1. Donor hearts in the Sydney Heart Bank: reliable control but is it ‘normal’ heart?
- Author
-
Maria Papadaki, Adam Jacques, Andrew E. Messer, Emma Dyer, Steven B. Marston, Christopher R. Bayliss, and Massimiliano Memo
- Subjects
Sydney Heart Bank ,medicine.medical_specialty ,In vitro motility ,Biophysics ,Review ,Contractility ,Human myocardium ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Structural Biology ,Internal medicine ,Troponin I ,medicine ,Normal heart ,Molecular Biology ,Troponin I phosphorylation ,030304 developmental biology ,Donor heart ,0303 health sciences ,business.industry ,Human heart ,Cardiology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Human heart samples from the Sydney Heart Bank have become a de facto standard against which others can be measured. Crucially, the heart bank contains a lot of donor heart material: for most researchers this is the hardest to obtain and yet is necessary since we can only study the pathological human heart in comparison with a control, preferably a normal heart sample. It is not generally realised how important the control is for human heart studies. We review our studies on donor heart samples. We report the results obtained with 17 different donor samples collected from 1994 to 2011 and measured from 2005 to 2015 by our standard methodology for in vitro motility and troponin I phosphorylation measurements. The donor heart sample parameters are consistent between the hearts, over time and with different operators indicating that Sydney Heart Bank donor hearts are a valid baseline control for comparison with pathological heart samples. We also discuss to what extent donor heart samples are representative of the normal heart. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12551-020-00740-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2020