCL who had received a rituximab-containing regimen and had progressed after at least 2 cycles of bortezomib therapy. Methods: In this phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study, patients received 560 mg/day oral ibrutinib continuously until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) in response evaluable patients, as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary end points, also assessed by IRC, included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 120 patients in this international multicenter study were enrolled. The median age was 67.5 years, ranging from 35 to 85 years with 62.5% ≥ 65 years. Most patients had stage IV disease at study entry (77.5%), and 9.2% were reported as blastoid variant (per investigator). 76.3% of patients had an intermediate or high risk simplified MIPI score, and 52.5% had bulky disease (longest diameter ≥ 5 cm). Forty two (35.0%), 67 (55.8%) and 11 patients (9.2%) had an ECOG score of 0, 1 and 2, respectively. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 2 (range 1-8 lines) with almost half of the patients (47.5%) receiving 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Overall, 33% of patients had received prior stem cell transplantation. At the time of clinical cut-off for the primary analysis (29 April, 2014), median follow-up was 14.9 months with median treatment duration of 8 months (range: 0.5-20.9 months). The main reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression in 53 patients (44.2%) and an adverse event (AE) in 8 patients (6.7%). The ORR for response evaluable patients was 62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53.7%-71.8%) with a complete response rate of 20.9%. Subgroup analysis suggested that the ORR was independent of age, gender, geographic region, number of prior lines of therapies, baseline extranodal disease, simplified MIPI score, bulky disease, and stage of MCL. Median DoR by IRC was 14.9 months and the median time to first response was 2.1 months, ranging from 1.3 to 6.3 months. Median PFS was 10.5 months and 47% of the patients remained progression-free at 1 year. The OS rate at 18 months was 61%. The most common AEs were fatigue (any grade, 43.3%; grade 3 or 4, 3.3%) and diarrhea (any grade, 42.5%; grade 3 or 4, 2.5%). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were neutropenia (20.8%), thrombocytopenia (13.3%), and pneumonia (12.5%). Any-grade hemorrhagic events were reported in 45 patients (37.5%), including 3 (2.5%) with major hemorrhagic events. The median time to initial hemorrhagic event was 84 days (range 1-515 days), with a median duration of 22 days (95% CI: 8-31 days). Atrial fibrillation was reported in 13 patients (10.8%), which was grade 3 or 4 in 6 patients (5%). AEs led to dose reductions in 8 patients (6.7%). Conclusion: Single agent ibrutinib is highly efficacious and well tolerated, with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with MCL who progressed after rituximab-containing chemotherapy and bortezomib therapy. These results are consistent with previous ibrutinib studies, with no new safety signals. Disclosures Wang: Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Celgene, Onyx, OnyPep, : Research Funding; Onyx, Janssen: Honoraria. Goy:Janssen/Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Clinical Trials through Institution: Research Funding; Janssen/Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Janssen: Honoraria. Popat:Janssen: Honoraria. Advani:Seattle Genetics, Genetech, (Uncompensated): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Le Gouill:Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Yuan:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Kranenburg:Johnson&Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen Biologics: Employment. Rizo:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhuang:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Deraedt:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rule:Pharmacyclics, J&J: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

TPS8613^ Background: MCL is a distinct subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for approximately 6% of NHL diagnoses. Current immunochemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance results in a prolonged duration of remission, but a constant relapse pattern is still observed. Ibrutinib, an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase(BTK) inhibitor, demonstrated promising single-agent activity in 115 patients with relapsed or refractory MCL who were enrolled in the phase II study PCYC-1104. The overall response rate (ORR) was 68%, with 46% of patients achieving partial response (PR) and 22% achieving complete remission (CR) (Wang ASH 2012). Blum et al (ASH 2012) demonstrated that ibrutinib can be safely combined with BR in a phase I combination study in relapsed or refractory NHL and that it enhanced BR’s clinical activity with an ORR in 5 evaluable MCL patients of 100% (80% CR, 20% PR). These data suggest that combining ibrutinib with BR will improve the outcome of these patients. Methods: The SHINE study, PCI-32765MCL3002, is a phase III double-blind study of ibrutinib in combination with BR versus BR for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed MCL. The study aims to enroll 520 patients (approximately 260 patients per arm). All patients will receive BR therapy for 6 cycles; those patients achieving a CR or PR will receive R maintenance for 2 years. In addition to BR and R, all patients will receive an oral daily dose of 560 mg ibrutinib or placebo concomitant with the chemotherapy and ongoing as a single agent until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective is to evaluate if the addition of ibrutinib to BR will result in prolongation of progression-free survival, with secondary objectives of ORR (CR+PR), CR rate, duration of response, safety, and overall survival. The study will enroll patients aged 65 years or older who are not suitable for high-dose chemotherapy. Key exclusion criteria include diagnosis or treatment for malignancy other than MCL, requirement for treatment with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists, and treatment with strong CYP3A4/5 inhibitors. Approximately 200 sites globally will enroll patients. Enrollment began in Q1 of 2013. Clinical trial information: NCT01776840.

TPS226 Background: The recognition of prognostically distinct subtypes of DLBCL by gene expression profiling has, until now, not led to improved outcomes. Conducting targeted studies in prospective...